Firm formation and survival in the shale boom
- 55 Downloads
We examine the geographical and temporal effects of the technological changes that led to the U.S. shale oil and gas boom. We assess changes in U.S. county rates of entrepreneurship and survival rates of existing businesses across different industries in response to the innovations that led to energy development in counties with shale resources. We employ a panel difference-in-differences approach and rely on the geological determination of the location of shale resources and the unexpected innovation in shale extraction as our source of exogeneity. We find that temporal impacts obscure effects that would look small if we only examined average effects. Namely, new firm formation and sales initially decrease in boom regions, followed by a positive trend after the initial disruption. While new firm formation eventually recovers after many years, the overall impact on business dynamism is negative, suggesting that the areas most affected by this technological change may not benefit.
KeywordsShale boom Entrepreneurship Firm survival
JEL classificationQ4 I2 O1 L26
- Bartik, T. J. (1991). Who benefits from state and local development policies? Kalamazoo, MI: W.E. Upjohn Institute.Google Scholar
- Betz, M., Farren, M., Lobao, L., & Partridge, M. (2015). Coal mining, economic development, and the natural resources curse. Energy Economics., (50), 105–116. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2015.04.005.
- Brown, J. (2014). Production of natural gas from shale in local economies: a resource blessing or curse? Economic Review, 99(1), 119–147.Google Scholar
- Bulte, E. & Damania, R. (2008). Resources for sale: corruption, democracy and the natural resource curse. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8(1). doi: https://doi.org/10.2202/1935-1682.1890.
- Goetz, S. J., Partridge, M.D., Rickman, D.S. & Majumdar, S. (2011). Sharing the gains of local economic growth: race to the top vs. race to the bottom economic development policies. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 29(3). doi: https://doi.org/10.1068/c1077r.
- Hanson, A., & Rohlin, S. (2013). Do spatially targeted redevelopment programs spillover? Regional Science and Urban Economics, 43(1), 86–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2012.05.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Kelley, M. R. & Helper, S. (1999). Firm size and capabilities, regional agglomeration, and the adoption of new technology. Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 8(1–2), 79–103.Google Scholar
- Light, A. & Munk, R. (2016). Business ownership vs. self-employment. (May 22, 2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0166-0462(98)00010-6.
- Lucas, R. E. (1988). On the mechanics of economic development. Journal of Monetary Economics, 22(1), 3–42.Google Scholar
- Munasib, A., & Rickman, D. (2015). Regional economic impacts of the shale gas and tight oil boom: a synthetic control analysis. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 50, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2014.10.006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Sobel, R. L., & Hall, J. C. (2008). Institutions, entrepreneurship, and regional differences in economic growth. American Journal of Entrepreneurship, 1, 69–96.Google Scholar
- Tsvetkova, Alexandra and Mark D. Partridge. (2017) “Shale revolution and entrepreneurship: an empirical assessment of the relationship between energy sector expansion and self-employment in US counties.” Energy Journal, (141): 423–434.Google Scholar
- U.S. BLS. Quarterly census of employment and wages. (n.d.). https://www.bls.gov/cew/#databases. Accessed 28 June 2018.
- U.S. EIA. U.S. natural gas imports. (n.d.). http://www.eia.gov/dnav/ng/hist/n9100us2A.htm. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
- U.S. BLS. Establishment age and survival data. (n.d.). https://www.bls.gov/bdm/bdmage.htm. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
- U.S. EIA. (n.d.). “Natural gas expected to surpass coal in mix of coal used for U.S. generation in 2016.” http://www.eia.gov/todayinenergy/detail.php?id=25392.. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
- U.S. EIA. U.S. imports of crude oil and petroleum products. (n.d.). https://www.eia.gov/dnav/pet/hist/LeafHandler.ashx?n=pet&s=mttimus1&f=a. Accessed 13 Feb 2017.
- Weinstein, A. L. (2014). Local labor market restructuring in the shale boom. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 44(1), 71–92.Google Scholar
- Weinstein, A. L. & Partridge, M. D. (2011). The economic value of shale natural gas in Ohio. Swank Program in Rural-Urban Policy Summary and Report. Columbus, OH: Ohio State University.Google Scholar
- Weinstein, A. L., & Partridge, M. D. (2015). Economic implications of unconventional fossil fuel production. Book chapter for. In D. Albrecht (Ed.), Our energy future, socioeconomic implications and policy options for rural America (pp. 19–39). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar