Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 48, Issue 5, pp 733–751 | Cite as

Right-wing populism as gendered performance: Janus-faced masculinity in the leadership of Vladimir Putin and Recep T. Erdogan

  • Betul EksiEmail author
  • Elizabeth A. Wood
Article
  • 176 Downloads

Abstract

Gender and populism have been extensively theorized separately, but there has not been sufficient study of the way that gender undergirds populism, strengthening its diverse manifestations. Focusing on the cases of Vladimir Putin and Recep T. Erdoğan, we argue that their political performance allows them to project a right-wing populism that hides much of its political program in an ostentatious masculine posturing that has the virtue of being relatively malleable. This political masculinity allows them to position themselves at different points in time as outsiders yet insiders, bad boys yet good fathers. In their early years Putin and Erdogan established themselves as transgressive outsiders who developed a profile of power by building up their masculine, working-class biographies. As their power became consolidated, they turned to a more paternal role, fostering a conservative gender order while attacking the masculinity of their opponents and casting them as outsiders. In this way over the years they have combined political performances that have both breached the conventional gender norms and also upheld and reinforced them. The result is a Janus-faced masculinity of outsiders-yet-insiders, bad-boys-yet-good-fathers, which establishes that the leader is both the same as other men and also different from them, standing above the citizenry, mediating and fostering a conservative political order. Understanding this gender performance also helps to explain the paradox of “electoral authoritarianism” (Levitsky and Way Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65, 2002; Schedler 2006), demonstrating how performed political masculinity can support and connect the cult of a popularly elected leader with conservative social and political gender norms.

Keywords

Electoral authoritarianism Gender ideology Gendered public performance Nativism Political leadership Political masculinity 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors would like to thank Kathrin Zippel, Berna Turam, Fatma Müge Göçek, Rochelle Ruthchild, and the Theory and Society Editors and reviewers for their helpful comments and suggestions.

References

  1. Abi-Hassan, S. (2017). Populism and gender. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. O. Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 426–444). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Alexander, J. C. (2010). The performance of politics: Obama's victory and the democratic struggle for power. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Althusser, L. (1968, 1998). Ideology and ideological state apparatuses. In Rivkin, J., & Ryan, M. (Eds.). (1998). Literary theory: an anthology (pp. 693–697). Hoboken: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  4. Aydintasbas, A. (2009). Erdogan’s Davos outburst is nothing new. Forbes. January 30. https://www.forbes.com/2009/01/30/erdogan-turkey-davos-opinions-contributors_0130_asli_aydintasbas.html#18ebc2dc5451 Accessed 20 May 2015
  5. Baev, P. (2015). Russia reinvents itself as a rogue state in the ungovernable multi-polar world. In M. Lipman & N. Petrov (Eds.), The state of Russia: What comes next? (pp. 69–85). London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bennhold, K. (2009). Leaders of Turkey and Israel clash at Davos panel. The New York Times, January, 29. https://www.nytimes.com/2009/01/30/world/europe/30clash.html, Accessed 16 September 2018.
  7. Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46(5), 357–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Çağaptay, S. (2018). How president Erdogan is turning Turkey into Putin’s Russia. Time, April 24. http://time.com/5252151/erdogan-turning-turkey-into-russia/ Accessed 10 June 2018
  9. Cannady, S., & Kubicek, P. (2014). Nationalism and legitimation for authoritarianism: A comparison of Nicholas I and Vladimir Putin. Journal of Eurasian Studies, 5(1), 1–9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Canovan, M. (1999). Trust the people!’: Populism and the two faces of democracy. Political Studies, 47, 2–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Cassiday, J. A., & Johnson, E. D. (2010). Putin, putiniana and the question of a post-soviet cult of personality. Slavonic and East European Review, 88(4), 681–707.Google Scholar
  12. Çetin, B. E. (2015). The paramilitary hero on Turkish television: A case study on the valley of the wolves. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Chazan, G. (1999). Rudest Ever PM Wins over Russia. Scotland on Sunday (Edinburgh, Scotland), November 28. http://www.highbeam.com/doc/1P2-18591499.html. Accessed 15 September 2015
  14. Claus, R., & Virchow, F. (2017). The far right's ideological constructions of 'deviant' male sexualities. In M. Köttig, R. Bitzan, A. Petö (Eds.), Gender and far right politics in Europe (pp.305–319). Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  15. Conniff, M. L. (1999). Populism in Latin America. University of Alabama Press.Google Scholar
  16. Edelman, M. (1988). Constructing the political spectacle. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  17. Edenborg, E. (2019). Russia’s spectacle of “traditional values”: Rethinking the politics of visibility. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 1–21.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14616742.2018.1560227.
  18. Eichler, M. (2006). Russia's post-communist transformation: A gendered analysis of the chechen wars. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 8(4), 486–511.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Eichler, M. (2011). Militarizing men: Gender, conscription, and war in post-soviet Russia. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Eksi, B. (2016). Masculinities of the state: The prime minister and the police in Turkey. Unpublished PhD Dissertation, Northeastern University.Google Scholar
  21. Erdogan, R.T. (2013a) Basbakan: Bu Tayyip Erdogan Degismez. Hurriyet Daily News. June 11. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/basbakan-bu-tayyip-erdogan-degismez-23479966 Accessed 15 June 2018
  22. Erdogan, R.T. (2013b). Speech in the parliament. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RH-oOU5wgEw Accessed 15 June 2018
  23. Erdoğan, R.T. (2014) AK Parti’nin cumhurbaskani adayi Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, Hurriyet Daily News. July 1. http://www.hurriyet.com.tr/gundem/ak-partinin-cumhurbaskani-adayi-recep-tayyip-erdogan-26719347 Accessed 7 July 2018
  24. Erdogan, R.T. (2016). Turkey’s Erdogan says childless women are ‘incomplete.’ Al Jazeera. June 6. https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2016/06/turkey-erdogan-childless-women-incomplete-160606042442710.html
  25. Erdogan, R.T. (2017) Cumhurbaskani Erdogan: Tanki yumrukla durduran baska bir millet yok. July 16. https://www.ntv.com.tr/turkiye/cumhurbaskani-erdogantanki-yumrukla-durduran-baska-bir-millet-yok,f5wEvr8XrUm4qbMgvp8Mzw Accessed 15 June 2018
  26. Fernandes, S. (2007). Barrio women and popular politics in Chavez’s Venezuela. Latin American Politics and Society, 49(3), 97–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Fish, M. S. (2005). Democracy derailed in Russia: The failure of open politics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Foxall, A. (2013). Photographing Vladimir Putin: Masculinity, nationalism and visuality in Russian political culture. Geopolitics, 18(1), 132–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goscilo, H. (2011). The ultimate celebrity: VVP as VIP objet d’Art. In H. Goscilo & V. Strukov (Eds.), Celebrity and glamour in contemporary Russia: Shocking chic (pp. 29–55). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  30. Goscilo, H. (2012). Putin’s performance of masculinity: The action hero and macho sex-object. In H. Goscilo (Ed.), Putin as celebrity and cultural icon (pp. 180–207). New York: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Hale, H. E. (2004). The origins of united Russia and the Putin presidency: The role of contingency in party-system development. Demokratizatsiya, 12(2), 169–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Halpin, T. (2012). Putin demands the vote of patriots to protect country from next Napoleon. The Times (London), February 24.Google Scholar
  33. Harteveld, E., & Ivarsflaten, E. (2018). Why women avoid the radical right: Internalized norms and party reputations. British Journal of Political Science, 48(2), 369–384.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hawkins, K. A. (2010). Venezuela’s chavismo and populism in comparative perspective. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Jaggers, J., & Walgrave, S. (2007). Populism as political communication style: An empirical study of political parties’ discourse in Belgium. European Journal of Political Research, 46, 319–345.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kampwirth, K. (Ed.). (2010). Gender and populism in Latin America: Passionate politics. University Park: Penn State University Press.Google Scholar
  37. Ken, O. (2004). Analiz: Putin i Stalin//Skhodstvo iazyka I myshleniia. Delo. September 13. http://www.idelo.ru/340/9.html. Accessed 12 May 2018
  38. Kolonitskii, B. (2004). Vladimir Putin: Velikii macho, moguchii i mochashchii. Delo, February 9.Google Scholar
  39. Korkman, Z., & Açıksöz, S.C. (2013). Erdoğan’s masculinity and the language of the Gezi resistance. Jadaliyya, June 22. https://www.jadaliyya.com/Details/28822. Accessed 5 April 2019
  40. Kuhar, R., & Paternotte, D. (Eds.). (2017). Anti-gender campaigns in Europe: Mobilizing against equality. New York: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  41. Laclau, E. (2005). On populist reason. London: Verso.Google Scholar
  42. Laruelle, M. (2009). In the name of the nation: Nationalism and politics in contemporary Russia. New York: Palgrave Macmillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lassila, J. (2018). Putin as a non-populist autocrat. Russian Politics, 3(2), 175–195.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lee, M. J. (2006). The populist chameleon: The people’s party, Huey long, George Wallace, and the populist argumentative frame. Quarterly Journal of Speech, 92(4), 355–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Levitsky, S., & Way, L. (2002). The rise of competitive authoritarianism. Journal of Democracy, 13(2), 51–65.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lipman, M. (2015). Putin’s ‘besieged fortress’ and its ideological arms. In M. Lipman & N. Petrov (Eds.), The state of Russia: What comes next? (pp. 110–136). London: Palgrave MacMillan.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Makarychev, A. (2018). Biopolitics and Russian studies: An introduction. Russian Politics, 3(1), 59–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Makarychev, A., & Yatsyk, A. (2017). Biopower and geopolitics as Russia’s neighborhood strategies: reconnecting people or reaggregating lands? Nationalities Papers, The Journal of Nationalism and Ethnicity, 45(1), 25–40.Google Scholar
  49. March, L. (2017). Populism in the post-soviet states. The Oxford Handbook of Populism, 214.Google Scholar
  50. Mazzoleni, G. (2003). The media and the growth of neo-populism in contemporary democracies. In G. Mazzoleni, J. Stewart, & B. Horsfield (Eds.), The media and neo-populism: A contemporary comparative analysis (pp. 1–20). Westport: Praeger.Google Scholar
  51. McCoy, T. (2014). The many temper tantrums of Turkey prime minister Tayyip Erdogan. Washington Post, March 31. https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/morning-mix/wp/2014/03/31/the-many-temper-tantrums-of-turkey-prime-minister-tayyip-erdogan/. Accessed 30 April 2017
  52. Meret, S., & Siim, B. (2012). Gender, populism and politics of belonging: Discourses of right-wing populist parties in Denmark, Norway and Austria. In B. Siim & M. Mokre (Eds.), Negotiating gender and diversity in an emergent European public sphere (pp. 78–96). Basingstoke and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  53. Moffitt, B., & Tormey, S. (2014). Rethinking populism: Politics, mediatisation and political style. Political Studies, 62(2), 381–397.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mudde, C. (2004). The populist zeitgeist. Government and Opposition., 39(4), 541–563.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Mudde, C. (2007). Populist radical right parties in Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Mudde, C., & Kaltwasser, C. R. (2015). Vox populi or vox masculini? Populism and gender in northern Europe and South America. Patterns of Prejudice, 49(1–2), 16–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Müller, J. W. (2015). Parsing populism: Who is and who is not a populist these days? Juncture, 22(2), 80–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Müller, J. W. (2016). What is populism? Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. No Putin, No Russia,’ Says Kremlin Deputy Chief of Staff. (2014). October 23. Moscow Times. https://themoscowtimes.com/articles/no-putin-no-russia-says-kremlin-deputy-chief-of-staff-40702. Accessed 23 April 2017
  60. Norocel, O. C. (2010a). Constructing radical right populist resistance: Metaphors of heterosexist masculinities and the family question in Sweden. Norma, 5(2), 170–183.Google Scholar
  61. Norocel, O. C. (2010b). Romania is a family and it needs a strict father: Conceptual metaphors at work in radical right populist discourses. Nationalities Papers, 38(5), 705–721.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00905992.2010.498465.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Norocel, C. (2013). Our people a tight-knit family under the same protective roof: A critical study of gendered conceptual metaphors at work in radical right populism. PhD Dissertation. https://helda.helsinki.fi/bitstream/handle/10138/42162/ourpeopl.pdf?1 Accessed 25 April 2019
  63. Novitskaya, A. (2017). Patriotism, sentiment, and male hysteria: Putin’s masculinity politics and the persecution of non-heterosexual Russians. Norma, 12(3–4), 302–318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ostiguy, P. (2017). Populism: A socio-cultural approach. In C. R. Kaltwasser, P. Taggart, P. Ochoa Espejo, & P. Ostiguy (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of populism (pp. 73–100). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  65. Özel, S. (2003). After the tsunami. Journal of Democracy, 14(2), 80–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Pavlova, M. (2012). Praktika i lirika. Moskovskaia Pravda, no.40, February 25. https://dlib-eastview-com.ezp-prod1.hul.harvard.edu/browse/doc/26659347 Accessed 30 April 2017
  67. Perreau, B. (2016). Queer theory: The French response. Redwood City: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  68. Putin, V. (1999). Zaplanirovannoe na segodnia zasedanie pravitel’stva nachalos’ s ekstrennoi teme - ChP v Volgodonske.. Novosti. Pervyi Kanal. September 16. https://www.1tv.ru/news/1999/09/16/292939-zaplanirovannoe_na_segodnya_zasedanie_pravitelstva_nachalos_s_ekstrennoy_temy_chp_v_volgodonske. Accessed 19 September 2018.
  69. Putin, V. (2000). First person: an astonishingly frank self-portrait by Russia's president Vladimir Putin with Nataliya Gevorkyan, Natalya Timakova, and Andrei Kolesnikov; translated by Catherine A. Fitzpatrick. New York: Public Affairs.Google Scholar
  70. Putin, V. (2004). Obrashchenie Prezidenta Rossii Vladimira Putina. September 4. http://kremlin.ru/events/president/transcripts/22589.
  71. Putin, V. (2013). Poslanie Prezidenta Federal’nomu Sobraniiu. December 12. http://kremlin.ru/events/president/news/19825.
  72. Riabov, O., & Riabova, T. (2014). The ‘remasculinization’ of Russia? Gender, nationalism, and the legitimation of power under Vladimir Putin. Problems of Post-Communism, 61(2), 23–35.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Rotkirch, A., Temkina, A., & Zdravomyslova, E. (2007). Who helps the degraded housewife? Comments on Vladimir Putin's demographic speech. European Journal of Women's Studies, 14(4), 349–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Rupnik, J. (2007). From democracy fatigue to populist backlash. Journal of Democracy, 18(4), 17–25.Google Scholar
  75. Russian Patriarch Says Gay Marriage 'Sign of Apocalypse. (2013). Radio Free Europe-Radio Liberty, July 21. https://www.rferl.org/a/patriarch-russia-gay-apocalypse-kirill/25052758.html
  76. Ryabova, T., & Ryabov, O. (2011). The real man of politics in Russia (On gender discourse as a resource for the authority). Social Sciences, 42(3), 58–71.Google Scholar
  77. Riabov, O., & Riabova, T. (2014). The remasculinization of Russia. Problems of Post Communism, 61(2), 23–35.Google Scholar
  78. Schedler, A. (2006). Electoral authoritarianism: The dynamics of unfree competition. Boulder: Lynne Rienner Publishers.Google Scholar
  79. Schuler, C. A. (2015). Priamaia liniia s Vladimirom Putinym: Performing democracy Putin-style. TDR/The Drama Review, 59(1), 136–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Sperling, V. (2012). Nashi Devushki: Gender and political youth activism in Putin’s and Medvedev’s Russia. Post-Soviet Affairs, 28(2), 232–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Sperling, V. (2014). Sex, politics, and Putin: Political legitimacy in Russia. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Starck, K., & Luyt, R. (2019). Political masculinities, crisis tendencies, and social transition: Toward an understanding of change. Men and Masculinities, 22(3), 431–443.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1097184X18782730.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Starck, K., & Sauer, B. (2014). Political masculinities: Introduction. In K. Starck & B. Sauer (Eds.), A man's world? Political masculinities in literature and culture (pp. 3–10). Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.Google Scholar
  84. Stella, F., & Nartova, N. (2015). Sexual citizenship, nationalism and biopolitics in Putin’s Russia. In F. Stella, Y. Taylor, T. Reynolds, & A. Rogers (Eds.), Sexuality, citizenship and belonging: Trans-national and intersectional perspectives. Series: Advances in critical diversities (1) (pp. 24–42). London: Routledge.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Taguieff, P. A. (1995). Political science confronts populism: From a conceptual mirage to a real problem. Telos, (103), 9–43.Google Scholar
  86. Tang, W. (2016). Populist authoritarianism: Chinese political culture and regime sustainability. Oxford: Oxford University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  87. Tepe, S. (2005). Turkey's AKP: A model ‘muslim-democratic’ party? Journal of Democracy, 16(3), 69–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  88. Turk, H. B. (2014). Muktedir: Turk sag gelenegi ve Recep Tayyip Erdogan. Istanbul: Iletisim.Google Scholar
  89. van Dijk, T. A. (1995). "Discourse Analysis as Ideology Analysis." In Christina Schäffner, Anita Wenden (Eds.) Language and Peace (pp. 17–33). Aldershot Hants, England; Brookfield, Vt.: Dartmouth Pub. Co.Google Scholar
  90. Waisbord, S. (2003). Media populism: Neo-populism in Latin America. In Mazzoleni et al. (Eds.), The media and neo-populism: A contemporary comparative analysis (pp. 197–217). Santa Barbara: Praeger.Google Scholar
  91. Weyland, K. (2001). Clarifying a contested concept: Populism in the study of Latin American politics. Comparative Politics, 34(1), 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wodak, R. (2015). The politics of fear: What right-wing populist discourses mean. Los Angeles: SAGE.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Wood, E. A. (2008). Who leads Russia? Audit of the Conventional Wisdom, MIT Center for International Studies. https://www.researchgate.net/publication/327116501_Who_Leads_Russia_in_Audit_of_Conventional_Wisdom_MIT_Center_for_International_Studies_June_2008.
  94. Wood, E. A. (2011). Performing memory: Vladimir Putin and the celebration of world war II in Russia. The Soviet and Post-Soviet Review, 38(2), 172–200.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Wood, E. A. (2015). A small, victorious war? The symbolic politics of Vladimir Putin. In E. A. Wood, W. E. Pomeranz, E. W. Merry, & M. Trudolyubov (Eds.), Roots of Russia’s war in Ukraine (pp. 97–129). New York: Woodrow Wilson Center Press/Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Wood, E. A. (2016). Hypermasculinity as a scenario of power: Vladimir Putin's iconic rule, 1999–2008. International Feminist Journal of Politics, 18(3), 329–350.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  97. Wortman, R. (1995, 2000). Scenarios of power: Myth and ceremony in Russian monarchy. vols. 1 (1995), 2 (2000). Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  98. Zyuganov, G. (2007). Predsedatel’ TsK KPRF Gennadii Ziuganov: ‘Krome nas oppozitsii v strane net.’ Izvestiia, otchet o radiodiskussii na “Ekho Moskvy.” October 19. Accessed 2 July 2018. https://kprf.ru/rus_soc/52297.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Sociological and Anthropological Studies, Faculty of Social SciencesUniversity of OttawaOttawaCanada
  2. 2.Department of HistoryMassachusetts Institute of TechnologyCambridgeUSA

Personalised recommendations