Advertisement

Historical roots of regional entrepreneurship: the role of knowledge and creativity

  • Alfredo Del Monte
  • Luca PennacchioEmail author
Article
  • 64 Downloads

Abstract

This paper analyzes the historical factors that shape current levels and regional differences in new firm formation in innovative industries. Drawing on the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship, we propose and test the idea that regional knowledge and creativity affect entrepreneurial activity in the long term. We investigate this in Italy using data at the NUTS-3 geographical level, which goes back as far as 1100 on some items. Our results show that the historical knowledge base, measured as the presence of public universities, is strongly related to the current level of innovative start-ups. There is also a positive relationship between past creativity, measured by the presence of scientists and inventors in the area, and current intensity of new firm formation. Lastly, these long-term effects are complementary, because provinces with both a stronger knowledge base and higher levels of creativity have more current innovative start-ups. These findings suggest that a regional entrepreneurship culture and a social environment conducive to new firm formation can explain the path-dependency of regional entrepreneurship.

Keywords

Entrepreneurship Innovative start-ups Regional disparities Knowledge Knowledge spillovers Creativity 

JEL classification

L26 L60 L80 O18 O40 R11 R12 R30 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to participants at the SIEPI (Rome, Italy) and ICEED (Bari, Italy) conferences for their invaluable comments.

Funding information

Luca Pennacchio acknowledges financial support from Parthenope University through the research grants “Bando di sostegno alla ricerca individuale per il triennio 2015–2017” (years 2016 and 2017).

References

  1. Acconcia, A., Del Monte, A., & Pennacchio, L. (2011). Underpricing and firm’s distance from financial centre: evidence from three European countries. In CSEF Working Papers 295. Italy: University of Naples.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., & Armington, C. (2004). The impact of geographic differences in human capital on service firm formation rates. Journal of Urban Economic, 56, 244–278.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jue.2004.03.008.Google Scholar
  3. Acs, Z. J., Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. (2013). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 767–774.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9505-9.Google Scholar
  4. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9157-3.Google Scholar
  5. Acs, Z. J., Desai, S., & Klapper, L. F. (2008). What does “entrepreneurship” data really show? Small Business Economics, 31(3), 265–281.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-008-9137-7.Google Scholar
  6. Acs, Z. J., & Storey, D. J. (2004). Introduction: entrepreneurship and economic development. Regional Studies, 38(8), 871–877.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280901.Google Scholar
  7. Andersson, M., & Koster, S. (2011). Sources of persistence in regional start-up rates—evidence from Sweden. Journal of Economic Geography, 11(1), 179–201.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbp069.Google Scholar
  8. Armington, C., & Acs, Z. J. (2002). The determinants of regional variation in new firm formation. Regional Studies, 36(1), 33–45.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400120099843.Google Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B., & Belitski, M. (2013). The missing pillar: the creativity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 41(4), 819–836.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9508-6.Google Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D. B., Belitski, M., & Desai, S. (2015). Entrepreneurship and economic development in cities. The Annals of Regional Sciences, 55(1), 33–60.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-015-0685-x.Google Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., & Feldman, M. P. (1996). R&D spillovers and the geography of innovation and production. The American Economic Review, 86(3), 630–640 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118216.Google Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B., & Fritsch, M. (1994). The geography of firm births in Germany. Regional Studies, 28(4), 359–365.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409412331348326.Google Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. C. (2007). The localization of entrepreneurship capital: evidence from Germany. Papers in Regional Sciences, 86, 351–365.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1435-5957.2007.00131.x.Google Scholar
  14. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2005.03.012.Google Scholar
  15. Bae, J., & Koo, J. (2008). The nature of local knowledge and firm formation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 18(3), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtn017.Google Scholar
  16. Bellini, E., Piroli, G., & Pennacchio, L. (2018). Collaborative know-how and trust in university-industry collaborations: empirical evidence from ICT firms. Journal of Technology Transfer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-018-9655-7.
  17. Bellucci, A., & Pennacchio, L. (2016). University knowledge and firm innovation: evidence from European countries. Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4), 730–752.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-015-9408-9.Google Scholar
  18. Bellucci, A., Pennacchio, L., & Zazzaro, A. (2018). Public R&D subsidies: collaborative versus individual place-based programs for SMEs. Small Business Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0017-5.
  19. Bishop, P. (2012). Knowledge, diversity and entrepreneurship: a spatial analysis of new firm formation in Great Britain. Entrepreneurship and Regional Development, 24, 641–660.Google Scholar
  20. Bonaccorsi, A., Colombo, M. G., Guerini, M., & Rossi-Lamastra, C. (2014). The impact of local and external university knowledge on the creation of knowledge-intensive firms: evidence from the Italian case. Small Business Economics, 43(2), 261–287.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9536-2.Google Scholar
  21. Boschma, R., & Fritsch, M. (2009). Creative class and regional growth: empirical evidence from seven European countries. Economic Geography, 85(4), 391–423.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1944-8287.2009.01048.x.Google Scholar
  22. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2010.00390.x.Google Scholar
  23. Caliendo, M., Fossen, F., & Kritikos, A. (2014). Personality characteristics and the decisions to become and stay self-employed. Small Business Economics, 42(4), 787–814.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-013-9514-8.Google Scholar
  24. Caliendo, M., & Khunn, S. (2014). Regional effect heterogeneity of start-up subsidies for the unemployed. Regional Studies, 48(6), 1108–1134.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.851784.Google Scholar
  25. Cavalli-Sforza, L.L. (2016). L’evoluzione della cultura. Codice Edizioni.Google Scholar
  26. Cerisola, S. (2018). Creativity and local economic development: the role of synergy among different talents. Papers in Regional Science, 97(2), 199–215.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12254.Google Scholar
  27. Chapain, C., & Comunian, R. (2010). Enabling and inhibiting the creative economy: the role of the local and regional dimensions in England. Regional Studies, 44(6), 717–734.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343400903107728.Google Scholar
  28. Colombelli, A. (2016). The impact of local knowledge bases on the creation of innovative start-ups in Italy. Small Business Economics, 47(2), 383–396.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-016-9722-0.Google Scholar
  29. Coll-Martínez, E., (2018). Creativity and entrepreneurship: Empirical evidence for Catalonia. CREIP Working Paper, 2/2018.Google Scholar
  30. Doeringer, P., Evans-Klock, C., & Terkla, D. (2004). What attracts high performance factories? Management culture and regional advantage. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 34(5), 591–618.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.regsciurbeco.2003.08.001.Google Scholar
  31. Elfenbein, D. W., Hamilton, B. H., & Zenger, T. R. (2010). The small firm effect and the entrepreneurial spawning of scientists and engineers. Management Science, 56(4), 659–681.  https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.1090.1130.Google Scholar
  32. Florida, R. (2002). The rise of the creative class. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  33. Florida, R. L. (2004). Cities and the creative class. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Florida, R. L. (2014). The rise of the creative class—revisited. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  35. Fotopoulos, G. (2013). On the spatial stickiness of UK new firm formation rates. Journal of Economic Geography, 14(3), 651–679.  https://doi.org/10.1093/jeg/lbt011.Google Scholar
  36. Fritsch, M., & Aamoucke, R. (2017). Fields of knowledge in higher education institutions, and innovative start-ups-an empirical investigation. Papers in Regional Science, 96, 1–27.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12175.Google Scholar
  37. Fritsch, M., & Storey, D. J. (2014). Entrepreneurship in a regional context: historical roots, recent developments and future challenges. Regional Studies, 48(6), 939–954.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2014.892574.Google Scholar
  38. Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2014). The long persistence of regional levels of entrepreneurship: Germany, 1925–2005. Regional Studies, 48(6), 955–973.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.816414.Google Scholar
  39. Fritsch, M., & Wyrwich, M. (2018). Regional knowledge, entrepreneurial culture, and innovative start-ups over time and space―an empirical investigation. Small Business Economics, 51(2), 337–353.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0016-6.Google Scholar
  40. Ghani, E., Kerr, W. R., & O’Connell, S. (2014). Spatial determinants of entrepreneurship in India. Regional Studies, 48(6), 1071–1089.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343404.2013.839869.Google Scholar
  41. Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95(2), 347–361.  https://doi.org/10.1162/REST_a_00288.Google Scholar
  42. Helfat, C. E., & Lieberman, M. B. (2002). The birth of capabilities: market entry and the importance of pre-history. Industrial and Corporate Change, 11(4), 725–760.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/11.4.725.Google Scholar
  43. Jaffe, A. B., Trajtenberg, M., & Henderson, R. (1993). Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(3), 577–598 https://www.jstor.org/stable/2118401.Google Scholar
  44. Laspita, S., Breugst, N., Heblich, S., & Patzelt, H. (2012). Intergenerational transmission of entrepreneurial intentions. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(4), 414–435.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.11.006.Google Scholar
  45. Lazzeretti, L., Boix, R., & Capone, F. (2008). Do creative industries cluster? Mapping creative local production systems in Italy and Spain. Industry & Innovation, 15(5), 549–567.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13662710802374161.Google Scholar
  46. Lee, S. Y., Florida, R., & Acs, Z. (2004). Creativity and entrepreneurship: a regional analysis of new firm formation. Regional Studies, 38(8), 879–891.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0034340042000280910.Google Scholar
  47. Lee, N. I., & Rodríguez-Pose, A. (2014). Innovation in creative cities: evidence from British small firms. Industry and Innovation, 21(6), 494–512.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13662716.2014.983748.Google Scholar
  48. Mazzucato, M. (2011). The entrepreneurial state. Soundings, 49, 131–142.Google Scholar
  49. Mazzucato, M. (2013). Financing innovation: creative destruction vs. destructive creation. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22(4), 851–867.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icc/dtt025.Google Scholar
  50. Obschonka, M., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2012). Entrepreneurship from a development science perspective. International Journal of Development Science, 6, 107–115.  https://doi.org/10.3233/DEV-2012-12105.Google Scholar
  51. Obschonka, M., Schmitt-Rodermund, E., Gosling, S. D., & Silbereisen, R. K. (2013). The regional distribution and correlates of an entrepreneurship-prone personality profile in the United States, Germany, and the United Kingdom: a socioecological perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 105, 104–122.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0032275.Google Scholar
  52. Pan, F., & Yang, B. (2018). Financial development and the geographies of startup cities: evidence from China. Small Business Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-017-9983-2.
  53. Piergiovanni, R., Carree, M., & Santarelli, E. (2012). Creative industries, new business formation, and regional economic growth. Small Business Economics, 39(3), 539–560.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9329-4.Google Scholar
  54. Qian, H., & Acs, Z. J. (2013). An absorptive capacity theory of knowledge spillover entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 40(2), 185–197.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-011-9368-x.Google Scholar
  55. Reynolds, P. D., Storey, D. J., & Westhead, P. (1994). Cross-national comparisons of the variation in new firm formation rates. Regional Studies, 28(4), 443–456.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00343409412331348386.Google Scholar
  56. Santagata, W. (2002). Creativity, fashion, and market behavior. University of Torino Working Paper 05/2002.Google Scholar
  57. Scott, A. J. (2006). Entrepreneurship, innovation and industrial development: geography and the creative field revisited. Small Business Economics, 26(1), 1–24.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-004-6493-9.Google Scholar
  58. Schubert, T., & Kroll, H. (2016). Universities’ effects on regional GDP and unemployment: the case of Germany. Papers in Regional Sciences, 95(3), 467–489.  https://doi.org/10.1111/pirs.12150.Google Scholar
  59. Singer, C. J. (1959). Short history of scientific ideas to 1900. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  60. Sorgner, A., & Fritsch, M. (2013). Occupational choice and self-employment—are they related? Jena Economic Research Papers No. 001-2013.Google Scholar
  61. Sternberg, R. J. (1999). Handbook of creativity. New York: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Storey, D. J., & Johnson, S. (1987). Regional variation in entrepreneurship in the UK. Scottish Journal of Political Economy, 34, 161–173.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9485.1987.tb00276.x.Google Scholar
  63. Stuetzer, M., Obschonka, M., Audretsch, D. B., Wyrwich, M., Rentfrow, P. J., Coombes, M., Shaw-Taylor, L., & Satchell, M. (2016). Industry structure, entrepreneurship, and culture: an empirical analysis using historical coalfields. European Economic Review, 86, 52–72.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.euroecorev.2015.08.012.Google Scholar
  64. UNCTAD (2008). Creative economy. Report 2008, UNDP (UNCTAD): Geneva-New York.Google Scholar
  65. Urbano, D., Aparicio, S., & Audretsch, D. (2018). Twenty-five years of research on institutions, entrepreneurship, and economic growth: what has been learned? Small Business Economics.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-018-0038-0.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and StatisticsUniversity of Naples Federico IINaplesItaly
  2. 2.Department of Business and EconomicsParthenope UniversityNaplesItaly

Personalised recommendations