Advertisement

Identity Complexes and Science Identity in Early Secondary: Mono-topical or in Combination with Other Topical Identities

  • Paulette Vincent-RuzEmail author
  • Christian D. Schunn
Article

Abstract

Prior research suggests that students endorsing a science identity are more likely to participate in optional science experiences and choose STEM careers. Science identity is a topical identity, which refers to an identity related to a topic rather than a social or cultural group. However, studies of topical identities typically examine them in isolation. The current study identified typically occurring combinations of topical identities as identity complexes to determine whether science identity would tend to occur within STEM-only complexes or together within larger topical identity complexes. Over 1200 urban public-school students in 6th, 7th, and 9th grades from two different regions in the USA completed surveys asking about their topical identities, choice preferences, and optional science experiences. Latent class analyses revealed that students often endorse science identities in the context of other unrelated identities like athletic and artistic identities. Further, the frequency (overall and relative to each other) of the two high-science identity complexes varied substantially by gender, ethnicity, and grade. These patterns were not simple reflects of the commonly observed overall rates of science identity by demographics. Further, students in topical complexes with high science identity still had high participation in optional science experiences despite having many topical identities that could compete for time.

Keywords

Science identity Equity Gender Race Secondary school Science experiences 

Notes

References

  1. Activated Learning Enables Success 2015. (Learning Activation Lab). Retrieved August 7, 2019, from http://activationlab.org/Google Scholar
  2. Adams, J. D., Gupta, P., & Cotumaccio, A. (2014). Long-term participants: A museum program enhances girls’ STEM interest, motivation, and persistence. Afterschool Matters, 20, 13–20.Google Scholar
  3. Akiva, T., & Horner, C. (2016). Adolescent motivation to attend youth programs: A mixed-methods investigation. Applied Developmental Science, 20(4), 278–293.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10888691.2015.1127162.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Akiva, T., Schunn, C., & Louw, M. (2017). What drives attendance at informal learning activities?: A study of two art programs. Curator: The Museum Journal, 60(3), 351–364.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson, M. J. (2001). A new method for non‐parametric multivariate analysis of variance. Austral Ecology, 26, 32–46.Google Scholar
  6. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2010). “Doing” science versus “being” a scientist: Examining 10/11-year-old schoolchildren’s constructions of science through the lens of identity. Science Education, 94(4), 617–639.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2012). Science aspirations, capital, and family habitus: How families shape children’s engagement and identification with science. American Educational Research Journal, 49(5), 881–908.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Archer, L., DeWitt, J., Osborne, J., Dillon, J., Willis, B., & Wong, B. (2013). ‘Not girly, not sexy, not glamorous’: Primary school girls’ and parents’ constructions of science aspirations. Pedagogy, Culture & Society, 21(1), 171–194.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Aschbacher, P. R., Li, E., & Roth, E. J. (2010). Is science me? High school students’ identities, participation and aspirations in science, engineering, and medicine. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 47(5), 564.  https://doi.org/10.1002/tea.20353.Google Scholar
  10. Bagwell, C. L., Coie, J. D., Terry, R. A., & Lochman, J. E. (2000). Peer clique participation and social status in preadolescence. Merrill-Palmer Quarterly, 46(2), 280–305.Google Scholar
  11. Barber, B. L., Eccles, J. S., & Stone, M. R. (2001). Whatever happened to the jock, the brain, and the princess? Journal of Adolescent Research, 16(5), 429–455.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0743558401165002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Barton, A., & Tan, E. (2010). We be burnin’! Agency, identity, and science learning. The Journal of the Learning Sciences, 19(2), 187–229.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Barton, A., Kang, H., Tan, E., O’Neill, T. B., Bautista-Guerra, J., & Brecklin, C. (2013). Crafting a future in science: Tracing middle school girls’ identity work over time and space. American Educational Research Journal, 50(1), 37–75.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Biddulph, L. G. (1954). Athletic achievement and the personal and social adjustment of high school boys. Research Quarterly. American Association for Health, Physical Education and Recreation, 25(1), 1.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10671188.1954.10624937.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bolck, A., Croon, M., & Hagenaars, J. (2004). Estimating latent structure models with categorical variables: One-step versus three-step estimators. Political Analysis, 12, 3–27.Google Scholar
  16. Brown, B. A. (2006). “It isn't no slang that can be said about this stuff”: Language, identity, and appropriating science discourse. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 43(1), 96–126.Google Scholar
  17. Bucholtz, M. (1999). “Why be normal?”: Language and identity practices in a community of nerd girls. Language in Society, 28(2), 203–223.Google Scholar
  18. Carlone, H. B., & Johnson, A. (2007). Understanding the science experiences of successful women of color: Science identity as an analytic lens. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(8), 1187–1218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Celeux, G., & Soromenho, G. (1996). An entropy criterion for assessing the number of clusters in a mixture model. Journal of Classification, 13, 195–212.Google Scholar
  20. Chang, M. J., Eagan, K. M., Lin, M. H., & Hurtado, S. (2011). Considering the impact of racial stigmas and science identity: Persistence among biomedical and behavioral science aspirants. The Journal of Higher Education, 82(5), 564–596.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cochran, J. K., Maskaly, J., Jones, S., & Sellers, C. S. (2017). Using structural equations to model Akers’ social learning theory with data on intimate partner violence. Crime & Delinquency, 63(1), 39–60.Google Scholar
  22. Collins, L., & Lanza, S. (2009). The relation between the latent variable and its indicators Latent class and latent transition analysis: with applications in the social, behavioral, and health sciences. John Wiley & Sons, Inc., 49–76.Google Scholar
  23. Crenshaw, K. (1991). Mapping the margins: Intersectionality, identity politics, and violence against women of color. Stanford Law Review, 43, 1241–1299.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Crowley, K., Callanan, M. A., Tenenbaum, H. R., & Allen, E. (2001). Parents explain more often to boys than to girls during shared scientific thinking. Psychological Science, 12(3), 258–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Desimone, L. M., & Le Floch, K. C. (2004). Are we asking the right questions? Using cognitive interviews to improve surveys in education research. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 26(1), 1–22.Google Scholar
  26. Diekman, A. B., Clark, E. K., Johnston, A. M., Brown, E. R., & Steinberg, M. (2011). Malleability in communal goals and beliefs influences attraction to stem careers: Evidence for a goal congruity perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 101(5), 902–918.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0025199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Dixon, P. (2003). VEGAN, a package of R functions for community ecology. Journal of Vegetation Science, 14(6), 927–930.Google Scholar
  28. Feldman, A. F., & Matjasko, J. L. (2005). The role of school-based extracurricular activities in adolescent development: A comprehensive review and future directions. Review of Educational Research, 75(2), 159–210.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543075002159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Fordham, S., & Ogbu, J. U. (1986). Black students’ school success: Coping with the “burden of ‘acting white’”. The Urban Review, 18(3), 176–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gresalfi, M., & Cobb, P. (2006). Cultivating students’ discipline-specific dispositions as a critical goal for pedagogy and equity. Pedagogies: an International Journal, 1(1), 49–57.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15544818ped0101_8.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Guest, A., & Schneider, B. (2003). Adolescents’ extracurricular participation in context: The mediating effects of schools, communities, and identity. Sociology of Education, 76(2), 89–109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Harrison, L., Sailes, G., Rotich, W. K., & Bimper, A. Y. (2011). Living the dream or awakening from the nightmare: Race and athletic identity. Race Ethnicity and Education, 14(1), 91–103.  https://doi.org/10.1080/13613324.2011.531982.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hazari, Z., Sonnert, G., Sadler, P. M., & Shanahan, M. C. (2010). Connecting high school physics experiences, outcome expectations, physics identity, and physics career choice: A gender study. Journal of research in science teaching, 47(8), 978–1003.Google Scholar
  34. Hughes, R. M., Nzekwe, B., & Molyneaux, K. J. (2013). The single sex debate for girls in science: A comparison between two informal science programs on middle school students’ STEM identity formation. Research in Science Education, 43(5), 1979–2007.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Kahan, D. M., Braman, D., Gastil, J., Slovic, P., & Mertz, C. (2007). Culture and identity-protective cognition: Explaining the White-male effect in risk perception. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies, 4(3), 465–505.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1740-1461.2007.00097.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Kelly-McHale, J. (2013). The influence of music teacher beliefs and practices on the expression of musical identity in an elementary general music classroom. Journal of Research in Music Education, 61(2), 195–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Kendall, L. (2011). “White and nerdy”: Computers, race, and the nerd stereotype. The Journal of Popular Culture, 44(3), 505–524.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5931.2011.00846.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Kim, Y., & Park, N. (2012). The effect of STEAM education on elementary school student’s creativity improvement. In Computer applications for security, control and system engineering (pp. 115–121). Berlin: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Knifsend, C. A., & Graham, S. (2012). Too much of a good thing? How breadth of extracurricular participation relates to school-related affect and academic outcomes during adolescence. Journal of Youth and Adolescence, 41(3), 379–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Lakens, D. (2013). Calculating and reporting effect sizes to facilitate cumulative science: a practical primer for t-tests and ANOVAs. Frontiers in psychology, 4, 863.Google Scholar
  41. Langdon, S. W., & Petracca, G. (2010). Tiny dancer: Body image and dancer identity in female modern dancers. Body Image, 7(4), 360–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Lanza, S. T., Collins, L. M., Lemmon, D. R., & Schafer, J. L. (2007). PROC LCA: A SAS procedure for latent class analysis. Structural equation modeling: a multidisciplinary journal, 14(4), 671–694.Google Scholar
  43. Liao, C., Motter, J. L., & Patton, R. M. (2016). Tech-savvy girls: Learning 21st-century skills through STEAM digital artmaking. Art Education, 69(4), 29–35.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00043125.2016.1176492.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lin, P. Y., & Schunn, C. D. (2016). The dimensions and impact of informal science learning experiences on middle schoolers’ attitudes and abilities in science. International Journal of Science Education, 38(17), 2551–2572.Google Scholar
  45. Linzer, D. A., & Lewis, J. B. (2011). poLCA: An R package for polytomous variable latent class analysis. Journal of statistical software, 42(10), 1–29.Google Scholar
  46. Magidson, J., & Vermunt, J. K. (2004). Latent class models. The Sage handbook of quantitative methodology for the social sciences, 175–198.Google Scholar
  47. Meyer, J. P., Stanley, L. J., & Vandenberg, R. J. (2013). A person-centered approach to the study of commitment. Human Resource Management Review, 23(2), 190–202.Google Scholar
  48. Morin, A. J. S., Morizot, J., Boudrias, J.-S., & Madore, I. (2011). A multifoci person-centered perspective on workplace affective commitment: A latent profile/factor mixture analysis. Organizational Research Methods, 14, 58–90.Google Scholar
  49. Moses, R. P., & Cobb, C. E. (2001). Radical equations: Math literacy and civil rights. Boston: Beacon Press.Google Scholar
  50. National Science Foundation & National Center for Science and Engineering Statistics (2017). Women, minorities, and persons with disabilities in science and engineering.Google Scholar
  51. Nichols, J. D., & White, J. (2014). Friendship cliques: A comparison of the motivational traits of lower/upper track algebra students. Social Psychology of Education, 17(1), 141–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Norman, O., Ault, C. R., Jr., Bentz, B., & Meskimen, L. (2001). The black–white “achievement gap” as a perennial challenge of urban science education: A sociocultural and historical overview with implications for research and practice. Journal of Research in Science Teaching: The Official Journal of the National Association for Research in Science Teaching, 38(10), 1101–1114.Google Scholar
  53. Osborne, J., Simon, S., & Collins, S. (2003). Attitudes towards science: A review of the literature and its implications. International Journal of Science Education, 25(9), 1049–1079.  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069032000032199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Russell, S. H., Hancock, M. P., & McCullough, J. (2007). Benefits of undergraduate research experiences. Science (Washington), 316(5824), 548–549.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Sha, L., Schunn, C., Bathgate, M., & Ben‐Eliyahu, A. (2016). Families support their children's success in science learning by influencing interest and self‐efficacy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 53(3), 450–472.Google Scholar
  56. Sorge, C. (2007). What happens? Relationship of age and gender with science attitudes from elementary to middle school. Science Educator, 16(2), 33–37.Google Scholar
  57. Steele, C. M., & Aronson, J. (1995). Stereotype threat and the intellectual test performance of African Americans. Journal of personality and social psychology, 69(5), 797.Google Scholar
  58. Steinke, J., Applegate, B., Lapinski, M., Ryan, L., & Long, M. (2012). Gender differences in adolescents’ wishful identification with scientist characters on television. Science Communication, 34(2), 163–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Stets, J. E., & Burke, P. J. (2000). Identity theory and social identity theory. Social Psychology Quarterly, 63(3), 224–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Thornberg, R. (2011). ‘She’s weird!’—the social construction of bullying in school: A review of qualitative research. Children & Society, 25(4), 258–267.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2011.00374.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Vincent-Ruz, P., & Schunn, C. D. (2018). The nature of science identity and its role as the driver of student choices. International journal of STEM education, 5(1), 48.Google Scholar
  62. Veliz, P., Schulenberg, J., Patrick, M., Kloska, D., McCabe, S., & Zarrett, N. (2017). Competitive sports participation in high school and subsequent substance use in young adulthood: Assessing differences based on level of contact. International Review for the Sociology of Sport, 52(2), 240–259.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1012690215586998.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Wiedermann, W., & von Eye, A. (2015). Direction of effects in mediation analysis. Psychological Methods, 20(2), 221.Google Scholar
  64. Zeidler, D. L. (2016). STEM education: A deficit framework for the twenty first century? A sociocultural socioscientific response. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 11(1), 11–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Open AccessSpringer Nature terms of reuse for archived author accepted manuscripts (AAMs) of subscription articles For articles published within the Springer Nature group of companies that have been archived into academic repositories such as institutional repositories, PubMed Central and its mirror sites, where a Springer Nature company holds copyright, or an exclusive license to publish, users may view, print, copy, download and text and data-mine the content, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full conditions of use. The conditions of use are not intended to override, should any national law grant further rights to any user.Conditions of use Articles, books and chapters published within the Springer Nature group of companies which are made available through academic repositories remain subject to copyright. The following restrictions on use of such articles, books and chapters apply: Academic research only 1. Archived content may only be used for academic research. Any content downloaded for text based experiments should be destroyed when the experiment is complete. Reuse must not be for Commercial Purposes 2. Archived content may not be used for purposes that are intended for or directed towards commercial advantage or monetary compensation by means of sale, resale, licence, loan, transfer or any other form of commercial exploitation ("Commercial Purposes"). Wholesale re-publishing is prohibited 3. Archived content may not be published verbatim in whole or in part, whether or not this is done for Commercial Purposes, either in print or online. 4. This restriction does not apply to reproducing normal quotations with an appropriate citation. In the case of text-mining, individual words, concepts and quotes up to 100 words per matching sentence may be used, whereas longer paragraphs of text and images cannot (without specific permission from Springer Nature). Moral rights 5. All use must be fully attributed.  Attribution must take the form of a link - using the article DOI - to the published article on the journal's website. 6. All use must ensure that the authors' moral right to the integrity of their work is not compromised. Third party content 7. Where content in the document is identified as belonging to a third party, it is the obligation of the user to ensure that any use complies with copyright policies of the owner. Reuse at own risk 8. Any use of Springer Nature content is at your own risk and Springer Nature accepts no liability arising from such use.

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Learning Research and Development CenterUniversity of PittsburghPittsburghUSA

Personalised recommendations