Advertisement

Big fishing: the role of the large-scale commercial fishing industry in achieving Sustainable Development Goal 14

  • Bianca HaasEmail author
  • Aysha Fleming
  • Marcus Haward
  • Jeffrey McGee
Research Paper

Abstract

United Nation’s Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 14 ‘life below water’, is directed to the sustainable use and conservation of the oceans and marine resources. However, there is very limited information available on how the large-scale commercial fishing industry might contribute to the achievement of SDG 14. This paper shows engagement opportunities for the fishing industry, with a focus on fish harvesting, for the different targets of SDG 14. We find that the fish harvesting sector can contribute to almost all SDG 14 targets, except in the prohibition of certain forms of fishing subsidies. The fishing industry has the opportunity to implement practices that, for example, can help to reduce marine pollution or bycatch. More work is needed to provide specific reporting mechanisms for fisheries companies to assess their progress against the other SDGs.

Keywords

Fishing industry Marine policy Ocean governance Stakeholder engagement Sustainability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Alistair Hobday and Robert L. Stephenson for their useful remarks on earlier drafts of this paper.

References

  1. Allen C, Metternicht G, Wiedmann T (2016) National pathways to the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): a comparative review of scenario modelling tools. Environ Sci Policy 66:199–207.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2016.09.008 Google Scholar
  2. Austral Fisheries (2017) Carbon neutral. https://www.australfisheries.com.au/sustainability-2/carbon-neutral/. Accessed 3 May 2018
  3. Austral Fisheries (2018) Five regions added to list of protected areas in Indian Ocean. https://www.australfisheries.com.au/5-protected-regions-added/. Accessed 5 Nov 2018
  4. Australian Government (2018) Overview of Australia’s assistance for agriculture and food security. https://dfat.gov.au/aid/topics/investment-priorities/agriculture-fisheries-water/agriculture-food-security/Pages/agriculture-and-food-security.aspx. Accessed 5 Nov 2018
  5. Béné C, Barange M, Subasinghe R, Pinstrup-Andersen P, Merino G, Hemre G-I, Williams M (2015) Feeding 9 billion by 2050—putting fish back on the menu. Food Sec 7:261–274.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12571-015-0427-z Google Scholar
  6. Benson AJ, Stephenson RL (2018) Options for integrating ecological, economic, and social objectives in evaluation and management of fisheries. Fish Fish 19:40–56.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12235 Google Scholar
  7. Bhaduri A et al (2016) Achieving sustainable development goals from a water perspective. Front Environ Sci 4:1–13.  https://doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2016.00064 Google Scholar
  8. Biermann F, Kanie N, Kim RE (2017) Global governance by goal-setting: the novel approach of the UN Sustainable Development Goals. Curr Opin Environ Sustain 26:26–31.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2017.01.010 Google Scholar
  9. Blanchard C (2017) Fragmentation in high seas fisheries: preliminary reflections on a global oceans governance approach. Mar Policy 84:327–332.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.06.017 Google Scholar
  10. Blasiak R, Jouffray J-B, Wabnitz CCC, Sundström E, Österblom H (2018) Corporate control and global governance of marine genetic resources. Sci Adv.  https://doi.org/10.1126/sciadv.aar5237 Google Scholar
  11. Borrelle SB, Rochman CM, Liboiron M, Bond AL, Lusher A, Bradshaw H, Provencher JF (2017) Why we need an international agreement on marine plastic pollution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:9994.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1714450114 Google Scholar
  12. Brooker E, Devenport E, Hopkins CR, Hennige S, Roberts JM, Duncan C (2016) Scotland as a case study for how benefits of marine ecosystem services may contribute to the commercial fishing industry. Mar Policy 93:271–283.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.06.009 Google Scholar
  13. Buhl-Mortensen L, Buhl-Mortensen P (2017) Marine litter in the Nordic Seas: distribution composition and abundance. Mar Pollut Bull 125:260–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.08.048 Google Scholar
  14. Calosi P et al (2017) Regional adaptation defines sensitivity to future ocean acidification. Nat Commun 8:1–10.  https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms13994 Google Scholar
  15. Cisneros-Montemayor AM, Sanjurjo E, Munro GR, Hernández-Trejo V, Sumaila UR (2016) Strategies and rationale for fishery subsidy reform. Mar Policy 69:229–236.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.10.001 Google Scholar
  16. Clark CW, Munro GR, Sumaila UR (2005) Subsidies, buybacks, and sustainable fisheries. J Environ Econ Manag 50:47–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeem.2004.11.002 Google Scholar
  17. COLTO (2015) The coalition of legal toothfish operators. https://www.colto.org/. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  18. Conversi A, Fonda Umani S, Peluso T, Molinero JC, Santojanni A, Edwards M (2010) The Mediterranean Sea regime shift at the end of the 1980s, and intriguing parallelisms with other European basins. PLoS One 5:e10633.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0010633 Google Scholar
  19. Cormier R, Elliott M (2017) SMART marine goals, targets and management - Is SDG 14 operational or aspirational, is ‘Life Below Water’ sinking or swimming? Mar Pollut Bull 123:28–33.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2017.07.060 Google Scholar
  20. Cormier R, Kelble CR, Anderson MR, Allen JI, Grehan A, Gregersen Ó (2017) Moving from ecosystem-based policy objectives to operational implementation of ecosystem-based management measures. ICES J Mar Sci 74:406–413.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw181 Google Scholar
  21. Covert J (2017) Planning for the implementation of SDG-14. Environ Pol Law 47:6–8.  https://doi.org/10.3233/EPL-170003 Google Scholar
  22. Crist P (2009) Greenhouse gas emissions reduction potential from international shipping. Int Transp Forum Discus Pap.  https://doi.org/10.1787/223743322616 Google Scholar
  23. Da-Rocha J-M, García-Cutrín J, Prellezo R, Sempere J (2017) The social cost of fishery subsidy reforms. Mar Policy 83:236–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.06.013 Google Scholar
  24. Denham FC, Biswas WK, Solah VA, Howieson JR (2016) Greenhouse gas emissions from a Western Australian finfish supply chain. J Clean Prod 112:2079–2087.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.080 Google Scholar
  25. Ding Q, Chen X, Chen Y, Tian S (2017) Estimation of catch losses resulting from overexploitation in the global marine fisheries. Acta Oceanol Sin 36:37–44.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13131-017-1096-x Google Scholar
  26. Driscoll DA, Bland LM, Bryan BA, Newsome TM, Nicholson E, Ritchie EG, Doherty TS (2018) A biodiversity-crisis hierarchy to evaluate and refine conservation indicators. Nat Ecol Evol 2:775–781.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-018-0504-8 Google Scholar
  27. Edyvane KS, Penny SS (2017) Trends in derelict fishing nets and fishing activity in northern Australia: implications for trans-boundary fisheries management in the shared Arafura and Timor Seas. Fish Res 188:23–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fishres.2016.11.021 Google Scholar
  28. Environmental Defense Fund, Rare/Meloy Fund, Encourage Capital (2018) Principles for investment in sustainable wild-caught fisheries. http://www.fisheriesprinciples.org/files/2018/03/PrinciplesforInvestment-03-07-2018.pdf. Accessed 16 Mar 2018
  29. Eriksen M et al (2014) Plastic pollution in the world’s oceans: more than 5 trillion plastic pieces weighing over 250,000 tons afloat at sea. PLoS One 9:e111913.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0111913 Google Scholar
  30. FAO (2016a) Abandoned, lost or otherwise discarded gillnets and trammel nets: methods to estimate ghost fishing mortality, and the status of regional monitoring and management. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5051e.pdf. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
  31. FAO (2016b) The State of World Fisheries and Aquaculture 2016. Contributing to food security and nutrition for all. http://www.fao.org/3/a-i5555e.pdf. Accessed 22 Jan 2018
  32. FAO (2018) The state of world fisheries and aquaculture 2018—meeting the sustainable development goals. http://www.fao.org/3/I9540EN/i9540en.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  33. Farmery AK, Gardner C, Green BS, Jennings S, Watson RA (2015) Domestic or imported? An assessment of carbon footprints and sustainability of seafood consumed in Australia. Environ Sci Policy 54:35–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envsci.2015.06.007 Google Scholar
  34. Fernandes JA et al (2017) Estimating the ecological, economic and social impacts of ocean acidification and warming on UK fisheries. Fish Fish 18:389–411.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12183 Google Scholar
  35. Fleming A, Wise RM, Hansen H, Sams L (2017) The sustainable development goals: a case study. Mar Policy 86:94–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.09.019 Google Scholar
  36. Froelicher TL, Laufkoetter C (2018) Emerging risks from marine heat waves. Nat Commun.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03163-6 Google Scholar
  37. Gilman E (2015) Status of international monitoring and management of abandoned, lost and discarded fishing gear and ghost fishing. Mar Policy 60:225–239.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.06.016 Google Scholar
  38. Gilman E, Suuronen P, Hall M, Kennelly S (2013) Causes and methods to estimate cryptic sources of fishing mortalitya. J Fish Biol 83:766–803.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jfb.12148 Google Scholar
  39. Gjerde KM (2006) High seas fisheries management under the convention on the law of the sea. In: Freestone D, Barnes R, Ong D (eds) The law of the sea: progress and prospects. Oxford University Press, Oxford.  https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199299614.003.0015 Google Scholar
  40. Gjerde KM, Dotinga H, Hart S, Jaap Molenaar E, Rayfuse R, Warner R (2008) Regulatory and governance gaps in the international regime for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  41. Global Ghost Gear Initiative (2018) Global ghost gear initiative. https://www.ghostgear.org/. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  42. Griggs DJ, Nilsson M, Stevance A, McCollum De (2017) A guide to SDG interactions: from science to implementation. International Council for Science (ICSU), Paris, FranceGoogle Scholar
  43. Guillen J, Cheilari A, Damalas D, Barbas T (2016) Oil for fish: an energy return on investment analysis of selected European Union Fishing Fleets. J Ind Ecol 20:145–153.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jiec.12272 Google Scholar
  44. Halpern BS et al (2008) A global map of human impact on marine ecosystems. Science 319:948–952.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1149345 Google Scholar
  45. Haward M (2018) Plastic pollution of the world’s seas and oceans as a contemporary challenge in ocean governance. Nat Commun 9:667.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03104-3 Google Scholar
  46. Haward M, Vince J (2008) Oceans governance in the twenty-first century: managing the blue planet. Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd, CheltenhamGoogle Scholar
  47. Heinrich L, Krause T (2017) Fishing in acid waters: a vulnerability assessment of the norwegian fishing industry in the face of increasing ocean acidification. Integr Environ Assess Manag 13:778–789.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ieam.1843 Google Scholar
  48. Herr D, Isensee K, Harrould-Kolieb E, Turley C (2014) Ocean acidification: international policy and governance options, vol 4. IUCN, GlandGoogle Scholar
  49. Hobday AJ, Pecl GT (2014) Identification of global marine hotspots: sentinels for change and vanguards for adaptation action. Rev Fish Biol Fish 24:415–425.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11160-013-9326-6 Google Scholar
  50. Hobday AJ, Ogier E, Fleming A, Hartog JR, Thomas L, Stobutzki I, Finn M (2015) Fishery status report: healthcheck for australian fisheries, FRDC Final Report 2014/008. FRDC Final Report 2014/008. CSIRO Oceans and Atmosphere, Hobart, TasmaniaGoogle Scholar
  51. Hughes TP, Bellwood DR, Folke C, Steneck RS, Wilson J (2005) New paradigms for supporting the resilience of marine ecosystems. Trends Ecol Evol 20:380–386.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2005.03.022 Google Scholar
  52. Hughes TP et al (2018) Spatial and temporal patterns of mass bleaching of corals in the Anthropocene. Science 359:80–83.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aan8048 Google Scholar
  53. IMO (2018a) International Convention for the Prevention of Pollution from Ships (MARPOL). http://www.imo.org/en/About/Conventions/ListOfConventions/Pages/International-Convention-for-the-Prevention-of-Pollution-from-Ships-(MARPOL).aspx. Accessed 2 Mar 2018
  54. IMO (2018b) Low carbon shipping and air pollution. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/GHG/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 2 May 2018
  55. IMO (2018c) Marine litter—placards, garbage management plans and garbage record-keeping. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/HotTopics/marinelitter/Pages/default.aspx. Accessed 2 May 2018
  56. IMO (2018d) UN body adopts climate change strategy for shipping. http://www.imo.org/en/MediaCentre/PressBriefings/Pages/06GHGinitialstrategy.aspx. Accessed 2 May 2018
  57. Index Initiative (2017) Seafood stewardship index. https://www.indexinitiative.org/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/Seafood-Stewardship-Index-Feasibility-Study.pdf. Accessed 3 May 2018
  58. IPCC (2018) Working group III: mitigation. http://www.ipcc.ch/ipccreports/tar/wg3/index.php?idp=115. Accessed 27 Feb 2018
  59. ISSF (2018) International seafood sustainability foundation. https://iss-foundation.org/. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  60. IUCN (2017) Raising and integrating the cultural values of the Ocean. https://www.iucn.org/news/commission-environmental-economic-and-social-policy/201710/raising-and-integrating-cultural-values-ocean. Accessed 16 May 2018
  61. Kelleher G, Kenchington R (1992) Guidelines for establishing marine protected areas. A marine conservation and development report. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas, GlandGoogle Scholar
  62. Kelleher E, Phillips A (1999) Guidelines for marine protected areas: best practice protected area guidlines, 3rd edn. IUCN World Commission on Protected Areas, GlandGoogle Scholar
  63. Kelly R, Pecl GT, Fleming A (2017) Social licence in the marine sector: a review of understanding and application. Mar Policy 81:21–28.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.03.005 Google Scholar
  64. KIMO (2018) KIMO—local authorities international environmental organisation. http://www.kimointernational.org/. Accessed 2 Mar 2018
  65. Kincaid K, Rose G, Devillers R (2017) How fisher-influenced marine closed areas contribute to ecosystem-based management: a review and performance indicator scorecard. Fish Fish 18:860–876.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12211 Google Scholar
  66. Kittinger JN et al (2017) Committing to socially responsible seafood. Science 356:912.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.aam9969 Google Scholar
  67. Le Blanc D, Freire C, Vierros M (2017) Mapping the linkages between oceans and other sustainable development goals: a preliminary exploration. Department of Economic and Social Affairs, New York, USAGoogle Scholar
  68. Le Gallic B, Cox A (2006) An economic analysis of illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing: key drivers and possible solutions. Mar Policy 30:689–695.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2005.09.008 Google Scholar
  69. Lindegren M, Holt BG, MacKenzie BR, Rahbek C (2018) A global mismatch in the protection of multiple marine biodiversity components and ecosystem services. Sci Rep.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-22419-1 Google Scholar
  70. Lindley J, Techera EJ (2017) Overcoming complexity in illegal, unregulated and unreported fishing to achieve effective regulatory pluralism. Mar Policy 81:71–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.03.010 Google Scholar
  71. Link JS, Browman HI (2014) Integrating what? Levels of marine ecosystem-based assessment and management. ICES J Mar Sci 71:1170–1173.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsu026 Google Scholar
  72. Link JS, Browman HI (2017) Operationalizing and implementing ecosystem-based management. ICES J Mar Sci 74:379–381.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw247 Google Scholar
  73. Long RD, Charles A, Stephenson RL (2016) Key principles of ecosystem-based management: the fishermen’s perspective. Fish Fish 18:244–253.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12175 Google Scholar
  74. Maruha Nichiro (2018) Environmental value. https://www.maruha-nichiro.com/sustainability/environmental.html. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  75. McClanahan T, Davies J, Maina J (2005) Factors influencing resource users and managers’ perceptions towards marine protected area management in Kenya. Environ Conserv 32:42–49.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0376892904001791 Google Scholar
  76. McClanahan TR, Cinner JE, Abunge C, Rabearisoa A, Mahatante P, Ramahatratra F, Andrianarivelo N (2014) Perceived benefits of fisheries management restrictions in Madagascar. Ecol Soc 19:1.  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-06080-190105 Google Scholar
  77. Mohammed EY, Steinbach D, Steele P (2017) Fiscal reforms for sustainable marine fisheries governance: delivering the SDGs and ensuring no one is left behind. Mar Policy 93:262–270.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.017 Google Scholar
  78. Morgan R (2017) An investigation of constraints upon fisheries diversification using the Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP). Mar Policy 86:24–30.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.037 Google Scholar
  79. Nagelkerken I, Connell SD (2015) Global alteration of ocean ecosystem functioning due to increasing human CO2 emissions. Proc Natl Acad Sci 112:13272Google Scholar
  80. Norwegian Ministry of Foreign Affairs (2018) Fish for development. https://www.regjeringen.no/globalassets/departementene/ud/vedlegg/utvikling/fish_development.pdf. Accessed 5 Nov 2018
  81. Orr JC et al (2005) Anthropogenic ocean acidification over the twenty-first century and its impact on calcifying organisms. Nature 437:681–686.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04095 Google Scholar
  82. Ortuño Crespo G, Dunn DC (2017) A review of the impacts of fisheries on open-ocean ecosystems. ICES J Mar Sci 74:2283–2297.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx084 Google Scholar
  83. Österblom H, Bodin Ö (2012) Global cooperation among diverse organizations to reduce illegal fishing in the Southern Ocean. Conserv Biol 26:638–648.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2012.01850.x Google Scholar
  84. Österblom H, Sumaila UR (2011) Toothfish crises, actor diversity and the emergence of compliance mechanisms in the Southern Ocean. Glob Environ Chang 21:972–982.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.04.013 Google Scholar
  85. Österblom H, Jouffray J-B, Folke C, Crona B, Troell M, Merrie A, Rockström J (2015) Transnational corporations as ‘keystone actors’ in marine ecosystems. PLoS One 10:e0127533.  https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0127533 Google Scholar
  86. Österblom H, Jouffray J-B, Folke C, Rockström J (2017) Emergence of a global science–business initiative for ocean stewardship. Proc Nat Acad Sci 114:9038–9043.  https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704453114 Google Scholar
  87. Page B et al (2004) Entanglement of Australian sea lions and New Zealand fur seals in lost fishing gear and other marine debris before and after Government and industry attempts to reduce the problem. Mar Pollut Bull 49:33–42.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2004.01.006 Google Scholar
  88. Parker RWR, Blanchard JL, Gardner C, Green BS, Hartmann K, Tyedmers PH, Watson RA (2018) Fuel use and greenhouse gas emissions of world fisheries. Nat Clim Chang 8:333–337.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41558-018-0117-x Google Scholar
  89. Pauly D, Christensen V, Dalsgaard J, Froese R, Torres F Jr (1998) Fishing down marine food webs. Science 279:860–863.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.279.5352.860 Google Scholar
  90. Pauly D et al (2002) Towards sustainability in world fisheries. Nature 418:689–695.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nature01017 Google Scholar
  91. Petrossian GA (2015) Preventing illegal, unreported and unregulated (IUU) fishing: a situational approach. Biol Conserv 189:39–48.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2014.09.005 Google Scholar
  92. Pikitch EK et al (2004) Ecosystem-based fishery management. Science 305:346–347.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1098222 Google Scholar
  93. Potts T, Haward M (2007) International trade, eco-labelling, and sustainable fisheries—recent issues, concepts and practices. Environ Dev Sustain 9:91–106.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-005-9006-3 Google Scholar
  94. Rayfuse R, Warner R (2008) Securing a sustainable future for the oceans beyond national jurisdiction: the legal basis for an integrated cross-sectoral regime for high seas governance for the 21st century. Int J Mar Coast Law 23:399–421.  https://doi.org/10.1163/092735208X331845 Google Scholar
  95. Rife AN, Erisman B, Sanchez A, Aburto-Oropeza O (2012) When good intentions are not enough … Insights on networks of “paper park” marine protected areas. Conserv Lett 6:200–212.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1755-263X.2012.00303.x Google Scholar
  96. Sala E, Giakoumi S (2017) No-take marine reserves are the most effective protected areas in the ocean. ICES J Mar Sci 75:1166–1168.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx059 Google Scholar
  97. SANFORD (2018a) Environmental impacts. https://www.sanford.co.nz/sustainability/environmental-impact/. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  98. SANFORD (2018b) Environmental management. https://www.sanford.co.nz/sustainability/environmental-management/. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  99. SANFORD (2018c) Fisheries management. https://www.sanford.co.nz/sustainability/fisheries-management/. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  100. SANFORD (2018d) Precision seafood harvesting (PSH). https://www.sanford.co.nz/sustainability/precision-seafood-harvesting/. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  101. Sardà R, O’Higgins T, Cormier R, Diedrich A, Tintoré J (2014) A proposed ecosystem-based management system for marine waters: linking the theory of environmental policy to the practice of environmental management. Ecol Soc.  https://doi.org/10.5751/es-07055-190451 Google Scholar
  102. Schlüter L, Lohbeck KT, Gutowska MA, Gröger JP, Riebesell U, Reusch TBH (2014) Adaptation of a globally important coccolithophore to ocean warming and acidification. Nat Clim Chang 4:1024–1030.  https://doi.org/10.1038/nclimate2379 Google Scholar
  103. SDG Index & Dashboards (2018) SDG index & dashboards—2017 report. http://www.sdgindex.org/. Accessed 3 May 2018
  104. SEALORD (2018) Protecting the environment. https://www.sealord.com/au/sustainability/#!expand-2770. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  105. Selig ER et al (2016) A typology of fisheries management tools: using experience to catalyse greater success. Fish Fish 18:543–570.  https://doi.org/10.1111/faf.12192 Google Scholar
  106. Singh GG et al (2017) A rapid assessment of co-benefits and trade-offs among sustainable development goals. Mar Policy 93:223–231.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2017.05.030 Google Scholar
  107. Smith MD et al (2010) Sustainability and global seafood. Science 327:784–786.  https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1185345 Google Scholar
  108. Sothern Seabird Solutions (2018) About us. https://www.southernseabirds.org/about-us/. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  109. Stafford-Smith M et al (2017) Integration: the key to implementing the sustainable development goals. Sustain Sci 12:911–919.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-016-0383-3 Google Scholar
  110. Stephenson RL et al (2016) Integrating fishers’ knowledge research in science and management. ICES J Mar Sci 73:1459–1465.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsw025 Google Scholar
  111. Stephenson RL et al (2017) Practical steps toward integrating economic, social and institutional elements in fisheries policy and management. ICES J Mar Sci 74:1981–1989.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fsx057 Google Scholar
  112. Stockholm Resilience Centre (2018a) Keystone dialogues—connecting science with industry leaders for biosphere stewardship. http://keystonedialogues.earth/. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  113. Stockholm Resilience Centre (2018b) Wild Capture Fisheries. http://keystonedialogues.earth/wp-content/uploads/2015/07/Brief3-Wild-capture-fisheries.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  114. Sumaila UR, Bellmann C, Tipping A (2016a) Fishing for the future: an overview of challenges and opportunities. Mar Policy 69:173–180.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.01.003 Google Scholar
  115. Sumaila UR, Lam V, Le Manach F, Swartz W, Pauly D (2016b) Global fisheries subsidies: an updated estimate. Mar Policy 69:189–193.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2015.12.026 Google Scholar
  116. ThaiUnion (2017a) 2017 Sustainability report. http://www.thaiunion.com/files/download/sustainability/sd-report-2017.pdf. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  117. ThaiUnion (2017b) USAID and Thai Union Partner to implement digital traceability to combat illegal fishing in the Asian Pacific Region. http://www.thaiunion.com/en/newsroom/press-release/464/usaid-and-thai-union-partner-to-implement-digital-traceability-to-combat-illegal-fishing-in-the-asia-pacific-region. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  118. Tiller R, De Santo E, Mendenhall E, Nyman E (2019) The once and future treaty: towards a new regime for biodiversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction. Mar Policy 99:239–242.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2018.10.046 Google Scholar
  119. Trexler MC (1991) Minding the carbon store: weighing US forestry strategies to slow gobal warming. World Resources Institute Washington, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  120. Tyedmers PH, Watson R, Paul SD (2005) Fueling global fishing fleets. Ambio 34:635–638.  https://doi.org/10.1579/0044-7447-34.8.635 Google Scholar
  121. UNEP (2016) Marine plastic debris and microplastics—global lessons and research to inspire action and guide policy change. United Nations Environment Programme. https://wedocs.unep.org/rest/bitstreams/11700/retrieve. Accessed 20 Feb 2018
  122. UNEP-WCMEC, IUCN (2016) Protected planet report 2016. UNEP-WCMC and IUCN, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  123. Unger A, Harrison N (2016) Fisheries as a source of marine debris on beaches in the United Kingdom. Mar Pollut Bull 107:52–58.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.04.024 Google Scholar
  124. United Nations (2018a) The sustainable development agenda. https://www.un.org/sustainabledevelopment/development-agenda/. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  125. United Nations (2018b) Sustainable development goal 14—targets, indicators. https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdg14. Accessed 1 March 2018
  126. United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (2018) The Paris agreement. http://unfccc.int/paris_agreement/items/9485.php. Accessed 14 May 2018
  127. United Nations Global Compact (2018a) Action platform for sustainable ocean business. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/take-action/action-platforms/ocean. Accessed 5 Nov 2018
  128. United Nations Global Compact (2018b) Reporting on the SDGs. https://www.unglobalcompact.org/take-action/action-platforms/sdg-reporting. Accessed 2 Nov 2018
  129. van Holt T, Weisman W, Johnson CJ, Käll S, Whalen J, Spear B, Sousa P (2016) A social wellbeing in fisheries tool (SWIFT) to help improve fisheries performance. Sustain 8:1–15.  https://doi.org/10.3390/su8080667 Google Scholar
  130. Visbeck M (2018) Ocean science research is key for a sustainable future. Nat Commun 9:690.  https://doi.org/10.1038/s41467-018-03158-3 Google Scholar
  131. Visbeck M et al (2014) A sustainable development goal for the ocean and coasts: global ocean challenges benefit from regional initiatives supporting globally coordinated solutions. Mar Policy 49:87–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2014.02.010 Google Scholar
  132. Voyer M, Gladstone W (2017) Human considerations in the use of marine protected areas for biodiveristy conservation. Aust Zool 39:173–180.  https://doi.org/10.7882/AZ.2015.029 Google Scholar
  133. Wakamatsu M, Wakamatsu H (2017) The certification of small-scale fisheries. Mar Policy 77:97–103.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2016.12.016 Google Scholar
  134. Walther YM, Möllmann C (2014) Bringing integrated ecosystem assessments to real life: a scientific framework for ICES. ICES J Mar Sci 71:1183–1186.  https://doi.org/10.1093/icesjms/fst161 Google Scholar
  135. White AT, Courtney CA (2004) Policy instruments for coral reef management and their effectiveness. In: Ahmed M, Chong CK, Cesar H (eds) Economic valuation and policy priorities for sustainable management of coral reefs, 2nd edn. WorldFish Center, Penang, pp 141–161Google Scholar
  136. World Bank (2009) The Sunken Billions. The economic justification for fisheries reform. The World Bank, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  137. World Ocean Council (2018) The international business alliance for corporate ocean responsibilty. https://www.oceancouncil.org/. Accessed 5 Nov 2018
  138. Ye Y, Cochrane K, Bianchi G, Willmann R, Majkowski J, Tandstad M, Carocci F (2013) Rebuilding global fisheries: the World Summit Goal, costs and benefits. Fish Fish 14:174–185.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-2979.2012.00460.x Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute for Marine and Antarctic StudiesHobartAustralia
  2. 2.CSIRO, Land and WaterBattery PointAustralia
  3. 3.Faculty of LawUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia
  4. 4.Centre for Marine SocioecologyUniversity of TasmaniaHobartAustralia

Personalised recommendations