Fifteen years after September 11: Where is the medical research heading? A scientometric analysis
- 355 Downloads
The attacks of 9-11 have been not only the cause of the deaths of thousands of people but have also had an enormous impact on the health of the survivors, the rescue workers, the fire fighters and many more people worldwide. This study aims to depict a representative global picture of the research output of 15 years after the attacks of 9-11 by analyzing the bibliometric data of the overall publications with particular focus on medical topics. This study subsequently deepens the scientometric approach of the overall terrorism research of Magnone in 2014, also published in Scientometrics. The USA has published the most by far, taking the absolute numbers into account. When evaluating citation or socio-economic ratios, Israel takes first place. The main collaborating partner of the USA is the UK, followed by Canada. The share of European countries is rising over time, linked with the terror attacks in European cities. There are only a few other countries involved. Prospective study approaches should be concentrated on international performances as a contribution in dealing with terrorism, its causes and its consequences. The improved access and involvement of other countries’ scientists in the research and publication processes by a greater network would be an important component in facing international terrorism.
Keywords9-11 Scientometry Global publication output Disaster epidemiology Health effects Terrorism
DK and DAG contributed to conception, design and analyses. DK, DB, JJ MB and DAG contributed to the interpretation of data. DK drafted the article. DK, DAG, MB, DB and JJ revised the article. DK, MB and DAG participated in the final approval of the manuscript.
There have been no financial supports.
Compliance with ethical standards
Conflict of interest
The authors reported no conflicts of interest.
All data will be available via a public repository that is accessible by a provided link.
- Banauch, G. I., Hall, C., Weiden, M., Cohen, H. W., Aldrich, T. K., Christodoulou, V., et al. (2006). Pulmonary function after exposure to the World Trade Center collapse in the New York City Fire Department. American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, 174(3), 312–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Brackbill, R. M., Thorpe, L. E., DiGrande, L., Perrin, M., Sapp, J. H., 2nd, Wu, D., et al. (2006). Surveillance for World Trade Center disaster health effects among survivors of collapsed and damaged buildings. Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report: Surveillance Summaries, 55(2), 1–18.Google Scholar
- Gargano, L. M., Gershon, R. R., & Brackbill, R. M. (2016). Quality of life of persons injured on 9/11: Qualitative analysis from the World Trade Center Health Registry. PLoS Currents. https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.dis.7c70f66c1e6c5f41b43c797cb2a0479.Google Scholar
- Jordan, H. T., Stellman, S. D., Morabia, A., Miller-Archie, S. A., Alper, H., Laskaris, Z., et al. (2013). Cardiovascular disease hospitalizations in relation to exposure to the September 11, 2001 World Trade Center disaster and posttraumatic stress disorder. Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease, 2(5), e000431.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kelen, G., & Sauer, L. M. (2008). Trend analysis of disaster health articles in peer-reviewed publications pre- and post-9/11. American Journal of Disaster Medicine, 3(6), 369–376.Google Scholar
- Lioy, P. J., Weisel, C. P., Millette, J. R., Eisenreich, S., Vallero, D., Offenberg, J., et al. (2002). Characterization of the dust/smoke aerosol that settled east of the World Trade Center (WTC) in lower Manhattan after the collapse of the WTC 11 September 2001. Environmental Health Perspectives, 110(7), 703–714.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- McIntosh, D. N., Poulin, M. J., Silver, R. C., & Holman, E. A. (2011). The distinct roles of spirituality and religiosity in physical and mental health after collective trauma: A national longitudinal study of responses to the 9/11 attacks. Journal of Behavioral Medicine, 34(6), 497–507.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Moir, W., Zeig-Owens, R., Daniels, R. D., Hall, C. B., Webber, M. P., Jaber, N., et al. (2016). Post-9/11 cancer incidence in World Trade Center-exposed New York City firefighters as compared to a pooled cohort of firefighters from San Francisco, Chicago and Philadelphia (9/11/2001–2009). American Journal of Industrial Medicine, 59(9), 722–730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schlenger, W. E., Caddell, J. M., Ebert, L., Jordan, B. K., Rourke, K. M., Wilson, D., Thalji, L., Dennis, J. M., Fairbank, J. A., & Kulka, R. A. (2002). Psychological reactions to terrorist attacks: Findings from the National Study of Americans’ Reactions to September 11. JAMA, 288(5), 581–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Schreiber, M., Klingelhofer, D., Groneberg, D. A., & Bruggmann, D. (2016). Patient safety: The landscape of the global research output and gender distribution. British Medical Journal Open, 6(2), e008322.Google Scholar
- Silke, A. (2008). Research on terrorism, a review of the impact of 9/11 and the global war on terrorism. In H. Chen, E. Reid, J. Sinai, A. Silke, & B. Ganor (Eds.), Terrorism informatics, knowledge managment and data mining for homeland security (pp. 27–50). New York, NY: Springer.Google Scholar
- Silver, R. C., & Matthew, R. (2008). Terrorism. In V. N. Parrillo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of social problems (Vol. 2, pp. 926–929). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- The Worldfactbook, CIA. URL https://www.cia.gov/library/publications/the-world-factbook/fields/2195.html. Accessed 2016.
- Vossbrinck, M., Zeig-Owens, R., Hall, C. B., Schwartz, T., Moir, W., Webber, M. P., Cohen, H. W., Nolan, A., Weiden, M. D., Christodoulou, V., Kelly, K. J., Aldrich, T. K., & Prezant, D. J. (2017). Post-9/11/2001 lung function trajectories by sex and race in World Trade Center-exposed New York City emergency medical service workers. Occupational and Environmental Medicine, 74(3), 200–203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- World Trade Center Health Program. Covered conditions. URL https://www.cdc.gov/wtc/conditions.html. Accessed 2016 Dec, updated 2016 Aug.