Enhancing Scientific Communication Skills: a Real-World Simulation in a Tertiary-Level Life Science Class Using E-Learning Technology in Biomedical Literature Perception, Reflective Review Writing on a Clinical Issue, and Self and Peer Assessments
This educational study aimed to explore the feasibility and acceptance of a literacy exercise adopted from the realworld of scientific publishing in a cell and tissue biology course. For that purpose, a tertiary-level multimodality science course, which integrated a blended learning faculty and student lectures, journal club, and wet laboratory sessions including a research project as well as examinations, was complemented by essaywriting of a review and peerreviewing of five manuscripts. All tasks contributed to the final course mark. Special emphasis was laid on the usability of different E-Learning applications for scientific writing and teacher- and peerassessment procedures. Further, potential influences of student characteristics on their peer- and self-assessments as well as their acceptance of the feedback from their peers were evaluated. Seventy-five undergraduate students from different Bachelor programs were included in the study. Plagiarism check and double-blind assessments of the essays were performed using “Turnitin.com.” Students self-assessed their paper and received feedback from five peers and the teacher. Peer assessment was more severe than the teacher- or self-assessment, and the peer mark correlated best with the final course mark. Students with better marks assessed more generously, and there had moderate tendencies for influences of gender and background on peer feedback behavior. The students perceived the writing and assessment exercises, especially being peer-assessed, as demanding, but rewarding and a great learning experience. The additional tasks were feasible using E-Learning technology, which should foster future biomedical courses to train writing skills and the ability to cope with different roles in the scientific community.
KeywordsCommunication skills Scientific writing Peer assessment Self-assessment E-learning Blended learning Plagiarism Peer review
The study was supported by the School of Anatomy and Human Biology and an ISL Grant, UWA, Perth, Australia.
Compliance with Ethical Standards
The study was conducted in accordance with the ethics rules and regulations at the University of Western Australia.
Conflict of Interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
- Alberts, B., Bray, D., Hopkin, K., Johnson, A. D., Lewis, J., Raff, M., Roberts, K., & Walter, P. (2009). Essential cellbiology (Ed. 3 ed.). UK: Garland Science, Taylor and Francis.Google Scholar
- Bennett, C., Barsden, R., Cooke, D., Browne, A., Bradley, C., Bester, A., O’Kelly, H., Metzger, P., Lewis, J., & Filgueira, L. (2011). Plasticity of the human body (Kindle ed.). Seattle: Amazon.Google Scholar
- Cooper, G., Berry, A., & Baglin, J. (2018). Demographic predictors of students’ science participation over the age of 16: an Australian case study. Journal of Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9692-0.
- Filgueira, L. (2010a). Cell, tissue and development: ANHB 3323. Perth: School of Anatomy, Physiology and Human Biology, The University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
- Filgueira, L. (2010b). Cell and tissue organisation ANHB3313 examination paper. Perth: School of Anatomy and Human Biology. The University of Western Australia.Google Scholar
- Geerlings, P., Cole, H., Batt, S., & Martin-Lynch, P. (2016). Peer assisted study session (PASS): does gender matter? Journal of Peer Learning, 9, 10–25.Google Scholar
- Gibbs, G. (1995). Learning in teams. A tutor guide (1st ed.). Oxford: Oxford Centre for Staff Development.Google Scholar
- Gilbert, S. F. (2010). Developmental biology (9th ed.). Sunderland: Sinauer Associates, Inc.Google Scholar
- Gomes, S., Lee, V., Kagan, G., Pal, S., Iswan, N., Stepan, A., Mortimer, C., & Filgueira, L. (2011). Biological emotions of the heart (Kindle ed.). Seattle: Amazon.Google Scholar
- Hackling, M., Ramseger, J., & Chen, H. (2016). Quality teaching in primary science education. Springer Nature, Berlin: Switzerland.Google Scholar
- Hall, G. M. (Ed.). (2011). How to write a paper (4th ed.). Hoboken: BMJ Books.Google Scholar
- Harris, S., Hardy, L., Yousef, D., Gee, S., Jevadi, N., Tang, S., & Filgueira, L. (2011). Biology of vascular diseases (Kindle ed.). Seattle: Amazon.Google Scholar
- Hewson, P. W. (2010). Literacy and scientific literacy: a response to Fensham. Canadian Journal of Science, 2(2), 207–213.Google Scholar
- Hofmann, A. H. (2010). Scientific writing and communication: papers, proposals, and presentations (1st ed.). Cary: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- Holstein, S. E., Mickley Steinmetz, K. R., & Miles, J. D. (2015). Teaching science writing in an introductory lab course. Journal of Undergraduate Neuroscience Education, 13, A101–A109.Google Scholar
- https://endnote.com/ (n.d.) (last access: 07.08.2018)Google Scholar
- https://turnitin.com (n.d.) (last access: 07.08.2018)Google Scholar
- http://www.lab.anhb.uwa.edu.au/mb140/ (n.d.) (last access: 07.08.2018)Google Scholar
- https://www.nih.gov/health-information (n.d.) (last access: 07.08.2018)Google Scholar
- Inayah, A. T., Anwer, L. A., Shareef, M. A., Nurhussen, A., Alkabbani, H. M., Alzahrani, A. A., Obad, A. S., Zafar, M., & Afsar, N. A. (2017). Objectivity in subjectivity: do students’ self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study. BMJ Open, 7, e012289.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Jones, M., Hutt, P., Eastwood, S., & Singh, S. (2017). Impact of intercalated BSc on medical student performance and careers: a BEME systematic review: BEME guide No. 28. Medical Teacher, 35, 10.Google Scholar
- Kiernan, J. A. (2009). Histological and histochemical methods: theory and practice (4th ed.). Banbury: Scion Publishing Ltd..Google Scholar
- Kierszenbaum, A., & Tres, L. (2011). Histology and cell biology: an introduction to pathology (3rd ed.). USA: Mosby.Google Scholar
- Kommalage, M., & Gunawardena. (2011). Evaluation of physiology lectures conducted by students: Comparison between evaluation by staff and students. Advances in Physiology Education 35, 48–52.Google Scholar
- Lindsay, D. (2011). Scientific writing = thinking in words. Clayton, South Victoris, Australia: CSIRO Publishing.Google Scholar
- Lodish, H., Berk, A., & Kaiser, C. A. (2007). Molecular cell biology. London: W.H. Freeman & Co, Macmillan Publishers.Google Scholar
- Maxwell, A., Curtis, G. J., & Verdanega, L. (2008). Does culture influence understanding and perceived seriousness of plagiarism? The International Journal for Educational Integrity, 4(2), 25–40.Google Scholar
- May, L., Monoharan, S., Wingfield, S.-L., McMahen, A., Rule, G., Melvin, Z., Clark, M., Clark, A., Clancy-Love, K., & Filgueira, L. (2011). Biology of aging (Kindle ed.). Seattle: Amazon.Google Scholar
- McMillan, V. (2011). Writingpapers in thebiological sciences (5th ed.). Boston: Bedford/St. Martin’s.Google Scholar
- Mescher, A. (2009). Junqueira’s basic histology: text and atlas (12th ed.). USA: McGraw-Hill Medical.Google Scholar
- Moore, C., & Teather, S. (2013). Engaging students in peer review: feedback as learning. Issues in Educational Research, 23(2, Special issue), 196–211.Google Scholar
- Olitsky, S., Becker, E. A., Jayo, I., Vinogradov, P., & Montcalmo, J. (2018). Constructing “authentic” science: results from a university/high school collaboration integrating digital storytelling and social networking. Research in Science Education. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-018-9699-6.
- Paplia, P., Osman, A., Prempeh, L., Plint, G., Butchard, L., Brooks, S., Malaga, G., Koh, S. L., Tan, J., & Filgueira, L. (2011). The mystery of the human breast (Kindle ed.). Seattle: Amazon.Google Scholar
- Pizzimenti, M. A., Pantazis, N., Sandra, A., Hoffmann, D. S., Lenoch, S., & Ferguson, K. J. (2016). Dissection and dissection-associated required experiences improve student performance in gross anatomy: differences among quartiles. Anatomical Sciences Education, 9, 238–246. https://doi.org/10.1002/ase.1574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
- Plymouth University. (2013). Educational development. Guidelines for group work and its assessment—March 2013 (1st ed.). Plymouth: Plymouth University 5 p. URL: https://www.plymouth.ac.uk/uploads/production/document/path/2/2427/Guidelines_for_Assessing_Group_work_Dec_2012.pdf [accessed 17 February 2017].Google Scholar
- Pollack, G. H. (2001). Cells, gels and the engines of life: a new, unifying approach to cell function. Seattle: Ebner and Sons Publishers.Google Scholar
- Price, I., Smith, A., Pantula, R., Wilson, T., & Filgueira, L. (2011). Diabetic vascular disease (Kindle ed.). Seattle: Amazon.Google Scholar
- Ritschka, B., Stackpoole, E., Tedja, A., Brown, T., Luitingh, T., Symons, Y., Foster, N., & Filgueira, L. (2011). Blood-brain barrier-matter of life and death (Kindle ed.). Seattle: Amazon.Google Scholar
- Ross, M. H., Romrell, L. J., & Pawlina, W. (2006). Histology: a text and atlas (6th ed.). Philadelphia: Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.Google Scholar
- Sunderland, G. S. F. (2000). Developmental biology. Part 1: principles of development in biology. Cary: Sinauer Associates, Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
- The University of Western Australia (2014) http://www.international.uwa.edu.au/data/assets/pdf_file/0004/2633719/Accepted-Full-Load-Equivalents-updated-Nov-2014.pdf. Perth, WA, Australia.
- Truss, L. (2003). Eats, shoots and leaves (the zero tolerance approach to punctuation). London: Profile Books.Google Scholar
- WeaverKF, MoralesV, NelsonM, WeaverPF, ToledoA, GoddeK (2016) The benefits of peer review and a multisemester capstone writing series on inquiry and analysis skills in an undergraduate thesis. CBE Life Science Education 15Google Scholar
- www.blackboard.com (n.d.) (last access: 04.07.2018).Google Scholar
- www.lectopia.com.au (n.d.) (last access: 04.07.2018).Google Scholar
- Yap, C., Ma, J., Gow, S., Wilson, L., Toro, A., Amirudin, S., Pleydell-Bouvarie, M., Visser, C., & Filgueira, L. (2011). Bone biology (Kindle ed.). Seattle: Amazon.Google Scholar