Advertisement

Small Business Economics

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 437–454 | Cite as

Inducing heterogeneity in local entrepreneurial ecosystems: the role of MNEs

  • Nachiket BhaweEmail author
  • Shaker A. Zahra
Article
  • 354 Downloads

Abstract

The role of entrepreneurial ecosystems in fostering economic growth has become a key priority around the globe. To develop such ecosystems, numerous countries have provided significant inducements to multinational enterprises (MNEs) to attract them to locate their operations within their borders. Despite the rise in MNEs’ entry, evidence on their efficacy in invigorating local entrepreneurial systems has been mixed. We propose that this may arise from a lack of focus on local ecosystems’ absorptive capacity, which is essential to spawning different types of entrepreneurial ventures that combine both replicative (imitative) and truly innovative local firms. This occurs as local entrepreneurs in proceed to capture, assimilate, and exploit MNEs’ different knowledge spillovers. Further, we argue that the dynamic interplay between knowledge flows through spillovers from MNEs and absorptive capacity is likely to promote the emergence, evolution, and sustainability of different types of new local firms—in some cases creating conformity and lock-ins and in others enhancing the heterogeneity of entrepreneurial activities. Over time, these developments encourage co-specialization between local new ventures and MNEs. Our analyses highlight key sources of heterogeneity in types of new firms that might emerge in a local ecosystem and how they might develop over time as a result of MNEs’ entry, creating wealth.

Keywords

Entrepreneurial ecosystems Heterogeneity in local entrepreneurship MNEs Absorptive capacity; ecosystem governance 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We acknowledge with appreciation the supportive comments of the reviewers and special issue guest editors.

References

  1. Acs, Z. J., Braunerhjelm, P., Audretsch, D. B., & Carlsson, B. (2008). The knowledge spillover theory of entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 32(1), 15–30.Google Scholar
  2. Acs, Z. J., Autio, E., & Szerb, L. (2014). National systems of entrepreneurship: measurement issues and policy implications. Research Policy, 43(1), 476–494.Google Scholar
  3. Adler, N., & Hashai, N. (2007). Knowledge flows and the modelling of the multinational enterprise. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(4), 639–657.Google Scholar
  4. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2010). Value creation in innovation ecosystems: how the structure of technological interdependence affects firm performance in new technology generations. Strategic Management Journal, 31(3), 306–333.Google Scholar
  5. Adner, R., & Kapoor, R. (2015). Innovation ecosystems and the pace of substitution: re-examining technology S-curves. Strategic Management Journal, 37(4), 625–648.Google Scholar
  6. Agarwal, R., Audretsch, D., & Sarkar, M. (2010). Knowledge spillovers and strategic entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 271–283.Google Scholar
  7. Almeida, P., & Phene, A. (2004). Subsidiaries and knowledge creation: the influence of the MNC and host country on innovation. Strategic Management Journal, 25(8–9), 847–864.Google Scholar
  8. Almeida, P., Song, J., & Grant, R. M. (2002). Are firms superior to alliances and markets? An empirical test of cross-border knowledge building. Organization Science, 13(2), 147–161.Google Scholar
  9. Alvarez, S. A., & Busenitz, L. W. (2001). The entrepreneurship of resource-based theory. Journal of Management, 27(6), 755–775.Google Scholar
  10. Audretsch, D. B., & Thurik, A. R. (2004). A model of the entrepreneurial economy. International Journal of Entrepreneurship Education, 2(2), 143–166.Google Scholar
  11. Audretsch, D. B., & Keilbach, M. (2008). Resolving the knowledge paradox: knowledge-spillover entrepreneurship and economic growth. Research Policy, 37(10), 1697–1705.Google Scholar
  12. Audretsch, D. B., Heger, D., & Veith, T. (2014). Infrastructure and entrepreneurship. Small Business Economics, 44(2), 219–230.Google Scholar
  13. Audretsch, D., & Link, Al. (2016). Embracing an entrepreneurial ecosystem: an analysis of the governance of research joint ventures. Small Business Economics Special Issue Development Conference: The Governance of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Catania, Italy. September, 29–30.Google Scholar
  14. Autio, E., Kenney, M., Mustar, P., Siegel, D., & Wright, M. (2014). Entrepreneurial innovation: the importance of context. Research Policy, 43(7), 1097–1108.Google Scholar
  15. Autio, E., & Thomas, L. D. W. (2014). Innovation ecosystems: implications for innovation management. In M. Dodgson, D. M. Gann, & N. Phillips (Eds.), Oxford handbook of innovation management (pp. 204–228). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Barnett, W. P., & Hansen, M. T. (1996). The red queen in organizational evolution. Strategic Management Journal, 17(S1), 139–157.Google Scholar
  17. Baumol, W. J. (2010). The microtheory of innovative entrepreneurship. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Bhawe, N. M., Rawhouser, H., & Pollack, J. (2016). Horse and cart: the role of order in new ventures. Journal of Business Venturing Insights, 6, 7–13.Google Scholar
  19. Bhidé, A. (2000). The origin and evolution of new businesses. New York: Oxford University Press US.Google Scholar
  20. Birkinshaw, J. M. (2004). Strategic management. New York: Edward Elgar Pub.Google Scholar
  21. Blavy, R. (2006). Public debt and productivity: the difficult quest for growth in Jamaica. International Monetary Fund.Google Scholar
  22. Blomström, M., & Kokko, A. (1998). Multinational corporations and spillovers. Journal of Economic Surveys, 12(3), 247–277.Google Scholar
  23. den Bosch, F. A. J. V., Volberda, H. W., & de Boer, M. (1999). Co-evolution of firm absorptive capacity and knowledge environment: organizational forms and combinative capabilities. Organization Science, 10(5), 551–568.Google Scholar
  24. Boschma, R. A., & Wenting, R. (2007). The spatial evolution of the British automobile industry: does location matter? Industrial and Corporate Change, 16(2), 213–238.Google Scholar
  25. Bruton, G. D., Ahlstrom, D., & Obloj, K. (2008). Entrepreneurship in emerging economies: where are we today and where should the research go in the future. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32(1), 1–14.Google Scholar
  26. Cantwell, J., Dunning, J., & Lundan, S. (2010). An evolutionary approach to understanding international business activity: the co-evolution of MNEs and the institutional environment. Journal of International Business Studies, 41, 561–586.Google Scholar
  27. Carree, M. A., & Thurik, A. R. (2010). The impact of entrepreneurship on economic growth. In Z. J. Acs & D. B. Audretsch (Eds.), Handbook of entrepreneurship research (pp. 557–594). New York: Springer.Google Scholar
  28. Christensen, C. M. (1997). The Innovator’s dilemma: when new technologies cause great firms to fail. Boston: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  29. Clark, K. B. (1989). Project scope and project performance: the effect of parts strategy and supplier involvement on product development. Management Science, 35(10), 1247–1263.Google Scholar
  30. Cohen, W. M., & Levinthal, D. A. (1990). Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1), 128–152.Google Scholar
  31. Colins, N. (2016). What makes an entrepreneurial ecosystem? The Family Papers.Google Scholar
  32. Corallo, A., Errico, F., Latino, M, and Menegoli, M. (2016). Assuring the sustainability of entrepreneurial ecosystem through governance: a proposed framework. Small Business Economics Special Issue Development Conference: The Governance of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Catania, Italy. September, 29–30.Google Scholar
  33. Cumming, D. Werth, J., & Zhang, Y. (2016). Governance in entrepreneurial ecosystems: Venture capitalists vs. technology parks. Small Business Economics Special Issue Development Conference: The Governance of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Catania, Italy. September, 29–30.Google Scholar
  34. DeGhetto, K., Sutton, A., Holcomb, T. R., & Holmes, R. M. (2015). It’s who you know and what you do: how SMEs from developing economies capitalize on founder ties to create bargaining power with foreign multinational alliance partners. In T. K. Das (Ed.), Research in strategic alliances (pp. 121–155). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  35. DeGhetto, K.,Sutton, A., Holcomb, T. R., & Holmes, R. M. (2016) It's who you know and what you do: how SMEs from emerging economies capitalize on founder ties to create bargaining power with foreign multinational alliance partners. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=2718128 or  http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2718128.
  36. Dimelis, S. P. (2005). Spillovers from foreign direct investment and firm growth: technological, financial and market structure effects. International Journal of the Economics of Business, 12(1), 85.Google Scholar
  37. Drexler, M., Eltogby, M., Foster, G., Shimizu, C., Ciesinsik, S., Davila, A., Hassan, S. Z., Jia, N., Lee, D., Plunkett, S., Pinelli, M., Cunningham, J., Hiscock-Croft, R., McLenithan, M., Rottenberg, L., & Morris, R. (2014). Entrepreneurial ecosystems around the globe and early-stage company growth dynamics. In Industry agenda. Geneva: World Economic Forum.Google Scholar
  38. Dunning, J. H., & Lundan, S. M. (2008). Multinational enterprises and the global economy. Cambridge, MA: Edward Elgar Publishing.Google Scholar
  39. Dyer, J. H., & Singh, H. (1998). The relational view: cooperative strategy and sources of inter-organizational competitive advantage. The Academy of Management Review, 23(4), 660–679.Google Scholar
  40. Eggertsson, T. (2005). Imperfect institutions: possibilities and limits of reform. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press.Google Scholar
  41. Finegold, D. (1999). Creating self-sustaining, high-skill ecosystems. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 15(1), 60–81.Google Scholar
  42. Frost, T. S. (2001). The geographic sources of foreign subsidiaries’ innovations. Strategic Management Journal, 22(2), 101–123.Google Scholar
  43. Gardner Jr., E. I., Montjoy, R. S., & Watson, D. J. (2001). Moving into global competition: a case study of Alabama’s recruitment of Mercedes-Benz. Review of Policy Research, 18(3), 80–93.Google Scholar
  44. Girma, S., & Wakelin, K. (2000). Are there regional spillovers from FDI in the UK? Nottingham: University Centre for Research on Globalisation and Labour Markets Press.Google Scholar
  45. Girma, S. (2005). Absorptive capacity and productivity spillovers from FDI: a threshold regression analysis. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 67(3), 281–306.Google Scholar
  46. Globerman, S., & Shapiro, D. M. (1999). The impact of government policies on foreign direct investment: the Canadian experience. Journal of International Business Studies, 30(3), 513–532.Google Scholar
  47. Görg, H., & Greenaway, D. (2004). Much ado about nothing? Do domestic firms really benefit from foreign direct investment? The World Bank Research Observer, 19(2), 171–197.Google Scholar
  48. Grant, R. M. (1996). Prospering in dynamically-competitive environments: organizational capability as knowledge integration. Organization Science, 7(4), 375–387.Google Scholar
  49. Gupta, A. K., & Govindarajan, V. (1991). Knowledge flows and the structure of control within multinational corporations. The Academy of Management Review, 16(4), 768–792.Google Scholar
  50. Haskel, J. E., Pereira, S. C., & Slaughter, M. J. (2007). Does inward foreign direct investment boost the productivity of domestic firms? The Review of Economics and Statistics, 89(3), 482–496.Google Scholar
  51. Helfat, C. E. (1997). Know-how and asset complementarity and dynamic capability accumulation: the case of R&D. Strategic Management Journal, 18(5), 339–360.Google Scholar
  52. Hennart, J. F. (1991). The transaction costs theory of joint ventures: an empirical study of Japanese subsidiaries in the United States. Management Science, 37(4), 483–497.Google Scholar
  53. Hill, T. L., & Mudambi, R. (2010) Far from Silicon Valley: how emerging economies are re-shaping our understanding of global entrepreneurship. Journal of International Management, 16(4), 321–327.Google Scholar
  54. Holmes, R. M., Zahra, S., Hoskisson, R., DeGhetto, K., & Sutton, T. (2016). Two way streets: the role of institutions and technology policy for firms’ corporate entrepreneurship and political strategies. Academy of Management Perspectives, 30(3), 247–272.Google Scholar
  55. Hong, J. F. L., & Snell, R. S. (2013). Developing new capabilities across a supplier network through boundary crossing: a case study of a China-based MNC subsidiary and its local suppliers. Organization Studies, 34(3), 377–406.Google Scholar
  56. Hoskisson, R., Wright, M., Filatotchev, I., & Peng, M. (2013). Emerging multinationals from mid-range economies: the influence of institutions and factor markets. Journal of Management Studies, 50(7), 1295–1321.Google Scholar
  57. Isenberg, D. (2014). What an entrepreneurship ecosystem actually is. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved on May, 12 2014.Google Scholar
  58. Isenberg, D. (2011). Introducing the entrepreneurship ecosystem: four defining characteristics. Forbes. Retrieved on May, 25 2011.Google Scholar
  59. Kenney, M., & Florida, R. (1994). The organization and geography of Japanese R&D: Results from a survey of Japanese electronics and biotechnology firms. Research Policy, 23(3), 305–322 May, 30 2011.Google Scholar
  60. Khanna, T., Palepu, K. G., & Sinha, J. (2005). Strategies that fit emerging markets. Harvard Business Review, 83(6), 63–76.Google Scholar
  61. Kim, H., Kim, H., & Hoskisson, R. E. (2010). Does market-oriented institutional change in an emerging economy make business-group-affiliated multinationals perform better? An institution-based view. Journal of International Business Studies, 41(7), 1141–1160.Google Scholar
  62. Kim, L. (1997). Imitation to innovation: The dynamics of Korea’s technological learning. Cambridge: Harvard Business Press.Google Scholar
  63. Kiss, A. N., Danis, W. M., & Cavusgil, S. T. (2012). International entrepreneurship research in emerging economies: a critical review and research agenda. Journal of Business Venturing, 27(2), 266–290.Google Scholar
  64. Lerner, J. (2009). Boulevard of broken dreams: why public efforts to boost entrepreneurship and venture capital have failed and what to do about it. Princeton: University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Liu, X., Wang, C., & Wei, Y. (2009). Do local manufacturing firms benefit from transactional linkages with multinational enterprises in China? Journal of International Business Studies, 40(7), 1113–1130.Google Scholar
  66. Lucarelli, C., Micozzi, A and Marinell, N, 2016. Dynamic interactions of entrepreneurial domains and outcomes: a pattern towards the governance of ecosystems. Small Business Economics Special Issue Development Conference: The Governance of Entrepreneurial Ecosystems. Catania, Italy. September, 29–30.Google Scholar
  67. Luo, Y., Sun, J., & Wang, S. L. (2011). Emerging economy copycats: capability, environment, & strategy. The Academy of Management Perspectives, 25(2), 37–56.Google Scholar
  68. Martinkenaite, L., & Breunig, K. J. (2016). The emergence of absorptive capacity through micro-macro level interactions. Journal of Business Research, 69(2), 700–708.Google Scholar
  69. McKeon, H., Johnston, K., & Henry, C. (2004). Multinational companies as a source of entrepreneurial learning: examples from the IT sector in Ireland. Education and Training, 46(8/9), 433–443.Google Scholar
  70. Marquis, C., & Raynard, M. (2015). Institutional strategies in emerging markets. Academy of Management Annals, 9, 291–335.Google Scholar
  71. Meyer, K. E., Estrin, S., Bhaumik, S. K., & Peng, M. W. (2009). Institutions, resources, & entry strategies in emerging economies. Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 61–80.Google Scholar
  72. Meyers, M. (2015). Making (and measuring) an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Economic Development Journal, 14(3), 28–36.Google Scholar
  73. National Science Foundation. (2015). What is an innovation ecosystem? National Science Foundation White Paper.Google Scholar
  74. Naudé, W. (2009). Entrepreneurship, developing countries, & development economics: new approaches and insights. Small Business Economics, 34(1), 1–12.Google Scholar
  75. North, D. C. (1990). A transaction cost theory of politics. Journal of Theoretical Politics, 2(4), 355–367.Google Scholar
  76. O’Connor, A. (2013). A conceptual framework for entrepreneurship education policy: meeting government and economic purposes. Journal of Business Venturing, 28(4), 546–563.Google Scholar
  77. Parker, S. C. (2010). A predator–prey model of knowledge spillovers and entrepreneurship. Strategic Entrepreneurship Journal, 4(4), 307–322.Google Scholar
  78. Penner-Hahn, J., & Shaver, J. M. (2005) Does international research and development increase patent output? An analysis of Japanese pharmaceutical firms. Strategic Management Journal, 26(2), 121–140.Google Scholar
  79. Peterson, T.W. (2016). Creating an innovation ecosystem. National Science Foundation Working Paper.Google Scholar
  80. Praag, C. M., & Versloot, P. H. (2007). What is the value of entrepreneurship? A review of recent research. Small Business Economics, 29(4), 351–382.Google Scholar
  81. Ricart, J. E., Enright, M. J., Ghemawat, P., Hart, S. L., & Khanna, T. (2004). New frontiers in international strategy. Journal of International Business Studies, 35(3), 175–200.Google Scholar
  82. Roberts, N. (2015). Absorptive capacity, organizational antecedents, & environmental dynamism. Journal of Business Research, 68(11), 2426–2433.Google Scholar
  83. Saxenian, A. (1994). Regional advantage: culture and competition in Silicon Valley and route, 128. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  84. Shane, S. (2000). Prior knowledge and the discovery of entrepreneurial opportunities. Organization Science, 11(4), 448–469.Google Scholar
  85. Singh, J. (2007). Asymmetry of knowledge spillovers between MNCs and host country firms. Journal of International Business Studies, 38(5), 764–786.Google Scholar
  86. Spencer, J. W. (2008). The impact of multinational enterprise strategy on indigenous enterprises: horizontal spillovers and crowding out in developing countries. The Academy of Management Review, 33(2), 341–361.Google Scholar
  87. Spencer, J. W., Murtha, T. P., & Lenway, S. A. (2005). How governments matter to new industry creation. The Academy of Management Review, 30(2), 321–337.Google Scholar
  88. Stangler, D., & Bell-Masterson, J. (2015). Measuring an entrepreneurial ecosystem. Kauffman Foundation Research Series, March.Google Scholar
  89. Sydow, J., Schreyögg, G., & Koch, J. (2009). Organizational path dependence: opening the black box. The Academy of Management Review, 34(4), 689–709.Google Scholar
  90. Teece, D. J. (2007). Explicating dynamic capabilities: the nature and microfoundations of (sustainable) enterprise performance. Strategic Management Journal, 28(13), 1319–1350.Google Scholar
  91. Thomas, L. D. W., & Autio, E. (2014). The fifth facet: the ecosystem as organizational field, DRUID, 2014. Copenhagen, Denmark.Google Scholar
  92. Terjesesn, S., Hessels, J., & Li, D. (2016). Comparative international entrepreneurship. Journal of Management, 42(1), 299–344.Google Scholar
  93. Todorova, G., & Durisin, B. (2007). Absorptive capacity: valuing a reconceptualization. The Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 774–786.Google Scholar
  94. Welter, F. (2011). Contextualizing entrepreneurship—conceptual challenges and ways forward. Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 35(1), 165–184.Google Scholar
  95. Wu, J., Wang, C., Hong, J., Piperopoulos, P., & Zhuo, S. (2016). Internationalization and innovation performance of emerging market enterprises: the role of host-country institutional development. Journal of World Business, 51(2), 251–263.Google Scholar
  96. Yayavaram, S., & Ahuja, G. (2008). Decomposability in knowledge structures and its impact on the usefulness of inventions and knowledge-base malleability. Administrative Science Quarterly, 53(2), 333–362.Google Scholar
  97. Zahra, S. A., & George, G. (2002). Absorptive capacity: a review, re-conceptualization, & extension. The Academy of Management Review, 27(2), 185–203.Google Scholar
  98. Zahra, S. A., Ireland, R. D., & Hitt, M. A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: international diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, & performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 925–950.Google Scholar
  99. Zahra, S. A., & Nambisan, S. (2011). Entrepreneurship in global innovation ecosystems. AMS Review, 1(1), 4–17.Google Scholar
  100. Zahra, S. A., & Wright, M. (2011). Entrepreneurship’s net act. Academy of Management Perspectives, 25, 67–83.Google Scholar
  101. Zander, U., & Kogut, B. (1995). Knowledge and the speed of the transfer and imitation of organizational capabilities: an empirical test. Organization Science, 6(1), 76–92.Google Scholar
  102. Zhu, K., Kraemer, K. L., & Xu, S. (2006). The process of innovation assimilation by firms in different countries: a technology diffusion perspective on e-business. Management Science, 52(10), 1557–1576.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Management Innovation and Entrepreneurship, Poole College of ManagementNorth Carolina State UniversityRaleighUSA
  2. 2.Strategic Management and Entrepreneurship Department, Carlson School of Management [Suite, 3-430]University of MinnesotaMinneapolisUSA

Personalised recommendations