The influence of dispersion on journal impact measures
A family of measures of a journal’s impact is considered that takes account of the dispersion, as well as the mean, of the number of citations in a journal. These measures, called the Mean Dispersion Indices (MDI), generalize the stabilized-JIF recently introduced by Lando and Bertoli-Barsotti (J Informetr 11(3):689–703, 2017). The MDI use a geometric weighted average of the number of citations and the Gini coefficient to measure the dispersion of the number of citations. Journal rankings based on these measures are compared with those obtained from the Journal Impact Factor, the Scimago Journal Rank, the h-index measure, and the Eigenfactor rankings, four of the most well-known current impact measures. This comparison suggests that the different rankings may implicitly place different weights on dispersion and the average number of citations and some appear to show little correlation with dispersion.
KeywordsDispersion Concentration Citation analysis Bibliometrics Journal impact factor Stabilized journal impact factor Scimago journal rank The h-index Eigenfactor rankings
The authors appreciate the helpful and supportive comments provided by the editor and referees.
- Garfeld, E., & Sher, I. H. (1963). New factors in the evaluation of scientific literature through citation indexing. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 14(3), 195–201.Google Scholar
- Garfield, E. (1998). Long-term vs. short-term journal impact: Does it matter. Scientist, 12(3), 11–12.Google Scholar
- Glötzl, F., & Aigner, E. (2017). Six dimensions of concentration in economics: Scientometric evidence from a large-scale data set. Ecological Economics Papers, 15, WU Vienna University of Economics and Business, Vienna. Institute of Ecological Economics.Google Scholar
- Harzing, A. W., & Van Der Wal, R. (2008). Comparing the Google Scholar h-index with the ISI journal impact factor. Reserach in International Management Products and Services for Academics.Google Scholar
- Harzing, A. W., & Van Der Wal, R. (2009). A Google Scholar h-index for journals: An alternative metric to measure journal impact in economics and business. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(1), 41–46.Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, L. (2008). Caveats for the use of citation indicators in research and journal evaluations. Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 59(2), 278–287.Google Scholar
- Leydesdorff, L. (2009). How are new citation-based journal indicators adding to the bibliometric toolbox? Journal of the Association for Information Science and Technology, 60(7), 1327–1336.Google Scholar
- Thelwall, M. (2016). Not dead, just resting: The practical value of per publication citation indicators. arXiv preprint arXiv:1606.00193.