Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) as a Culturally Relevant Pedagogy (CRP) in Qatar: a Perspective from Grade 10 Chemistry Classes

  • David F. Treagust
  • Sheila S. Qureshi
  • Venkat Rao Vishnumolakala
  • Joseph Ojeil
  • Mauro Mocerino
  • Daniel C. Southam
Article
  • 58 Downloads

Abstract

Educational reforms in Qatar have seen the implementation of inquiry-based learning and other student-centred pedagogies. However, there have been few efforts to investigate how these adopted western pedagogies are aligned with the high context culture of Qatar. The study presented in this article highlights the implementation of a student-centred intervention called Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning (POGIL) in selected independent Arabic government schools in Qatar. The study followed a theoretical framework composed of culturally relevant pedagogical practice and social constructivism in teaching and learning. A mixed method research design involving experimental and comparison groups was utilised. Carefully structured learning materials when implemented systematically in a POGIL intervention helped Grade 10 science students improve their perceptions of chemistry learning measured from pre- and post-tests as measured by the What Is Happening In this Class (WIHIC) questionnaire and school-administered achievement test. The study further provided school-based mentoring and professional development opportunities for teachers in the region. Significantly, POGIL was found to be adaptable in the Arabic context.

Keywords

Qatar POGIL POGIL in high schools Science education Chemistry education Culturally relevant pedagogy Student-centred learning Active learning What Is Happening In this Class 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This publication was made possible by NPRP grant [6-1424-5-178] from the Qatar National Research Fund (a member of the Qatar Foundation). The statements made herein are solely the responsibility of the authors.

Compliance with Ethical Standards

The research was approved by the institutional review board at Cornell University located on Education City campus in Qatar and the MOE recommended two independent Arabic schools located in Doha to participate in the study.

References

  1. Abrams, E., Taylor, P. C. S., & Guo, C.-J. (2013). Contextualising culturally relevant science and mathematics teaching for indigenous learning. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 11(1), 1–21  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-012-9388-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Afari, E., Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Khine, M. S. (2013). Students’ perceptions of the learning environment and attitudes in game-based mathematics classrooms. Learning Environments Research, 16(1), 131–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Aldridge, J. M., Fraser, B. J., & Huang, T.-C. I. (1999). Investigating classroom environments in Taiwan and Australia with multiple research methods. The Journal of Educational Research, 93(1), 48–62.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alhammad, K. (2015). A conceptual framework for re-shaping science education in Saudi Arabia. In N. Mansour & S. Al-Shamrani (Eds.), Science education in the Arab gulf states (pp. 121–136). Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.Google Scholar
  5. Areepattamannil, S. (2012). Effects of inquiry-based science instruction on science achievement and interest in science: Evidence from Qatar. The Journal of Educational Research, 105(2), 134–146.  https://doi.org/10.1080/00220671.2010.533717.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Baepler, P., Walker, J. D., & Driessen, M. (2014). It’s not about seat time: Blending, flipping, and efficiency in active learning classrooms. Computers & Education, 78(2014), 227–236.Google Scholar
  7. Bailey, C. P., Minderhout, V., & Loertscher, J. (2012). Learning transferable skills in large lecture halls: Implementing a POGIL approach in biochemistry. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 40(1), 1–7. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/968112505?accountid=10382  https://doi.org/10.1002/bmb.20556 Accessed 10 April 2017.
  8. Baker, D., & Taylor, P. C. S. (1995). The effect of culture on the learning of science in non-western countries: The results of an integrated research review. International Journal of Science Education, 17(6), 695–704  https://doi.org/10.1080/0950069950170602.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Balawi, S., Khalaf, K., & Hitt, G. W. (2016). Leveraging pedagogical innovations for science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) education in the Middle East context. In M. Abdulwahed, M. O. Hasna, & J. E. Froyd (Eds.), Advances in engineering education in the Middle East and North Africa: Current status, and future insights (pp. 59–115). Cham: Springer International Publishing http://dx.doi.org/:10.1007/978-3-319-15323-0_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bart, W. M., Kamal, A., & Lane, J. F. (1987). The development of proportional reasoning in Qatar. The Journal of Genetic Psychology: Research and Theory on Human Development, 148(1), 95–103.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Barthlow, M. J., & Watson, S. B. (2014). The effectiveness of process-oriented guided inquiry learning to reduce alternative conceptions in secondary chemistry. School Science and Mathematics, 114(5), 246–255.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bazeley, P., & Jackson, K. (2013). Qualitative data analysis with NVivo (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  13. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1(3), 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Canelas, D. A., Hill, J. L., & Novicki, A. (2017). Cooperative learning in organic chemistry increases student assessment of learning gains in key transferable skills. Chemistry Education Research and Practice.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C7RP00014F.
  15. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioural sciences. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  16. Cole, R. S., Becker, N., Towns, M., Sweeney, G., Wawro, M., & Rasmussen, C. (2012). Adapting a methodology from mathematics education research to chemistry education research: Documenting collective activity. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 10(1), 193–211.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-011-9284-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Creswell, J. W. (2003). Research design, qualitative, quantitative, and mixed methods approaches (2nd ed.). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc..Google Scholar
  18. Dalgety, J., & Coll, R. K. (2006). The influence of first-year chemistry students’ learning experiences on their educational choices. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 31(3), 303–328.Google Scholar
  19. Durden, T. R., Escalante, E., & Blitch, K. (2015). Start with us! Culturally relevant pedagogy in the preschool classroom. Early Childhood Education Journal, 43(3), 223–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Emilov, I., & Tafrova-Gergorova, A. (2016). A cross-national study of the learning environment in chemistry classes at Albanian, Kosovar, Romanian and Turkish secondary schools. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 14(1), 107–123.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-014-9591-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Haidar, A. H. (2000). Professors' views on the influence of Arab society on science and technology. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 9(3), 257–273.  https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1009447718203.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hamdan, A. K. (2014). The reciprocal and correlative relationship between learning culture and online education: A case from Saudi Arabia. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 15(1), 309–336.Google Scholar
  23. Howard, T. C. (2003). Culturally relevant pedagogy: Ingredients for critical teacher reflection. Theory Into Practice, 42(3), 195–202  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15430421tip4203_5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Irvine, J. J. (2010). Culturally relevant pedagogy. Education Digest: Essential Readings Condensed for Quick Review, 75(8), 57–61.Google Scholar
  25. Johnson, C. C. (2011). The road to culturally relevant science: Exploring how teachers navigate change in pedagogy. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 42(2), 170–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Ladson-Billings, G. (1992). Reading between the lines and beyond the pages: A culturally relevant approach to literacy teaching. Theory Into Practice, 31(4), 312. Retrieved from http://search.ebscohost.com/login.aspx?direct=true&db=bth&AN=5204300&site=ehost-live Accessed 10 April 2017.
  27. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal, 32(3), 465–491.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Ladson-Billings, G. (2001). Crossing over to Canaan: The journey of new teachers in diverse classrooms. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass, Inc..Google Scholar
  29. Lemke-Westcott, T., & Johnson, B. (2013). When culture and learning styles matter: A Canadian university with middle-eastern students. Journal of Research in International Education, 12(1), 66–84.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Mansour, N., & Al-Shamrani, S. (2015). The context of science education in the gulf states. In N. Mansour & S. Al-Shamrani (Eds.), Science education in the gulf states: Visions, sociocultural contexts, and challenges. Rotterdam: Sense Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Martin-Dunlop, C., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment and attitudes associated with an innovative science course designed for prospective elementary teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 6(1), 163–190  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10763-007-9070-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Minderhout, V., & Loertscher, J. (2007). Lecture-free biochemistry: A process oriented guided inquiry approach. Biochemistry and Molecular Biology Education, 35(3), 172–180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Moog, R. S., Creegan, J. F., Hanson, M. D., Spencer, N. J., Straumanis, A., & Bunce, M. D. (2009). POGIL: Process-oriented guided-inquiry learning. In N. Pienta, M. M. Cooper, & T. J. Greenbowe (Eds.), Chemists' guide to effective teaching (Vol. 2, pp. 90–101). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Prentice Hall.Google Scholar
  34. OECD. (2013). PISA 2012 results: What students know and can do: Student performance in mathematics, reading and science. http://www.oecd.org/pisa/keyfindings/pisa-2012-results-volume-i.htm Accessed 7 March 2017.
  35. OECD. (2015). PISA 2015: Results in focus. Paris, France: Retrieved from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf Accessed 7 March 2017.
  36. Osborne, A. B. (1996). Practice into theory into practice: Culturally relevant pedagogy for students we have marginalized and normalized. Anthropology & Education Quarterly, 27, 285–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Prowse, J., & Goddard, J. T. (2010). Teaching across cultures: Canada and Qatar. The Canadian Journal of Higher Education, 40(1), 31–52.Google Scholar
  38. Qureshi, S., Bradley, K. L., Vishnumolakala, V. R., Treagust, D. F., Southam, D. C., Mocerino, M., & Ojeil, J. (2016). Educational reforms and implementation of student-centered active learning in science at secondary and university levels in Qatar. Science Education International, 27(3), 437–456.Google Scholar
  39. Rostron, M. (2009). Liberal arts education in Qatar: Intercultural perspectives. Intercultural Education, 20(3), 219–229  https://doi.org/10.1080/14675980903138517.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Said, Z. (2016). Science education reform in Qatar: Progress and challenges. Eurasia Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology, 12(8), 2253–2265.Google Scholar
  41. Said, Z., Summers, R., Abd-El-Khalick, F., & Wang, S. (2016). Attitudes toward science among grades 3 through 12 Arab students in Qatar: Findings from a cross-sectional national study. International Journal of Science Education, 38(4), 621–643  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500693.2016.1156184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Seymour, E. (2002). Tracking the processes of change in US undergraduate education in science, mathematics, engineering, and technology. Science Education, 86(1), 79–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Smith, D. R., & Ayers, D. F. (2006). Culturally responsive pedagogy and online learning: Implications for the globalized community college. Community College Journal of Research and Practice, 30(5), 401–415.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Spencer, J. N., & Moog, R. S. (2008). POGIL in the physical chemistry classroom. In R. S. Moog & J. N. Spencer (Eds.), Process oriented guided inquiry learning (pp. 148–156). Wachington, DC: American Chemical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Straumanis, A., & Simons, E. A. (2008). A milti-institutional assessment of the use of POGIL in organic chemistry. In R. S. Moog & J. N. Spencer (Eds.), ACS symposium series 994: Process-oriented guided inquiry learning (pp. 226–239). Washington, DC: American Chemical Society.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Su, C.-T., & Parham, L. D. (2002). Generating a valid questionnaire translation for cross-cultural use. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 56(5), 581–585.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Tate, W. F. (1995). Returning to the root: A culturally relevant approach to mathematics pedagogy. Theory Into Practice, 34(3), 166–173.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Treagust, D. F. (1986). Exemplary practice in high school biology classes. In Tobin, K., & Fraser, B. J. (Eds.), Exemplary Practice in Science and Mathematics Education (pp. 29–44). Perth: Key Centre for School Science and Mathematics, Curtin University of Technology. Retrieved from http://search.proquest.com/docview/63233585?accountid=10382 Accessed 9 March 2017.
  49. Vishnumolakala, V. R., Southam, D. C., Treagust, D. F., & Mocerino, M. (2016). Latent constructs of the students’ assessment of their learning gains instrument following instruction in stereochemistry. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 17, 309-319.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RP00214A.
  50. Vishnumolakala, V. R., Southam, D. C., Treagust, D. F., Mocerino, M., & Qureshi, S. (2017). Students’ attitudes, self-efficacy and experiences in a modified Process-Oriented Guided Inquiry Learning undergraduate chemistry classroom. Chemistry Education Research and Practice, 18, 340-352.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RP00233A.
  51. Vygotsky, L. S. (1978). Mind in society: The development of higher psychological processes. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  52. Weimer, M. (2013). Learner-centred teaching: Five key changes to practice. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  53. Wolf, S. J., & Fraser, B. J. (2008). Learning environment, attitudes and achievement among middle-school science students using inquiry-based laboratory activities. Research in Science Education, 38(3), 321–341  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-007-9052-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Zellman, G. L., Ryan, G. W., Karam, R., Constant, L., Salem, H., Gonzalez, G., . . . Al-Obaidli, K. (2009). Implementation of the K–12 education reform in Qatar’s schools. Santa Monica, CA: R. Corporation.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V., part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • David F. Treagust
    • 1
  • Sheila S. Qureshi
    • 2
  • Venkat Rao Vishnumolakala
    • 3
  • Joseph Ojeil
    • 2
  • Mauro Mocerino
    • 4
  • Daniel C. Southam
    • 4
  1. 1.STEM Education Research Group (formerly, Science and Mathematics Education Centre)Curtin UniversityPerthAustralia
  2. 2.Weill Cornell Medicine–QatarEducation CityDohaQatar
  3. 3.Department of Education, College of Arts and SciencesAbu Dhabi UniversityAbu DhabiUnited Arab Emirates
  4. 4.School of Molecular and Life SciencesCurtin UniversityPerthAustralia

Personalised recommendations