Advertisement

Research in Science Education

, Volume 49, Issue 6, pp 1569–1593 | Cite as

Young Children’s Development of Scientific Knowledge Through the Combination of Teacher-Guided Play and Child-Guided Play

  • Marija Sliogeris
  • Sylvia Christine AlmeidaEmail author
Article
  • 423 Downloads

Abstract

Play-based approaches to science learning allow children to meaningfully draw on their everyday experiences and activities as they explore science concepts in context. Acknowledging the crucial role of the teacher in facilitating science learning through play, the purpose of this qualitative study was to examine how teacher-guided play, in conjunction with child-guided play, supports children’s development of science concepts. While previous research on play-based science learning has mainly focused on preschool settings, this study explores the possibilities of play-based approaches to science in primary school contexts. Using a qualitative methodology grounded in the cultural-historical theoretical perspective, children’s learning was examined during a science learning sequence that combined teacher-guided and child-guided play. This study revealed that the teacher-guided play explicitly introduced science concepts which children then used and explored in subsequent child-guided play. However, intentional teaching during the child-guided play continued to be important. Play-based approaches to science allowed children to make sense of the science concepts using familiar, everyday knowledge and activities. It became evident that the expectations and values communicated through classroom practices influenced children’s learning through play.

Keywords

Science education Cultural-historical theory Play Elementary education Early childhood education 

References

  1. Andrée, M., & Lager-Nyqvist, L. (2013). Spontaneous play and imagination in everyday science classroom practice. Research in Science Education, 43, 1735–1750.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-012-9333-y.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Bassey, M. (1999). Case study research in educational settings. Buckingham: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  3. Blake, E., & Howitt, C. (2012). Science in early learning centres: satisfying curiosity, guided play or lost opportunities? In K. Tan & M. Kim (Eds.), Issues and challenges in science education research: moving forward (pp. 281–299). Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-3980-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Briggs, M., & Hansen, A. (2012). Play-based learning in the primary school. London: SAGE.  https://doi.org/10.4135/9781446254493.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Davydov, V. V. (1999). What is real learning activity? In M. Hedegaard & J. Lompscher (Eds.), Learning activity and development (pp. 123–138). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  6. Edwards, S., & Cutter-Mackenzie, A. (2011). Environmentalising early childhood education curriculum through pedagogies of play. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 36(1), 51–59. Retrieved from http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/our-publications/australasian-journal-early-childhood/.
  7. Fleer, M. (2009). Understanding the dialectical relationship between everyday concepts and scientific concepts within play-based programs. Research in Science Education, 39, 281–306.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-008-9085-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Fleer, M. (2010). Early learning and development cultural-historical concepts in play. Melbourne: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Fleer, M. (2011). ‘Conceptual play’: foregrounding imagination and cognition during concept formation in early years education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 12(3), 224–240.  https://doi.org/10.2304/ciec.2011.12.3.224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Fleer, M., & Pramling, N. (2015). A cultural-historical study of children learning science: foregrounding affective imagination in play-based settings. Dordrecht: Springer.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-9370-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Fleer, M., Gomes, J., & March, S. (2014). Science learning affordances in preschool environments. Australasian Journal of Early Childhood, 39(1), 38–48. Retrieved from http://www.earlychildhoodaustralia.org.au/our-publications/australasian-journal-early-childhood/.
  12. Franks, M. (2011). Pockets of participation: revisiting child-centred participation research. Children & Society, 25, 15–25.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1099-0860.2009.00258.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Gray, A. (2003). Research practice for cultural studies: ethnographic methods and lived cultures. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Hedegaard, M. (1999). The influence of societal knowledge traditions on children’s thinking and conceptual development. In M. Hedegaard & J. Lompscher (Eds.), Learning activity and development (pp. 22–50). Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Hedegaard, M. (2008). Children’s learning through participation in institutional practice. In B. van Oers, W. Wardekker, & R. van der Veer (Eds.), The transformation of learning (pp. 294–318). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Hedegaard, M., & Chaiklin, S. (2005). Radical-local teaching and learning a cultural-historical approach. Aarhus: Aarhus University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Hedegaard, M., & Fleer, M. (2008). Studying children: a cultural-historical approach. Melbourne: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  18. Larsson, J. (2013). Children’s encounters with friction as understood as a phenomenon of emerging science and as “opportunities for learning”. Journal of Research in Childhood Education, 27, 377–392.  https://doi.org/10.1080/02568543.2013.796335.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Lincoln, E. G., & Guba, Y. S. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Robbins, J. (2005). Brown paper packages’? A sociocultural perspective on young children’s ideas in science. Research in Science Education, 35, 151–172.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-005-0092-x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Segal, G., & Cosgrove, M. (1994). “I want to find out how the sun works!” Children’s sociodramatic play and its potential role in the early learning of physical science. Research in Science Education, 24, 304–312.  https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02356357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Siraj-Blatchford, I. (2009). Conceptualising progression in the pedagogy of play and sustained shared thinking in early childhood education: a Vygotskian perspective. Education and Child Psychology, 26(2), 77–89.Google Scholar
  23. Siry, C. (2013). Exploring the complexities of children’s inquiries in science: knowledge production through participatory practices. Research in Science Education, 42, 2407–2430.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-013-9364-z.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Vygostky, L. S. (1987). Volume 1: Problems of general psychology. (R. W. Rieber, A. S. Carton, Eds., & N. Minick, Trans.) New York, NY: Plenum Press.Google Scholar
  25. Walker, K. (2011). Play matters: investigative learning for preschool to grade 2 (2nd ed.). Camberwell: ACER Press.Google Scholar
  26. Wolfe, C. R., Cummins, R. H., Myers, C. A., & Cedillos, E. M. (2015). Scientific inquiry and exploratory representational play. In D. P. Fromberg & D. Bergen (Eds.), Play from birth to twelve: contexts, perspectives and meanings (3rd ed., pp. 207–215). New York: Routledge.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media B.V. 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.EducationMonash University-Peninsula CampusMelbourneAustralia

Personalised recommendations