Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 669–686 | Cite as

Early internationalization patterns and export market persistence: a pseudo-panel data analysis

  • Yancy VaillantEmail author
  • Esteban Lafuente
  • Manoj Chandra Bayon
Article

Abstract

This study evaluates the international market persistence of early exporting businesses. The relationship between time in the market and export propensity/intensity levels was analyzed to identify the persistence of the internationalization patterns of entrepreneurial ventures. The empirical application employs a pseudo-panel approach at the business age- and industry-based cohort level drawn from a group of independent cross-sectional surveys that include information for 13,961 independently and randomly selected business owners for the period 2007–2012. The results show that the proportion of firms that export significantly diminishes following the initial post start-up years and that low export intensity levels at start-up leads to greatest tenacity and persistence of the exporting efforts for new firms. The results contribute to the recent discussions on whether early internationalization is an effective strategy and should be encouraged.

Keywords

Market persistence Entrepreneurial internationalization Export propensity Export intensity Pseudo-panel data analysis 

JEL classification

L26 M13 M21 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Esteban Lafuente acknowledges financial support from the Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness (grant number: ECO2017-86305-C4-2-R).

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., & Audretsch, D. B. (1990). Innovation and small firms. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  2. Amiti, M., & Weinstein, D. E. (2011). Exports and financial shocks. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 126(4), 1841–1877.  https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr033.Google Scholar
  3. Andersen, O. (1993). On the internationalization process of firms: a critical analysis. Journal of International Business Studies, 24(2), 209–231.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490230.Google Scholar
  4. Autio, E., & Sapienza, H.J. (2000). Comparing process and born global perspectives in the international growth of technology-based new firms, Frontiers of Entrepreneurship Research (Center for Entrepreneurial Studies, Babson College), pp. 413–424.Google Scholar
  5. Autio, E., Sapienza, H. J., & Almeida, J. G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909–924.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1556419.Google Scholar
  6. Awokuse, T. O. (2005). Exports, economic growth and causality in Korea. Applied Economics Letters, 12(11), 693–696.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500188265.Google Scholar
  7. Balassa, B. (1985). Exports, policy choices, and economic growth in developing countries after the 1973 oil shock. Journal of Development Economics, 18(1), 23–35.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(85)90004-5.Google Scholar
  8. Baptista, R., Escária, V., & Madruga, P. (2008). Entrepreneurship, regional development and job creation: the case of Portugal. Small Business Economics, 30(1), 49–58.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-007-9055-0.Google Scholar
  9. Barkema, H. G., Shenkar, O., Vermeulen, F., & Bell, J. H. J. (1997). Working abroad, working with others: how firms learn to operate international joint ventures. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 426–442.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256889.Google Scholar
  10. Bell, J., & McNaughton, R. (2000). Born global firms: a challenge to public policy in support of internationalization. In J. Pels & D. W. Stewart (Eds.), Marketing in a global economy (pp. 176–185). Buenos Aires, Argentina: American Marketing Association.Google Scholar
  11. Bernard, J. T., Bolduc, D., & Yameogo, N. D. (2011). A pseudo-panel data model of household electricity demand. Resource and Energy Economics, 33, 315–325.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2010.07.002.Google Scholar
  12. Blundell, R.W., Browning, O.M., & Meghir, C. (1989). A microeconometric model of intertemporal substitution and consumer demand. The Warwick Economics Research Paper Series (TWERPS) 324, University of Warwick, Department of Economics.
  13. Browning, M., Deaton, A., & Irish, M. (1985). A profitable approach to labor supply and commodity demands over the life-cycle. Econometrica, 53, 503–544.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1911653.Google Scholar
  14. Calof, J. (1994). The relationship between firm size and export behavior revisited. Journal of International Business Studies, 25(2), 367–387.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490205.Google Scholar
  15. Carr, J. C., Haggard, K. S., Hmieleski, K. M., & Zahra, S. A. (2010). A study of the moderating effects of firm age at internationalization on firm survival and short-term growth. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4, 183–192.  https://doi.org/10.1002/sej.90.Google Scholar
  16. Cavusgil, S. T., & Knight, G. (2015). The born global firm: an entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. Journal of International Business Studies, 46(1), 3–16.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2014.62.Google Scholar
  17. Chang, S.-J. (1995). International expansion strategy of Japanese firms: capability building through sequential entry. Academy of Management Journal, 38, 383–407.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256685.Google Scholar
  18. Chetty, S., & Campbell-Hunt, C. (2003). Explosive international growth and problems of success amongst small to medium-sized firms. International Small Business Journal, 21(1), 5–27.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242603021001719.Google Scholar
  19. Chiao, Y. C., Yang, K. P., & Yu, C. M. J. (2006). Performance, internationalization, and firm-specific advantages of SMEs in a newly-industrialized economy. Small Business Economics, 26(5), 475–492.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-5604-6.Google Scholar
  20. Cope, J. (2005). Toward a dynamic learning perspective of entrepreneurship. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 29(4), 373–397.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2005.00090.x.Google Scholar
  21. Crick, D. (2003). The international entrepreneurial decision of UK SMEs to discontinue overseas activities: a research note reporting practices within the clothing industry eighteen months on. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1(4), 405–413.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1025685509020.Google Scholar
  22. Das, S., Roberts, M. J., & Tybout, J. R. (2007). Market entry costs, producer heterogeneity, and export dynamics. Econometrica, 75, 837–873.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0262.2007.00769.x.Google Scholar
  23. Deaton, A. (1985). Panel data from time series of cross-sections. Journal of Econometrics, 30, 109–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-4076(85)90134-4.Google Scholar
  24. Eaton J., Eslava M., Kugler M., & Tybout J. (2007). Export dynamics in Colombia: firm-level evidence. Technical report, National Bureau of Economic Research.Google Scholar
  25. Eriksson, K., Johanson, J., Majkgård, A., & Sharma, D. (1997). Experiential knowledge and cost in internationalization process. Journal of International Business Studies, 28, 337–360.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490104.Google Scholar
  26. Forsgren, M. (2002). The concept of learning in the Uppsala internationalization process model: a critical review. International Business Review, 11(3), 257–277.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(01)00060-9.Google Scholar
  27. Fritsch, M., & Noseleit, F. (2013). Investigating the anatomy of the employment effect of new business formation. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(2), 349–377.  https://doi.org/10.1093/cje/bes030.Google Scholar
  28. Glaister, A., Yipeng, L., Sahadev, S., & Gomes, E. (2014). Externalising, internalising and fostering commitment—the case of born-global firms in emerging economies. Management International Review, 54(4), 473–496.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-014-0215-6.Google Scholar
  29. Greene, W. (2003). Econometric analysis. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  30. Harrison, A. (1996). Openness and growth: a time-series, cross-country analysis for developing countries. Journal of Development Economics, 48(2), 419–447.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3878(95)00042-9.Google Scholar
  31. Hausman, J. (1978). Specification tests in econometrics. Econometrica, 46, 1251–1271.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1913827.Google Scholar
  32. Hitt, M. A., Hoskisson, R. E., & Kim, H. (1997). International diversification: effects on innovation and firm performance in product-diversified firms. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 787–798.  https://doi.org/10.2307/256948.Google Scholar
  33. Hollender, L., Zapkau, F. B., & Schwens, C. (2017). SME foreign market entry mode choice and foreign venture performance: the moderating effect of international experience and product adaptation. International Business Review, 26(2), 250–263.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.07.003.Google Scholar
  34. Hutchinson, K., Quinn, B., & Alexander, N. (2005). The internationalisation of small to medium-sized retail companies: towards a conceptual framework. Journal of Marketing Management, 21(1–2), 149–179.  https://doi.org/10.1362/0267257053166857.Google Scholar
  35. Javalgi, R., White, S., & Lee, O. (2000). Firm characteristics influencing export propensity: an empirical investigation by industry type. Journal of Business Research, 47, 217–228.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0148-2963(98)00065-4.Google Scholar
  36. Jiménez-Martín, S., Labeaga, J. M., & Pérez, A. (1998). Participation, heterogeneity and dynamics in tobacco consumption: evidence from cohort data. Health Economics, 7, 401–414.  https://doi.org/10.1002/(SICI)1099-1050(199808)7:5<401::AID-HEC361>3.0.CO;2-2.Google Scholar
  37. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (1977). The internationalization process of the firm—a model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676.Google Scholar
  38. Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J. E. (2009). The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. Journal of International Business Studies, 40(9), 1411–1431.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2009.24.Google Scholar
  39. Jones, M., Coviello, N., & Tang, Y. K. (2011). International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): a domain ontology and thematic analysis. Journal of Business Venturing, 26(6), 632–659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusvent.2011.04.001.Google Scholar
  40. Kalinic, I., & Forza, C. (2012). Rapid internationalization of traditional SMEs: between gradualist models and born globals. International Business Review, 21(4), 694–707.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2011.08.002.Google Scholar
  41. Katsikeas, C. S., Leonidou, L. C., & Morgan, N. A. (2000). Firm-level export performance assessment: review, evaluation, and development. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 28, 493–511.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0092070300284003.Google Scholar
  42. Kim, B. Y., & Kang, Y. (2014). Social capital and entrepreneurial activity: a pseudo-panel approach. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 97, 47–60  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jebo.2013.10.003.Google Scholar
  43. Knight, G. A., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(2), 124–141.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071.Google Scholar
  44. Knight, G. A., & Liesch, P. W. (2016). Internationalization: from incremental to born global. Journal of World Business, 51(1), 93–102.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2015.08.011.Google Scholar
  45. Keupp, M. M., & Gassmann, O. (2009). The past and the future of international entrepreneurship: a review and suggestions for developing the field. Journal of Management, 35(3), 600–633.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0149206308330558.Google Scholar
  46. Lafuente, E., Stoian, C., & Rialp, J. (2015). From export entry to de-internationalisation through entrepreneurial attributes. Journal of Small Business and Enterprise Development, 22(1), 21–37.  https://doi.org/10.1108/JSBED-09-2012-0101.Google Scholar
  47. Lafuente, E., Vaillant, Y., & Vendrell-Herrero, F. (2017). Territorial servitization: exploring the virtuous circle connecting knowledge-intensive services and new manufacturing businesses. International Journal of Production Economics, 192, 19–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2016.12.006.Google Scholar
  48. Lee, I. H., Paik, Y., & Uygur, U. (2016). Does gender matter in the export performance of international new ventures? Mediation effects of firm-specific and country-specific advantages. Journal of International Management, 22(4), 365–379.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intman.2016.05.004. Google Scholar
  49. Madsen, T. K., & Servais, P. (1997). The internationalization of born globals: an evolutionary process? International Business Review, 6(6), 561–583.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0969-5931(97)00032-2.Google Scholar
  50. Majocchi, A., Bacchiocchi, E., & Mayrhofer, U. (2005). Firm size, business experience and export intensity in SMEs: a longitudinal approach to complex relationships. International Business Review, 14, 719–738.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2005.07.004.Google Scholar
  51. Manolova, T. S., Manev, I. M., & Gyoshev, B. S. (2010). In good company: the role of personal and inter-firm networks for new-venture internationalization in a transition economy. Journal of World Business, 45(3), 257–265.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2009.09.004.Google Scholar
  52. Martin, S. L., Javalgi, R. G., & Cavusgil, E. (2017). Marketing capabilities, positional advantage, and performance of born global firms: contingent effect of ambidextrous innovation. International Business Review, 26(3), 527–543.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.11.006.Google Scholar
  53. Martineau, C., & Pastoriza, D. (2016). International involvement of established SMEs: a systematic review of antecedents, outcomes and moderators. International Business Review, 25(2), 458–470.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2015.07.005.Google Scholar
  54. McDougall, P., Shane, S., & Oviatt, B. (1994). Explaining the formation of international new ventures: the limits of theories from international business research. Journal of Business Venturing, 9, 469–487.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0883-9026(94)90017-5.Google Scholar
  55. Melitz, M. J. (2003). The impact of trade on intra-industry reallocations and aggregate industry productivity. Econometrica, 71(6), 1695–1725  https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-0262.00467.Google Scholar
  56. Mora J. (2015). Export failure and its consequences: evidence from Colombian exporters. Working paper series, Department of Economics, Occidental College (California, USA).Google Scholar
  57. Morgan, N. A., Katskieas, C. S., & Vrohies, D. W. (2012). Export marketing strategy implementation, export marketing capabilities, and export venture performance. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 40(2), 271–289  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11747-011-0275-0.Google Scholar
  58. OECD. (2016). Entrepreneurship at a glance (Vol. 2016). Paris: OECD Publishing.  https://doi.org/10.1787/entrepreneur_aag-2016-en.
  59. Orser, B., Spence, M., Riding, A., & Carrington, C. (2010). Gender and export propensity. Entrepreneurship: Theory and Practice, 34(5), 933–957.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00347.x.Google Scholar
  60. Oviatt, B., & McDougall, P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25, 45–64.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193.Google Scholar
  61. Pangarkar, N. (2008). Internationalization and performance of small- and medium-sized enterprises. Journal of World Business, 43(4), 475–485.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.11.009.Google Scholar
  62. Paul, J., Parthasarathy, S., & Gupta, P. (2017). Exporting challenges of SMEs: a review and future research agenda. Journal of World Business, 52(3), 327–342.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2017.01.003.Google Scholar
  63. Puig, F., González-Loureiro, M., & Ghauri, P. N. (2014). Internationalisation for survival: the case of new ventures. Management International Review, 54(5), 653–673.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-014-0209-4.Google Scholar
  64. Rauch, J. E., & Watson, J. (2003). Starting small in an unfamiliar environment. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 21, 1021–1042.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0167-7187(03)00018-3.Google Scholar
  65. Reynolds, P., Bosma, N., Autio, E., Hunt, S., De Bono, N., Servais, I., Lopez, P., & Chin, N. (2005). Global entrepreneurship monitor: data collection design and implementation 1998–2003. Small Business Economics, 24, 205–231.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-005-1980-1.Google Scholar
  66. Rialp, A., Rialp, J., & Knight, G. A. (2005a). The phenomenon of early internationalizing firms: what do we know after a decade (1993–2003) of scientific inquiry? International Business Review, 14(2), 147–166.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2004.04.006.Google Scholar
  67. Rialp, A., Rialp, J., Urbano, D., & Vaillant, Y. (2005b). The born-global phenomenon: a comparative case study research. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 3(2), 133–171  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-005-4202-7.Google Scholar
  68. Ribau, C. P., Moreira, A. C., & Raposo, M. (2016). SME internationalization research: mapping the state of the art. Canadian Journal of Administrative Sciences/Revue Canadienne des Sciences de l’Administration, in press.  https://doi.org/10.1002/cjas.1419.
  69. Salomon, R., & Shaver, J. M. (2005). Export and domestic sales: their interrelationship and determinants. Strategic Management Journal, 26(9), 855–871.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.481.Google Scholar
  70. Sapienza, H., Autio, E., George, G., & Zahra, S. (2006). A capabilities perspective on the effects of early internationalization on firm survival and growth. Academy of Management Review, 31(4), 914–933.  https://doi.org/10.5465/AMR.2006.22527465.Google Scholar
  71. Smolarski, J., & Kut, C. (2011). The impact of venture capital financing method on SME performance and internationalization. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 7(1), 39–55.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11365-009-0128-1.Google Scholar
  72. Suzuki, J., & Okamuro, H. (2017). Determinants of academic startups’ orientation toward international business expansion. Administrative Sciences, 7(1), 1–20.  https://doi.org/10.3390/admsci7010001.Google Scholar
  73. Taylor, M., & Jack, R. (2013). Understanding the pace, scale and pattern of firm internationalization: an extension of the ‘born global’ concept. International Small Business Journal, 31(6), 701–721.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0266242611431992.Google Scholar
  74. Vaillant, Y., Rialp, A., Rialp, J., & Urbano, D. (2006). Un estudio cualitativo y exploratorio de cuatro nuevas empresas exportadoras. Cuadernos de Economía y Dirección de la Empresa, 29, 107–132 ISSN:1138–5758.Google Scholar
  75. Vendrell-Herrero, F., Gomes, E., Mellahi, K., & Child, J. (2017). Building international business bridges in geographically isolated areas: the role of foreign market focus and outward looking competences in Latin American SMEs. Journal of World Business, 52(4), 489–502.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2016.08.007.Google Scholar
  76. Verbeek, M., & Nijman, T. (1992). Can cohort data be treated as genuine panel data? Empirical Economics, 17, 9–23.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01192471.Google Scholar
  77. Vernon, R. (1971). Sovereignty at bay: the multinational spread of US enterprises. New York: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  78. Wagner, J. (2015). A note on firm age and the margins of exports: first evidence from Germany. International Trade Journal, 29(2), 93–102.  https://doi.org/10.1080/08853908.2014.984796.Google Scholar
  79. Weerawardena, J., Mort, G. S., & Liesch, P. W. (2017). Capabilities development and deployment activities in born global B-to-B firms for early entry into international markets. Industrial Marketing Management, in press.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indmarman.2017.06.004.
  80. Westhead, P., Wright, M., & Ucbasaran, D. (2001). The internationalization of new and small firms: a resource-based view. Journal of Business Venturing, 16(4), 333–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0883-9026(99)00063-4.Google Scholar
  81. Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  82. Zahra, S., Ireland, R., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 925–950.  https://doi.org/10.2307/1556420.Google Scholar
  83. Zhang, Y., Li, H., Hitt, M. A., & Cui, G. (2007). R&D intensity and international joint venture performance in an emerging market: moderating effects of market focus and ownership structure. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(6), 944–960.  https://doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400301.Google Scholar
  84. Zhou, L., & Wu, A. (2014). Earliness of internationalization and performance outcomes: exploring the moderating effects of venture age and international commitment. Journal of World Business, 49(1), 132–142.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2013.10.001.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Strategy, Entrepreneurship & InnovationToulouse Business School (TBS)TOULOUSE Cedex 7France
  2. 2.Department of ManagementUniversitat Politècnica de Catalunya (Barcelona Tech)BarcelonaSpain
  3. 3.Department of Organization and ManagementPontificia Universidad Javeriana de CaliCaliColombia

Personalised recommendations