Advertisement

The Stigma of Tenure Denied: An Exploration of Individual and Institutional Implications

  • Nathan F. AllemanEmail author
  • Justin J. Nelson
  • Cara Cliburn Allen
Article

Abstract

Although tenure denial is a familiar feature of the faculty profession, the dearth of specific research on the subject indicates that it is a phenomenon not sufficiently understood. The analyses that do exist are largely a-theoretical and unsystematic. In this qualitative study, we employed Goffman’s social psychological concepts of stigma and moral career to examine whether tenure denial is stigmatizing, and if so, how individuals navigate the personal, social, and professional implications of this undesirable label. Findings highlight the implicit burden of responsibility placed solely on individuals for their tenure denial, the challenge of managing social and professional situations, and the factors that contribute to or mitigate against the establishment of a new sense of self. We argue that just as the profession is learning that non-tenure track faculty should be treated with respect without regard for their non-traditional professional status, so tenure denial, although painful, need not be stigmatic. Rather, individuals may become advocates, activists, and employees (faculty or otherwise) who are able to serve with greater professional clarity and self-understanding as a result of their tenure denial experience.

Keywords

Faculty Stigma Denied tenure Goffman 

References

  1. Alleman, N. F. (2014). Reaffirming the importance of faculty rituals at religious colleges and universities. Religion and Education, 41(2), 151–170.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Anderson, M. (1992). Imposters in the temple: American intellectual are destroying our universities and cheating our students out of their future. New York: Simon and Schuster.Google Scholar
  3. Baez, B. & Centra, J. A. (1995). Tenure, promotion, and reappointment: Legal and administrative implications. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Reports.Google Scholar
  4. Becher, T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual enquiry and the cultures of disciplines. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  5. Bednash, G. (1995). Tenure review: Process and outcomes. Review of Higher Education, 15(1), 47–63.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bieber, J. P., & Worley, L. K. (2006). Conceptualizing the academic life: Graduate students’ perspectives. The Journal of Higher Education, 77(6), 1009–1035.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Boice, R. (1992). Advice for new faculty members. New York: Pearson.Google Scholar
  8. Bonilla-Silva, E. (2009). Racism without racists: Color-blind racism and the persistence of racial inequality in America. Lanham, MD: Rowman & Littlefield.Google Scholar
  9. Chait, R. (Ed.). (2002). The questions of tenure. Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  10. Clark, B. R. (1987). The academic profession: National, disciplinary, and institutional settings. Berkeley: University of California Press.Google Scholar
  11. Davis, L. J. (1998). Beyond tenure: A tortuous journey through academe. The Chronicle of Higher Education, April 17, B6–7.Google Scholar
  12. Diamond, R. M. (2002). Serving on promotion, tenure, and faculty review committees: A faculty guide (2nd ed.). Bolton, MA: Anker Publishing.Google Scholar
  13. Dooris, M. J., & Guidos, M. (2006). Tenure achievement rates at research universities. Presentation at the Annual Forum of the Association for Institutional Research, Chicago, IL.Google Scholar
  14. Dyer, S. (Ed). (2004). Tenure denied: Cases of sex discrimination in academia. Washington D.C.: American Association of University Women Educational Foundation and the American Association of University Women Legal Advocacy Fund.Google Scholar
  15. Fenelon, J. (2003). Race, research, and tenure: Institutional credibility and the incorporation of African, Latino, and American Indian faculty. Journal of Black Studies, 34(1), 87–100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Finkelstein, M. J., Conley, V. M., & Schuster, J. H. (2016). The faculty factor: Reassessing the American academy in a turbulent era. Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press.Google Scholar
  17. Finkin, M. W. (1996). The case for tenure. Ithica, NY: ILR Press.Google Scholar
  18. Franke, A. H. (2001). Making defensible tenure decisions. Academe, 87(6), 32–36.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Goffman, E. (1963). Stigma: Notes on the management of spoiled identity. NY: Simon & Schuster.Google Scholar
  20. Hannem, S. (2012). Theorizing stigma and the politics of resistance: Symbolic and structural stigma in everyday life. In S. Hannem & C. Bruckert (Eds.), Stigma revisited: Implications of the mark (pp. 10–28). Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press.Google Scholar
  21. Hansman, C. A. (2009). Ethical issues in mentoring adults in higher education. In E. J. Burge (Ed.), New directions for adult and continuing education, No. 123 (pp. 53–63).Google Scholar
  22. Haviland, D., Alleman, N. F., & Cliburn Allen, C. (2017). ‘Separate but not quite equal’: Collegiality experiences of full-time non-tenure-track faculty members. The Journal of Higher Education, 88(4), 505–528.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hearn, J., & Anderson, M. (2002). Conflict in academic departments: An analysis of disputes over faculty tenure and promotion. Research in Higher Education, 43(5), 503–529.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Johnsrud, L. K., & Des Jarlais, C. (1994). Barriers to tenure for women and minorities. The Review of Higher Education, 73(4), 518–541.Google Scholar
  25. Junn, J. (2016). University of Southern California analysis of data on tenure. In P. Matthew (Ed.), Written/Unwritten: Diversity and the hidden truths of tenure. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  26. Krieger, M. H. (2013). The scholar’s survival manual: A road map for students, faculty, and administrators. Bloomington, IN: University of Indiana Press.Google Scholar
  27. Layder, D. (1998). Sociological practice: Linking theory and social research. London: Sage.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Leatherman, C. (1999). Million judgement in tenure case leaves many academic experts stunned. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 45, 22.Google Scholar
  29. Lee, L. J., & Leonard, C. A. (2001). Violence in predominantly white institutions of higher education. Journal of Behavior in the Social Environment, 4(2–3), 167–186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Leshem, S., & Trafford, V. (2007). Overlooking the conceptual framework. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 44(1), 93–105.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. G. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. London: Sage Publications.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Machlup, R. (1964). In defense of academic tenure. AAUP Bulletin, 50, 112–124.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Margolis, E., & Romero, M. (2001). “In the image and likeness…”: How mentoring functions in the hidden curriculum. In E. Margolis (Ed.), The hidden curriculum of higher education. New York: Routledge.Google Scholar
  34. Marshall, B. W., & Rothgeb, J. M. (2011). So you want tenure? Factors affecting tenure decisions in political science departments. The Profession, 44, 571–577.Google Scholar
  35. Matthew, P. (2016). Written/unwritten: Diversity and the hidden truths of tenure. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Metzger, W. P. (1973). Academic tenure in America: A historical essay. In W. R. Keast & J. W. Macy Jr. (Eds.), Academic tenure: A report and recommendations by the Commission on Academic Tenure in Higher Education. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.Google Scholar
  37. Miles, M., & Huberman, M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  38. Nestingen, L. M. (1999). Nurturing feminine voices in public administration education. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Denver, CO: University of Colorado at Denver.Google Scholar
  39. O’Neil, R. M., & White, L. (2002). Understanding tenure: History, purpose, and relationship to academic freedom: NACUA continuing legal education outline. Washington, DC: National Association of College and University Attorneys.Google Scholar
  40. Perlmutter, D. D. (2010). Tenure and promotion confidential. Cambridge: Harvard University.Google Scholar
  41. Perna, L. W. (2005). Sex differences in faculty tenure and promotion: The contribution of family ties. Research in Higher Education, 46(3), 277–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Rice, R. E. (1986). The academic profession in transition: Toward a new social fiction. Teaching Sociology, 14, 12–23.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Rice, R. E., Sorcinelli, M. D., & Austin, A. E. (2000). Heeding new voices: Academic careers for a new generation. New Pathways Working Paper Series, No. 7. Washington, DC: American Association for Higher Education.Google Scholar
  44. Robinson, G. Identity work and sensemaking by faculty approaching tenure. Unpublished doctoral dissertation, Pittsburgh, PA: University of Pittsburgh, 2010.Google Scholar
  45. Saldana, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (3rd ed.). London: Sage.Google Scholar
  46. Schwandt, T. A. (1994). Constructivist, interpretivist approaches to human enquiry. In N. Denzin & Y. Lincoln (Eds.), Handbook of qualitative research. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.Google Scholar
  47. See, S. E. (2016). Talking tenure: Don’t be safe. Because there is no safety anyway. In P. Matthew (Ed.), Written/Unwritten: Diversity and the hidden truths of tenure. Chapel Hill, NC: University of North Carolina Press.Google Scholar
  48. Steadman, L. (2005). A review of court cases involving faculty denied tenure in higher education. Unpublished dissertation. Tuscaloosa, AL: University of Alabama.Google Scholar
  49. Stivale, C. J. (2006). Tenure and its denial. College Literature, 33(2), 70–83.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Sykes, C. J. (1988). Profscam: Professors and the demise of higher education. Washington, DC: Regnery Gateway.Google Scholar
  51. Tierney, W. G., & Bensimon, E. M. (1996). Promotion and tenure: Community and socialization in academe. Albany, NY: State University of New York Press.Google Scholar
  52. Tierney, W. G., & Rhoads, R. A. (1993). Enhancing promotion, tenure, and beyond: Faculty socialization as a cultural process. (ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 6). Washington, DC: The George Washington University.Google Scholar
  53. Trower, C. A. (2002). What is current policy? In R. Chait (Ed.), The questions of tenure (pp. 32–68). Boston: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  54. Turner, C. S. V., Gonzalez, J. C., & Wood, J. L. (2008). Faculty of color in academe: What 20 years of literature tells us. Journal of Diversity in Higher Education, 1(3), 139–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Webb, W. J. (1990). Psychotrauma: The human injustice crisis. Ohio: Fairway Press.Google Scholar
  56. Williams, B., & Williams, S. (2006). Perceptions of African American male junior faculty on promotion and tenure: Implications for community building and social capital. Teachers College Record, 108(2), 287–315.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Wilson, R. (1998). ‘It’s like you have leprosy: The year after losing a tenure bid’. The Chronicle of Higher Education, 44, 12.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Baylor UniversityWacoUSA
  2. 2.Campbell UniversityBuies CreekUSA

Personalised recommendations