Advertisement

Influence of design and operational parameters on the pathogens reduction in constructed wetland under the climate change scenario

  • D. López
  • A. M. Leiva
  • W. Arismendi
  • G. VidalEmail author
Review Paper
  • 20 Downloads

Abstract

Under the climate change scenario, constructed wetlands (CWs) as an engineered system for treating domestic wastewater will face different challenges. Some of them are: (a) the increase of pathogens concentration in wastewater due to the rise of global temperature; (b) higher precipitation that can cause an increase of pathogens due to runoff; (c) the reuse of treated wastewater related to the water scarcity. These problems can affect the capacity of CWs for removal pathogens. In this context, the objective of this review is to provide an overview of the influence of design and operational parameters on pathogens reduction in CWs. To accomplish with this purpose, the published information (> 30 studies) about the reduction of pathogens and the operational and design parameters in different CWs configurations and were gathered. With this data, statistical analyses were performed considering the most relevant variables which significantly influence the removal of pathogens in CWs. For this, principal component analyses (PCA) were achieved for determining, separately, the correlation of operational parameters with fecal coliform (FC) and total coliform (TC) removal. The results of PCA showed that FC and TC were correlated positively with mass removal rates of chemical oxygen demand (COD) and biological oxygen Demand (BOD5), total suspended solids (TSS) removal and the size of support medium. This study is the first approach that analyzes together the design and operational parameters which influence the pathogen removal in CWs. For this reason, these parameters and the increase on microorganism concentrations due to the climate change have to be considered for the future design of CWs.

Keywords

Total and fecal coliform Constructed wetlands Climate change Principal component analyses Wastewater reuse 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by CONICYT/FONDAP/15130015. D. López thanks to CONICYT-FONDECYT (Chile) No. 3170295 for supporting his postdoctoral studies at Adolfo Ibáñez University (Chile).

References

  1. Ajonina C, Buzie C, Rubiandini RH, Otterpohl R (2015) Microbial pathogens in wastewater treatment plants in Hamburg. J Toxicol Environ Health Part A 78:381–387.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15287394.2014.989626 Google Scholar
  2. Ali TH, Saleh DS (2014) A simplified experimental model for clearance of some pathogenic bacteria using common bacterivorous ciliated spp. in Tigris river. Appl Water Sci 4:63–71.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s13201-013-0130-1 Google Scholar
  3. Alufasi R, Gere J, Chakauya E, Lebea P, Parawira W, Chingwaru W (2017) Mechanisms of pathogen removal by macrophytes in constructed wetlands. Environ Technol Rev 6:135–144.  https://doi.org/10.1080/21622515.2017.1325940 Google Scholar
  4. Andreo-Martínez P, García-Martínez N, Quesada-Medina J, Almela L (2017) Domestic wastewaters reuse reclaimed by an improved horizontal subsurface-flow constructed wetland: a case study in the southeast of Spain. Bioresour Technol 233:236–246.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.02.123 Google Scholar
  5. Arcos M, Ávila S, Gómez A (2005) Indicadores microbiológicos de contaminación de las fuentes de agua. Nova-Publicación Científica, CudimarcaGoogle Scholar
  6. Arends JBA, Van Denhouwe S, Verstraete W, Boon N, Rabaey K (2014) Enhanced disinfection of wastewater by combining wetland treatment with bioelectrochemical H2O2 production. Bioresour Technol 155:352–358.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.058 Google Scholar
  7. Ashbolt N, Grabow W, Snozzi M (2001) Indicators of microbial water quality. In: Fewtrell L, Bartram J (eds) Water quality: guidelines, standards and health, assessment of risk and risk management for water related infectious disease. IWA Publishing, WHO Water Series, pp 289–315Google Scholar
  8. Avelar FF, de Matos AT, de Matos MP, Borges AC (2014) Coliform bacteria removal from sewage in constructed wetlands planted with Mentha aquatica. Environ Technol 35:2095–2103.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2014.893025 Google Scholar
  9. Ayaz SÇ (2008) Post-treatment and reuse of tertiary treated wastewater by constructed wetlands. Desalination 226:249–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2007.02.110 Google Scholar
  10. Ayaz SÇ, Aktaş Ö, Fındık N, Akça L, Kınacı C (2012) Effect of recirculation on nitrogen removal in a hybrid constructed wetland system. Ecol Eng 40:1–5.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2011.12.028 Google Scholar
  11. Azaizeh H, Linden K, Barstow C, Kalbouneh S, Tellawi A, Albalawneh A, Gerchman Y (2012) Constructed wetlands combined with UV disinfection systems for removal of enteric pathogens and wastewater contaminants. Water Sci Technol 67:651–657.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2012.615 Google Scholar
  12. Barreras JH, Kelly EA, Kumar N, Solo-Gabriele HM (2019) Evaluación de estrategias locales y regionales para controlar los niveles de bacterias en las playas teniendo en cuenta los impactos del cambio climático. Bol Contam Mar 138:249–259.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2018.10.046 Google Scholar
  13. Bates B, Kundzewicz Z, Wu S (2008) Climate change and water. Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change Secretariat, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  14. Bayo J, Angosto JM, Ayala P (2008) Disinfection efficiency of secondary effluents with ultraviolet light in a Mediterranean area. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 111:511–520.  https://doi.org/10.2495/WP080501 Google Scholar
  15. Becerra-Castro C, Lopes AR, Vaz-Moreira I, Silva EF, Manaia CM, Nunes OC (2015) Wastewater reuse in irrigation: A microbiological perspective on implications in soil fertility and human and environmental health. Environ Int 75:117–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2014.11.001 Google Scholar
  16. Bitton G (2011) Wastewater microbiology. Wiley, New JerseyGoogle Scholar
  17. Boano F, Rizzo A, Samsó R, García J, Revelli R, Ridolfi L (2018) Changes in bacteria composition and efficiency of constructed wetlands under sustained overloads: a modeling experiment. Sci Total Environ 612:1480–1487.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.08.265 Google Scholar
  18. Bolton KGE, Greenway M (1997) A feasibility study of Melaleuca trees for use in constructed wetlands in subtropical Australia. Water Sci Technol 35:247.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00075-9 Google Scholar
  19. Boutilier L, Jamieson R, Gordon R, Lake C, Hart W (2009) Adsorption, sedimentation, and inactivation of E. coli within wastewater treatment wetlands. Water Res 43:4370–4380.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2009.06.039 Google Scholar
  20. Boxall ABA, Hardy A, Beulke S, Boucard T, Burgin L, Falloon PD, Haygarth PM, Hutchinson T, Kovats PS, Giovanni Leonardi, Levy LS, Nichols G, Parsons SA, Potts L, Stone D, Topp E, Turley E, Turley DB, Walsh K, Wellington EMH, Williams RJ (2009) Impacts of climate change on indirect human exposure to pathogens and chemicals from agriculture. Environ Health Perspect 117:508–514.  https://doi.org/10.1289/ehp.0800084 Google Scholar
  21. Burgos V, Araya F, Reyes-Contreras C, Vera I, Vidal G (2017) Performance of ornamental plants in mesocosm subsurface constructed wetlands under different organic sewage loading. Ecol Eng 99:246–255.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.11.058 Google Scholar
  22. Carballeira T, Ruiz I, Soto M (2016) Effect of plants and surface loading rate on the treatment efficiency of shallow subsurface constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 90:203–214.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.01.038 Google Scholar
  23. Carballeira T, Ruiz I, Soto M (2017) Aerobic and anaerobic biodegradability of accumulated solids in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Int Biodeterior Biodegrad 119:396–404.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibiod.2016.10.048 Google Scholar
  24. Caselles-Osorio A, Villafañe P, Caballero V, Manzano Y (2011) Efficiency of mesocosm-scale constructed wetland systems for treatment of sanitary wastewater under tropical conditions. Water Air Soil Pollut 220:161–171.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-011-0743-7 Google Scholar
  25. Chahal C, van den Akker B, Young F, Franco C, Blackbeard J, Monis P (2016) Pathogen and particle associations in wastewater: significance and implications for treatment and disinfection processes. In: Sariaslani S, Michael Gadd G (eds) Advances in applied microbiology. Academic Press, New York, pp 63–119.  https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aambs.2016.08.001 Google Scholar
  26. Chandrasena GI, Shirdashtzadeh M, Li YL, Deletic A, Hathaway JM, McCarthy DT (2017) Retention and survival of E. coli in stormwater biofilters: role of vegetation, rhizosphere microorganisms and antimicrobial filter media. Ecol Eng 102:166–177.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.02.009 Google Scholar
  27. Characklis GW, Dilts MJ, Simmons OD, Likirdopulos CA, Krometis L-AH, Sobsey MD (2005) Microbial partitioning to settleable particles in stormwater. Water Res 39:1773–1782.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.03.004 Google Scholar
  28. Chartier C, López D, Vidal G (2013) Anaerobic technology influence on pig slurry biofertirrigation: evaluation of enteric bacteria. Water Air Soil Pollut 225:1790.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11270-013-1790-z Google Scholar
  29. Chen ZJ, Tian YH, Zhang Y, Song BR, Li HC, Chen ZH (2016) Effects of root organic exudates on rhizosphere microbes and nutrient removal in the constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 92:243–250.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.04.001 Google Scholar
  30. Chretien JP, Anyamba A, Small J, Britch S, Sanchez JL, Halbach AC, Tucker C, Linthicum KJ (2015) Global climate anomalies and potential infectious disease risks: 2014–2015. PLoS Curr 26:7.  https://doi.org/10.1371/currents.outbreaks.95fbc4a8fb4695e049baabfc2fc8289f Google Scholar
  31. Das S, Ranjana N, Misra AJ, Suar M, Mishra A, Tamhankar AJ, Lundborg CS, Tripathy SK (2017) Disinfection of the water borne pathogens Escherichia coli and Staphylococcus aureus by solar photocatalysis using sonochemically synthesized reusable Ag@ZnO core-shell nanoparticles. Int J Environ Res Public Health 14:747.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph14070747 Google Scholar
  32. Delgadillo O, Camacho A, Pérez LP, Andrade M (2010) Depuración de aguas residuales por medio de humedales artificiales. Centro Agua, CochabambaGoogle Scholar
  33. Díaz Peña F, O’Geen AT, Dahlgren RA (2010) Efficacy of constructed wetlands for removal of bacterial contamination from agricultural return flows. Agric Water Manag 97:1813–1821.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.agwat.2010.06.015 Google Scholar
  34. Fayer R, Trout JM, Walsh E, Cole R (2000) Rotifers ingest oocysts of Cryptosporidium parvum. J Eukaryot Microbiol 47:161–163.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2000.tb00026.x Google Scholar
  35. Fountoulakis MS, Terzakis S, Chatzinotas A, Brix H, Kalogerakis N, Manios T (2009) Pilot-scale comparison of constructed wetlands operated under high hydraulic loading rates and attached biofilm reactors for domestic wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 407(8):2996–3003.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2009.01.005 Google Scholar
  36. Galvão AF, Matos JS, Ferreira FS, Correia FN (2010) Simulating flows in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands operating in Portugal. Ecol Eng 36:596–600.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2009.11.014 Google Scholar
  37. García J, Aguirre P, Barragán J, Mujeriego R, Matamoros V, Bayona JM (2005) Effect of key design parameters on the efficiency of horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 25:405–418.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.06.010 Google Scholar
  38. García M, Soto F, González JM, Bécares E (2008) A comparison of bacterial removal efficiencies in constructed wetlands and algae-based systems. Ecol Eng 32:238–243.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.11.012 Google Scholar
  39. García JA, Paredes D, Cubillos JA (2013) Effect of plants and the combination of wetland treatment type systems on pathogen removal in tropical climate conditions. Ecol Eng 58:57–62.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.06.010 Google Scholar
  40. Giacoman-Vallejos G, Ponce-Caballeroe C, Champagne P (2015) Pathogen removal from domestic and swine wastewater by experimental constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 71(8):263–270.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2015.102 Google Scholar
  41. Graczyk TK, Lucy FE, Tamang L, Mashinski Y, Broaders MA, Connolly M, Cheng HWA (2009) Propagation of human enteropathogens in constructed horizontal wetlands used for tertiary wastewater treatment. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:4531–4538.  https://doi.org/10.1128/aem.02873-08 Google Scholar
  42. Greenway M (2005) The role of constructed wetlands in secondary effluent treatment and water reuse in subtropical and arid Australia. Ecol Eng 25:501–509.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.008 Google Scholar
  43. Gregory R, Edzwald J (2010) Sedimentation & flotation. In: Edzwald J (ed) Water quality & treatment, 6th edn. AWWA & McGrawHill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  44. Gross A, Shmueli O, Ronen Z, Raveh E (2007) Recycled vertical flow constructed wetland (RVFCW)—a novel method of recycling greywater for irrigation in small communities and households. Chemosphere 66:916–923.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2006.06.006 Google Scholar
  45. Halverson N (2004) Review of constructed subsurface flow vs. surface flow wetlands. Westinghouse Savanna River Company, AikenGoogle Scholar
  46. Headley T, Nivala J, Kassa K, Olsson L, Wallace S, Brix H, van Afferden M, Müller R (2013) Escherichia coli removal and internal dynamics in subsurface flow ecotechnologies: effects of design and plants. Ecol Eng 61:564–574.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.07.062 Google Scholar
  47. Hench KR, Bissonnette GK, Sexstone AJ, Coleman JG, Garbutt K, Skousen JG (2003) Fate of physical, chemical, and microbial contaminants in domestic wastewater following treatment by small constructed wetlands. Water Res 37:921–927.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(02)00377-9 Google Scholar
  48. Horn TB, Zerwes FV, Kist LT, Machado ÊL (2014) Constructed wetland and photocatalytic ozonation for university sewage treatment. Ecol Eng 63:134–141.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.12.012 Google Scholar
  49. Hua G, Cheng Y, Kong J, Li M, Zhao Z (2018) High-throughput sequencing analysis of bacterial community spatiotemporal distribution in response to clogging in vertical flow constructed wetlands. Bioresour Technol 248:104–112.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.07.061 Google Scholar
  50. Ilyas H, Masih I (2017) The performance of the intensified constructed wetlands for organic matter and nitrogen removal: a review. J Environ Manag 198:372–383.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2017.04.098 Google Scholar
  51. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2001) Climate change 2001: synthesis report. In: Watson RT, Team CW (eds) A contribution of Working Groups I, II, and III to the third assessment report of the Integovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  52. International Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Contribution of working Groups I, II and III to the fifth assessment report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. IPCC, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  53. Iqbal MS, Islam MM, Hofstra N (2019) The impact of socio-economic development and climate change on E. coli loads and concentrations in Kabul River, Pakistan. Sci Total Environ 650:1935–1943.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.09.347 Google Scholar
  54. Jeon DJ, Ligaray M, Kim M, Kim G, Lee G, Pachepsky YA, Cha D, Cho KH (2018) Evaluating the influence of climate change on the fate and transport of fecal coliform bacteria using the modified SWAT model. Sci Total Environ 658:753–762.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.12.213 Google Scholar
  55. Jimenez B (2007) Helminth ova removal from wastewater for agriculture and aquaculture reuse. Water Sci Technol 55:485–493.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2007.046 Google Scholar
  56. Jiménez B (2003) Health risk in aquifer recharge with recycled water. State of the art report—health risks in aquifer recharge using reclaimed water. World Health Organization, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  57. Jiménez-Cisneros BE, Maya-Rendón C, Salgado-Velázquez G (2001) The elimination of helminth ova, faecal coliforms, Salmonella and protozoan cysts by various physicochemical processes in wastewater and sludge. Water Sci Technol 43:179–182.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2001.0733 Google Scholar
  58. Jin G, Kelley T, Freeman M, Callahan M (2002) Removal of N, P, BOD5, and coliform in pilot-scale constructed wetland systems. Int J Phytoremediat 4:127–141.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226510208500078 Google Scholar
  59. Kadlec R, Wallace S (2009) Treatment wetlands. CRC Press, Boca RatonGoogle Scholar
  60. Karim MR, Manshadi FD, Karpiscak MM, Gerba CP (2004) The persistence and removal of enteric pathogens in constructed wetlands. Water Res 38:1831–1837.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.029 Google Scholar
  61. Karimi B, Ehrampoush MH, Jabary H (2014) Indicator pathogens, organic matter and LAS detergent removal from wastewater by constructed subsurface wetlands. J Environ Health Sci Eng 12:52–52.  https://doi.org/10.1186/2052-336X-12-52 Google Scholar
  62. Kouki S, M’hiri F, Saidi N, Belaïd S, Hassen A (2009) Performances of a constructed wetland treating domestic wastewaters during a macrophytes life cycle. Desalination 246:452–467.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.067 Google Scholar
  63. Kristian Stevik T, Kari A, Ausland G, Fredrik Hanssen J (2004) Retention and removal of pathogenic bacteria in wastewater percolating through porous media: a review. Water Res 38:1355–1367.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2003.12.024 Google Scholar
  64. Levantesi C, La Mantia R, Masciopinto C, Böckelmann U, Ayuso-Gabella MN, Salgot M, Tandoi V, Van Houtte E, Wintgens T, Grohmann E (2010) Quantification of pathogenic microorganisms and microbial indicators in three wastewater reclamation and managed aquifer recharge facilities in Europe. Sci Total Environ 408:4923–4930.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2010.07.042 Google Scholar
  65. Li F, Shi M, Zheng X, Zhang N, Zheng H, Gao C (2014) A novel method of rural sewage disinfection via root extracts of hydrophytes. Ecol Eng 64:344–349.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2014.01.006 Google Scholar
  66. Li X, Zhang M, Liu F, Chen L, Li Y, Xiao R, Wu J (2018) Seasonality distribution of the abundance and activity of nitrification and denitrification microorganisms in sediments of surface flow constructed wetlands planted with Myriophyllum elatinoides during swine wastewater treatment. Bioresour Technol 248:89–97.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2017.06.102 Google Scholar
  67. Liu JJ, Dong B, Guo CQ, Liu FP, Brown L, Li Q (2016) Variations of effective volume and removal rate under different water levels of constructed wetland. Ecol Eng 95:652–664.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.122 Google Scholar
  68. López D, Fuenzalida Vera L, Rojas K, Vidal G (2015) Relationship between organic matter and methane production in horizontal sub-surface flow constructed wetlands systems planted with Phragmites australis and Schoenoplectus californicus for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 83:296–304.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.06.037 Google Scholar
  69. López D, Sepúlveda M, Ruiz-Tagle N, Sossa K, Uggetti E, Vidal G (2019) Potential methane production and molecular characterization of bacterial and archaeal communities in a horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetland under cold and warm seasons. Sci Total Environ 648:1042–1051.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.08.186 Google Scholar
  70. Manios T, Stentiford EI, Millner PA (2002) The removal of indicator microorganisms from primary treated wastewater in subsurface reed beds using different substrates. Environ Technol 23:767–774.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593332408618367 Google Scholar
  71. Marecos do Monte H, Albuquerque A (2010) Analysis of constructed wetland performance for irrigation reuse. Water Sci Technol 61(7):1699–1705.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2010.063 Google Scholar
  72. Massoud MA, Tarhini A, Nasr JA (2009) Decentralized approaches to wastewater treatment and management: applicability in developing countries. J Environ Manag 90:652–659.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2008.07.001 Google Scholar
  73. McMichael AJ, Woodruff RE, Hales S (2006) Climate change and human health: present and future risks. The Lancet 367:859–869.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(06)68079-3 Google Scholar
  74. Mendonça S (2000) Sistemas de lagunas de estabilización: Como utilizar aguas residuales tratadas en sistemas de regadío. McGraw Hill, Santafé de BogotaGoogle Scholar
  75. Miranda ND, Oliveira E, Da Silva G (2014) Study of constructed wetlands effluent disinfected with ozone. Water Sci Technol 70:108–113.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2014.202 Google Scholar
  76. Morató J, Codony F, Sánchez O, Pérez LM, García J, Mas J (2014) Key design factors affecting microbial community composition and pathogenic organism removal in horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Sci Total Environ 481:81–89.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.01.068 Google Scholar
  77. Mulling BTM, van den Boomen RM, van der Geest HG, Kappelhof JWNM, Admiraal W (2013) Suspended particle and pathogen peak discharge buffering by a surface-flow constructed wetland. Water Res 47:1091–1100.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2012.11.032 Google Scholar
  78. Navarro AE, Hernández ME, Bayona JM, Morales L, Ruiz P (2011) Removal of selected organic pollutants and coliforms in pilot constructed wetlands in southeastern Mexico. Int J Environ Anal Chem 91:680–692.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03067319.2010.547578 Google Scholar
  79. Neralla S, Weaver RW (2000) Phytoremediation of domestic wastewater for reducing populations of Escherichia coli and MS-2 Coliphage. Environ Technol 21:691–698.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2000.9618954 Google Scholar
  80. Nguyen MT, Jasper JT, Boehm AB, Nelson KL (2015) Sunlight inactivation of fecal indicator bacteria in open-water unit process treatment wetlands: modeling endogenous and exogenous inactivation rates. Water Res 83:282–292.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2015.06.043 Google Scholar
  81. Nokes RL, Gerba CP, Karpiscak MM (2003) Microbial water quality improvement by small scale on-site subsurface wetland treatment. J Environ Sci Health Part A 38:1849–1855.  https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-120022883 Google Scholar
  82. Noor R, Islam Z, Munshi S, Rahman F (2013) Influence of temperature on Escherichia coli growth in different culture media. J Pure Appl Microbiol 7:899–904Google Scholar
  83. Norton-Brandão D, Scherrenberg SM, van Lier JB (2013) Reclamation of used urban waters for irrigation purposes—a review of treatment technologies. J Environ Manag 122:85–98.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2013.03.012 Google Scholar
  84. Ottová V, Balcarová J, Vymazal J (1997) Microbial characteristics of constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 35:117–123.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0273-1223(97)00060-7 Google Scholar
  85. Pankhurst CE, Lynch JM (2005) Biocontrol of soil-borne plant diseases. In: Hillel D (ed) Encyclopedia of soils in the environment. Elsevier, Oxford, pp 129–136.  https://doi.org/10.1016/B0-12-348530-4/00137-5 Google Scholar
  86. Papadimitriou CA, Papatheodoulou A, Takavakoglou V, Zdragas A, Samaras P, Sakellaropoulos GP, Lazaridou M, Zalidis G (2010) Investigation of protozoa as indicators of wastewater treatment efficiency in constructed wetlands. Desalination 250:378–382.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2009.09.060 Google Scholar
  87. Papaevangelou V, Gikas GD, Tsihrintzis VA (2016a) Effect of operational and design parameters on performance of pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating university campus wastewater. Environ Sci Pol Res 23:19504–19519.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-016-7162-7 Google Scholar
  88. Papaevangelou V, Gikas GD, Tsihrintzis VA (2016b) Effect of operational and design parameters on performance of pilot-scale vertical flow constructed wetlands treating university campus wastewater. Water Resour Manag 30:5875–5899.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11269-016-1484-6 Google Scholar
  89. Proakis E (2003) Pathogen removal in constructed wetlands focusing on biological predation and marine recreational water quality. Proc Water Environ Fed 9:310–332.  https://doi.org/10.2175/193864703784639408 Google Scholar
  90. Pundsack J, Axler R, Hicks R, Henneck J, Nordman D, McCarthy B (2001) Seasonal pathogen removal by alternative on-site wastewater treatment systems. Water Environ Res 73:204–212.  https://doi.org/10.2175/106143001X139182 Google Scholar
  91. Quiñónez-Dìaz MDJ, Karpiscak MM, Ellman ED, Gerba CP (2001) Removal of pathogenic and indicator microorganisms by a constructed wetland receiving untreated domestic wastewater. J Environ Sci Health Part A 36:1311–1320.  https://doi.org/10.1081/ESE-100104880 Google Scholar
  92. Redder A, Dürr M, Daeschlein G, Baeder-Bederski O, Koch C, Müller R, Exner M, Borneff-Lipp M (2010) Constructed wetlands—are they safe in reducing protozoan parasites? Int J Hyg Environ Health 213:72–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijheh.2009.12.001 Google Scholar
  93. Rühmland S, Barjenbruch M (2013) Disinfection capacity of seven constructed wetlands and ponds. Water Sci Technol 68:211–217.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2013.382 Google Scholar
  94. Saeed T, Sun G (2012) A review on nitrogen and organics removal mechanisms in subsurface flow constructed wetlands: dependency on environmental parameters, operating conditions and supporting media. J Environ Manag 112:429–448.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2012.08.011 Google Scholar
  95. Saeed T, Muntaha S, Rashid M, Sun G, Hasnat A (2018) Industrial wastewater treatment in constructed wetlands packed with construction materials and agricultural by-products. J Clean Prod 189:442–453.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.115 Google Scholar
  96. Seeger EM, Braeckevelt M, Reiche N, Müller JA, Kästner M (2016) Removal of pathogen indicators from secondary effluent using slow sand filtration: optimization approaches. Ecol Eng 95:635–644.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.068 Google Scholar
  97. Sengupta ME, Thamsborg SM, Andersen TJ, Olsen A, Dalsgaard A (2011) Sedimentation of helminth eggs in water. Water Res 45:4651–4660.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2011.06.017 Google Scholar
  98. Sepúlveda M, López D, Vidal G (2017) Methanogenic activity in the biomass from horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating domestic wastewater. Ecol Eng 105:66–77.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.04.039 Google Scholar
  99. Sheludchenko M, Padovan A, Katouli M, Stratton H (2016) Removal of fecal indicators, pathogenic bacteria, adenovirus, Cryptosporidium and Giardia (oo)cysts in waste stabilization ponds in Northern and Eastern Australia. Int J Environ Res Public Health 13:96.  https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph13010096 Google Scholar
  100. Shingare RP, Nanekar SV, Thawale PR, Karthik R, Juwarkar AA (2017) Comparative study on removal of enteric pathogens from domestic wastewater using Typha latifolia and Cyperus rotundus along with different substrates Int J Phytoremediat 19:899–908.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15226514.2017.1303809 Google Scholar
  101. Shirdashtzadeh M, Chandrasena GI, Henry R, McCarthy DT (2017) Plants that can kill; improving E. coli removal in stormwater treatment systems using Australian plants with antibacterial activity. Ecol Eng 107:120–125.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2017.07.009 Google Scholar
  102. Silverman AI, Peterson BM, Boehm AB, McNeill K, Nelson KL (2013) Sunlight inactivation of human viruses and bacteriophages in coastal waters containing natural photosensitizers. Environ Sci Technol 47:1870–1878.  https://doi.org/10.1021/es3036913 Google Scholar
  103. Solano ML, Soriano P, Ciria MP (2004) Constructed wetlands as a sustainable solution for wastewater treatment in small villages. Biosyst Eng 87:109–118.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2003.10.005 Google Scholar
  104. Song ZW, Wu L, Yang G, Xu M, Wen SP (2008) Indicator microorganisms and pathogens removal function performed by copepods in constructed wetlands. Bull Environ Contam Toxicol 81:459–463.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s00128-008-9527-1 Google Scholar
  105. Sophonsiri C, Morgenroth E (2004) Chemical composition associated with different particle size fractions in municipal, industrial, and agricultural wastewaters. Chemosphere 55:691–703.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2003.11.032 Google Scholar
  106. Soto-Beltran M, Ikner LA, Bright KR (2013) Effectiveness of poliovirus concentration and recovery from treated wastewater by two electropositive filter methods. Food Environ Virol 5:91–96.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s12560-013-9104-6 Google Scholar
  107. Stefanakis AI, Seeger E, Dorer C, Sinke A, Thullner M (2016) Performance of pilot-scale horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands treating groundwater contaminated with phenols and petroleum derivatives. Ecol Eng 95:514–526.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2016.06.105 Google Scholar
  108. Stott R, May E, Matsushita E, Warren A (2001) Protozoan predation as a mechanism for the removal of cryptosporidium oocysts from wastewaters in constructed wetlands. Water Sci Technol 44:191–198.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wst.2001.0828 Google Scholar
  109. Symonds EM, Griffin DW, Breitbart M (2009) Eukaryotic viruses in wastewater samples from the United States. Appl Environ Microbiol 75:1402–1409.  https://doi.org/10.1128/AEM.01899-08 Google Scholar
  110. Teodoro A, Boncz MÁ, Júnior AM, Paulo PL (2014) Disinfection of greywater pre-treated by constructed wetlands using photo-Fenton: influence of pH on the decay of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. J Environ Chem Eng 2:958–962.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jece.2014.03.013 Google Scholar
  111. Thurston JA, Foster KE, Karpiscak MM, Gerba CP (2001) Fate of indicator microorganisms, giardia and cryptosporidium in subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Water Res 35:1547–1551.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0043-1354(00)00414-0 Google Scholar
  112. Tobiason JE, Cleasby JL, Logsdon GS, O’Melia CR (2010) Granular media filtration. In: Edzwald J (ed) Water quality & treatment, 6th edn. AWWA & McGrawHill, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  113. Torrens A, Molle P, Boutin C, Salgot M (2009) Removal of bacterial and viral indicator in vertical flow constructed wetlands and intermittent sand filters. Desalination 246:169–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.desal.2008.03.050 Google Scholar
  114. Toscano A, Hellio C, Marzo A, Milani M, Lebret K, Cirelli GL, Langergraber G (2013) Removal efficiency of a constructed wetland combined with ultrasound and UV devices for wastewater reuse in agriculture. Environ Technol 34:2327–2336.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.767284 Google Scholar
  115. Tram Vo P, Ngo HH, Guo W, Zhou JL, Nguyen PD, Listowski A, Wang XC (2014) A mini-review on the impacts of climate change on wastewater reclamation and reuse. Sci Total Environ 494–495:9–17.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2014.06.090 Google Scholar
  116. Trout JM, Walsh EJ, Fayer R (2002) Rotifers ingest giardia cysts. J Parasitol 88:1038–1040.  https://doi.org/10.1645/0022-3395(2002)088%5b1038:RIGC%5d2.0.CO;2 Google Scholar
  117. United Nations International Children’s Emergency Fund (UNICEF), World Health Organization (WHO) (2015) Progress on sanitation and drinking water: 2015 update and MDG assessment. UNICEF, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  118. United Nations World Water Assessment Programme (UNWWAP) (2017) The United Nations World Water Development Report. Wastewater: the untapped resource. UNESCO, ParisGoogle Scholar
  119. United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) (1992) Guidelines for Exposure Assessment. USEPA, WashingtonGoogle Scholar
  120. Vacca G, Wand H, Nikolausz M, Kuschk P, Kästner M (2005) Effect of plants and filter materials on bacteria removal in pilot-scale constructed wetlands. Water Res 39:1361–1373.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2005.01.005 Google Scholar
  121. Vázquez MA, de la Varga D, Plana R, Soto M (2013) Vertical flow constructed wetland treating high strength wastewater from swine slurry composting. Ecol Eng 50:37–43.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2012.06.038 Google Scholar
  122. Vera I, García J, Sáez K, Moragas L, Vidal G (2011) Performance evaluation of eight years experience of constructed wetland systems in Catalonia as alternative treatment for small communities. Ecol Eng 37:364–371.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2010.11.031 Google Scholar
  123. Vera I, Araya F, Andrés E, Sáez K, Vidal G (2014) Enhanced phosphorus removal from sewage in subsurface treatment wetland through zeolite as medium and artificial aeration. Environ Technol 35:1639–1649.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09593330.2013.877984 Google Scholar
  124. Vivant AL, Boutin C, Prost-Boucle S, Papias S, Hartmann A, Depret G, Ziebal C, Le Roux S, Pourcher AM (2016) Free water surface constructed wetlands limit the dissemination of extended-spectrum beta-lactamase producing Escherichia coli in the natural environment. Water Res 104:178–188.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2016.08.015 Google Scholar
  125. Von Sperling M (2007) Wastewater characteristics, treatment and disposal. IWA Publishing, London.  https://doi.org/10.2166/9781780402086 Google Scholar
  126. Vymazal J (2005) Horizontal sub-surface flow and hybrid constructed wetlands systems for wastewater treatment. Ecol Eng 25:478–490.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2005.07.010 Google Scholar
  127. Vymazal J, Kröpfelová L (2015) Multistage hybrid constructed wetland for enhanced removal of nitrogen. Ecol Eng 84:202–208.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2015.09.017 Google Scholar
  128. Wahyuni EA (2015) The influence of pH characteristics on the occurance of coliform bacteria in Madura Strait. Procedia Environ Sci 23:130–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proenv.2015.01.020 Google Scholar
  129. Wand H, Vacca G, Kuschk P, Krüger M, Kästner M (2007) Removal of bacteria by filtration in planted and non-planted sand columns. Water Res 41:159–167.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.watres.2006.08.024 Google Scholar
  130. Weerakoon GMPR, Jinadasa KBSN, Herath GBB, Mowjood MIM, van Bruggen JJA (2013) Impact of the hydraulic loading rate on pollutants removal in tropical horizontal subsurface flow constructed wetlands. Ecol Eng 61:154–160.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2013.09.016 Google Scholar
  131. Winward GP, Avery LM, Frazer-Williams R, Pidou M, Jeffrey P, Stephenson T, Jefferson B (2008) A study of the microbial quality of grey water and an evaluation of treatment technologies for reuse. Ecol Eng 32:187–197.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoleng.2007.11.001 Google Scholar
  132. World Health Organization (WHO) (2005) Laboratory biosafety manual. WHO, GenevaGoogle Scholar
  133. Wu S, Carvalho PN, Müller JA, Manoj VR, Dong R (2016a) Sanitation in constructed wetlands: a review on the removal of human pathogens and fecal indicators. Sci Total Environ 541:8–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2015.09.047 Google Scholar
  134. Wu X, Lu Y, Zhou S, Chen L, Xu B (2016b) Impact of climate change on human infectious diseases: empirical evidence and human adaptation. Environ Int 86:14–23.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2015.09.007 Google Scholar
  135. Zouboulis A, Tolkou A (2015) Effect of climate change in wastewater treatment plants: reviewing the problems and solutions. In: Shrestha S, Anal AK, Salam PA, van der Valk M (eds) Managing water resources under climate uncertainty: examples from Asia, Europe, Latin America, and Australia. Springer, Cham, pp 197–220.  https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10467-6_10 Google Scholar
  136. Zurita F, Carreón A (2014) Performance of three pilot-scale hybrid constructed wetlands for total coliforms and Escherichia coli removal from primary effluent—a 2-year study in a subtropical climate. J Water Health 13:446–458.  https://doi.org/10.2166/wh.2014.135 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Engineering and Environmental Biotechnology Group, Environmental Sciences Faculty and EULA-Chile CenterUniversidad de ConcepciónConcepciónChile
  2. 2.Faculty of Engineering and SciencesAdolfo Ibáñez UniversityViña del MarChile

Personalised recommendations