Research in Science Education

, Volume 48, Issue 2, pp 437–464 | Cite as

Early-Years Teachers’ Professional Upgrading in Science: a Long-Term Programme

Article

Abstract

In this paper, we present a professional development/upgrading programme in science for early-years teachers and investigate its impact on the teachers’ competencies in relation to their knowledge and teaching of science. The basic idea of the programme was to motivate the teachers by making them members of an action research group aimed at developing and implementing curriculum activities to which they would contribute and thus meaningfully engaging them in their own learning. The programme used a ‘collaborative partnership’ model for the development of the activities. In this model, the collaborative notion is defined as an act of ‘shared creation’: partners share a goal and members bring their expertise to the partnership. Within this context, the partners were a researcher in science education with a background in physics, who also served as a facilitator, and six in-service early-years teachers with a background in early-years pedagogy and developmental sciences, who had many years of experience (classroom experts). These teachers participated in the programme as co-designers, but were involved to a significantly lesser degree than the researcher. The programme procedures comprised group work and individual teachers’ class work. Data sources included teachers’ essays, field-notes, lesson recordings and group-work records. Data were qualitatively analysed. The main results indicate improvement of teachers’ ‘transformed’ knowledge of the subject matter, development/improvement of knowledge of instructional strategies, including factors related to quality of implementation of the activities, knowledge of the pupils and improvement of the teachers’ efficacy.

Keywords

Professional development in science Early-years science Early-years teachers Collaborative partnership Science education 

Notes

Acknowledgments

Special thanks are extended to the early-years teachers, M. Homata, P. Patinioti, T. Loupidou, F. Fista, F. Sarigiannidou and E. Fragonikolaki, for participating in the work group, for their interest and for their valuable views.

References

  1. Appleton, K. (2005). Elementary science teacher education: international perspectives on contemporary issues and practice. London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Appleton, K. (2008). Developing science pedagogical content knowledge through mentoring elementary teachers. Journal of Science Teacher Education, 19, 523–545. doi: 10.1007/s10972-008-9109-4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Avalos, B. (2011). Teacher professional development in teaching and teacher education over ten years. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27, 10–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baldwin, R. (2005).Making the biggest difference: planning professional development in schools. The Adviser, January, 5–8.Google Scholar
  5. Barba, R., & Rubba, P. (1992). A comparison of pre-service and in-service earth and space science teachers’ general mental abilities, content knowledge and problem solving skills. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 29(10), 1021–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Barnett, J., & Hodson, D. (2001). Pedagogical context knowledge: towards a fuller understanding of what good science teachers know. Science Teacher Education, 85, 426–453.Google Scholar
  7. Blömeke, S., & Delaney, S. (2012). Assessment of teacher knowledge across countries: a review of the state of research. ZDM Mathematics Education, 44, 223–247.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Borko, H., & Putnam, R. (1995). Expanding a teachers’ knowledge base: a cognitive psychological perspective on professional development. In T. Guskey & M. Huberman (Eds.), Professional development in education: new paradigms and practices (pp. 35–66). New York: Teachers College Press.Google Scholar
  9. Borko, H., Jacobs, J., & Koellner, K. (2010). Contemporary approaches to teacher professional development. In P. L. Peterson, E. Baker, & B. McGaw (Eds.), Third international encyclopaedia of education, 7 (pp. 548–556). Amsterdam: Elsevier.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Boudreaux, A., Shaffer, P., Heron, P., & McDermott, L. (2008). Student understanding of control of variables: deciding whether or not a variable influences the behaviour of a system. American Journal of Physics, 76(2), 163–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Boulter, C. J. (2000). Language, models and modelling in the primary science classroom. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 289–305). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Boulter, C. J., & Buckley, B. C. (2000). Constructing typology of models for science education. In J. K. Gilbert & C. J. Boulter (Eds.), Developing models in science education (pp. 41–57). Dordrecht: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Boulter, C. J., Prain, V., & Armitage, M. (1998). “What is going to happen in the eclipse tonight?” Rethinking perspectives on primary school science. International Journal of Science Education, 20(4), 487–500.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bruce, C. D., Indigo, E., Ross, J., Dookie, L., & Beatty, R. (2010). The effects of sustained classroom-embedded teacher professional learning on teacher efficacy and related student achievement. Teaching and Teacher Education, 26, 1598–1608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bush, T. & Glover, D. (2003). Leadership development for new school leaders: the New Visions Induction to Headship programme, paper presented at BELMAS Conference, Milton Keynes, October.Google Scholar
  16. Chaille, C., & Britain, L. (1991). The young child as scientist. New York: Harper Collins.Google Scholar
  17. Chin, C. (2007). Teacher questioning in science classrooms: approaches that stimulate productive thinking. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 44(6), 815–843.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Clements, D. H., & Sarama, J. (2011). Early childhood teacher education: the case of geometry. Journal of Math Teacher Education, 14, 133–148. doi: 10.1007/s10857-011-9173-0.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Cochran, K. F., DeRuiter, J. A., & King, R. (1993). Pedagogical content knowing: an integrative model for teacher preparation. Journal of Teacher Education, 44(4), 263–273.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Copley, J., & Padron, Y. (1999). Preparing teachers of young learners: professional development of early childhood teachers in mathematics and science. In: Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics, and technology education. Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
  21. Cormas, P., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2007). Effective research-based characteristics of professional development: a mixed methods study. Paper presented at the annual meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  22. Cormas, P., & Barufaldi, J. P. (2011). The effective research-based characteristics of professional development of the National Science Foundation’s GK-12 Programme. J SciTeachrEduc, 22(3), 255–277.Google Scholar
  23. Darling-Hammond, L. (2000). How Teacher Education Matters. Journal of Teacher Education, 51(3), 166–173.Google Scholar
  24. Darling-Hammond, L., Wei, R. C., Andree, A., Richardson, N., & Orphanos, S. (2009). State of the profession: study measures status of professional development. Journal of Staff Development, 30(2), 42–50.Google Scholar
  25. Dass, P. M. (2001). Implementation of instructional innovations in k-8 science classes: perspectives of in-service teachers. International Journal of Science Education, 23(9), 969–984.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Duit, R. (1991). On the role of analogies and metaphors in learning science. Science Education, 75(6), 649–672.Google Scholar
  27. Edmonds, S., & Lee, B. (2002). Teacher feelings about continuing professional development. Education journal, 61, 28–29.Google Scholar
  28. Elstgeest, J. (1985). The right question at the right time. In W. Harlen (Ed.), Primary science: taking the plunge (pp. 36–46). Oxford: Heinemann.Google Scholar
  29. Erdogan, I., & Campbell, T. (2008). Teacher questioning and interaction patterns in classrooms facilitated with differing levels of constructivist teaching practices. International Journal of Science Education, 30(14), 1891–1914.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Erickson, G. L. (1979). Children’s conceptions of heat and temperature. Science Education, 63(2), 221–230.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Eshach, H., & Fried, M. (2005). Should science be taught in early childhood? Journal of Science Education and Technology, 14(3), 315–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Falk, A. (2012). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science Education, 96, 265–290. doi: 10.1002/sce.20473.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fernandez-Balboa, J.-M., & Stiehl, J. (1995). The generic nature of pedagogical content knowledge among college professors. Teaching and Teacher Education, 11(3), 293–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fleer, M. (1993). Science education in child care. Science Education, 77(6), 561–573.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Fleer, M. (2009). Supporting scientific conceptual consciousness or learning in ‘a roundabout way’ in play-based contexts. International Journal of Science Education, 31(8), 1069–1089.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Fleer, M. (2016). Early childhood science teacher education. In R. Gunstone (Ed.), Encyclopedia of science education (pp. 347–354). Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht. doi: 10.1007/978-94-007-2150-0.
  37. Fleer, M., & Robbins, J. (2003). Understanding our youngest scientific and technological thinkers: international developments in early childhood science education. Research in Science Education, 33, 399–404.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Funk, J. H., Fiel, R. L., Okey, J. R., Jaus, H. H., & Sprague, C. S. (1985). Learning science process skills. IA, Kendall/Hunt: Dubuque.Google Scholar
  39. Garbett, D. (2003). Science education in early childhood teacher education: putting forward a case to enhance student teachers’ confidence and competence. Research in Science Education, 33, 467–481.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38, 915–945.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gillies, R. M., & Nichol, K. (2015). How to support primary teachers’ implementation of inquiry: teachers’ reflections on teaching cooperative inquiry-based science. Research in Science Education, 45, 171–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Ginsburg, H., Lee, J., & Boyd, J. (2008). Mathematics education for young children: what it is and how to promote it. Social Policy Report, 22, 1–13.Google Scholar
  43. Gitomer, D. H., & Zisk, R. C. (2015). Knowing what teachers know. Review of Research in Education, 39, 1–53.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Gramann, J. (2004). Windows of opportunity in early learning. Literacy Links, Volume 8, No. 3, Texas Center for the Advancement of Literacy and Learning.Google Scholar
  45. Greenfield, D., Jirout, L., Dominguez, X., Greenberg, A., Maier, M., & Fuccillo, J. (2009). Science in the preschool classroom: a programmatic research agenda to improve science readiness. Early Education and Development, 20(1), 138–264.Google Scholar
  46. Grossman, P. L. (1990). The making of a teacher: teacher knowledge and teacher education. New York: Teacher College Press.Google Scholar
  47. Grossman, P., Hammerness, K., & McDonald, M. (2009). Redefining teacher: re-imagining teacher education. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 15(2), 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Guba, E. G., & Lincoln, Y. S. (1981). Effective education. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  49. Guskey, T. R. (2002). Professional development and teacher change. Teachers and Teaching: Theory and Practice, 8(3/4), 381–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Hadzigeorgiou, Y. (2002). A study of the development of the concept of mechanical stability in preschool children. Research in Science Education, 32(3), 373–391.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Haefner, L., & Zembal-Saul, C. (2004). Learning by doing? Prospective elementary teachers’ developing understandings of scientific inquiry and science teaching and learning. International Journal of Science Education, 26(13), 1653–1674.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Harlen, W. (1996). The teaching of science. London: David Fulton.Google Scholar
  53. Harlen, W., Holroyd, C., & Byrne, M. (1995). Confidence and understanding: issues in the teaching of science and technology in Scottish primary schools. Edinburgh: Scottish Council for Research in Education.Google Scholar
  54. Havu-Nuutinen, S. (2005). Examining young children’s conceptual change process in floating and sinking from a social constructivist perspective. International Journal of Science Education, 27(3), 259–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Hong, S-Y., Torquati, J. & Molfese, V. (2013). Theory guided professional development in early childhood science education. Faculty Publications from CYFS. Paper 29, http://digitalcommons.unl.edu/cyfsfacpub/29
  56. Honold, L. (2003). Developing effective employee learning experiences. Development and Learning in Organisations, 17(6), 6–8.Google Scholar
  57. Hume, A., & Berry, A. (2011). Constructing CoRes—a strategy for building PCK in pre-service science teacher education. Research in Science Education, 41, 341–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Janssen, F., Westbroek, H., & Doyle, W. (2014). The practical turn in teacher education: designing a preparation sequence for core practice frames. Journal of Teacher Education, 65, 195–206. doi: 10.1177/0022487113518584.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Jones, M. (2008). Collaborative partnerships: a model for science teacher education and professional development. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33(3), 60–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Kallery, M. (2000). Children’s science questions and ideas provide an invaluable tool for the early years’ teacher. Primary Science Review, 61, 18–19.Google Scholar
  61. Kallery, M. (2001). Early-years Educators' Attitudes to Science and Pseudo-science: The case of astronomy and astrology. European Journal of Teacher Education, 24(3), 329–342.Google Scholar
  62. Kallery, M. (2004). Early years teachers' late concerns and perceived needs in science: an exploratory study. European Journal of Teacher Education, 27(2), 147–165.Google Scholar
  63. Kallery, M. (2011). Astronomical Concepts and Events Awareness for Young Children. International Journal of Science Education, 33(3), 341–369.Google Scholar
  64. Kallery, M. (2014). In quest of teaching quality in preschool science: Teacher views of factors influencing their work. Proceedings of the 9th International conference of the European Science Education Research Association (E.S.E.R.A.). Retrieved from http://www.esera.org/publications/esera-conference-proceedings/science-educationresearch-for-evidence-/.
  65. Kallery, M. (2015). Science in early years education: introducing floating and sinking as a property of matter. International Journal of Early Years Education, 23(1), 31–53.Google Scholar
  66. Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2001). Preschool teachers’ content knowledge in science: Their understanding of elementary science concepts and of issues raised by children’s questions. International Journal of Early Years Education, 9(3), 165–179.Google Scholar
  67. Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2002). What happens in the early years science classroom? The reality of teachers curriculum implementation activities. European Early Childhood Education Research Journal, 10(2).Google Scholar
  68. Kallery, M., & Psillos, D. (2004). Anthropomorphism and animism in early years’ science: Why teachers use them, how they conceptualise them and what are their views on their use. Research in Science Education, 34, 291–311.Google Scholar
  69. Kallery, M., Psillos, D., & Tselfes, V. (2009). Typical didactical activities in the Greek early-years science classroom: Do they promote science learning? International Journal of Science Education, 31(1), 1187–1204.Google Scholar
  70. Kariotoglou, P., Pnevmatikos, D. & Karnezou, M. (2014). In-service teachers’ professional development in science education: designing principles of a research project. 2nd EduCbr-CTE 2014, Albania-Korçё. ISBN (print) 9789928146274; ISBN (on line) 978992814619, 401–408.Google Scholar
  71. Kelly, J. (2000). Rethinking the elementary science methods course: a case of content, pedagogy and informal science education. International Journal of Science Education, 22(7), 755–777.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Kenny, J. (2010). Preparing pre-service primary teachers to teach primary science: a partnership-based approach. International Journal of Science Education, 32(10), 1267–1288.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Kind, V. (2009). Pedagogical content knowledge in science education: perspectives and potential for progress. Studies in Science Education, 45(2), 169–204.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Kind, V. (2015). On the beauty of knowing then not knowing: pinning down the elusive qualities of PCK. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 178–195). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  75. King, M. B., & Newmann, F. M. (2001). Building school capacity through professional development: conceptual and empirical considerations. International Journal of Educational Management, 15(2), 86–93.Google Scholar
  76. Kruger, C. J. (1990). Some primary teachers’ ideas about energy. Physics Education, 25, 86–91.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Kruger, C., & Summers, M. (1988). Primary school teachers’ understanding of science concepts. Journal of Education for Teaching, 14(3), 259–265.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Lawrenz, F. (1986). Misconceptions of physical science concepts among elementary school teachers. School Science and Mathematics, 86(8), 654–660.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Lind, K. (1999). Science in early childhood: developing and acquiring fundamental concepts and skills. In, Dialogue on early childhood science, mathematics and technology education (pp. 73–83). Washington, DC: AAAS.Google Scholar
  80. Magnusson, S., Krajcik, J., & Borko, H. (1999). Nature, sources, and development of pedagogical content knowledge for science teaching. In J. Gess-Newsome & N. G. Lederman (Eds.), Examining pedagogical content knowledge: the construct and its implications for science education (pp. 95–132). Boston: Kluwer.Google Scholar
  81. Malone, A., & Smith, G. (2010). Developing schools as professional learning communities: the TL21 experience. US-China education review, 7(9), 106–114.Google Scholar
  82. Mant, J., & Summers, M. (1993). Some primary school teachers’ understanding of the earth’s place in the universe. Research Papers in Education, 8(1), 101–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. McIldowie, E. (1998). Introducing temperature scales. Physics Education, 33, 368.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Nash, J. M. (1997). Fertile minds. Time, 3, 49–56.Google Scholar
  85. National Research Council (2007). Taking science to school: learning and teaching science in grades k-8. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  86. National Research Council (2012). Developing assessments of science proficiency in K-12. Washington, DC: National Academies Press.Google Scholar
  87. Nordenbo, S-E., Søgaard Larsen, M., Tiftik¸i, N., Wendt, R. E., & Østergaard, S. (2008). Lærerkompetencer og elevers læring iførskole og skole. Et systematisk review udført for Kunnskapsdepartementet, Oslo [Teacher competence and student learning in preschool and school]. Køpenhamn: Danmarks Pædagogiske Universitetsskole.Google Scholar
  88. Palardy, G. J., & Rumberger, R. W. (2008). Teacher effectiveness in first grade: the importance of background qualifications, attitudes, and instructional practices for student learning. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 30(2), 111–140.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Park, S., & Oliver, S. (2008). Revisiting the conceptualisation of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): PCK as a conceptual tool to understand teachers as professionals. Research in Science Education, 38, 261–284.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Piaget, J. (1951). The child’s conception of the world. Maryland: Littlefield Adams.Google Scholar
  91. Piggot-Irvine, E. (2006). Establishing criteria for effective professional development and use in evaluating an action research programme. Journal of In-service Education, 32(4), 477–496.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Radford, D. (1998). Transferring theory into practice: a model for professional development for science education reform. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35(1), 73–88.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Rose, J. & Reynolds, D. (2006). Teachers’ continuing professional development: a new approach [online]. Paper presented at 20th Annual World International Congress for effectiveness and Improvement. Available from: http://wwwfm-kp.si/zalozba/ISBN/978-961-6573-65-8/219-240.pdf [Accessed September 2015].
  94. Ross, J. A., Bruce, C. D., & Hogaboam-Gray, A. (2006). The impact of a professional development programme on student achievement in grade 6 mathematics. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 9, 551–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Rozenszajn, R., & Yarden, A. (2014). Expansion of biology teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) during a long-term professional development program. Research in Science Education, 44, 189–213.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Rudman, R. (1999). Human resources management in New Zealand. Longman: Auckland.Google Scholar
  97. Scher, L., & O’Reilly, F. (2009). Professional development for K-12 math and science teachers: what do we really know? Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 2, 209–249. doi: 10.1080/19345740802641527.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  98. Scott, P. H., & Driver, R. H. (1998). Learning about science teaching: perspectives from an action research project. In B. J. Fraser & K. G. Tobin (Eds.), International handbook of science education (pp. 67–80). GB: Kluwer Academic Publishers.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  99. Shore, R. (1997). Rethinking the brain: new insights into early development. New York: Families and Work Institute.Google Scholar
  100. Shulman, L. (1986). Those who understand: knowledge growth in teaching. Educational Researcher, 15(2), 4–14.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  101. Shulman, L. (1987). Knowledge and teaching: foundations of the new reform. Harvard Educational Review, 57, 1–22.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  102. Shulman, L. (2015). PCK: its genesis and exodus. In A. Berry, P. Friedrichsen, & J. Loughran (Eds.), Re-examining pedagogical content knowledge in science education (pp. 3–13). New York and London: Routledge.Google Scholar
  103. Shulman, L. S., & Sykes, G. (1986). A national board for teaching? In search for a bold standard. A report for the task force on teaching as a profession. Carnegie Corporation: New York.Google Scholar
  104. Smith, G. (2014). An innovative model of professional development to enhance teaching and learning primary science in Irish schools. Professional Development in Education, 40(3), 467–487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  105. Smith, G. (2015). The impact of a professional development programme on primary teachers’ classroom practice and pupils’ attitudes to science. Research in Science Education, 45, 215–239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  106. Smith, D. C., & Neale, D. C. (1989). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. Teaching and Teacher Education, 5(1), 1–20.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  107. Smith, D.C. & Neale, D.C., 1991). The construction of subject matter knowledge in primary science teaching. In: J. Brophy (Ed.) Advances in research on teaching, vol. 2. JAI Press.Google Scholar
  108. Sparks, G. M. (1983). Synthesis of research on staff development for effective teaching. Educational Leadership, 41, 65–72.Google Scholar
  109. Spektor-Levy, O., Baruch, Y. K., & Mevarech, Z. (2013). Science and scientific curiosity in pre-school—the teacher’s point of view. International Journal of Science Education, 35(13), 2226–2253. doi: 10.1080/09500693.2011.631608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  110. Stephen, C. (2010). Pedagogy: the silent partner in early years learning. Early Years, 30(1), 15–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  111. Strauss, A., & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research. Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. CA, Sage Publications: Newbury Park.Google Scholar
  112. Sullivan, H. McMillan, D., & McConnell, B. (2011). Continuous professional development and its impact on practice: a north-south comparative study of Irish teachers’ perceptions, experiences and motivation [SCoTENS]Google Scholar
  113. Sutala, V., & Krajcik, J. S. (1988). The effective use of analogies for solving mole problems in high school chemistry. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the National Association of Research in Science Teaching.Google Scholar
  114. Sykes, G. (1996). Reform of and as professional development. Phi Delta Kappan, 77(7), 465–489.Google Scholar
  115. Tamir, P. (1988). Subject matter and related pedagogical knowledge in teacher education. Teaching and Teacher Education, 4(2), 99–110.Google Scholar
  116. Thulin, S., & Redfors, A. (2016). Student preschool teachers’ experiences of science and its role in preschool. Early Childhood Education Journal. doi: 10.1007/s10643-016-0783-0.Google Scholar
  117. Tomita, A., & Kallery, M. (2016). Expert teachers’ views of factors influencing their teaching quality in early childhood science in Japan. Proceedings of the 10th International conference of the European Science Education Research Association (E.S.E.R.A.), Helsinki Finland, September 2015.Google Scholar
  118. Torquati, J., Cutler, K., Gilkerson, D., & Sarver, S. (2013). Early childhood educators’ perceptions of nature, science, and environmental education. Early Education and Development., 24(5).Google Scholar
  119. Treagust, D. F., Duit, R., Josh, P., & Lindauer, I. (1990). A naturalistic study of science teachersuse of analogies us part of their regular teaching. Paper presented at the Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, Boston.Google Scholar
  120. US Department of Education (1996). Why professional development. In Achieving the goals: goal 4, professional development. Retrieved from www.ed.gov.pubs/AchGoal14/intro.html.
  121. Van Driel, J. H., & Berry, A. (2012). Teacher professional development focusing on pedagogical content knowledge. Educational Researcher, 41(8), 26–28.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  122. Van Driel, J. H., Beijaard, D., & Verloop, N. (2001). Professional development and reform in science education: the role of teachers’ practical knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(2), 137–158.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  123. Van Driel, J. H., Verloop, N., & De Vos, W. (1998). Developing science teachers’ pedagogical content knowledge. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 35, 673–695.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  124. Wandersee, J. H., Mintzes, J. J., & Novac, J. D. (1994). Research on alternative conceptions in science. In D. L. Gabel (Ed.), Handbook of research on science teaching and learning (pp. 177–210). New York: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  125. Webster-Wright, A. (2009). Reframing professional development through understanding authentic professional learning. Review of Educational Research, 79(2), 702–739.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  126. Windschitl, M., Thompson, J., Braaten, M., & Stroupe, D. (2012). Proposing a core set of instructional practices and tools for teachers of science. Science Education, 96(5), 878–903.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  127. Yoshikawa, H., Wieland, C., Brooks-Gunn, J., Burchinal, M. R., Espinosa, L. M., Gormley, W. T., et al. (2013). Investing in our future: the evidence base on preschool education. Society for Research in Child Development. http://fcd-us.org/resourcec/evidence-base-preschool.
  128. Dick, B. (1997). Action learning and action research. Retrieved from http://www.scu.edu.au/schools/gcm/ar/arp/actlearn.html.

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media Dordrecht 2016

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of PhysicsAristotle University of ThessalonikiThessalonikiGreece

Personalised recommendations