Advertisement

University and Department Influences on Scientists’ Occupational Outcomes

  • Jeongeun KimEmail author
  • Molly Ott
  • Lindsey Dippold
Article

Abstract

Over 50,000 Ph.D. degrees in Science and Engineering (S&E) are awarded annually by United States (U.S.) universities, but few studies have systematically considered how the various aspects of doctoral training can influence the occupational outcomes of S&E doctoral graduates. This inquiry draws from the National Science Foundation’s Scientists and Engineers Statistical Data System to investigate how the characteristics of U.S. degree-granting departments and institutions are associated with doctoral graduates’ entrance into different career sectors (i.e., academia, industry, government). The conceptual framework is based on the Scientific and Technical Human Capital theory (Bozeman et al. in Int J Technol Manag 22(7–8):716–740, 2001) as well as Berger and Milem’s (Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, Agathon Press, New York, 2000) model of college impact. We find that a number of university and department factors are associated with the career choice of S&E doctoral graduates after finishing their Ph.D including: (a) structural characteristics, such as geographic location and faculty composition, (b) organizational behaviors, such as those symbolizing a program’s relative emphasis on traditional academic work versus activities valued in industry, and (c) peer group characteristics such as a department’s proportion of female and minority Ph.D. students. These results will be particularly informative for policy makers, faculty and administrators in S&E programs, and prospective doctoral students.

Keywords

STEM Ph.D. students Occupational outcomes College impact Scientific and Technical Human Capital 

Notes

Acknowledgement

The authors also would like to recognize additional support provided by Arizona State University’s Center for Organization Research and Design and Dr. Stuart Bretschneider.

Funding

This study was funded by the Institute for Social Science Research at Arizona State University.

References

  1. Agarwal, R., & Ohyama, A. (2013). Industry or academia, basic or applied? Career choices and earnings trajectories of scientists. Management Science, 59(4), 950–970.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Altbach, P. (2006). Doctoral education: Present realities and future trends. In J. Forest & P. Altbach (Eds.), International handbook of higher education (pp. 65–81). Amsterdam: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Antony, J. S., & Taylor, E. (2004). Theories and strategies of academic career socialization: Improving paths to the professoriate for black graduate students. In D. H. Wulff & A. E. Austin (Eds.), Paths to the professoriate: Strategies for enriching the preparation of future faculty (pp. 92–114). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  4. Ashcraft, C., & Breitzman, A. (2012). Who invents IT? Women’s participation in information technology patenting, 2012 update. Boulder, CO: National Center for Women & Information Technology.Google Scholar
  5. Astin, A. W. (1984). Student involvement: A developmental theory for higher education. Journal of College Student Personnel, 25(4), 297–308.Google Scholar
  6. Baker, A. (2015). Non-tenured post-doctoral researchers’ job mobility and research output: An analysis of the role of research discipline, department size, and coauthors. Research Policy, 44, 634–650.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Balsmeier, B., & Pellens, M. (2014). Who makes, who breaks: Which scientists stay in academe? Economics Letters, 122(2), 229–232.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bastedo, M. N., & Bowman, N. A. (2011). College rankings as an interorganizational dependency: Establishing the foundation for strategic and institutional accounts. Research in Higher Education, 52(1), 3–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bercovitz, J., & Feldman, M. (2008). Academic entrepreneurs: Organizational change at the individual level. Organization Science, 19(1), 69–89.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Berger, J. B. (2001). Understanding the organizational nature of student persistence: Empirically-based recommendations for practice. Journal of College Student Retention: Research, Theory & Practice, 3(1), 3–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Berger, J. & Milem, J. (2000). Organizational behavior in higher education and student outcomes. Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research, vol. XV (pp. 268–338). Agathon Press: New York.Google Scholar
  12. Bowman, N. A., & Culver, K. C. (2018). When do honors programs make the grade? Conditional effects on college satisfaction, achievement, retention, and graduation. Research in Higher Education, 59(3), 249–272.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bozeman, B., Dietz, J. S., & Gaughan, M. (2001). Scientific and technical human capital: An alternative model for research evaluation. International Journal of Technology Management, 22(7–8), 716–740.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Bozeman, B., Fay, D., & Slade, C. P. (2013). Research collaboration in universities and academic entrepreneurship: The-state-of-the-art. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 38(1), 1–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Burris, V. (2004). The academic caste system: Prestige hierarchies in PhD exchange networks. American Sociological Review, 69(2), 239–264.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Burt, B. A. (2017). Learning competencies through engineering research group experiences. Studies in Graduate and Postdoctoral Education, 8(1), 48–64.  https://doi.org/10.1108/SGPE-05-2017-019.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Burt, B. A., Williams, K. L., & Smith, W. A. (2018). Into the storm: Ecological and sociological impediments to Black males’ persistence in engineering graduate programs. American Educational Research Journal, 55(5), 965–1006.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Byrd, J., Herskowitz, O., Aloise, J., Nye, A., Rao, S., & Reuther, K. (2017). University technology accelerators: Design considerations and demerging best practices. Technology and Innovation, 19(1), 349–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Celis, S., & Kim, J. (2018). The making of homophilic networks in international research collaborations: A global perspective from Chilean and Korean engineering. Research Policy, 47(3), 573–582.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Chen, R. (2012). Institutional characteristics and college student dropout risks: A multilevel event history analysis. Research in Higher Education, 53(5), 487–505.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Clauset, A., Arbesman, S., & Larremore, D. B. (2015). Systematic inequality and hierarchy in faculty hiring networks. Science Advances, 1(1), e1400005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Conti, A., & Visentin, F. (2015). A revealed preference analysis of PhD students’ choices over employment outcomes. Research Policy, 44(10), 1931–1947.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Crisp, G., Doran, E., & Reyes, N. A. S. (2018). Predicting graduation rates at 4-year broad access institutions using a Bayesian modeling approach. Research in Higher Education, 59(2), 133–155.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Curtin, N., Malley, J., & Stewart, A. J. (2016). Mentoring the next generation of faculty: Supporting academic career aspirations among doctoral students. Research in Higher Education, 57(6), 714–738.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cyranoski, D., Gilbert, N., Ledford, H., Nayar, A., & Yahia, M. (2011). Education: The PhD factory. Nature, 472(7343), 276–279.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Davis, G. (2005). Doctors without orders: Highlights of the Sigma Xi postdoc survey. American Scientist, 93 (3, Supplement).Google Scholar
  27. De Grande, H., De Boyser, K., Vandevelde, K., & Van Rossem, R. (2014). From academia to industry: Are doctorate holders ready? Journal of the Knowledge Economy, 5(3), 538–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. De Welde, K., & Laursen, S. (2011). The glass obstacle course: Informal and formal barriers for women Ph D students in STEM fields. International Journal of Gender, Science and Technology, 3(3), 571–595.Google Scholar
  29. Debackere, K., & Rappa, M. (1995). Scientists at major and minor universities: Mobility along the prestige continuum. Research Policy, 24, 137–150.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Facebook. (n.d.). Facebook fellowship program. Retrieved June 9, 2019 from https://research.fb.com/programs/fellowship/.
  31. Farritor, S. (2017). University-based makerspaces: A source of innovation. Technology and Innovation, 19(1), 389–395.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Fox, M. (2001). Women, science and academia: Graduate education and careers. Gender and Society, 15(5), 654–666.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Fox, M. F., & Stephan, P. E. (2001). Careers of young scientists: Preferences, prospects and realities by gender and field. Social Studies of Science, 31(1), 109–122.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Fritsch, M., & Krabel, S. (2012). Ready to leave the ivory tower? Academic scientists’ appeal to work in the private sector. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 37(3), 271–296.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Gardner, S. K. (2008). Fitting the mold of graduate school: A qualitative study of socialization in doctoral education. Innovative Higher Education, 33(2), 125–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Gaughan, M., & Robin, S. (2004). National science training policy and early scientific careers in France and the United States. Research Policy, 33, 569–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Gemme, B., & Gingras, Y. (2012). Academic careers for graduate students: A strong attractor in a changed environment. Higher Education, 63(6), 667–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Geuna, A. (Ed.). (2015). Global mobility of research scientists: The economics of who goes where and why. Cambridge, MA: Academic Press.Google Scholar
  39. Geuna, A., & Shibayama, S. (2015). Moving out of academic research: why do scientists stop doing research? In A. Guena (Ed.), Global mobility of research scientists: The economics of who goes where and why (pp. 271–303). Cambridge: Academic Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Gibbs, K. D., Jr., & Griffin, K. A. (2013). What do I want to be with my PhD? The roles of personal values and structural dynamics in shaping the career interests of recent biomedical science PhD graduates. CBE—Life Sciences Education, 12(4), 711–723.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Gibbs, K. D., Jr., McGready, J., Bennett, J. C., & Griffin, K. (2014). Biomedical science Ph.D. career interest patterns by race/ethnicity and gender. PLoS ONE, 9(12), e114736.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Golde, C. (2006). Preparing the stewards of the discipline. In C. Golde & G. Walker (Eds.), Envisioning the future of doctoral education (pp. 3–21). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  43. Hanks, A. S., & Kniffin, K. M. (2014). Early career PhD salaries: The industry premium and interdisciplinary debate. Applied Economics Letters, 21(18), 1277–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Headworth, S., & Freese, J. (2016). Credential privilege or cumulative advantage? Prestige, productivity, and placement in the academic sociology job market. Social Forces, 94(3), 1257–1282.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Herring, C. (2009). Does diversity pay? Race, gender, and the business case for diversity. American Sociological Review, 74(2), 208–224.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Holley, K. A. (2018). The longitudinal career experiences of interdisciplinary neuroscience PhD recipients. The Journal of Higher Education, 89(1), 106–127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hong, L., & Page, S. (2004). Groups of diverse problem solvers can outperform groups of high-ability problem solvers. PNAS, 101(46), 16385–16389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2005). Flying the nest: How the home department shapes researchers’ career paths. Studies in Higher Education, 42, 1–19.Google Scholar
  49. Hottenrott, H., & Lawson, C. (2015). Flying the nest: How the home department shapes researchers’ career paths (No. 153 [rev.]). DICE Discussion Paper.Google Scholar
  50. Huyghe, A., & Knockaert, M. (2015). The influence of organizational culture and climate on entrepreneurial intentions among research scientists. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 40(1), 138–160.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Larson, R. C., Ghaffarzadegan, N., & Xue, Y. (2014). Too many PhD graduates or too few academic job openings: The basic reproductive number R0 in academia. Systems research and behavioral science, 31(6), 745–750.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lin, E., & Chiu, S. (2016). Does holding a postdoctoral position bring benefits for advancing to academia? Research in Higher Education, 57, 335–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Mangematin, V. (2000). PhD job market: Professional trajectories and incentives during the PhD. Research Policy, 29(6), 741–756.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Mayhew, M. J., Rockenbach, A. N., Bowman, N. A., Seifert, T. A., Wolniak, G. C., Pascarella, E. T., et al. (2016). How college affects students: 21st century evidence that higher education works (Vol. 3). Hoboken: Wiley.Google Scholar
  55. Meyers, S., & Turner, C. (2000). Faculty of color in academe: Bittersweet success. Upper Saddle River, NJ: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  56. Miller, C. C., Glick, W. H., & Cardinal, L. B. (2005). The allocation of prestigious positions in organizational science: Accumulative advantage, sponsored mobility, and contest mobility. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 26(5), 489–516.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. National Science Foundation. (2015). Science and Engineering doctorates 2015 data tables. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2017/nsf17306/report/.
  58. National Science Board. (2018). Science and engineering indicators 2018. NSB-2018-1. Alexandria, VA: National Science Foundation. Retrieved from https://www.nsf.gov/statistics/2018/nsb20181/report/sections/science-and-engineering-labor-force/u-s-s-e-workforce-definition-size-and-growth.
  59. Nerad, M. (2004). The PhD in the US: Criticisms, facts and remedies. Higher Education Policy, 17, 183–199.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Neumann, R., & Tan, K. K. (2011). From PhD to initial employment: The doctorate in a knowledge economy. Studies in Higher Education, 36(5), 601–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ong, M., Wright, C., Espinosa, L., & Orfield, G. (2011). Inside the double bind: A synthesis of empirical research on undergraduate and graduate women of color in science, technology, engineering, and mathematics. Harvard Educational Review, 81(2), 172–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Ott, M., & Cisneros, J. (2015). Understanding the changing faculty workforce in higher education: A comparison of non-tenure track and tenure line experiences. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 23, 90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Pellens, M., Arts, S., & Veugelers, R. (2013). Taste for science and job (mis)match of industrial researchers. In Paper presented at the DRUID Academy 2013, Rebild/Aalborg, Denmark.Google Scholar
  64. Quinn, K., & Litzler, E. (2009). Turning away from academic careers: What does work-family have to do with it? NASPA Journal about Women in Higher Education, 2(1), 68–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Rindova, V. P., Williamson, I. O., Petkova, A. P., & Sever, J. M. (2005). Being good or being known: An empirical examination of the dimensions, antecedents, and consequences of organizational reputation. The Academy of Management Journal, 48(6), 1033–1049.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Rivera, L. A. (2011). Ivies, extracurriculars, and exclusion: Elite employer’s use of educational credentials. Stratification and Mobility, 29(1), 71–90.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Roach, M., & Sauermann, H. (2010). A taste for science? PhD scientists’ academic orientation and self-selection into research careers in industry. Research Policy, 39(3), 422–434.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Sargent, J. F., Jr. (2017). The U.S. Science and engineering workforce: Recent, current, and projected employment, wages, and unemployment. Congressional Research Service, 7-5700. R43061. Retrieved from https://fas.org/sgp/crs/misc/R43061.pdf.
  69. Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2012). Science PhD career preferences: Levels, changes, and advisor encouragement. PloS one, 7(5), e36307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2014). Not all scientists pay to be scientists: PhDs’ preferences for publishing in industrial employment. Research Policy, 43(1), 32–47.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Sauermann, H., & Roach, M. (2016). Why pursue the postdoc path? Science, 352(6286), 663–664.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Sauermann, H., & Stephan, P. (2013). Conflicting logics? A multidimensional view of industrial and academic science. Organization Science, 24(3), 889–909.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Smeets, V., Warzynski, F., & Coupé, T. (2006). Does the academic labor market initially allocate new graduates efficiently? Journal of Economic Perspectives, 20(3), 161–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Spector, P. E. (1997). Job satisfaction: Application, assessment, causes, and consequences (Vol. 3). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage publications.Google Scholar
  75. Stephan, P. E. (2012). How economics shapes science (Vol. 1). Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Stephan, P. (2007). Wrapping it up in a person: The mobility patterns of new PhDs. In J. Lerner & S. Stern (Eds.), Innovation policy and the economy (Vol. 7, pp. 71–98). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.Google Scholar
  77. Stokes, D. E. (1997). Pasteur’s quadrant: Basic science and technological innovation. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press.Google Scholar
  78. Thiry, H., Laursen, S. L., & Loshbaugh, H. G. (2015). “How do I get from here to there?” An examination of Ph. D. science students’ career preparation and decision making. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 10, 237–256.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Tinto, V. (1987). Leaving college: Rethinking the causes and cures of student attrition. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  80. Titus, M. A. (2004). An examination of the influence of institutional context on student persistence at 4-year colleges and universities: A multilevel approach. Research in Higher Education, 45(7), 673–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Titus, M. A. (2006). Understanding the influence of the financial context of institutions on student persistence at four-year colleges and universities. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(2), 353–375.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Turner, C., Gonzalez, J., & Wood, L. (2008). Faculty of color in academe: What 20 years of literature tells us. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(3), 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Weidman, J. C., Twale, D. J., & Stein, E. L. (2001). Socialization of Graduate and professional students in higher education: A perilous passage? ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report, Volume 28, Number 3. Jossey-Bass Higher and Adult Education Series. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  84. Yang, L., & Webber, K. L. (2015). A decade beyond the doctorate: The influence of a US postdoctoral appointment on faculty career, productivity, and salary. Higher Education, 70(4), 667–687.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Mary Lou Fulton Teachers CollegeArizona State UniversityTempeUSA

Personalised recommendations