Advertisement

Scientometrics

, Volume 116, Issue 1, pp 449–462 | Cite as

Russian Index of Science Citation: Overview and review

  • Olga Moskaleva
  • Vladimir Pislyakov
  • Ivan Sterligov
  • Mark Akoev
  • Svetlana Shabanova
Article
  • 258 Downloads

Abstract

In early 2016 a new database was launched on the Web of Science platform—Russian Science Citation Index. The database is free to all Web of Science subscribers except those from the post-Soviet states. This database includes papers from 652 selected Russian journals and is based on the data from national citation index—Russian Index of Science Citation (RISC). RISC was launched in 2005 but it is scarcely known to the English-language audience. The paper describes the history, current structure and user possibilities of RISC. We focus on the novel features of RISC which are crucial to bibliometrics and are unavailable in the international citation indexes.

Keywords

National citation indexes Russia Russian Index of Science Citation eLIBRARY.RU 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The present study is an extended version of an article presented at the 16th International Conference on Scientometrics and Informetrics, Wuhan, China, 16–20 October 2017 (Moskaleva et al. 2017). We are grateful to Gennadiy Eremenko, CEO of eLIBRARY.RU, for his invaluable help. We thank Natalia Maksimova, Higher School of Economics Library Director, for arranging HSE access to bibliometric databases and her continuous support. M.A. thanks RFBR/RFH for support of this research (grant #14-03-00333). We also thank Vasiliy Pislyakov for his help in data mining.

References

  1. Arefiev, P., Eremenko, G., & Glukhov, V. (2012). Russian Index of Science Citation—The instrument for research evaluation. Bibliosphera, 5, 66–71.Google Scholar
  2. Eremenko, G. (2003). Science Electronic Library is 3 years old: The results and main opportunities for further development. Electronic Libraries, 6(1), 39–51.Google Scholar
  3. Garfield, E. (1974). Errors—Theirs, Ours and Yours. Current Contents, 25(19), 5–6.Google Scholar
  4. Garfield, E. (1990). How ISI selects journals for coverage: Quantitative and qualitative considerations. Current Contents, 22(28), 185–193.Google Scholar
  5. Gibson, J., Anderson, D. L., & Tressler, J. (2012). Which journal rankings best explain academic salaries? Evidence from the University of California. Working Paper in Economics 10/12. University of Waikato. Retrieved January 08, 2018, from ftp://wms-webprod1.mngt.waikato.ac.nz/RePEc/wai/econwp/1210.pdf.
  6. Jin, B., & Wang, B. (1999). Chinese Science Citation Database: Its construction and application. Scientometrics, 45(2), 325–332.MathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Kosmulski, M. (2006). “I”—A bibliometric index. Forum Akademickie, 11, 31.Google Scholar
  8. Merton, R. K. (1968). The Matthew effect in science. Science, 3810, 56–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Moed, H. F. (2010). Measuring contextual citation impact of scientific journals. Journal of Informetrics, 4(3), 265–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Moskaleva, O., Pislyakov, V., Sterligov, I., Akoev, M., & Shabanova, S. (2017). Russian Index of Science Citation: Overview and review. In Proceedings of ISSI 2017The 16th international conference on scientometrics and informetrics (pp. 1076–1086). China: Wuhan University.Google Scholar
  11. Moskovkin, V. M., Liu, Y., Pupynina, E. V., Balabanova, T. V., & Peresypkin, A. P. (2017). Methodological aspects of assessing regional publication activity and citations: The case of the RF Central Federal District universities. Journal of Fundamental and Applied Sciences, 9(7S), 1089–1102.Google Scholar
  12. Negishi, M., Sun, Y., & Shigi, K. (2004). Citation Database for Japanese Papers: A new bibliometric tool for Japanese academic society. Scientometrics, 60(3), 333–351.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Nemtsov, A. V., Trushchelev, S. A., & Krasnov, V. N. (2015). Publishing activity of Russian research institutes in the field of psychiatry and addictology in 2006–2013. Zhurnal Nevrologii i Psikhiatrii Imeni S. S. Korsakova, 1, 85–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Pajić, D. (2015). The Serbian Citation Index: Contest and collapse. In Proceedings of ISSI conference 2015, Istanbul, Turkey (pp. 604–605).Google Scholar
  15. Pislyakov, V. (2007). Why should we create national citation indexes? Science and Technical Libraries, 2, 65–71.Google Scholar
  16. Rousseau, R., Yang, L., & Yue, T. (2010). A discussion of Prathap’s h 2-index for institutional evaluation with an application in the field of HIV infection and therapy. Journal of Informetrics, 4(2), 175–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Šipka, P. (2005). The Serbian citation index: Context and content. In Proceedings of ISSI 2005The 10th international conference of the international society for scientometrics and informetrics, Stockholm, Sweden (pp. 710–711). Stockholm: Karolinska University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Su, X., Deng, S., & Shen, S. (2014). The design and application value of the Chinese Social Science Citation Index. Scientometrics, 98(3), 1567–1582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Teodorescu, D., & Andrei, T. (2014). An examination of “citation circles” for social sciences journals in Eastern European countries. Scientometrics, 99(2), 209–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Tretyakova, O. V. (2015). Development of national citation index as a condition for the formation of a system to evaluate scientific research performance. Economic and Social Changes: Facts, Trends, Forecast, 1(37), 230–245.Google Scholar
  21. Wouters, P., Thelwall, M., Kousha, K., Waltman L., de Rijcke, S., Rushforth, A., & Franssen, T. (2015). The metric tide: Literature review (Supplementary Report I to the Independent Review of the Role of Metrics in Research Assessment and Management). HEFCE. Retrieved December 12, 2017, from http://www.dcscience.net/2015_metrictideS1.pdf.
  22. Wu, Y., Pan, Y., Zhang, Y., Ma, Z., Pang, J., Guo, H., et al. (2004). China scientific and technical papers and citations (CSTPC): History, impact and outlook. Scientometrics, 60(3), 385–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Yadav, B., & Yadav, M. (2014). Resources, facilities and services of the Indian citation index (ICI). Library Hi Tech News, 31(4), 21–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Ye, J. (2014). Development, significance and background information about the “Chinese Book Citation Index” (CBkCI) demonstration database. Scientometrics, 98(1), 557–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Zibareva, I., & Parmon, V. (2012). Ranking institutes of the Russian academy of sciences by the Russian science citation index: The case of chemical research institutes. Herald of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 82(5), 363–372.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Scientific LibrarySaint Petersburg State UniversitySaint PetersburgRussia
  2. 2.LibraryNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia
  3. 3.Scientometrics CenterNational Research University Higher School of EconomicsMoscowRussia
  4. 4.Scimetrics LabUral Federal UniversityYekaterinburgRussia
  5. 5.Scientific Electronic LibraryMoscowRussia

Personalised recommendations