Russian Physics Journal

, Volume 61, Issue 6, pp 1100–1108 | Cite as

Polarization Observables of the Reaction γp→η'p Near Threshold

  • V. A. TryasuchevEmail author
  • A. G. Kondratyeva
  • A. S. Gogolev

In the isobaric model of photoproduction of η'-mesons on protons, reproducing well the experimental cross sections for photon energies from 1500 to 2500 MeV and the Σ-asymmetry of this reaction near its threshold, various polarization observables of this reaction have been calculated in the energy range near its threshold in order to stimulate future experiments.


isobaric model of photoproduction nucleon resonances effective resonances single and double polarization observables of a reaction 


Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.

Unable to display preview. Download preview PDF.


  1. 1.
    G. F. Chew, M. L. Goldberger, F. E. Low, and Y. Nambu, Phys. Rev., 106, 1345 (1957).ADSMathSciNetCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    V. A. Tryasuchev, Phys. Part. Nucl. Lett., 10, 315 (2013).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    S. R. Deans, D. T. Jacobs, P. W. Lyons, and D. L. Montgomery, Phys. Rev. D, 6, 1906 (1972).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    H. R. Hicks, S. E. Deans, D. T. Jacobset, et al., Phys. Rev. D, 7, 2614 (1973).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    J. M. Blatt and V. F. Weisskopf, Theoretical Nuclear Physics, John Wiley & Sons, New York (1952).zbMATHGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    X.-H. Zhong and Q. Zhao, Phys. Rev. C, 84, 065204 (2011); arXiv: 1110.5466v2 [nucl-th] (2011).Google Scholar
  7. 7.
    L. Tiator, Int. J. Mod. Phys. A, 22, 297 (2007); ArXiv: 0610114v1 [nucl-th] (2006).Google Scholar
  8. 8.
    F. Huang, H. Haberzettl, and K. Nakayama, Phys. Rev. C, 87, 054004 (2013); arXiv: 1208.2279v2 [nucl-th] (2013).Google Scholar
  9. 9.
    V. A. Tryasuchev, A. G. Kondratyeva, and A. A. Kiziridi, Russ. Phys. J., 60, No. 5, 782 (2017).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    R. L. Walker, Phys. Rev., 182, 1729 (1969).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    M. Dugger, J. P. Ball, P. Collins, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 96, 062001 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    M. Williams, Z. Krahn, D. Applegate, et al., Phys. Rev. C, 80, 045213 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    V. Crede, A. McVeigh, A. V. Anisovich, et al., Phys. Rev. C, 80, 055202 (2009).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    P. Collins, B. G. Ritchie, M. Dugger, et al., ArXiv: 1703.00433 [nucl-ex] (2017).Google Scholar
  15. 15.
    A. V. Anisovich, V. Burkert, P. M. Collins, et al., arXiv: 1706.05144 [nucl-ex] (2017).Google Scholar
  16. 16.
    V. L. Kashevarov, L. Tiator, and M. Ostrick, arXiv: 1602.05829 [nucl-th] (2016).Google Scholar
  17. 17.
    P. LeviSandri, G. Mandaglio, V. DeLeo, et al., Eur. Phys. J. A, 51, 77 (2015).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    V. A. Tryasuchev, Phys. Atom. Nucl., 69, 282 (2006).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    V. L. Kashevarov, L. Tiator, and M. Ostrick, JPS Conf. Proc., 13, 020029 (2017).Google Scholar
  20. 20.
    V. L. Kashevarov, P. Ott, S. Prakhov, et al., Phys. Rev. Lett., 118, 212001 (2017).ADSCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    R. L. Workman, M. W. Paris, W. J. Briscoe, et al., ArXiv: 1102.4807v1 [nucl-th] (2011).Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • V. A. Tryasuchev
    • 1
    Email author
  • A. G. Kondratyeva
    • 1
  • A. S. Gogolev
    • 1
  1. 1.National Research Tomsk Polytechnic UniversityTomskRussia

Personalised recommendations