Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 1017–1032 | Cite as

Family involvement, environmental turbulence, and R&D investment: evidence from Listed Chinese SMEs

  • Jie YangEmail author
  • Jieqiong Ma
  • Hongxin Zhao
  • Jim Cater
  • Mark Arnold
Article

Abstract

This study draws on the insights of institutional theory and the environmental contingency perspective to explore family firm leaders’ approaches toward R&D investment in China. Our sample consisted of 577 manufacturing firms listed on the small and medium enterprises (SMEs) board of the Shenzhen Stock Exchange over a period of three years (2013–2015), representing a total of 1731 observations. Our findings show that family firms tend to invest less in R&D than their counterparts among non-family firms. Interestingly, this negative impact on R&D investment grows stronger under conditions of high technological turbulence and high government policy turbulence, but not under conditions of high market turbulence.

Keywords

Family firms Environmental turbulence R&D investment China 

JEL classifications

L26 O32 

References

  1. Aguilera, R. V., & Jackson, G. (2003). The cross-national diversity of corporate governance: dimensions and determinants. Academy of Management Review, 28, 447–465.Google Scholar
  2. Aiken, L. S., West, S. G., & Reno, R. R. (1991). Multiple regression: testing and interpreting interactions. New York: Sage.Google Scholar
  3. Augusto, M., & Coelho, F. (2009). Market orientation and new-to-the-world products: exploring the moderating effects of innovativeness, competitive strength, and environmental forces. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 94–108.Google Scholar
  4. Banalieva, E. R., Eddleston, K. A., & Zellweger, T. M. (2015). When do family firms have an advantage in transitioning economies? Toward a dynamic institution-based view. Strategic Management Journal, 36, 1358–1377.Google Scholar
  5. Bedeian, A. G., & Mossholder, K. W. (1994). Simple question, not so simple answer: interpreting interaction terms in moderated multiple regression. Journal of Management, 20, 159–165.Google Scholar
  6. Benavides-Velasco, C. A., Quintana-García, C., & Guzmán-Parra, V. F. (2013). Trends in family business research. Small Business Economics, 40, 41–57.Google Scholar
  7. Bing, M. N., LeBreton, J. M., Davison, H. K., Migetz, D. Z., & James, L. R. (2007). Integrating implicit and explicit social cognitions for enhanced personality assessment: a general framework for choosing measurement and statistical methods. Organizational Research Methods, 10, 136–179.Google Scholar
  8. Block, J. H. (2012). R&D investments in family and founder firms: an agency perspective. Journal of Business Venturing, 27, 248–265.Google Scholar
  9. Breton-Miller, L., & Miller, D. (2009). Agency vs. stewardship in public family firms: a social embeddedness reconciliation. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 1169–1191.Google Scholar
  10. Brewer, M. B., & Chen, Y.-R. (2007). Where (who) are collectives in collectivism? Toward conceptual clarification of individualism and collectivism. Psychological Review, 114, 133.Google Scholar
  11. Broekaert, W., Andries, P., & Debackere, K. (2016). Innovation processes in family firms: the relevance of organizational flexibility. Small Business Economics, 47, 771–785.Google Scholar
  12. Cao, Q., Gedajlovic, E., & Zhang, H. (2009). Unpacking organizational ambidexterity: dimensions, contingencies, and synergistic effects. Organization Science, 20, 781–796.Google Scholar
  13. Carney, M. (2005). Corporate governance and competitive advantage in family-controlled firms. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 249–265.Google Scholar
  14. Carney, M., & Gedajlovic, E. (2003). Strategic innovation and the administrative heritage of East Asian family business groups. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 20, 5–26.Google Scholar
  15. Carrigan, M., & Buckley, J. (2008). ‘What’s so special about family business?’ An exploratory study of UK and Irish consumer experiences of family businesses. International Journal of Consumer Studies, 32, 656–666.Google Scholar
  16. Chang, P.-L., & Shih, H.-Y. (2004). The innovation systems of Taiwan and China: a comparative analysis. Technovation, 24, 529–539.Google Scholar
  17. Chen, H.-L., & Hsu, W.-T. (2009). Family ownership, board independence, and R&D investment. Family Business Review, 22, 347–362.Google Scholar
  18. Chen, W. R., & Miller, K. D. (2007). Situational and institutional determinants of firms’ R&D search intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 369–381.Google Scholar
  19. Chen, Y.-S., Lin, M.-J. J., & Chang, C.-H. (2009). The positive effects of relationship learning and absorptive capacity on innovation performance and competitive advantage in industrial markets. Industrial Marketing Management, 38, 152–158.Google Scholar
  20. Cheong, T. S., & Wu, Y. (2014). The impacts of structural transformation and industrial upgrading on regional inequality in China. China Economic Review, 31, 339–350.Google Scholar
  21. Choi, Y. R., Zahra, S. A., Yoshikawa, T., & Han, B. H. (2015). Family ownership and R&D investment: the role of growth opportunities and business group membership. Journal of Business Research, 68, 1053–1061.Google Scholar
  22. Chrisman, J. J., & Patel, P. C. (2012). Variations in R&D investments of family and nonfamily firms: behavioral agency and myopic loss aversion perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 55, 976–997.Google Scholar
  23. Chua, R. Y., Morris, M. W., & Ingram, P. (2009). Guanxi vs networking: distinctive configurations of affect-and cognition-based trust in the networks of Chinese vs American managers. Journal of International Business Studies, 40, 490–508.Google Scholar
  24. Classen, N., Carree, M., Van Gils, A., & Peters, B. (2014). Innovation in family and non-family SMEs: an exploratory analysis. Small Business Economics, 42, 595–609.Google Scholar
  25. Cleff, T., & Rennings, K. (2012). Are there any first-mover advantages for pioneering firms? Lead market orientated business strategies for environmental innovation. European Journal of Innovation Management, 15, 491–513.Google Scholar
  26. Cooper, M. J., Upton, N., & Seaman, S. (2005). Customer relationship management: a comparative analysis of family and nonfamily business practices. Journal of Small Business Management, 43, 242–256.Google Scholar
  27. Corbetta, G., & Salvato, C. A. (2004). The board of directors in family firms: one size fits all? Family Business Review, 17, 119–134.Google Scholar
  28. Craig, J., & Dibrell, C. (2006). The natural environment, innovation, and firm performance: a comparative study. Family Business Review, 19, 275–288.Google Scholar
  29. Craig, J. B., & Moores, K. (2006). A 10-year longitudinal investigation of strategy, systems, and environment on innovation in family firms. Family Business Review, 19, 1–10.Google Scholar
  30. Dayan, M., & Basarir, A. (2009). Antecedents and consequences of team reflexivity in new product development projects. Journal of Business & Industrial Marketing, 25, 18–29.Google Scholar
  31. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., & Lichtenthaler, U. (2013). Research on technological innovation in family firms: present debates and future directions. Family Business Review, 26, 10–31.Google Scholar
  32. Deng, Z., & Treiman, D. J. (1997). The impact of the cultural revolution on trends in educational attainment in the People’s Republic of China. American Journal of Sociology, 103, 391–428.Google Scholar
  33. Dibrell, C. (2010). Life settlements from the perspective of institutional, real options, and stewardship theories. Family Business Review, 23, 94–98.Google Scholar
  34. DiMaggio, P., & Powell, W. W. (1983). The iron cage revisited: collective rationality and institutional isomorphism in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48, 147–160.Google Scholar
  35. Family Firm Institute. (2018). https://www.ffi.org/page/globaldatapoints. Accessed 19 October 2018.
  36. Farh, L.J., Cheng, B., Chou, L.-f., & Chu, X. (2004). Organizational citizenship behavior in the People's Republic of China. Organization Science. 15(2), 241–253.Google Scholar
  37. Financial Times. (2016). Digitally weary users switch to ‘dumb’ phones. https://www.ft.com/content/01ba2970-9e70-11e5-8ce1-f6219b685d74. Accessed 19 October 2018.
  38. Garcia, R., & Calantone, R. (2002). A critical look at technological innovation typology and innovativeness terminology: a literature review. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 19, 110–132.Google Scholar
  39. Gentry, R. J., & Shen, W. (2013). The impacts of performance relative to analyst forecasts and analyst coverage on firm R&D intensity. Strategic Management Journal, 34, 121–130.Google Scholar
  40. Gudmundson, D., Tower, C. B., & Hartman, E. A. (2003). Innovation in small businesses: culture and ownership structure do matter. Journal of Developmental Entrepreneurship, 8, 1.Google Scholar
  41. Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate data analysis. Upper Saddle River: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  42. Hoffman, J., Hoelscher, M., & Sorenson, R. (2006). Achieving sustained competitive advantage: a family capital theory. Family Business Review, 19, 135–145.Google Scholar
  43. Hofstede, G. (2007). Asian management in the 21st century. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 24, 411–420.Google Scholar
  44. Jansen, J. J., Van Den Bosch, F. A., & Volberda, H. W. (2006). Exploratory innovation, exploitative innovation, and performance: effects of organizational antecedents and environmental moderators. Management Science, 52, 1661–1674.Google Scholar
  45. Jaworski, B. J., & Kohli, A. K. (1993). Market orientation: antecedents and consequences. The Journal of marketing, 53–70Google Scholar
  46. Johns, G. (2006). The essential impact of context on organizational behavior. Academy of Management Review, 31, 386–408.Google Scholar
  47. Kang, Y., & He, X. (2017). Institutional forces and environmental management strategy: moderating effects of environmental orientation and innovation capability. Management and Organization Review. 14(3), 577–605.Google Scholar
  48. Kim, Y., & Gao, F. Y. (2013). Does family involvement increase business performance? Family-longevity goals’ moderating role in Chinese family firms. Journal of Business Research, 66(2), 265–274.Google Scholar
  49. Kohli, A. K., & Jaworski, B. J. (1990). Market orientation: the construct, research propositions, and managerial implications. The Journal of Marketing, 1–18.Google Scholar
  50. Kumar, V., Jones, E., Venkatesan, R., & Leone, R. P. (2011). Is market orientation a source of sustainable competitive advantage or simply the cost of competing? Journal of Marketing, 75, 16–30.Google Scholar
  51. Leaptrott, J. (2005). An institutional theory view of the family business. Family Business Review, 18, 215–228.Google Scholar
  52. Levinthal, D. A., & March, J. G. (1993). The myopia of learning. Strategic Management Journal, 14, 95–112.Google Scholar
  53. Liang, X., Wang, L., & Cui, Z. (2014). Chinese private firms and internationalization: Effects of family involvement in management and family ownership. Family Business Review, 27(2), 126–141.Google Scholar
  54. Li, H., & Zhang, Y. (2007). The role of managers’ political networking and functional experience in new venture performance: evidence from China’s transition economy. Strategic Management Journal, 28, 791–804.Google Scholar
  55. Li, X. C., Chen, L., Chua, J. H., Kirkman, B. L., Rynes-Weller, S., & Gomez-Mejia, L. (2015). Research on Chinese family businesses: perspectives. Management and Organization Review, 11, 579–597.Google Scholar
  56. Liang, Q., Li, X., Yang, X., Lin, D., & Zheng, D. (2013). How does family involvement affect innovation in China? Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 30, 677–695.Google Scholar
  57. Lichtenthaler, U. (2009). Absorptive capacity, environmental turbulence, and the complementarity of organizational learning processes. Academy of Management Journal, 52, 822–846.Google Scholar
  58. Liu, Y., Chen, Y.-J., & Wang, L. C. (2017). Family business, innovation and organizational slack in Taiwan. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 34, 193–213.Google Scholar
  59. Lu, L., Cooper, C. L., Kao, S.-F., & Zhou, Y. (2003). Work stress, control beliefs and well-being in Greater China: an exploration of sub-cultural differences between the PRC and Taiwan. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 18, 479–510.Google Scholar
  60. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Academy of Management Review, 21, 135–172.Google Scholar
  61. Luo, Y., Huang, Y., & Wang, S. L. (2012). Guanxi and organizational performance: a meta-analysis. Management and Organization Review, 8, 139–172.Google Scholar
  62. Madanoglu, M., Altinay, L., & Wang, X. L. (2016). Disentangling the effect of family involvement on innovativeness and risk taking: the role of decentralization. Journal of Business Research, 69, 1796–1800.Google Scholar
  63. Marques, P., Presas, P., & Simon, A. (2014). The heterogeneity of family firms in CSR engagement: The role of values. Family Business Review, 27(3), 206–227.Google Scholar
  64. Meyer, J. W., & Rowan, B. (1977). Institutionalized organizations: formal structure as myth and ceremony. American Journal of Sociology, 83, 340–363.Google Scholar
  65. Miller, D., & Breton-Miller, L. (2006). Family governance and firm performance: agency, stewardship, and capabilities. Family Business Review, 19, 73–87.Google Scholar
  66. Munari, F., Oriani, R., & Sobrero, M. (2010). The effects of owner identity and external governance systems on R&D investments: a study of Western European firms. Research Policy, 39, 1093–1104.Google Scholar
  67. Muñoz-Bullón, F., & Sanchez-Bueno, M. J. (2011). The impact of family involvement on the R&D intensity of publicly traded firms. Family Business Review, 24, 62–70.Google Scholar
  68. Patel, P. C., & Chrisman, J. J. (2014). Risk abatement as a strategy for R&D investments in family firms. Strategic Management Journal, 35, 617–627.Google Scholar
  69. Rauch, A., Wiklund, J., Lumpkin, G. T., & Frese, M. (2009). Entrepreneurial orientation and business performance: an assessment of past research and suggestions for the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 33, 761–787.Google Scholar
  70. Rodríguez, A., & Nieto, M. J. (2016). Does R&D offshoring lead to SME growth? Different governance modes and the mediating role of innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 37, 1734–1753.Google Scholar
  71. Royer, S., Simons, R., Boyd, B., & Rafferty, A. (2008). Promoting family: a contingency model of family business succession. Family Business Review, 21, 15–30.Google Scholar
  72. Saboo, A. R., & Grewal, R. (2013). Stock market reactions to customer and competitor orientations: the case of initial public offerings. Marketing Science, 32, 70–88.Google Scholar
  73. Sciascia, S., Nordqvist, M., Mazzola, P., & De Massis, A. (2015). Family ownership and R&D intensity in small-and medium-sized firms. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 32, 349–360.Google Scholar
  74. Scott, W. R. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 493–511.Google Scholar
  75. Sharma, P., & Manikutty, S. (2005). Strategic divestments in family firms: role of family structure and community culture. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29, 293–311.Google Scholar
  76. Sheng, S., Zhou, K. Z., & Li, J. J. (2011). The effects of business and political ties on firm performance: evidence from China. Journal of Marketing, 75, 1–15.Google Scholar
  77. Song, M., Droge, C., Hanvanich, S., & Calantone, R. (2005). Marketing and technology resource complementarity: an analysis of their interaction effect in two environmental contexts. Strategic Management Journal, 26, 259–276.Google Scholar
  78. Spieth, P., Schneckenberg, D., & Ricart, J. E. (2014). Business model innovation—state of the art and future challenges for the field. R&D Management, 44, 237–247.Google Scholar
  79. Stewart, A. (2003). Help one another, use one another: toward an anthropology of family business. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 27, 383–396.Google Scholar
  80. Stinchcombe, A. L. (1997). On the virtues of the old institutionalism. Annual Review of Sociology, 23, 1–18.Google Scholar
  81. Terleckyj, N. (1980). Direct and indirect effects of industrial research and development on the productivity growth of industries, new developments in productivity measurement (pp. 357–386). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  82. Triandis, H. C. (2001). Individualism-collectivism and personality. Journal of Personality, 69, 907–924.Google Scholar
  83. Tsai, K.-H., & Yang, S.-Y. (2014). The contingent value of firm innovativeness for business performance under environmental turbulence. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 10, 343–366.Google Scholar
  84. Tsai, W. S., Yang, Q., & Liu, Y. (2013). Young Chinese consumers’ snob and bandwagon luxury consumption preferences. Journal of International Consumer Marketing, 25, 290–304.Google Scholar
  85. Tsang, E. W. (2001). Internationalizing the family firm: a case study of a Chinese family business. Journal of Small Business Management, 39, 88–93.Google Scholar
  86. Urbinati, A., Franzò, S., De Massis, A., & Frattini, F. (2017). Innovation in family firms: A review of prior studies and a framework for future research. In Revolution of Innovation Management (pp. 213–246). Palgrave Macmillan, London.Google Scholar
  87. World Bank. (2016) https://data.worldbank.org/indicator/NY.GDP.PCAP.CD, Accessed 10 October 2016.
  88. Xiong, G., & Bharadwaj, S. (2011). Social capital of young technology firms and their IPO values: the complementary role of relevant absorptive capacity. Journal of Marketing, 75, 87–104.Google Scholar
  89. Xu, D., & Meyer, K. E. (2013). Linking theory and context: ‘strategy research in emerging economies’ after Wright et al.(2005). Journal of Management Studies, 50, 1322–1346.Google Scholar
  90. Young, M. N., Tsai, T., Wang, X., Liu, S., & Ahlstrom, D. (2014). Strategy in emerging economies and the theory of the firm. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 31, 331–354.Google Scholar
  91. Zachary, M. A., McKenny, A., Short, J. C., & Payne, G. T. (2011). Family business and market orientation: construct validation and comparative analysis. Family Business Review, 24, 233–251.Google Scholar
  92. Zhang, J., & Ma, H. (2009). Adoption of professional management in Chinese family business: a multilevel analysis of impetuses and impediments. Asia Pacific Journal of Management, 26, 119–139.Google Scholar
  93. Zucker, L. G. (1987). Institutional theories of organization. Annual Review of Sociology, 13, 443–464.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Marketing and Management, Soules School of BusinessThe University of Texas at TylerTylerUSA
  2. 2.Department of Marketing & International Business, Frank G. Zarb School of BusinessHofstra UniversityHempsteadUSA
  3. 3.Department of International Business, Richard A. Chaifetz School of BusinessSaint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA
  4. 4.Department of Marketing, Richard A. Chaifetz School of BusinessSaint Louis UniversitySt. LouisUSA

Personalised recommendations