Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 359–374 | Cite as

Hidden champions and unicorns: a question of the context of human capital investment

  • Erik E. LehmannEmail author
  • Julian Schenkenhofer
  • Katharine Wirsching
Article
  • 240 Downloads

Abstract

The Silicon Valley model of high-tech entrepreneurship has been placed in the spotlight by academics in the past at the expense of the plenitude of Main Street businesses — businesses beyond the high-tech and ICT sector and the highly scalable platform economy. This study aims at resolving this one-sidedness contributing to unexplained aspects of entrepreneurship theory. Our focus lies on a subgroup of Main Street companies, known as hidden champions, as the counterpart of Silicon Valley high-growth firms, the unicorns. In spite of a worldwide distribution, just as unicorns are highly skewed to a few countries and regions, so are hidden champions. On a snapshot, it appears that unicorns and hidden champions are substitutes rather than complementary to one another. We illustrate that the emergence and skewed distribution of these two types of firms can be explained by the institutional context, in particular the provision of human capital. In an explorative approach, our line of reasoning puts forward that the centralization (public provision) vs. decentralization (individual investment) in organizing the accumulation of human capital helps to explain the different and path-dependent evolution of both, the Silicon Valley and the Main Street models of entrepreneurship.

Keywords

Main street entrepreneurship Hidden champions Human capital 

JEL classification

J24 L26 M13 

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2009). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Stam, E., Audretsch, D. B., & O’Connor, A. (2017). The lineages of the entrepreneurial ecosystem approach. Small Business Economics, 49(1), 1–10.Google Scholar
  3. Aldrich, H. E., & Martinez, M. (2015). Why aren’t entrepreneurs more creative? Conditions affecting creativity and innovation in entrepreneurial activity. In C. E. Shalley, M. A. Hitt, & J. Zhou (Eds.), Oxford handbook on creativity, innovation, and entrepreneurship (pp. 445–456). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Almeida, P., & Kogut, B. (1997). The exploration of technological diversity and geographic localization in innovation: start-up firms in the semiconductor industry. Small Business Economics, 9(1), 21–31.Google Scholar
  5. Audretsch, D. B. (2009). The entrepreneurial society. Journal of Technology Transfer, 34(3), 245–254.Google Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2004). Entrepreneurship capital and economic performance. Regional Studies, 38(8), 949–959.Google Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2004). Dept or equity: the role of venture capital in financing high-tech firms in Germany. Schmalenbach Business Review, 56, 340–357.Google Scholar
  8. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2005). Does the knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship hold for regions? Research Policy, 34(8), 1191–1202.Google Scholar
  9. Audretsch, D. B., & Lehmann, E. E. (2016). The seven secrets of Germany: economic resilience in an era of global turbulence. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, R. (2004). A model of the entrepreneurial economy: papers on entrepreneurship, growth and public policy.Google Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., Lehmann, E. E., & Schenkenhofer, J. (2018). Internationalization strategies of hidden champions: lessons from Germany. Multinational Business Review, 26(1), 2–24.Google Scholar
  12. Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: the importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.Google Scholar
  13. Autor, D. H. (2014). Skills, education, and the rise of earnings inequality among the “other 99 percent”. Science, 344(6186), 843–851.Google Scholar
  14. Baker, S., & Mazzarol, T. (2015). The Australian manufacturing Mittelstand: an initial exploration. Retrieved from http://research-repository.uwa.edu.au/en/publications/the-australian-manufacturing-mittelstand-an-initial-exploration(14bbe27f-dc22-467e-8770-a558d2a35421)/export.html. Accessed 25 July 2017.
  15. Baker, T., & Welter, F. (2015). Bridges to the future of entrepreneurship research. In T. Baker & F. Welter (Eds.), The Routledge companion to entrepreneurship (pp. 3–17). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  16. Becker, G. S. (1964). Human capital: a theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. Chicago: Chicago University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Bonvillian, W. B. (2017). Advanced manufacturing: a new policy challenge. Annals of Science and Technology Policy, 1(1), 1–131.Google Scholar
  18. Bosch, G., & Charest, J. (2008). Vocational training and the labour market in liberal and coordinated economies. Industrial Relations Journal, 39(5), 428–447.Google Scholar
  19. Bradley, S. W., & Klein, P. (2016). Institutions, economic freedom, and entrepreneurship: the contribution of management scholarship. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 211–221.Google Scholar
  20. Bresnahan, T. F., Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2002). Information technology, workplace organization, and the demand for skilled labor: firm-level evidence. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 117(1), 339–376.Google Scholar
  21. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Li, H.-L. (2010). Institutional theory and entrepreneurship: where are we now and where do we need to move in the future? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 34(3), 421–440.Google Scholar
  22. Brynjolfsson, E., & Hitt, L. M. (2000). Beyond computation: information technology, organizational transformation and business performance. The Journal of Economic Perspectives, 14(4), 23–48.Google Scholar
  23. Campbell, B. A., Coff, R., & Kryscynski, D. (2012). Rethinking sustained competitive advantage from human capital. Academy of Management Review, 37(3), 376–395.Google Scholar
  24. Coff, R., & Raffiee, J. (2015). Toward a theory of perceived firm-specific human capital. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(3), 326–341.Google Scholar
  25. Covin, J. G., & Slevin, D. P. (1991). A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as firm behavior. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 16(1), 7–24.Google Scholar
  26. Dalton, R. J. (2004). Democratic challenges, democratic choices. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  27. De Massis, A., Frattini, F., Kotlar, J., Petruzzelli, A. M., & Wright, M. (2016). Innovation through tradition: lessons from innovative family businesses and directions for future research. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(1), 93–116.Google Scholar
  28. De Massis, A., Audretsch, D. B., Uhlaner, L., & Kammerlander, N. (2017). Innovation with limited resources: management lessons from the German Mittelstand. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 35(1), 125–146.Google Scholar
  29. Decker, R. A., Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2016). Where has all the skewness gone? The decline in high-growth (young) firms in the U.S. European Economic Review, 86, 4–23.Google Scholar
  30. Dequech, D. (2013). Economic institutions: explanations for conformity and room for deviation. Journal of Institutional Economics, 9(1), 81–108.Google Scholar
  31. Evans, D. S., & Jovanovic, B. (1989). An estimated model of entrepreneurial choice under liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 97(4), 808–827.Google Scholar
  32. Fleming, P. (2017). The human capital hoax: work, debt and insecurity in the era of Uberization. Organization Studies, 38(5), 691–709.Google Scholar
  33. Friedman, M. (1962). Capitalism and freedom. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  34. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research. (2018). The German vocational training system. Retrieved from https://www.bmbf.de/en/the-german-vocational-training-system-2129.html. Accessed 10 June 2018.
  35. Goldin, C. D., & Katz, L. F. (2009). The race between education and technology. Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  36. Greinert, W.-D. (2005). Mass vocational education and training in Europe: classical models of the 19th century and training in England, France and Germany during the first half of the 20 th. Office for Official Publications of the European Communities.Google Scholar
  37. Groysberg, B. (2010). Chasing stars: the myth of talent and the portability of performance. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  38. Groysberg, B., Lee, L.-E., & Nanda, A. (2008). Can they take it with them? The portability of star knowledge workers’ performance. Management Science, 54(7), 1213–1230.Google Scholar
  39. Hambrick, D. C., & Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Are you sure you have a strategy? The Academy of Management Executive, 15(4), 48–59.Google Scholar
  40. Harhoff, D., & Kane, T. J. (1997). Is the German apprenticeship system a panacea for the US labor market? Journal of Population Economics, 10(2), 171–196.Google Scholar
  41. Hecklau, F., Galeitzke, M., Flachs, S., & Kohl, H. (2016). Holistic approach for human resource management in Industry 4.0. Procedia CIRP, 54, 1–6.Google Scholar
  42. Hoeckel, K., & Schwartz, R. (2010). Lernen für die Arbeitswelt OECD-Studien zur Berufsbildung.Google Scholar
  43. Holtz-Eakin, D., Joulfaian, D., & Rosen, H. S. (1994). Sticking it out: entrepreneurial survival and liquidity constraints. Journal of Political Economy, 102(1), 53–75.Google Scholar
  44. Hornsby, J. S., Kuratko, D. F., & Zahra, S. A. (2002). Middle managers’ perception of the internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship: assessing a measurement scale. Journal of Business Venturing, 17(3), 49–63.Google Scholar
  45. Hoskisson, R. E., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. W. (2013). Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: the influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1295–1321.Google Scholar
  46. Jahn, V. (2015). The importance of Mittelstand firms for regional apprenticeship activity: lessons for policy: Diskussionspapier, Helmut-Schmidt-Universität, Fächergruppe Volkswirtschaftslehre.Google Scholar
  47. Kelley, D. J., Bosma, N., & Amorós, J. (2011). Global entrepreneurship monitor: global report 2010. Global Entrepreneurship Research Association.Google Scholar
  48. Klepper, S. (2011). Nano-economics, spinoffs, and the wealth of regions. Small Business Economics, 37(2), 141.Google Scholar
  49. Korsgaard, S., Müller, S., & Wittorff Tanvig, H. (2015). Rural entrepreneurship or entrepreneurship in the rural—between place and space. International Journal of Entrepreneurial Behavior & Research, 21(1), 5–26.Google Scholar
  50. Kuhlee, D. (2015). Federalism and corporatism: on the approaches of policy-making and governance in the dual apprenticeship system in Germany and their functioning today. Research in Comparative and International Education, 10(4), 476–492.Google Scholar
  51. Kuratko, D. F., Montagno, R. V., & Hornsby, J. S. (1990). Developing an intrapreneurial assessment instrument for an effective corporate entrepreneurial environment. Strategic Management Journal, 11, 49–58.Google Scholar
  52. Kuratko, D. F., Hornsby, J. S., & Covin, J. G. (2014). Diagnosing a firm’s internal environment for corporate entrepreneurship. Business Horizons, 57(1), 37–47.Google Scholar
  53. La Porta, R., Lopez-de-Silanes, F., Shleifer, A., & Vishny, R. W. (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106(6), 1113–1155.Google Scholar
  54. Landström, H., Harirchi, G., & Åström, F. (2012). Entrepreneurship: exploring the knowledge base. Research Policy, 41(7), 1154–1181.Google Scholar
  55. Le Breton-Miller, I., & Miller, D. (2006). Why do some family businesses out-compete? Governance, long-term orientations, and sustainable capability. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 30(6), 731–746.Google Scholar
  56. Lehmann, E. E., & Neuberger, D. (2001). Do lending relationships matter? Evidence from bank survey data. Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 45, 339–359.Google Scholar
  57. Lehmann, E. E., & Weigand, J. (2000). Does the governed corporation perform better? Governance structures and corporate performance in Germany. Review of Finance, 4(2), 157–195.Google Scholar
  58. Levinthal, D. A. (1997). Adaptation on rugged landscapes. Management Science, 43(7), 934–950.Google Scholar
  59. Lewis, T. (2007). The problem of cultural fit—what can we learn from borrowing the German dual system? Compare, 37(4), 463–477.Google Scholar
  60. Litan, R. E., & Hathaway, I. (2017). Is America encouraging the wrong kind of entrepreneurship? Harvard Business Review, Economics Digital Article. Retrieved from https://hbr.org/2017/06/is-america-encouraging-the-wrong-kind-of-entrepreneurship. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  61. Lumpkin, G. T., & Dess, G. G. (1996). Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. The Academy of Management Review, 21(1), 135–172.Google Scholar
  62. McMullen, J. S., Wood, M. S., & Kier, A. S. (2016). An embedded agency approach to entrepreneurship public policy: managerial position and politics in new venture location decisions. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 222–246.Google Scholar
  63. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1990). The economics of modern manufacturing: technology, strategy, and organization. The American Economic Review, 80(3), 511–528.Google Scholar
  64. Milgrom, P., & Roberts, J. (1995). Complementarities and fit strategy, structure, and organizational change in manufacturing. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 19(2), 179–208.Google Scholar
  65. Molloy, J. C., & Barney, J. B. (2015). Who captures the value created with human capital? A market-based view. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(3), 309–325.Google Scholar
  66. Morelix, A., Tareque, I., Fairlie, R. W., Russell, J., & Reedy, E. (2016). The Kauffman Index 2016: Main Street entrepreneurship metropolitan area and city trends (November 2016). Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=2872903.
  67. Morris, M. H., Kuratko, D. F., & Covin, J. G. (2011). Corporate entrepreneurship & innovation. Mason: Thomson South-Western.Google Scholar
  68. Morris, M. H., Neumeyer, X., & Kuratko, D. F. (2015). A portfolio perspective on entrepreneurship and economic development. Small Business Economics, 45(4), 713–728.Google Scholar
  69. Nyberg, A. J., & Wright, P. M. (2015). 50 years of human capital research: assessing what we know, exploring where we go. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 29(3), 287–295.Google Scholar
  70. Rammer, C., & Spielkamp, A. (2015). Hidden champions—driven by innovation: Empirische Befunde auf Basis des Mannheimer Innovationspanels: ZEW-Dokumentation.Google Scholar
  71. Roberts, J. (2004). The modern firm: organizational design for performance and growth. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  72. Simon, H. (1990). Hidden champions: spearheads of the German economy. Zeitschrift fuer Betriebswirtschaft (ZfB), 60(9), 875–890.Google Scholar
  73. Simon, H. (2009). Hidden champions of the 21st century: success strategies of unknown market leaders. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag.Google Scholar
  74. Stiglitz, J. E., & Weiss, A. (1981). Credit rationing in markets with imperfect information. The American Economic Review, 71(3), 393–410.Google Scholar
  75. U.S. Census Bureau (2017). Business dynamics statistics. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/ces/dataproducts/bds/overview.html. Accessed 20 June 2017.
  76. Wadhwani, D. R. (2017). Entrepreneurship in historical context: using history to develop theory and understanding process. In F. Welter & W. B. Gartner (Eds.), A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context (pp. 65–78). Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  77. Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.Google Scholar
  78. Welter, F., & Gartner, W. B. (2016). A research agenda for entrepreneurship and context. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  79. Welter, F., Baker, T., Audretsch, D. B., & Gartner, W. B. (2017). Everyday entrepreneurship—a call for entrepreneurship research to embrace entrepreneurial diversity. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 41(3), 311–321.Google Scholar
  80. Williamson, O. E. (1975). Markets and hierarchies, analysis and antitrust implications. New York: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  81. Witt, A., & Carr, C. (2014). Success secrets shared: learning from the best Mittelstand and British global niche champions. Scottish Policy Now, 8(1).Google Scholar
  82. Wright, P. M., Coff, R., & Moliterno, T. P. (2014). Strategic human capital. Journal of Management, 40(2), 353–370.Google Scholar
  83. Yoon, B. (2013). How do hidden champions differ from normal small and medium enterprises (SMEs) in innovation activities. Journal of Applied Sciences Research, 9(13), 6257–6263.Google Scholar
  84. Zahra, S. A., Wright, M., & Abdelgawad, S. G. (2014). Contextualization and the advancement of entrepreneurship research. International Small Business Journal, 32(5), 479–500.Google Scholar
  85. Zellweger, T. M., & Sieger, P. (2012). Entrepreneurial orientation in long-lived family firms. Small Business Economics, 38(1), 67–84.Google Scholar
  86. Zuckerman, M. B. (1998). A second American century. Foreign Affairs, 77(3), 18–31.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Erik E. Lehmann
    • 1
    Email author
  • Julian Schenkenhofer
    • 2
  • Katharine Wirsching
    • 2
  1. 1.Faculty of Business and EconomicsUniversity of Augsburg and CCSE (Augsburg/Bergamo, It)AugsburgGermany
  2. 2.Faculty of Business and EconomicsUniversity of AugsburgAugsburgGermany

Personalised recommendations