Understanding the advisor–advisee relationship via scholarly data analysis
- 136 Downloads
Advisor–advisee relationship is important in academic networks due to its universality and necessity. Despite the increasing desire to analyze the career of newcomers, however, the outcomes of different collaboration patterns between advisors and advisees remain unknown. The purpose of this paper is to find out the correlation between advisors’ academic characteristics and advisees’ academic performance in Computer Science. Employing both quantitative and qualitative analysis, we find that with the increase of advisors’ academic age, advisees’ performance experiences an initial growth, follows a sustaining stage, and finally ends up with a declining trend. We also discover the phenomenon that accomplished advisors can bring up skilled advisees. We explore the conclusion from two aspects: (1) Advisees mentored by advisors with high academic level have better academic performance than the rest; (2) Advisors with high academic level can raise their advisees’ h-index ranking. This work provides new insights on promoting our understanding of the relationship between advisors’ academic characteristics and advisees’ performance, as well as on advisor choosing.
KeywordsAcademic networks Scholarly data Social network analysis Advisor–advisee relationship Collaboration patterns
The authors extend their appreciation to the Deanship of Scientific Research at King Saud University for funding this work through research group NO (RG-1438-027). Xiangjie Kong is supported by Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities under Grant NO (DUT18JC09), and China Scholarship Council under Grant NO (201706060067).
- Anderson, C. (2006). The long tail: Why the future of business is selling less of more. New York: Hachette Books.Google Scholar
- Dobson, L. (2013). Effective practices of formal mentoring programs. Math Alliance Research Study, 3, 1–3.Google Scholar
- Gollapalli, S. D., Mitra, P., & Giles, C. L. (2011). Ranking authors in digital libraries. In Proceedings of the 11th annual international ACM/IEEE joint conference on Digital libraries, (pp. 251–254). ACM.Google Scholar
- Johnson, W. B., & Ridley, C. R. (2015). The elements of mentoring. Basingstoke: Macmillan.Google Scholar
- Kram, K. E. (1983). Phases of the mentor relationship. Academy of Management Journal, 26(4), 608–625.Google Scholar
- Moreira, C., Calado, P., & Martins, B. (2011). Learning to rank for expert search in digital libraries of academic publications. In Portuguese conference on artificial intelligence, (pp. 431–445). Springer.Google Scholar
- Tang, J., Jin, R., & Zhang, J. (2008). A topic modeling approach and its integration into the random walk framework for academic search. In Eighth IEEE international conference on data mining, 2008. ICDM’08, (pp. 1055–1060). IEEE.Google Scholar
- Tang, J., Zhang, J., Yao, L., Li, J., Zhang, L., & Su, Z. (2008). Arnetminer: Extraction and mining of academic social networks. In Proceedings of the 14th ACM SIGKDD international conference on knowledge discovery and data mining, (pp. 990–998). ACM.Google Scholar
- Wang, W., Liu, J., Xia, F., King, I., & Tong, H. (2017). Shifu: Deep learning based advisor–advisee relationship mining in scholarly big data. In Proceedings of the 26th international conference on world wide web companion, (pp. 303–310). International World Wide Web Conferences Steering Committee.Google Scholar
- Wang, W., Liu, J., Yu, S., Zhang, C., Xu, Z., & Xia, F. (2016). Mining advisor–advisee relationships in scholarly big data: A deep learning approach. In Proceedings of the 16th ACM/IEEE-CS on joint conference on digital libraries.Google Scholar