Effect of Peer Coaching on Teachers’ Practice and Their Students’ Scientific Competencies
- 8 Downloads
This study aimed to explore the effect of peer coaching on science teachers’ practice and their students’ scientific competencies. The mixed method approach and static group comparison design were adopted. The participants in this study consisted of four science teachers and 132 high school students. The results showed that the students in the peer-coached group teachers’ classes demonstrated more positive perceptions of their teachers’ teaching practice than those in the comparison group. The students in the peer-coached group teachers’ classes outperformed their counterparts in terms of their scientific competencies. From the teachers’ perception, peer coaching workshops encouraged them to use science literacy-based instruction and improve their assessment knowledge. These workshops also guided them to carry out reflections and provided them with the support and opportunities for interactions. These results indicated that the peer coaching model may improve science teachers’ teaching practice and their students’ scientific competencies.
KeywordsPeer coaching Scientific competencies Scientific literacy Teacher practice
The work reported here was supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology, Taiwan, under grants MOST 104-2511-S-110-013-MY3. The authors also greatly appreciate the valuable suggestions of the journal reviewers and editors.
- Averill, R., Drake, M., Anderson, D., & Anthony, G. (2016). The use of questions within in-the-moment coaching in initial mathematics teacher education: enhancing participation, reflection, and co-construction in rehearsals of practice. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 44(5), 486–503.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Avikasari, A., Rukayah, R., & Indriayu, M. (2018). The influence of science literacy-based teaching material towards science achievement. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 7(3), 182–187.Google Scholar
- Barendsen, E., & Henze, I. (2017). Relating teacher PCK and teacher practice using classroom observation. Research in Science Education, Online First. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-017-9637-z.
- Chen, S. (2005). An alternative approach of instructional supervision: peer observation in educational practicum. Contemporary Educational Research Quarterly, 13(1), 11–24.Google Scholar
- Doppelt, Y., Schunn, C. D., Silk, E. M., Mehalik, M. M., Reynolds, B., & Ward, E. (2009). Evaluating the impact of a facilitated learning community approach to professional development on teacher practice and student achievement. Research in Science & Technological Education, 27(3), 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Fernandez, C., & Yoshida, M. (2004). Lesson study: a Japanese approach to improving mathematics teaching and learning. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
- Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. M. (2017). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1265158.
- Glesne, C. (1992). Becoming qualitative researchers: an introduction. White Plains: Longman.Google Scholar
- Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. New York: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
- Kovic, S. (1996). Peer coaching to facilitate inclusion: a job-embedded staff development model. Journal of Staff Development, 17, 28–31.Google Scholar
- Lin, H. S. (2008). Results report of Taiwan participated in PISA 2006 (Report No. NSC 95–2522-S-026-002). Taipei: National Science Council.Google Scholar
- Linacre, J. M., & Wright, B. D. (1994). Reasonable mean-square fit values. Rasch Measurement Transactions, 8(3), 370–371.Google Scholar
- Lindahl, M. G., & Folkesson, A. M. (2016). Attitudes and language use in group discussions on socio-scientific issues. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education, 12(2), 283–301.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 assessment framework: key competencies in reading, mathematics and science. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 Assessment and Analytical Framework: Science, Reading, Mathematic and Financial Literacy, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
- Rasch, G. (1960). Probabilistic models for some intelligence and attainment tests. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
- Robbins, P. (1991). How to plan and implement a peer coaching program. Alexandria: Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development.Google Scholar
- Rozenszajn, R., & Yarden, A. (2014). Mathematics and biology teachers’ tacit views of the knowledge required for teaching: varying relationships between CK and PCK. International Journal of STEM Education, 1(11), 1–12.Google Scholar
- Showers, B., & Joyce, B. (1996). The evolution of peer coaching. Educational Leadership, 53(6), 12–17.Google Scholar
- Wang, K.-H., Tuan, H.-L., & Chang, H. P. (1998). Secondary school student perceptions of science teacher’s knowledge. Chinese Journal of Science Education, 6(4), 35–470.Google Scholar