Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 325–350 | Cite as

Good on paper: sociological critique, pragmatism, and secularization theory

  • Shai M. DromiEmail author
  • Samuel D. Stabler
Article

Abstract

Recent years have seen numerous sociological disagreements devolve into heated debates, with scholars openly accusing their peers of being both empirically wrong and morally misguided. While social scientists routinely reflect on the ethical implications of certain research assumptions and data collection methods, the sociology of knowledge production has said little about how moral debates over scholarship shape subsequent research trajectories. Drawing on the new French pragmatic sociology, this article examines how sociologists respond to criticisms of the moral worth of their research. The article outlines three typical responses: (1) accepting the criticism and changing direction completely; (2) accepting the criticism but changing discursive framing to incorporate existing research without being subject to critique; and (3) navigating through the debate by devising new research directions that do not trigger such criticism. To demonstrate, the article looks at how sociologists of religion responded, in their published scholarship, to criticisms of secularization theory as depreciating religious people and spiritual experience. Across the responses, we show that sociologists have included moral considerations in their empirical investigations, and have switched among several diverse moral justifications to address—and also avoid—criticism. We conclude by demonstrating that this model can be extended to other domains of sociological inquiry, including the study of gender-based wage inequality and methodological nationalism. The article highlights the importance of mapping the moral frameworks sociologists use for the sociology of knowledge and the sociology of morality.

Keywords

Knowledge production Morality Pragmatic sociology Religion Secularization Valuation 

Notes

Acknowledgments

The authors contributed equally to this article and are listed alphabetically. The authors are indebted to Jeffrey C. Alexander, Ron Jacobs, Michèle Lamont, Ann Mische, Margarita Mooney, Philip Smith, and Eleanor Townsley for invaluable feedback on this project. The authors also thank Matthew A. Andersson, Thomas Lyttleton, and Candas Pinar for their comments on previous versions of this article. Finally, the authors thank the Editors and reviewers at Theory & Society whose input has greatly improved the final article.

References

  1. Abbott, A. (2016). Processual Sociology. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  2. Abbott, A. (2018). Varieties of normative inquiry: Moral alternatives to politicization in sociology. The American Sociologist, 49(2), 158–180.Google Scholar
  3. Abend, G. (2014). The Moral Background: An Inquiry into the History of Business Ethics. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Abraham, M., & Purkayastha, B. (2012). Making a difference: Linking research and action in practice, pedagogy, and policy for social justice: Introduction. Current Sociology, 60(2), 123–141.Google Scholar
  5. Ammerman, N. (2013). Sacred stories, spiritual tribes: Finding religion in everyday life. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Archibugi, D., & Koenig-Archibugi, M. (2003). Debating cosmopolitics. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  7. Baker, J., & Smith, B. (2009). The nones: Social characteristics of the religiously unaffiliated. Social Forces, 87(3), 1251–1263.Google Scholar
  8. Beck, U. (1998). World risk society. Cambridge, Polity Press.Google Scholar
  9. Bellah, R. (1976). New Religious Conciousness and the crisis in modernity. In C. Y. Glock, R. N. Bellah, & R. H. Alfred (Eds.), The New Religious Consciousness (pp. 333–352). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  10. Bénatouïl, T. (1999). A tale of two sociologies: The critical and the pragmatic stance in contemporary French sociology. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 379–396.Google Scholar
  11. Bender, C. (2010). The new metaphysicals: Spirituality and the American religious imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  12. Bender, C. (2011). Pluralism and secularism. In C. Bender, W. Cadge, P. Levitt, & D. Smilde (Eds.), Religion on the edge: De-centering and re-centering the sociology of religion (pp. 138–158). New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Blok, A., & Meilvang, M. L. (2015). Picturing urban green attachments: Civic activists moving between familiar and public engagements in the city. Sociology, 49(1), 19–37.Google Scholar
  14. Blokker, P. (2011). Pragmatic sociology: Theoretical evolvement and empirical application. European Journal of Social Theory, 14(3), 251–261.Google Scholar
  15. Boltanski, Luc. 2011 [2009]. On Critique. Cambridge: John Wiley & Sons.Google Scholar
  16. Boltanski, Luc, and Eve Chiapello. 2005 [1999]. The new Spirit of capitalism. London and New York: Verso.Google Scholar
  17. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (1999). The sociology of critical capacity. European Journal of Social Theory, 2(3), 359–377.Google Scholar
  18. Boltanski, L., & Thévenot, L. (2000). The reality of moral expectations: A sociology of situated judgement. Philosophical Explorations, 3(3), 208–231.Google Scholar
  19. Boltanski, Luc, and Laurent Thévenot. 2006 [1991]. On justification: Economies of worth. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  20. Boltanski, L., Honneth, A., & Celikates, R. (2014 [2009]). 'Sociology of critique or critical theory?’ Luc Boltanski and Axel Honneth in conversation with Robin Celikates. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique (pp. 561–589). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  21. Bonikowski, B., & Gidron, N. (2015). The populist style in American politics: Presidential campaign discourse, 1952-1996. Social Forces, 94(4), 1593–1621.Google Scholar
  22. Bourdieu, P. (1988). Homo Academicus. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Bourdieu, P. (1991). Epilogue: On the Possibliity of a field of world sociology. In P. Bourdieu & J. Coleman (Eds.), Social theory for a changing society (pp. 373–387). Boulder: Routledge.Google Scholar
  24. Bourdieu, P. (1998). The state nobility: Elite schools in the field of power. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  25. Brenneman, R., & Miller, B. J. (2016). When bricks matter: Four arguments for the sociological study of religious buildings. Sociology of Religion, 77(1), 82–101.Google Scholar
  26. Brubaker, Rogers. 2017. "The Uproar Over ‘Transracialism.’" New York Times.Google Scholar
  27. Bruce, S. (2011). Secularization: In Defence of an unfashionable theory. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Burawoy, M. (2005). For public sociology. American Sociological Review, 70(1), 4–28.Google Scholar
  29. Burawoy, M. (2016). Sociology as a vocation. Contemporary Sociology, 45(4), 379–393.Google Scholar
  30. Cadge, W., & Konieczny, M. E. (2014). 'Hidden in plain sight': The significance of religion and spirituality in secular organizations. Sociology of Religion, 75(4), 551–563.Google Scholar
  31. Calhoun, C. (1983). The radicalism of tradition: Community strength or venerable disguise and borrowed language? American Journal of Sociology, 88(5), 886–914.Google Scholar
  32. Calhoun, C., & Van Antwerpen, J. (2007). Orthodoxy, heterodoxy, and hierarchy: 'Mainstream' sociology and its challengers. In C. Calhoun (Ed.), Sociology in America (pp. 367–410). Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  33. Camic, C., & Gross, N. (2004). The new sociology of ideas. In J. Blau (Ed.), Blackwell Companion to Sociology (pp. 236–250). Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.Google Scholar
  34. Camic, C., Gross, N., & Lamont, M. (2011). Social knowledge in the making. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  35. Casanova, J. (1994). Public Religions in the Modern World. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  36. Casanova, J. (2006). Rethinking secularization: A global comparative perspective. Hedgehog Review, 8(1/2), 7.Google Scholar
  37. Castells, M. (1997). The power of identity: The information age: Economy, society and culture vol. II. Cambridge, and Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  38. Chaves, M. (1994). Secularization as declining religious authority. Social Forces, 72(3), 749–774.Google Scholar
  39. Chaves, M., & Gorski, P. (2001). Religious pluralism and religious participation. Annual Review of Sociology, 27, 261–281.Google Scholar
  40. Cheng, S., & Powell, B. (2015). Measurement, methods, and divergent patterns: Reassessing the effects of same-sex parents. Social Science Research, 52, 615–626.Google Scholar
  41. Clayman, S. (1995). The dialectic of ethnomethodology. Semiotica, 107, 105–123.Google Scholar
  42. Cohen, A. C., & Dromi, S. M. (2018). Advertising morality: Maintaining moral worth in a stigmatized profession. Theory and Society, 47(2), 175–206.Google Scholar
  43. Colen, C., & Ramey, D. (2014). Is breast truly best? Estimating the effects of breastfeeding on long-term child health and wellbeing in the United States using sibling comparisons. Social Science & Medicine, 109, 55–65.Google Scholar
  44. Collins, P. H. (1991). Black feminist thought: Knowledge, Consciousness, and the Politics of Empowerment. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  45. Collins, P. H. (2007). Going public. In D. Clawson, R. Zussman, J. Misra, N. Gerstel, R. Stokes, & D. L. Anderton (Eds.), Public sociology. Fifteen eminent sociologists debate politics and the profession in the twenty-first century (pp. 101–113). Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  46. Collins, P. H. (2013). On intellectual activism. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Cordero, R. (2017). Crisis and critique: On the fragile foundations of social life. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  48. Curtis, B. (1997). Reworking moral regulation: Metaphorical capital and the field of disinterest. Canadian Journal of Sociology, 22(3), 303–318.Google Scholar
  49. Demearth, N. J., Hall, P. D., Schmitt, T., & Williams, R. H. (Eds.). (1998). Sacred companies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Dromi, S. M. (2016). Soldiers of the cross: The red cross and the genesis of the humanitarian field. Sociological Theory, 34(3), 196–219.Google Scholar
  51. Dromi, S. M. (Forthcoming). Above the fray: The Red Cross and the making of the humanitarian NGO sector. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  52. Dromi, S. M., & Illouz, E. (2010). Recovering morality: Pragmatic sociology and literary studies. New Literary History, 41(2), 351–369.Google Scholar
  53. Duarte, J. L., Crawford, J. T., Stern, C., Haidt, J., Jussim, L., & Tetlock, P. E. (2015). Political diversity will improve social psychological science 1. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 38.Google Scholar
  54. Edgell, P. (2012). A cultural sociology of religion: New directions. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 247–265.Google Scholar
  55. Edgerton, R. (1992). Sick societies. New York: Free Press.Google Scholar
  56. Fein, S., Mandal, B., & Roe, B. (2008). Success of strategies for combining employment and breastfeeding. Pediatrics, 122(Supplement 2), S56–S62.Google Scholar
  57. Fine, R. (2003). Taking the ‘Ism’Out of cosmopolitanism an essay in reconstruction. European Journal of Social Theory, 6(4), 451–470.Google Scholar
  58. Finke, R. (2013). Origins and consequences of religious freedoms: A global overview. Sociology of Religion, 74(3), 297–313.Google Scholar
  59. Finke, R., & Martin, R. R. (2014). Ensuring liberties: Understanding state restrictions on religious freedoms. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 53(4), 687–705.Google Scholar
  60. Finke, R., & Stark, R. (1992). The churching of America, 1776–2005: Winners and losers in our religious economy. New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  61. Finke, Roger, and Rodney Stark. 2005 [1992]. The churching of America, 1776–2005: Winners and losers in our religious economy. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  62. Foucault, M. (1980). Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972–1977. New York: Pantheon Books.Google Scholar
  63. Fourcade, M. (2009). Economists and Societies: Discipline and Profession in the United States, Britain, and France, 1890s to 1990s. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  64. Fox, J., & Tabory, E. (2008). Contemporary evidence regarding the impact of state regulation of religion on religious participation and belief. Sociology of Religion, 69(3), 245–271.Google Scholar
  65. Froese, P. (2008). The plot to kill god: Findings from the soviet experiment in secularization. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  66. Gans, H. (2016). Public sociology and its publics. The American Sociologist, 47(1), 3–11.Google Scholar
  67. Garfinkel, H. (1967). Studies in ethnomethodology. Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall.Google Scholar
  68. Gellner, E. (1982). Relativism and universals. In M. Hollis & S. Lukes (Eds.), Rationality and Relativism (pp. 181–200). Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  69. Gill, A. (2007). The political origins of religious liberty. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  70. Gorski, P. S. (2000). Historicizing the secularization debate: Church, state, and society in late medieval and early modern Europe, ca. 1300 to 1700. American Sociological Review, 65(1), 1381–1367.Google Scholar
  71. Gorski, P. S. (2003). The disciplinary revolution: Calvinism and the rise of the state in early modern Europe. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  72. Gorski, P. S. (2005). The return of the repressed: Religion and the political unconscious of historical sociology. In J. Adams, E. Clemens, & A. Orloff (Eds.), Remaking modernity: Politics, history, and sociology (pp. 161–189). Durham: Duke University Press.Google Scholar
  73. Gorski, P. S. (2013). Beyond the fact/value distinction: Ethical naturalism and the social sciences. Society, 50(6), 543–553.Google Scholar
  74. Gorski, P. S., & Altinordu, A. (2008). After secularization? Annual Review of Sociology, 34, 55–85.Google Scholar
  75. Gouldner, A. W. (1970). The coming crisis of Western sociology. New York and London: Basic Books.Google Scholar
  76. Grim, B., & Finke, R. (2010). The Price of freedom denied: Religious persecution and conflict in the twenty-first century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  77. Gross, N. (2009). A pragmatist theory of social mechanisms. American Sociological Review, 74(3), 358–379.Google Scholar
  78. Gross, N. (2018). Pragmatism and the study of large-scale social phenomena. Theory and Society, 47(1), 87–111.Google Scholar
  79. Guhin, J. (2014). Religion as site rather than religion as category: On the sociology of religion's export problem. Sociology of Religion, 75(4), 579–593.Google Scholar
  80. Hirschman, D. (2016). Stylized facts in the social sciences. Sociological Science, 3(30), 604–626.Google Scholar
  81. Hitlin, S., & Vaisey, S. (2013). The new sociology of morality. Sociology, 39(1), 51–68.Google Scholar
  82. Holbraad, M., Morten, A. P., & Viveiros de Castro, E. (2014). The politics of ontology: Anthropological positions. Cultural Anthropology website: https://culanth.org/fieldsights/462-the-politics-of-ontology-anthropological-positions. Accessed 13 Feb 2019.
  83. Horowitz, M., Haynor, A., & Kickham, K. (2018). Sociology’s Sacred Victims and the Politics of Knowledge: Moral Foundations Theory and Disciplinary Controversies. The American Sociologist, 1–37.Google Scholar
  84. Iannaccone, L. R. (1994). Why strict churches are strong. American Journal of Sociology, 99(5), 1180–1211.Google Scholar
  85. Iannaccone, L. R., Finke, R., & Stark, R. (1997). Deregulating religion: The economics of church and state. Economic Inquiry, 35(2), 350–364.Google Scholar
  86. Ignatow, G. (2009). Culture and embodied cognition: Moral discourses in internet support groups for overeaters. Social Forces, 88(2), 643–669.Google Scholar
  87. Illouz, E. (2008). Saving the Modern Soul: Therapy, Emotions, and the Culture of Self-Help. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  88. Jeffries, V. (2014). The Palgrave handbook of altruism, morality, and social solidarity: Formulating a field of study. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  89. Kaldor, M. (2003). The idea of global civil society. International Affairs, 79(3), 583–593.Google Scholar
  90. Krause, M. (2016). ‘Western hegemony’in the social sciences: Fields and model systems. The Sociological Review, 64(2), 194–211.Google Scholar
  91. Kuru, A. (2009). Secularism and state policies toward religion: The United States, France, and Turkey. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  92. Lamont, M. (2009). How professors think. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  93. Lamont, M. (2012). Toward a comparative sociology of valuation and evaluation. Annual Review of Sociology, 38, 201–221.Google Scholar
  94. Lamont, M., & Aksartova, S. (2002). Ordinary cosmopolitanisms strategies for bridging racial boundaries among working-class men. Theory, Culture & Society, 19(4), 1–25.Google Scholar
  95. Lamont, M., & Thévenot, L. (2000). Rethinking comparative cultural sociology: Repertoires of evaluation in France and the United States. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  96. Law, J. (2000). The politics of breastfeeding: Assessing risk, dividing labor. Signs, 25(2), 407–450.Google Scholar
  97. Lemieux, C. (2014). 'The Moral Idealism of Ordinary People as a Sociological Challenge: Reflections on the French Reception of Luc Boltanski and Laurent Thévenot’s On Justification. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique (p. 153170). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  98. Levitt, P. (2013). Religion on the move: Mapping global cultural production and consumption. In C. Bender, W. Cadge, P. Levitt, & D. Smilde (Eds.), Religion on the edge: De-centering and re-centering the sociology of religion (pp. 159–176). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  99. Levitt, P., & Schiller, N. G. (2004). Conceptualizing simultaneity: A transnational social field perspective on society. International Migration Review, 38(3), 1002–1039.Google Scholar
  100. Lewis-Kraus, G. (2016). The trials of Alice Goffman. The New York Times Magazine, 12.Google Scholar
  101. Li, R., Darling, N., Maurice, E., & Barker, L. (2005). Breastfeeding rates in the United States by characteristics of the child, mother, or family: The 2002 National Immunization Survey. Pediatrics, 115(1), e31–e37.Google Scholar
  102. Lichterman, P. (2012). Religion in public action: From actors to settings. Sociological Theory, 30(1), 15–36.Google Scholar
  103. Lim, C., MacGregor, C. A., & Putnam, R. D. (2010). Secular and liminal: Discovering heterogeneity among religious nones. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 49(4), 596–618.Google Scholar
  104. Loveman, M. (2014). National Colors: Racial classification and the state in Latin America. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  105. Lukes, S. 1974. Power: A Radical View: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  106. Lukes, S. (2008). Moral relativism. New York: Picador.Google Scholar
  107. Lukianoff, G., & Haidt, J. (2018). The coddling of the American mind: How good intentions and bad ideas are setting up a generation for failure. New York: Penguin Publishing Group.Google Scholar
  108. Mandal, B., Roe, B., & Fein, S. (2010). The differential effects of full-time and part-time work status on breastfeeding. Health Policy, 97(1), 79–86.Google Scholar
  109. Manders-Huits, N. (2011). What values in design? The challenge of incorporating moral values into design. Science and Engineering Ethics, 17(2), 271–287.Google Scholar
  110. Marcus, G., & Fischer, M. (1986). A crisis of representation in the human sciences. In Anthropology as cultural critique, edited by George Marcus and Michael Fischer (pp. 7–16). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  111. Markofski, W. (2015). The public sociology of religion. Sociology of Religion, 76(4), 459–475.Google Scholar
  112. Miles, A. (2015). The (re) genesis of values examining the importance of values for action. American Sociological Review, 80(4), 680–704.Google Scholar
  113. Mills, C. W. (1959). The sociological imagination. New York: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  114. Mooney Nickel, P. (2013). Public sociology and civil society: Governance, politics, and power. Boulder: Paradigm Publishers.Google Scholar
  115. Nussbaum, M., & Sen, A. (1993). The quality of life. Oxford: Clarendon Press.Google Scholar
  116. Ogbuanu, C., Glover, S., Probst, J., Liu, J., & Hussey, J. (2011). The effect of maternity leave length and time of return to work on breastfeeding. Pediatrics, 127(6), e1414–e1427.Google Scholar
  117. Potthast, J. (2017). The sociology of conventions and testing. In C. E. Benzecry, M. Krause, & I. A. Reed (Eds.), Social Theory Now (–337, 360). Chicago, University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  118. Putnam, H. (1982). Beyond the fact/value dichotomy. In Science and the Quest for Reality (pp. 3633–3669). London: Palgrave MacMillan Springer.Google Scholar
  119. Quéré, L., & Terzi, C. (2014). Did You Say ‘Pragmatic’? Luc Boltanski’s Sociology from a Pragmatist Perspective. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique (pp. 91–128). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  120. Regnerus, M. (2012). How different are the adult children of parents who have same-sex relationships? Findings from the new family structures study. Social Science Research, 41(4), 752–770.Google Scholar
  121. Riesebrodt, M. (2010). The promise of salvation: A theory of religion. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  122. Rippeyoung, P., & Noonan, M. (2012). Is breastfeeding truly cost free? Income consequences of breastfeeding for women. American Sociological Review, 77(2), 244–267.Google Scholar
  123. Rodríguez-Muñiz, M. (2015). Intellectual inheritances: Cultural diagnostics and the state of poverty knowledge. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 3(1), 89–122.Google Scholar
  124. Ryan, A., Zhou, W., & Arensberg, M. B. (2006). The effect of employment status on breastfeeding in the United States. Women's Health Issues, 16(5), 243–251.Google Scholar
  125. Sayer, A. (2009). Who’s afraid of critical social science? Current Sociology, 57(6), 767–786.Google Scholar
  126. Sayer, A. (2011). Why things matter to people: Social science, values and ethical life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  127. Schwarz, O. (2013). Dead honest judgments: Emotional expression, sonic styles and evaluating sounds of mourning in late modernity. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 1(2), 153–185.Google Scholar
  128. Silber, I. F. (2003). Pragmatic sociology as cultural sociology: Beyond repertoire theory? European Journal of Social Theory, 6(4), 427–449.Google Scholar
  129. Smilde, D., & May, M. (2015). Causality, normativity, and diversity in 40 years of US sociology of religion: Contributions to paradigmatic reflection. Sociology of Religion, 76(4), 3693–3688.Google Scholar
  130. Smith, C. (2003). The secular revolution: Power, interests, and conflict in the secularization of American public life. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  131. Smith, C., Vaidyanathan, B., Ammerman, N.T., Casanova, J., Davidson, H., Ecklund, E.H., et al. (2013). Roundtable on the sociology of religion: Twentythree theses on the status of religion in American sociology--A Mellon working-group reflection. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 81(4), 903–938.Google Scholar
  132. Smith, C. (2014). The sacred project of American sociology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  133. Stamatov, P. (2013). The origins of global humanitarianism: Religion, empires, and advocacy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  134. Stark, R. (1999). Secularization, rip. Sociology of Religion, 60(3), 249–273.Google Scholar
  135. Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1987). A theory of religion. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  136. Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1979). Of churches, sects, and cults: Preliminary concepts for a theory of religious movements. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 18, 117–131.Google Scholar
  137. Stark, R., & Bainbridge, W. S. (1980). Networks of faith: Interpersonal bonds and recruitment to cults and sects. American Journal of Sociology, 85(6), 1376–1395.Google Scholar
  138. Stark, R., & Finke, R. (2000). Acts of faith: Explaining the human side of religion. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  139. Steinmetz, G., & Chae, O.-B. (2002). Sociology in an era of fragmentation :From the sociology of knowledge to the philosophy of science, and Back again. The Sociological Quarterly, 43(1), 111–137.Google Scholar
  140. Stets, J., & Carter, M. (2011). The moral self applying identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 74(2), 192–215.Google Scholar
  141. Sullivan, W. F. (2005). The impossibility of religious freedom. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  142. Sullivan, W., & Beaman, L. (2013). Varieties of religious establishment. London and New York: Ashgate Publishing Limited.Google Scholar
  143. Sullivan, W., Yelle, R., & Taussig-Rubbo, M. (2011). After secular Law. Palo Alto: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  144. Susen, S. (2014a). Is There Such a Thing as a ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique’? Reflections on Luc Boltanski’s ‘On Critique. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique (pp. 173–210). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  145. Susen, S. (2014b). Towards a Dialogue between Pierre Bourdieu’s ‘Critical Sociology’ and Luc Boltanski’s ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique. In S. Susen & B. S. Turner (Eds.), The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique (pp. 313–348). London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  146. Susen, S., & Turner, B. S. (Eds.). (2014). The Spirit of Luc Boltanski: Essays on the ‘Pragmatic Sociology of Critique. London: Anthem Press.Google Scholar
  147. Swartz, S. (2010). ‘Moral ecology’and ‘moral capital’: Tools towards a sociology of moral education from a south African ethnography. Journal of Moral Education, 39(3), 305–327.Google Scholar
  148. Tavory, I. (2010). Of yarmulkes and categories: Delegating boundaries and the phenomenology of interactional expectation. Theory and Society, 39(1), 49–68.Google Scholar
  149. Tavory, I. (2011). The question of moral action: A formalist position. Sociological Theory, 29(4), 272–293.Google Scholar
  150. Taylor, C. (2011). Why we need a radical redefinition of secularism. In J. Butler, J. Habermas, C. Taylor, & C. West (Eds.), The power of religion in the public sphere. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  151. Timmermans, S. (2017). Matching genotype and phenotype: A pragmatist semiotic analysis of clinical exome sequencing. American Journal of Sociology, 123(1), 136–177.Google Scholar
  152. Timmermans, S., & Tavory, I. (2012). Theory construction in qualitative research: From grounded theory to abductive analysis. Sociological Theory, 30(3), 167–186.Google Scholar
  153. Touraine, A. (2003). Sociology without societies. Current Sociology, 51(2), 123–131.Google Scholar
  154. Turner, S. (2013). Explaining the normative. Cambridge and Malden: Wiley.Google Scholar
  155. Uggen, C., & Inderbitzin, M. (2010). Public criminologies. Criminology & Public Policy, 9(4), 725–749.Google Scholar
  156. Urry, J. (2007). Mobilities. Malden, Wiley.Google Scholar
  157. Vaisey, S. (2009). Motivation and justification: A dual-process model of culture in action. American Journal of Sociology, 114(6), 1675–1715.Google Scholar
  158. Vaisey, S. (2014). Is interviewing compatible with the dual-process model of culture. American Journal of Cultural Sociology, 2(1), 150–158.Google Scholar
  159. Valverde, M. (1994). Moral capital. Canadian Journal of Law & Society, 9(1), 213–232.Google Scholar
  160. Verbeek, P.-P. (2008). Morality in design: Design ethics and the morality of technological artifacts. In Philosophy and design (pp. 91–103). Dordrecht: Springer.Google Scholar
  161. Walters, S. D. (2017). Academe’s poisonous call-out culture. The Chronic of Higher: Education.Google Scholar
  162. Warner, S. (1993). Work in progress toward a new paradigm for the sociological study of religion in the United States. American Journal of Sociology, 98(5), 1044–1093.Google Scholar
  163. Warner, R. S. (2005). A Church of Our Own: Disestablishment and Diversity in American Religion. New Brunswick: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
  164. Warner, M., VanAntwerpen, J., & Calhoun, C. (2010). Varieties of secularism in a secular age. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  165. Weber, M. (2009). Science as a vocation. In H. H. Gerth & C. W. Mills (Eds.), From Max Weber: essays in sociology (pp. 129–158). London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  166. Weiner, L. Y. (1994). Reconstructing motherhood: The La Leche league in postwar America. The Journal of American History, 80(4), 1357–1381.Google Scholar
  167. Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. G. (2002). Methodological nationalism and beyond: Nation–state building, migration and the social sciences. Global Networks, 2(4), 301–334.Google Scholar
  168. Winchester, D. (2008). Embodying the faith: Religious practice and the making of a Muslim moral habitus. Social Forces, 86(4), 1753–1780.Google Scholar
  169. Winchester, D. (2017). 'A part of who I Am': Material objects as 'Plot Devices' in the formation of religious selves. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 56(1), 83–103.Google Scholar
  170. Winnubst, S. (2017). Why Tuvel’s article so troubled its critics. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 8, 2017.Google Scholar
  171. Wuthnow, R. (2014). General concepts and domain-specific concepts: An argument about the study of religion in sociology. Sociology of Religion, 75(4), 594–606.Google Scholar
  172. Yang, F. (2010). Oligopoly dynamics: Consequences of religious regulation. Social Compass, 57(2), 194–205.Google Scholar
  173. Yang, F. (2016). Exceptionalism or chinamerica: Measuring religious change in the globalizing world today. Journal for the Scientific Study of Religion, 55(1), 7–22.Google Scholar
  174. Young, M. (2006). Bearing witness against sin: The evangelical birth of the American social movement. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  175. Zuberi, T. (2001). Thicker than blood: How racial statistics lie. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of SociologyHarvard University, William James HallCambridgeUSA
  2. 2.Department of SociologyHunter CollegeNew YorkUSA

Personalised recommendations