Mapping the knowledge domain and the theme evolution of appropriability research between 1986 and 2016: a scientometric review
- 252 Downloads
The scholars in the research domains of innovation and strategic management concerned about the appropriability for about 30 years or more. They focused on appropriability research and constantly evolving. In this paper, we analyze 30 years (1986–2016) literature on appropriability studies from Web of Science Core Collection database. A cited reference clustering map of different periods and terms co-occurrence map have been generated using bibliometric analysis and content analysis. Based on this, we study the evolutionary trajectory, mechanisms and theoretical architecture of appropriability research and explore further research directions. The results indicate that the essence of the appropriability research evolution is the perception changes in opening and sharing, value creation and value growth, and future research is focusing on role of appropriability in the platform governance, generative appropriability and the evolution of the problem-solving mechanisms.
KeywordsAppropriability Knowledge map Cluster analysis Open innovation Platform governance
The authors gratefully acknowledge financial support from several sources: the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No. 71472061; No. 71172193) and Specialized Research Fund for the Doctoral Program of Higher Education of China (No. 20130161110032).
- Andersen, B., & Howells, J. (1998). Innovation dynamics in services: Intellectual property rights as indicators and shaping systems in innovation. Manchester: Centre for Research on Innovation and Competition, University of Manchester.Google Scholar
- Arrow, K. (1962). Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. The rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors (pp. 609–626). Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
- Boisot, M. H. (1998). Knowledge assets: Securing competitive advantage in the information economy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Cohen, W. M., Nelson, R. R., & Walsh, J. P. (2000). Protecting their intellectual assets: Appropriability conditions and why US manufacturing firms patent (or not) (No. w7552). National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
- Nambisan, S., & Sawhney, M. (2011). Orchestration processes in network-centric innovation: Evidence from the field. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(3), 40–57.Google Scholar
- Nelson, R. R., & Winter, S. G. (1982). An evolutionary theory of economic change. Cambridge, Mass: Belknap Press.Google Scholar
- Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Hamper Brother.Google Scholar
- Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Dekker, R., & Van den Berg, J. (2008). An experimental comparison of bibliometric mapping techniques. Paper presented at the 10th international conference on science and technology indicators, Vienna.Google Scholar
- Van Eck, N. J., Waltman, L., Van den Berg, J., & Kaymak, U. (2006). Visualizing the computational intelligence field. IEEE Computational Intelligence Magazine, 1(4), 6–10.Google Scholar