Influence of the Interplay of Habitual Affective Attributes and Classroom Learning Environments on Learners’ Situational Affective Experiences in Learning Science: The Narratives of Primary Pre-Service Teachers
Science education researchers have found that instructional design focusing more on learners’ affective needs can be powerful in nurturing effective and exciting science learning. This paper reports a qualitative study exploring how learners’ situational affective experiences are influenced by the interplay of their habitual affective attributes and classroom learning environment. The research method adopted was semi-structured in-depth interview. The study is descriptive and retrospective in nature. Nine pre-service teachers who were taking a science method course at an Australian university took part in the study voluntarily. Each interview lasted about 1 h. Six types of interplay were identified: Self-sustained, Beyond expectation, Resonant, Adversely Overpowered, Below expectation and Irresponsive. Implications for science teaching and science teacher education are discussed in terms of the identified types of interplay.
KeywordsClassroom learning environments Habitual affective attributes Science learning Situational affective experiences
- Aikenhead, G., & Michell, H. (2011). Bridging culture—Indigenous and scientific ways of knowing nature. Toronto. Canada: Pearson.Google Scholar
- AITSL (2014). Australian professional standards for graduate teachers. Retrieved from http://www.aitsl.edu.au/australian-professional-standards-for-teachers/standards/list. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
- Brophy, J. (1987). On motivating students. In D. Berliner & B. Rosenshine (Eds.), Talks to teachers (pp. 201–245). New York, NY: Random House.Google Scholar
- Education Council (2015). National STEM school education strategy, 2016–2026. Retrieved from http://www.educationcouncil.edu.au/site/DefaultSite/filesystem/documents/National%20STEM%20School%20Education%20Strategy.pdf. Accessed 15 Oct 2018.
- Fawcett, J., & Downs, F. (1986). The relationship of theory and research. Norwalk, CT: Appleton Century Crofts.Google Scholar
- Foster, E. (2010). A new equation: How encore careers in math and science education equal more success for students. Washington, D.C: National Commission on Teaching and America’s Future.Google Scholar
- Fraser, B. J. (1981). Test of science related attitudes (TOSRA). Melbourne, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Fraser, B. J., Anderson, G. J., & Walberg, H. J. (1982). Assessment of learning environments: Manual for learning environment inventory (LEI) and my class inventory (MCI) (third version). Perth, Australia: Western Australian Institute of Technology.Google Scholar
- Hattie, J.A.C. (2003). Teachers make a difference: What is the research evidence?. Paper presented at the Building Teacher Quality: What does the research tell us ACER Research Conference, Melbourne, Australia. Retrieved from http://research.acer.edu.au/research_conference_2003/4/. Accessed 10 Aug 2018.
- Kennedy, J., Lyons, T., & Quinn, F. (2014). The continuing decline of science and mathematics enrolments in Australian high schools. Teaching Science, 60(2), 34–46.Google Scholar
- Klopfer, L. E. (1971). Evaluation of learning in science. In B. S. Bloom, J. T. Hastings, & G. F. Madaus (Eds.), Handbook on summative and formative evaluation of student learning. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill.Google Scholar
- Koballa, T. R., & Glynn, S. M. (2007). Attitudinal and motivational constructs in science learning. In S. K. Abell & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Handbook of research on science education (pp. 75–102). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
- Krathwohl, D. R., Bloom, B. S., & Masia, B. B. (1964). Taxonomy of educational objectives—the classification of educational goals, handbook II: Affective domain. London: The United Kingdom: Longman.Google Scholar
- Kvale, S. (1996). InterViews: An introduction to qualitative research interviewing. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development [OECD]. (2008). Encouraging student interest in science and technology studies. Paris: OECD.Google Scholar
- Randler, C. & Bogner, F. X. (2007). Pupils’ interest before, during and after a curriculum dealing with ecological topics and its relationship with achievement. Educational Research and Evaluation, 13, 463–478.Google Scholar
- Richardson, L. (1997). Fields of play: Constructing an academic life. New Jersey: Rutgers University Press.Google Scholar
- Rubin, J., & Rubin, S. (2012). Qualitative interviewing: The art of hearing data (3rd ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
- Sjøberg, S., & Schreiner, C. (2010). The ROSE project: An overview and key findings. Retrieved from http://roseproject.no/network/countries/norway/eng/nor-Sjoberg-Schreiner-overview-2010.pdf. Accessed 20 Oct 2017.
- Trobst, S., Kleickmann, T., Lange-Schubert, K., Rothkopf, A., & Moller, K. (2016). Instruction and learners’ declining interest in science: An analysis of German fourth- and sixth-grade classrooms. American Educational Research Journal, 53(1), 162–193. https://doi.org/10.3102/0002831215618662.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Tytler, R. (2007). Australian education review: Re-imaging science education. Camberwell, Australia: Australian Council for Educational Research.Google Scholar
- Zeidner, M. (1998). Test anxiety: The state of art. New York, NY: Plenum.Google Scholar