Advertisement

Theory and Society

, Volume 47, Issue 4, pp 467–486 | Cite as

State-authorizing citizenship: the narrow field of civic engagement in the liberal age

  • Erica Weiss
Article
  • 169 Downloads

Abstract

Liberal citizens are held ethically accountable not only for their own acts and behaviors, but also those of their state. Reciprocally, a proper liberal subject is one that metonymizes with the state, merging their fates and moral worth, and taking personal responsibility for the state’s actions. I claim that as a result, the liberal subject is not only self-authorizing according to liberal theories of moral autonomy, but also state-authorizing. I demonstrate the above claims through a consideration of changing activist practices among the Israeli political left. I show that the hegemonic model of civic engagement is oriented towards the state and state policy as the privileged and naturalized site of ethical intervention. I then describe the ways this model hampers political endeavors by restricting the sites of intervention as well as structural access to political participation. I also consider contemporary efforts at political engagement that bypass the state.

Keywords

Activism Ethics Hegemony Liberalism Israeli political left State 

Notes

Acknowledgments

I would like to thank Yifat Gutman, Inna Leykin, and Tom Pesach who were kind enough to read drafts of this article while it was in preparation. I would also like to thank the Theory and Society reviewers of this article, who read very carefully and offered sharp, helpful, and constructive advice.

References

  1. Abrahamsen, R. (2000). Disciplining democracy: Development discourse and good governance in Africa. London: Zed Books.Google Scholar
  2. Anderson, B. (1991). Imagined communities: Reflections on the origin and spread of nationalism. New York and London: Verso.Google Scholar
  3. Asad, T. (2009). Free speech, blasphemy, and secular criticism. In Is critique secular? Blasphemy, injury, and free speech (pp. 20–63). New York: Fordham University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Asch, R. G. (2000). Religious toleration, the peace of Westphalia and the German Territorial Estates. Parliaments, Estates & Representation, 20(1), 75–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bakhtin, MM (1981 [1935]) The dialogic imagination. Austin: University of Texas Press.Google Scholar
  6. Balibar, É. (2015). Citizenship. Cambridge: John Wiley and Sons.Google Scholar
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1999). Rethinking the state: Genesis and structure of the bureaucratic field. In G. Steinmetz (Ed.), State/culture: State-formation after the cultural turn. Ithaca: Cornell University Press.Google Scholar
  8. Brown, W. (2008). Regulating aversion: Tolerance in the age of identity and empire. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Brubaker, R. (1996). Nationalism reframed: Nationhood and the national question in the new Europe. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Brubaker, R. (2017). Why populism? Theory and Society, 46(5), 357–338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chatterjee, P. (2004). The politics of the governed: Reflections on popular politics in most of the world. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Chatterjee, P. (2011). Lineages of political society: Studies in postcolonial democracy. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  13. Cody, F. (2009). Inscribing subjects to citizenship: Petitions, literacy activism, and the performativity of signature in rural Tamil India. Cultural Anthropology, 24(3), 347–380.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Connors, M. (2007). Democracy and National Identity in Thailand. Honolulu: University of Hawai’i Press.Google Scholar
  15. El-Ad, Hagai (2016) B'Tselem head: Why I spoke against the occupation at the UN. Haaretz Op-Ed: http://www.haaretz.com/opinion/.premium-1.747699.
  16. Ferguson, J. (2013). Declarations of dependence: Labour, personhood and welfare in southern Africa. Journal of the Royal Anthropological Institute, 19(2), 223–242.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Ferguson, J., & Gupta, A. (2002). Spatializing states: Toward an ethnography of neoliberal governmentality. American Ethnologist, 29(4), 981–1002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Goodman, Y. C., & Mizrachi, N. (2008). “The holocaust does not belong to European Jews alone”: The differential use of memory techniques in Israeli high schools. American Ethnologist, 35(1), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Gordon, A., & Stack, T. (2007). Citizenship beyond the state: Thinking with early modern citizenship in the contemporary world. Citizenship Studies, 11(2), 117–133.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Greenhouse, C. (2005). Hegemony and hidden transcripts: The discursive arts of neoliberal legitimation. American Anthropologist, 107(3), 356–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Greenhouse, C. (2011). The paradox of relevance: Ethnography and citizenship in the United States. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Habermas, J. (1991). The structural transformation of the public sphere: An inquiry into a category of bourgeois society. Cambridge: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  23. Holston, J. (2009). Insurgent Citizenship: Disjunctions of Democracy and Modernity in Brazil. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  24. Handelman, D., & Katz, E. (1995). State ceremonies in Israel–remembrance day and independence day. In C. Leibman & M. Shokeid (Eds.), Shlomo Deshen. The Sociology of Religion in Israel: Israeli Judaism.Google Scholar
  25. Handelman, D. (2004). Nationalism and the Israeli state: Bureaucratic logic in public events. London: Berg Publishers.Google Scholar
  26. Keane, W. (2010). Minds, surfaces, and reasons in the anthropology of ethics. In M. Lambek (Ed.), Ordinary ethics. New York: Fordham University Press.Google Scholar
  27. Kymlicka, W. (1994). Multicultural citizenship: A liberal theory of minority rights. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  28. Lavie, S. (2014). Wrapped in the flag of Israel: Mizrahi single mothers and bureaucratic torture. New York and Oxford: Berghahn Books.Google Scholar
  29. Lazar, S. (2010). Schooling and critical citizenship: Pedagogies of political Agency in El Alto, Bolivia. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 41(2), 181–205.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lazar, S., & Nuitjen, M. (2013). Citizenship, the self and political agency. Critique of Anthropology, 33(1), 3–8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Levinas, E. (1979). Totality and infinity. New York: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lomsky-Feder, E. (2004). The memorial ceremony in Israeli schools: Between the state and civil society. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 25(3), 291–305.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. MacIntyre, A. (1984). After Virtue. Notre Dame: University of Notre Dame Press.Google Scholar
  34. Mahmood, S. (2012). Religious freedom, the minority question, and geopolitics in the Middle East. Comparative Studies in Society and History, 54(02), 418–446.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. McQuarrie, M. (2013). No contest: Participatory technologies and the transformation of Urban Authority. Public Culture, 25(1 69), 143–175.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mehager, T. (2016). Conscientious objection is yet another Ashkenazi privilege. In +972.Google Scholar
  37. Mein, E. (2009). Literacy, knowledge production, and grassroots civil society: Constructing critical responses to neoliberal dominance. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 40(4), 350–368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mizrachi, N. (2011). Beyond the garden and the jungle: On the social limits of the human rights discourse in Israel. Ma’asei Mishpat., 4, 51–74 (in Hebrew).Google Scholar
  39. Murphy, R. (2004). Turning peasants into modern Chinese citizens:“population quality” discourse, demographic transition and primary education. The China Quarterly, 177, 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Needleman, J. (2003). The American soul: Rediscovering the wisdom of the founders. London: Penguin.Google Scholar
  41. Paley, J. (2004). Accountable democracy: Citizens' impact on public decision making in Postdictatorship Chile. American Ethnologist, 31(4), 497–513.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Phillips, A. (2010). War, religion and empire: The transformation of international orders. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Povinelli, E. (2006). The empire of love: Toward a theory of intimacy, genealogy, and carnality. Durham: Duke University Press Books.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Rawls, John (2009 [1971]) A theory of justice. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  45. Rawls, J. (2005). Political liberalism. New York: Columbia University Press.Google Scholar
  46. Rorty, R. (1999). Achieving our country: Leftist thought in twentieth-century America. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  47. Rose, N. (2006). Governing “advanced” liberal democracies. In A. Sharma & A. Gupta (Eds.), The anthropology of the state: A reader. Hoboken: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  48. Schinkel, A. (2007). Conscience and conscientious objections. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Scott, J. (2009). The art of not being governed: An anarchist history of upland Southeast Asia. New Haven: Yale University Press.Google Scholar
  50. Spivak, G. (2004). The trajectory of the subaltern in my work (lecture). Columbia University.Google Scholar
  51. Taylor, C. (1992). Sources of the self: The making of the modern identity. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Ticktin, M. (2006). Where ethics and politics meet. American Ethnologist., 33(1), 33–49.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Taylor, C. (1991). The ethics of authenticity. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Tsing, A. (1993). In the realm of the diamond queen: Marginality in an out-of-the-way place. Princeton: Princeton University Press.Google Scholar
  55. Weber, E. (1976). Peasants into Frenchmen: The modernization of rural France, 1870–1914. Stanford: Stanford University Press.Google Scholar
  56. Weiss, E. (2011). The interrupted sacrifice: Hegemony and moral crisis among Israeli conscientious objectors. American Ethnologist, 38(3), 576–588.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Weiss, E. (2016). Incentivized obedience: How a gentler Israeli military prevents organized obedience. American Anthropologist, 118(1), 91–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Weiss, E. (2017). Competing ethical claims in a diverse society: Israeli military refusers. American Ethnologist, 44(1), 52–64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Wimmer, A., & Schiller, N. G. (2003). Methodological nationalism, the social sciences, and the study of migration: An essay in historical epistemology. The International Migration Review., 37(3), 576–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Zerubavel, Y. (1997). Recovered roots: Collective memory and the making of Israeli National Tradition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Sociology and AnthropologyTel Aviv UniversityRamat AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations