Advertisement

Drivers of growth in Tunisia: young firms vs incumbents

  • Hassan Arouri
  • Adel Ben Youssef
  • Francesco Quatraro
  • Marco VivarelliEmail author
Article
  • 46 Downloads

Abstract

The aim of this paper is to investigate the growth dynamics of young small firms (in contrast with larger and older incumbents) in a developing country context, using a unique and comprehensive dataset of non-agricultural Tunisian companies. Our results suggest that significant differences between young and mature firms can be found as far as the drivers of their growth are concerned. The key finding being that—while consistently with the extant literature Gibrat’s law is overall rejected—the negative impact of the initial size is significantly larger for young than mature firms. This result has interesting policy implications: since smaller young firms are particularly conducive to employment generation, they can be considered good candidate for targeted accompanying policies addressed to sustain their post-entry growth.

Keywords

Firm’s growth Young firms Gibrat’s law Tunisia 

JEL classification

O12 L26 

Notes

References

  1. Aly, H., Daoud, Y., Ragab, A., & Saad, A. (2017). Young gazelles and aging turtles: understanding the determinants of employment creation in the labor market in MENA countries, No. 1121, Cairo.Google Scholar
  2. Amoroso, S., Audretsch, D. B., & Link, A. N. (2018). Sources of knowledge used by entrepreneurial firms in the European high-tech sector. Eurasian Business Review, 8, 55–70.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Anyadike-Danes, M., & Hart, M. (2018). All grown up? The fate after 15 years of a quarter of a million UK firms born in 1998. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28, 45–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arrighetti, A., & Vivarelli, M. (1999). The role of innovation in the postentry performance of new small firms: evidence from Italy. Southern Economic Journal, 65, 927–939.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arvanitis, S., & Stucki, T. (2012). What determines the innovation capability of firm founders? Industrial and Corporate Change, 21, 1049–1084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Audretsch, D. B., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (1999). Start-up size and industrial dynamics: some evidence from Italian manufacturing. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 17, 965–983.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Audretsch, D. B., Seitz, N., & Rouch, K. M. (2018). Tolerance and innovation: the role of institutional and social trust. Eurasian Business Review, 8, 71–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ayadi, M., & Mattoussi, W. (2016a). From productivity to exporting or vice versa? Evidence from the Tunisian manufacturing sector. In Brookings Africa Growth Initiative, Working Paper N. 23. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  9. Ayadi, M., & Mattoussi, W. (2016b). Disentangling the pattern of geographic concentration in Tunisian manufacturing industries. In Brookings Africa Growth Initiative, Working Paper N. 15. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution.Google Scholar
  10. Baptista, R., & Mendonça, J. (2010). Proximity to knowledge sources and the location of knowledge-based start-ups. Annals of Regional Science, 45, 5–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bianchini, S., Krafft, J., Quatraro, F., & Ravix, J. L. (2017). Corporate governance and innovation: does firm age matter? Industrial and Corporate Change, 27(2), 349–370.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bigsten, A., & Gebreeyesus, M. (2007). The small, the young and the productive: determinants of manufacturing firm growth in Ethiopia. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 55, 813–840.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Birch, D. (1979). The job generation process. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  14. Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2003). Common properties and sectoral specificities in the dynamics of U.S. manufacturing companies. Review of Industrial Organization, 23, 217–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bottazzi, G., & Secchi, A. (2006). Explaining the distribution of firms growth rates. Rand Journal of Economics., 37, 234–263.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bottazzi, G., Cefis, E., Dosi, G., & Secchi, A. (2007). Invariances and diversities in the patterns of industrial evolution: some evidence from Italian manufacturing industries. Small Business Economics, 29, 137–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Breschi, S., Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (2000). Technological regimes and Schumpeterian patterns of innovation. Economic Journal, 110, 288–410.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Calvo, J. L. (2006). Testing Gibrat’s law for small, young and innovating firms. Small Business Economics, 26, 117–123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Castaldi, C., & Dosi, G. (2009). The patterns of output growth of firms and countries: scale invariances and scale specificities. Empirical Economics, 37, 475–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2005). A matter of life and death: innovation and firm survival. Industrial and Corporate Change, 14, 1167–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cefis, E., & Marsili, O. (2006). Survivor: the role of innovation in firm’s survival. Research Policy, 35, 626–641.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coad, A. (2009). The growth of firms: a survey of theories and empirical evidence. Cheltenham, UK and Northampton, MA, USA: Edward Elgar.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Coad, A. (2018). Firm age: a survey. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28, 13–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Coad, A., & Hoelzl, W. (2011). Firm growth: empirical analysis. In M. Dietrich & J. Krafft (Eds.), Handbook on the economics and theory of the firm. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.Google Scholar
  25. Coad, A., Segarra, A., & Teurel, M. (2013). Like milk or wine: does firm performance improve with age? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 24, 173–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Coad, A., Holm, J. R., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2018). Firm age and performance. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 28, 1–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Quatraro, F. (2013). High-growth firms and technological knowledge: do gazelles follow exploration or exploitation strategies? Industrial and Corporate Change, 23, 261–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Colombelli, A., Krafft, J., & Vivarelli, M. (2016). To be born is not enough: the key role of innovative start-ups. Small Business Economics, 47, 277–291.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Colombo, M. G., & Grilli, L. (2010). On growth drivers of high-tech start-ups: exploring the role of founders’ human capital and venture capital. Journal of Business Venturing, 25, 610–626.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Dahl, M. S., & Sorenson, O. (2012). Home sweet home: entrepreneurs’ location choices and the performance of their ventures. Management Science, 58, 1059–1071.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Das, S. (1995). Size, age and firm growth in an infant industry: the computer hardware industry in India. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 13, 111–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Daunfeldt, S., & Elert, N. (2013). When is Gibrat’s law a law? Small Business Economics, 41, 133–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Davis, S., Haltiwanger, J., & Schuh, S. (1996). Job creation and destruction. Cambridge, USA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  34. Dunne, P., & Hughes, A. (1994). Age, size, growth and survival: UK companies in the 1980s. Journal of Industrial Economics, 42, 115–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dunning, J. H., & Fontanier, F. (2007). Multinational enterprises and the new development paradigm: consequences for host country development. Multinational Business Review, 15(1), 25–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Edwards, L. (2004). A firm level analysis of trade, technology and employment in South Africa. Journal of International Development, 16, 45–61.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Emami, A., & Dimov, D. (2017). Degree of innovation and the entrepreneurs’ intention to create value: a comparative study of experienced and novice entrepreneurs. Eurasian Business Review, 7, 161–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Evans, D. S. (1987). The relationship between firm growth, size, and age: estimates for 100 manufacturing industries. Journal of Industrial Economics, 35, 567–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Fackler, D., Schnabel, C., & Wagner, J. (2013). Establishment exits in Germany: the role of size and age. Small Business Economics, 41, 683–700.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Fajnzylber, P., & Fernandes, A. (2009). International economic activities and skilled demand: evidence from Brazil and China. Applied Economics, 41, 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Falk, M., & Hagsten, E. (2018). Employment impacts of market novelty sales: evidence for nine European countries. Eurasian Business Review, 8, 119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Foray, D. (2018). Smart specialization strategies as a case of mission-oriented policy—a case study on the emergence of new policy practices. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27, 817–832.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Ganotakis, P. (2012). Founders’ human capital and the performance of UK new technology based firms. Small Business Economics, 39, 495–515.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. García-Quevedo, J., Pellegrino, G., & Vivarelli, M. (2014). R&D drivers and age: are young firms different? Research Policy, 43, 1544–1556.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Geroski, P. A., Mata, J., & Portugal, P. (2010). Founding conditions and the survival of new firms. Strategic Management Journal, 31, 510–529.Google Scholar
  46. Gibrat, R. (1931). Les Inegalites Economiques. Paris: Librairie du Recueil Sirey.Google Scholar
  47. Goedhuys, M., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2000). Entrepreneurship and growth of entrepreneurial firms in Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Development Studies, 36, 123–145.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Goedhuys, M., & Sleuwaegen, L. (2010). High-growth entrepreneurial firms in Africa: a quantile regression approach. Small Business Economics, 34, 31–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Haile, G., Srour, I., & Vivarelli, M. (2017). Imported technology and manufacturing employment in Ethiopia. Eurasian Business Review, 7, 1–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hall, B. (1987). The relationship between firm size and firm growth in the US manufacturing sector. Journal of Industrial Economics, 3, 583–606.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Haltiwanger, J., Jarmin, R. S., & Miranda, J. (2013). Who creates jobs? Small versus large versus young. Review of Economics and Statistics, 95, 347–361.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hart, P. E., & Oulton, N. (1996). Growth and size of firms. Economic Journal, 106, 1242–1252.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Hölzl, W. (2009). Is the R&D behaviour of fast-growing SMEs different? Evidence from CIS III data for 16 countries. Small Business Economics, 33, 59–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. INS (2012). Répertoire National des Entreprises (RNE): http://www.ins.tn/fr/methode-1
  55. Lotti, F., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2003). Does Gibrat’s law hold among young, small firms? Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, 213–235.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Lotti, F., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2006). Gibrat’s law in a medium-technology industry: empirical evidence for Italy. In E. Santarelli (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, growth and innovation: the dynamics of firms and industries (pp. 149–164). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Lotti, F., Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2009). Defending Gibrat’s law as a long-run regularity. Small Business Economics, 32, 31–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Lucas, R. E., Jr. (1978). On the size distribution of business firms. Bell Journal of Economics, 9, 508–523.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Malerba, F., & Orsenigo, L. (1996). Schumpeterian patterns of innovation are technology-specific. Research Policy, 25, 451–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Mazzucato, M. (2018). Mission-oriented innovation policies: challenges and opportunities. Industrial and Corporate Change, 27, 803–815.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. McPherson, M. A. (1996). Growth of micro and small enterprises in Southern Africa. Journal of Development Economics, 48, 253–277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Michelacci, C., & Silva, O. (2007). Why so many local entrepreneurs? Review of Economics and Statistics, 89, 615–633.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Nasr, S., & Pearce, D. (2012). SMEs for job creation in the Arab world: SME access to financial services. Washington, DC: World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Neumark, D., Wall, B., & Zhang, J. (2011). Do small businesses create more jobs? New evidence for the United States from the National Establishment Time Series. Review of . Economics and Statistics, 93, 16–29.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Nichter, S., & Goldmark, L. (2009). Small firm growth in developing countries. World Development, 37, 1453–1464.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Ortega-Argilés, R., Vivarelli, M., & Voigt, P. (2009). R&D in SMEs: a paradox? Small Business Economics, 33, 3–11.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Pellegrino, G., Piva, M., & Vivarelli, M. (2012). Young firms and innovation: a microeconometric analysis. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 23, 329–340.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Piva, M. (2003). The impact of technology transfer on employment and income distribution in developing countries: a survey of theoretical models and empirical studies. In International Policy Group, Working Paper No. 15. Geneva: Policy Integration Department of the ILO.Google Scholar
  69. Quatraro, F., & Vivarelli, M. (2015). Drivers of entrepreneurship and post-entry performance of newborn firms in developing countries. World Bank Research Observer, 30, 277–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Santarelli, E., & Vivarelli, M. (2007). Entrepreneurship and the process of firms’ entry, survival and growth. Industrial and Corporate Change, 16, 455–488.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Santarelli, E., Klomp, L., & Thurik, A. R. (2006). Gibrat’s law: an overview of the empirical literature. In E. Santarelli (Ed.), Entrepreneurship, growth, and innovation: the dynamics of firms and industries (pp. 41–73). New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Schneider, C., & Veugelers, R. (2010). On young highly innovative companies: why they matter and how (not) to policy support them. Industrial and Corporate Change, 19, 969–1007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Schumpeter, J. A. (1934). The theory of economic development. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  74. Schumpeter, J. A. (1942). Capitalism, socialism and democracy. New York: Harper.Google Scholar
  75. Sleuwaegen, L., & Goedhuys, M. (2002). Growth of firms in developing countries, evidence from Côte d’Ivoire. Journal of Development Economics, 68, 117–135.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Sutton, J. (1997). Gibrat’s legacy. Journal of Economic Literature, 35, 40–59.Google Scholar
  77. Tran, H. T., & Santarelli, E. (2017). Spatial heterogeneity, industry heterogeneity, and entrepreneurship. Annals of Regional Science, 59, 69–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. UNIDO (2001). ‘Support to SMEs in the Arab Region: The Case of Tunisia’. Project coordinated by Stefanu Giovannelli, UNIDO/UNDP edition, 2001Google Scholar
  79. Viner, J. (1932). Cost curves and supply curves. Zeitschrift für Nationalöconomie, 3, 23–46.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Vivarelli, M. (2004). Are all the potential entrepreneurs so good? Small Business Economics, 23, 41–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Vivarelli, M. (2013). Is entrepreneurship necessarily good? Microeconomic evidence from developed and developing countries. Industrial and Corporate Change, 22, 1453–1495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Winter, S. G. (1984). Schumpeterian competition in alternative technological regimes. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 5, 287–320.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.National Institute of StatisticsTunisTunisia
  2. 2.GREDEG-CNRSUniversity of Nice Sophia-AntipolisNiceFrance
  3. 3.Department of Economics and Statistics Cognetti de MartiisUniversity of TorinoTurinItaly
  4. 4.Universita’ Cattolica del Sacro CuoreMilanItaly
  5. 5.UNU-MERITMaastrichtThe Netherlands
  6. 6.IZABonnGermany

Personalised recommendations