Advertisement

Reviews in Environmental Science and Bio/Technology

, Volume 17, Issue 3, pp 447–469 | Cite as

Trends in organic micropollutants removal in secondary treatment of sewage

  • T. Alvarino
  • J. Lema
  • F. Omil
  • S. Suárez
Review Paper

Abstract

Organic micropollutants (OMPs) comprise a wide group of substances highly consumed in modern societies. There has been a growing social and scientific interest on OMPs in wastewaters in the twentyfirst century. This research paper has identified the evolution of the research trends in the period 2001–2017 on OMPs fate during secondary wastewater treatment. These trends have moved from a global perspective on the occurrence of OMPs in wastewaters to more specific research focussed on understanding their behaviour during advanced treatment processes. Based on a bibliometric analysis carried out using one of the leading scientific databases, pharmaceuticals have been identified as the main group of OMPs. An increasing number of publications have been released on the fate of pharmaceuticals in wastewater with a growing number of countries involved: from 38 publications belonging to 14 countries in first 5-year period analysed (2001–2005) up to 138 from 42 countries only in the last 2 years (2016–2017). The main operational conditions in wastewater treatment plants influencing the removal of OMPs, as well as the mechanisms involved depending on the physico-chemical characteristics of the substances are reviewed. The paper also considers the role of microbial populations, as well as technological and operational features in OMPs abatement. Finally, a specific section is dedicated to the metabolic and cometabolic biotransformations of some OMPs taking place under heterotrophic, nitrifying and anaerobic conditions, a more novel research trend explored more recently.

Keywords

Advanced treatments Biotransformation Cometabolism Operational conditions Organic micropollutants Removal mechanisms 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by the Ministerio de Economía y Competitividad (AEI) through the Project COMETT (CTQ2016-80847-R). The authors belong to the Galician Competitive Research Group GRC2013-032 and to the CRETUS Strategic Partnership (AGRUP2015/02). All these programs and project are co-funded by FEDER (UE).

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Abegglen C, Joss A, McArdell CS, Fink G, Schlüsener MP, Ternes TA, Siegrist H (2009) The fate of selected micropollutants in a single-house MBR. Water Res 43:2036–2046Google Scholar
  2. Adrian NR, Suflita ÜM (1994) Anaerobic biodegradation of halogenated and nonhalogenated N-, S-, and O-heterocyclic compounds in aquifer slurries. Environ Toxicol Chem 13:1551–1557Google Scholar
  3. Alvarino T, Suarez S, Lema JM, Omil F (2014) Understanding the removal mechanisms of PPCPs and the influence of main technological parameters in anaerobic UASB and aerobic CAS reactors. J Hazard Mater 278:506–513Google Scholar
  4. Alvarino T, Suarez S, Katsou E, Vazquez-Padin J, Lema JM, Omil F (2015) Removal of PPCPs from the sludge supernatant in a one stage nitritation/anammox process. Water Res 68:701–709Google Scholar
  5. Alvarino T, Suarez S, Garrido JM, Lema JM, Omil F (2016a) A UASB reactor coupled to a hybrid aerobic MBR as innovative plant configuration to enhance the removal of organic micropollutants. Chemosphere 144:452–458Google Scholar
  6. Alvarino T, Naslod P, Suarez S, Omil F, Corvini PFX, Bouju H (2016b) Role of biotransformation, sorption and mineralization of 14C-labelled sulfamethoxazole under different redox conditions. Sci Total Environ 542:706–715Google Scholar
  7. Alvarino T, Komesli O, Suarez S, Lema JM, Omil F (2016c) The potential of the innovative SeMPAC process for enhancing the removal of recalcitrant organic micropollutants. J Hazard Mater 308:29–36Google Scholar
  8. Alvarino T, Torregrosa N, Omil F, Lema JM, Suarez S (2017) Assessing the feasibility of two hybrid MBR systems using PAC for removing macro and micropollutants. J Environ Manage 203:831–837Google Scholar
  9. Alvarino T, Suarez S, Lema J, Omil F (2018) Understanding the sorption and biotransformation of organic micropollutants in innovative biological wastewater treatment technologies. Sci Total Environ 615:297–306Google Scholar
  10. Arya V, Philip L, Bhallamudi SM (2016) Performance of suspended and attached growth bioreactors for the removal of cationic and anionic pharmaceuticals. Chem Eng J 284:1295–1307Google Scholar
  11. Banzhaf S, Nödler K, Licha T, Krein A, Scheytt T (2012) Redox-sensitivity and mobility of selected pharmaceutical compounds in a low flow column experiment. Sci Total Environ 438(2–3):113–121Google Scholar
  12. Baronti C, Curini R, D’Ascenzo G, Di Corcia A, Gentili A, Samperi R (2000) Monitoring natural and synthetic estrogens at activated sludge sewage treatment plants and in a receiving river water. Environ Sci Technol 34:5059–5066Google Scholar
  13. Behera SK, Kim HW, Oh J-E, Park H-S (2011) Occurrence and removal of antibiotics, hormones and several other pharmaceuticals in wastewater treatment plants of the largest industrial city of Korea. Sci Total Environ 409:4351–4360Google Scholar
  14. Belhaj D, Baccar R, Jaabiri I, Bouzid J, Kallel M, Ayadi H, Zhou JL (2008) Fate of selected estrogenic hormones in an urban sewage treatment plant in Tunisia (North Africa). Sci Total Environ 505:154–160Google Scholar
  15. Besse J-P, Kausch-Barreto C, Garric J (2008) Exposure assessment of pharmaceuticals and their metabolites in the aquatic environment: application to the French situation and preliminary prioritization. Hum Ecol Risk Assess 14(4):665–695Google Scholar
  16. Bester K (2005) Polycyclic musks in the Ruhr catchment area—transport, discharges of waste water and transformations of HHCB, AHTN and HHCB-lactone. J Environ Monit 7:43–51Google Scholar
  17. Boethling RS, Howard PH, Meylan W, Stiteler W, Beauman J, Tirado N (1994) Group contribution method for predicting probability and rate of aerobic biodegradation. Environ Sci Technol 28(3):459–465Google Scholar
  18. Boethling RS, Sommer E, DiFiore D (2007) Designing small molecules for biodegradability. Chem Rev 107:2207–2227Google Scholar
  19. Brepols Ch, Dorgeloh E, Frechen F-B, Fuchs W, Haider S, Joss A, de Korte K, Ruiken Ch, Schier W, van der Roest H, Wett M, Wozniak Th (2008) Upgrading and retrofitting of municipal wastewater treatment plants by means of membrane bioreactor (MBR) technology. Desalination 231(1–3):20–26Google Scholar
  20. Buntner D, Sánchez A, Garrido JM (2011) Three stages MBR (methanogenic, aerobic biofilm and membrane filtration) for the treatment of low-strength wastewaters. Water Sci Technol 64(2):397–402Google Scholar
  21. Burke V, Richter D, Hass U, Duennbier U, Greskowiak J, Massmann G (2014) Redox-dependent removal of 27 organic trace pollutants: compilation of results from tank aeration experiments. Environ Earth Sci 71:3685–3695Google Scholar
  22. Buser H-R, Poiger T, Müller MD (1998) Occurrence and fate of the pharmaceutical drug diclofenac in surface waters: rapid photodegradation in a lake. Environ Sci Technol 32(22):3449–3456Google Scholar
  23. Bustillo-Lecompte CF, Mehrvar M (2017) Treatment of actual slaughterhouse wastewater by combined anaerobic–aerobic processes for biogas generation and removal of organics and nutrients: an optimization study towards a cleaner production in the meat processing industry. J Clean Prod 141:278–289Google Scholar
  24. Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM, Llompart M, García-Jares C, Rodríguez I, Gómez M, Ternes T (2004) Behavior of pharmaceuticals, cosmetics and hormones in a sewage treatment plant. Water Res 38(12):2918–2926Google Scholar
  25. Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM (2007) Calculation methods to perform mass balances of micropollutants in sewage treatment plants. Application to pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs). Environ Sci Technol 41(3):884–890Google Scholar
  26. Chang SW (1997) Cometabolic degradation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and aromatic ethers by phenol- and ammonia-oxidizing bacteria, PhD thesis, University of Oregon StateGoogle Scholar
  27. Clara M, Strenn B, Kreuzinger N (2004) Carbamazepine as a possible anthropogenic marker in the aquatic environment: investigations on the behaviour of Carbamazepine in wastewater treatment and during groundwater infiltration. Water Res 38:947–954Google Scholar
  28. Clara M, Strenn B, Gans O, Martinez E, Kreuzinger N, Kroiss H (2005a) Removal of selected pharmaceuticals, fragrances and endocrine disrupting compounds in a membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment plants. Water Res 39(19):4797–4807Google Scholar
  29. Clara M, Kreuzinger N, Strenn B, Gans O, Kroiss H (2005b) The solids retention time—a suitable design parameter to evaluate the capacity of wastewater treatment plants to remove micropollutants. Water Res 39(1):97–106Google Scholar
  30. Clara M, Gans O, Windhofer G, Krenn U, Hartl W, Braun K, Scharf S, Scheffknecht C (2011) Occurrence of polycyclic musks in wastewater and receiving water bodies and fate during wastewater treatment. Chemosphere 82(8):1116–1123Google Scholar
  31. Collado N, Rodriguez-Mozaz S, Gros M, Rubirola A, Barceló D, Comas J, Rodriguez-Roda I, Buttiglieri G (2014) Pharmaceuticals occurrence in a WWTP with significant industrial contribution and its input into the river system. Environ Pollut 185:202–212Google Scholar
  32. Dai W, Xu X, Liu B, Yang F (2015) Toward energy-neutral wastewater treatment: a membrane combined process of anaerobic digestion and nitritation–anammox for biogas recovery and nitrogen removal. Chem Eng J 279:725–734Google Scholar
  33. de Graaff MS, Vieno NM, Kujawa-Roeleveld K, Zeeman G, Temmink H, Buisman CJN (2011) Fate of hormones and pharmaceuticals during combined anaerobic treatment and nitrogen removal by partial nitritation–anammox in vacuum collected black water. Water Res 45(1):375–383Google Scholar
  34. de la Torre T, Alonso E, Santos JL, Rodríguez C, Gómez MA, Malfeito JJ (2015) Trace organics removal using three membrane bioreactor configurations: MBR, IFAS-MBR and MBMBR. Water Sci Technol 71(5):761–768Google Scholar
  35. de Mes T, Zeeman G, Lettinga G (2005) Occurrence and fate of estrone, 17β-estradiol and 17α-ethynylestradiol in STPs for domestic wastewater. Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 4(4):275–311Google Scholar
  36. De Wever H, Weiss S, Reemtsma T, Vereecken J, Müller J, Knepper T, Rörden O, Gonzalez S, Barcelo D, Dolores Hernando M (2007) Comparison of sulfonated and other micropollutants removal in membrane bioreactor and conventional wastewater treatment. Water Res 41(4):935–945Google Scholar
  37. Di Trapani D, Di Bella G, Mannina G, Torregrossa M, Viviani G (2014) Comparison between moving bed-membrane bioreactor (MB-MBR) and membrane bioreactor (MBR) systems: influence of wastewater salinity variation. Bioresour Technol 162:60–69Google Scholar
  38. Dorival-García N, Zafra-Gómez A, Navalón A, González-López J, Hontoria E, Vílchez JL (2013) Removal and degradation characteristics of quinolone antibiotics in laboratory scale activated sludge reactors under aerobic, nitrifying and anoxic conditions. J Environ Manage 120:75–83Google Scholar
  39. Dutta K, Lee MY, Lai WW, Lee CH, Lin AY, Lin CF, Lin JG (2014) Removal of pharmaceuticals and organic matter from municipal wastewater using two-stage anaerobic fluidized membrane bioreactor. Bioresour Technol 165:42–49Google Scholar
  40. Eguchi K, Nagase H, Ozawa M, Endoh YS, Goto K, Hirata K, Miyamoto K, Yoshimura H (2004) Evaluation of antimicrobial agents for veterinary use in the ecotoxicity test using microalgae. Chemosphere 57(11):1733–1738Google Scholar
  41. Ellis JB (2006) Pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) in urban receiving waters. Environ Pollut 144(1):184–189Google Scholar
  42. Escolà Casas M, Chhetri RK, Ooi G, Hansen KM, Litty K, Christensson M, Kragelund C, Andersen HR, Bester K (2015) Biodegradation of pharmaceuticals in hospital wastewater by a hybrid biofilm and activated sludge system (Hybas). Sci Total Environ 530–531:383–392Google Scholar
  43. Falås P, Baillon-Dhumez A, Andersen HR, Ledin A, la Cour Jansen J (2012) Suspended biofilm carrier and activated sludge removal of acidic pharmaceuticals. Water Res 46(4):1167–1175Google Scholar
  44. Falås P, Longrée P, la Cour Jansen J, Siegrist H, Hollender J, Joss A (2013) Micropollutant removal by attached and suspended growth in a hybrid biofilm-activated sludge process. Water Res 47(13):4498–4506Google Scholar
  45. Falås P, Wick A, Castronovo S, Habermacher J, Ternes TA, Joss A (2016) Tracing the limits of organic micropollutant removal in biological wastewater treatment. Water Res 95:240–249Google Scholar
  46. Federal Office for the Environment FOEN (2015) Switzerland: Swiss confederation. https://www.bafu.admin.ch. Accessed 11 Nov 2017
  47. Fernandez-Fontaina E, Omil F, Lema JM, Carballa M (2012) Influence of nitrifying conditions on the biodegradation and sorption of emerging micropollutants. Water Res 46(16):5434–5444Google Scholar
  48. Fernandez-Fontaina E, Gomes IB, Aga DS, Omil F, Lema JM, Carballa M (2016) Biotransformation of pharmaceuticals under nitrification, nitratation and heterotrophic conditions. Sci Total Environ 541:1439–1447Google Scholar
  49. Field JA (2002) Anaerobic degradation of xenobiotic compounds. In: VII Latin America workshop and symposium on anaerobic digestionGoogle Scholar
  50. Gabet-Giraud V, Miège C, Choubert JM, Ruel SM, Coquery M (2010) Occurrence and removal of estrogens and beta blockers by various processes in wastewater treatment plants. Sci Total Environ 408(19):4257–4269Google Scholar
  51. Gerrity D, Gamage S, Holady JC, Mawhinney DB, Quiñones O, Trenholm RA, Snyder SA (2011) Pilot-scale evaluation of ozone and biological activated carbon for trace organic contaminant mitigation and disinfection. Water Res 45(5):2155–2165Google Scholar
  52. Göbel A, McArdell CS, Joss A, Siegrist H, Giger W (2007) Fate of sulfonamides, macrolides, and trimethoprim in different wastewater treatment technologies. Sci Total Environ 372(2–3):361–371Google Scholar
  53. Gómez MJ, Martínez Bueno MJ, Lacorte S, Fernández-Alba AR, Agüera A (2007) Pilot survey monitoring pharmaceuticals and related compounds in a sewage treatment plant located on the Mediterranean coast. Chemosphere 66:993–1002Google Scholar
  54. González S, Müller J, Petrovic M, Barceló D, Knepper TP (2006) Biodegradation studies of selected priority acidic pesticides and diclofenac in different bioreactors. Environ Pollut 144(3):926–932Google Scholar
  55. Gonzalez-Gil L, Carballa M, Lema JM (2017) Cometabolic enzymatic transformation of organic micropollutants under methanogenic conditions. Environ Sci Technol 51(5):2963–2971Google Scholar
  56. Guo J, Peng Y, Huang H, Wang S, Ge S, Zhang J, Wang Z (2010) Short- and longterm effects of temperature on partial nitrification in a sequencing batch reactor treating domestic wastewater. J Hazard Mater 179(1–3):471–479Google Scholar
  57. Haiyan R, Shulan J, ud din Ahmad N, Dao W, Chengwu C (2007) Degradation characteristics and metabolic pathway of 17α-ethinylestradiol by Sphingobacterium sp. JCR5. Chemosphere 66:340–346Google Scholar
  58. Helbling DE, Hollender J, Kohler HP, Fenner K (2010) Structure-based interpretation of biotransformation pathways of amide-containing compounds in sludge-seeded bioreactors. Environ Sci Technol 44(17):6628–6635Google Scholar
  59. Hirai N, Nanba A, Koshio M, Kondo T, Morita M, Tatarazako N (2006) Feminization of Japanese medaka (Oryzias latipes) exposed to 17beta-estradiol: effect of exposure period on spawning performance in sex-transformed females. Aquat Toxicol 79(3):288–295Google Scholar
  60. Hirsch R, Ternes TA, Haberer K, Mehlich A, Ballwanz F, Kratz KL (1998) Determination of antibiotics in different water compartments via liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 815(2):213–223Google Scholar
  61. Hoeger B, Köllner B, Dietrich DR, Hitzfeld B (2005) Water-borne diclofenac affects kidney and gill integrity and selected immune parameters in brown trout (Salmo trutta f. fario). Aquat Toxicol 75(1):53–64Google Scholar
  62. Hörsing M, Ledin A, Grabic R, Fick J, Tysklind M, la Cour Jansen J, Andersen HR (2011) Determination of sorption of seventy-five pharmaceuticals in sewage sludge. Water Res 45:4470–4482Google Scholar
  63. Hu X, Xie L, Shim H, Zhang S, Yang D (2014) Biological nutrient removal in a full scale anoxic/anaerobic/aerobic/pre-anoxic-MBR plant for low C/N ratio municipal wastewater treatment. Chin J Chem Eng 22(4):447–454Google Scholar
  64. Huppert N, Würtele M, Hahn HH (1998) Determination of the plasticizer Nbutylbenzenesulfonamide and the pharmaceutical Ibuprofen in wastewater using solid phase microextraction (SPME). Fresenius J Anal Chem 362:529–536Google Scholar
  65. Hyman MR, Murton IB, Arp DJ (1988) Interaction of ammonia monooxygenase from Nitrosomonas europaea with alkanes, alkenes and alkynes. Environ Microbiol 54(12):3187–3190Google Scholar
  66. Iasur-Kruh L, Hadar Y, Minz D (2011) Isolation and bioaugmentation of an estradiol-degrading bacterium and its integration into a mature biofilm. Appl Environ Microbiol 77(11):3734–3740Google Scholar
  67. Jermann D, Pronk W, Boller M, Schäfer AI (2009) The role of NOM fouling for the retention of estradiol and ibuprofen during ultrafiltration. J Membr Sci 329(1–2):75–84Google Scholar
  68. Jewell KS, Castronovo S, Wick A, Falås P, Joss A, Ternes TA (2016) New insights into the transformation of trimethoprim during biological wastewater treatment. Water Res 88:550–557Google Scholar
  69. Joss A, Ternes HA, Richle P, Siegrist H (2004) Removal of estrogens in municipal wastewater treatment under aerobic and anaerobic conditions: consequences for plant optimization. Environ Sci Technol 38(11):3047–3055Google Scholar
  70. Joss A, Keller E, Alder AC, Göbel A, McArdell CS, Ternes T, Siegrist H (2005) Removal of pharmaceuticals and fragrances in biological wastewater treatment. Water Res 39(14):3139–3152Google Scholar
  71. Joss A, Zabczynski S, Gobel A, Hoffmann B, Loffler D, McArdell CS, Ternes TA, Thomsen A, Siegrist H (2006) Biological degradation of pharmaceuticals in municipal wastewater treatment: proposing a classification scheme. Water Res 40(8):1686–1696Google Scholar
  72. Kartal B, van Niftrik L, Rattray J, van de Vossenberg JL, Schmid MC, Sinninghe Damsté J, Jetten MS, Strous M (2008) Candidatus 'Brocadia fulgida': an autofluorescent anaerobic ammonium oxidizing bacterium. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63:46–55Google Scholar
  73. Kartal B, de Almeida NM, Maalcke WJ, Op den Camp HJ, Jetten MS, Keltjens JT (2013) How to make a living from anaerobic ammonium oxidation. FEMS Microbiol Rev 37(3):428–461Google Scholar
  74. Kasprzyk-Hordern B, Dinsdale RM, Guwy AJ (2009) The removal of pharmaceuticals, personal care products, endocrine disruptors and illicit drugs during wastewater treatment and its impact on the quality of receiving waters. Water Res 43(2):363–380Google Scholar
  75. Kassotaki E, Pijuan M, Joss A, Borrego CM, Rodriguez-Roda I, Buttiglieri G (2018) Unraveling the potential of a combined nitritation–anammox biomass towards the biodegradation of pharmaceutically active compounds. Sci Total Environ 624:722–731Google Scholar
  76. Keener WK, Arp DJ (1993) Kinetic studies of ammonia monooxygenase inhibition in nitrosomonas europaea by hydrocarbons and halogenated hydrocarbons in an optimized whole-cell assay. Appl Environ Microbiol 59(8):2501–2510Google Scholar
  77. Khunjar WO, Mackintosh SA, Skotnicka-Pitak J, Baik S, Aga DS, Love NG (2011) Elucidating the relative roles of ammonia oxidizing and heterotrophic bacteria during the biotransformation of 17α-ethinylestradiol and trimethoprim. Environ Sci Technol 45(8):3605–3612Google Scholar
  78. Kim SD, Cho J, Kim IS, Vanderford BJ, Snyder SA (2007) Occurrence and removal of pharmaceuticals and endocrine disruptors in South Korean surface, drinking and waste waters. Water Res 41:1013–1021Google Scholar
  79. Kimura K, Hara H, Watanabe Y (2005) Removal of pharmaceutical compounds by submerged membrane bioreactors (MBRs). Desalination 178(1–3):135–140Google Scholar
  80. Knackmuss HJ (1996) Basic knowledge and perspectives of bioelimination of xenobiotics compounds. J Biotechnol 51(3):287–295Google Scholar
  81. Kolpin DW, Skopec M, Meyer MT, Furlong ET, Zaugg SD (2004) Urban contribution of pharmaceuticals and other organic wastewater contaminants to streams during differing flow conditions. Sci Total Environ 328(1–3):119–130Google Scholar
  82. Kovalova L, Siegrist H, von Gunten U, Eugster J, Hagenbuch M, Wittmer A, Moser R, McArdell CS (2013) Elimination of micropollutants during post-treatment of hospital wastewater with powdered activated carbon, ozone, and UV. Environ Sci Technol 47(14):7899–7908Google Scholar
  83. Kuenen JG (2008) Anammox bacteria: from discovery to application. Nat Rev Microbiol 6:320–326Google Scholar
  84. Kupper T, Plagellat C, Brändli RC, De Alencastro LF, Grandjean D, Tarradellas J (2006) Fate and removal of polycyclic musks, UV filters and biocides during wastewater treatment. Water Res 40(14):2603–2612Google Scholar
  85. Larcher S, Yargeau V (2013) Biodegradation of 17α-ethinylestradiol by heterotrophic bacteria. Environ Pollut 173:17–22Google Scholar
  86. Laureni M, Falås P, Robin O, Wick A, Weissbrodt DG, Nielsen JL, Ternes TA, Morgenroth E, Joss A (2016) Mainstream partial nitritation and anammox: long-term process stability and effluent quality at low temperatures. Water Res 101:628–639Google Scholar
  87. Leyva-Díaz JC, Muñío MM, González-López J, Poyatos JM (2016) Anaerobic/anoxic/oxic configuration in hybrid moving bed biofilm reactor-membrane bioreactor for nutrient removal from municipal wastewater. Ecol Eng 91:449–458Google Scholar
  88. Lin AY, Lin C, Tsai Y (2010) Fate of selected pharmaceuticals and personal care products after secondary wastewater treatment processes in Taiwan. Water Sci Technol 62(10):2450–2458Google Scholar
  89. Liu G, Xu X, Zhu L, Xing S, Chen J (2013) Biological nutrient removal in a continuous anaerobic–aerobic–anoxic process treating synthetic domestic wastewater. Chem Eng J 225:223–229Google Scholar
  90. Lu J, Jin Q, He YL, Wu J (2007) Biodegradation of nonylphenol polyethoxylates under Fe(III)-reducing conditions. Chemosphere 69:1047–1054Google Scholar
  91. Lu J, Jin Q, He Y, Wu J, Zhang W, Zhao J (2008) Anaerobic degradation behavior of nonylphenol polyethoxylates in sludge. Chemosphere 71:345–351Google Scholar
  92. Luo Y, Guo W, Ngo HH, Nghiem LD, Hai FI, Zhang J, Liang S, Wang XC (2014) A review on the occurrence of micropollutants in the aquatic environment and their fate and removal during wastewater treatment. Sci Total Environ 473–474:619–641Google Scholar
  93. Lv L, Li W, Wu C, Meng L, Qin W (2017) Microbial community composition and function in a pilot-scale anaerobic–anoxic–aerobic combined process for the treatment of traditional Chinese medicine wastewater. Bioresour Technol 240:84–93Google Scholar
  94. Maeng SK, Choi BG, Lee KT, Song KG (2013) Influences of solid retention time, nitrification and microbial activity on the attenuation of pharmaceuticals and estrogens in membrane bioreactors. Water Res 47(9):3151–3162Google Scholar
  95. Majewsky M, Gallé T, Yargeau V, Fischer K (2011) Active heterotrophic biomass and sludge retention time (SRT) as determining factors for biodegradation kinetics of pharmaceuticals in activated sludge. Bioresour Technol 102(16):7415–7421Google Scholar
  96. Margot J, Kienle C, Magnet A, Weil M, Rossi L, de Alencastro LF, Abegglen C, Thonney D, Chèvre N, Schärer M, Barry DA (2013) Treatment of micropollutants in municipal wastewater: ozone or powdered activated carbon? Sci Total Environ 461–462:480–498Google Scholar
  97. Matamoros V, Arias C, Brix H, Bayona JM (2007) Removal of pharmaceuticals and personal care products (PPCPs) from urban wastewater in a pilot vertical flow constructed wetland and a sand filter. Environ Sci Technol 41(23):8171–8177Google Scholar
  98. Maurer M, Escher BI, Richle P, Schaffner C, Alder AC (2007) Elimination of [beta]-blockers in sewage treatment plants. Water Res 41:1614–1622Google Scholar
  99. McAvoy DC, Schatowitz B, Jacob M, Hauk A, Eckhoff WS (2002) Measurement of triclosan in wastewater treatment systems. Environ Toxicol Chem 21(7):1323–1329Google Scholar
  100. McCarty PL, Bae J, Kim J (2011) Domestic wastewater treatment as a net energy producer—can this be achieved? Environ Sci Technol 45(17):7100–7106Google Scholar
  101. Miège C, Choubert JM, Ribeiro L, Eusebe M, Coquery M (2009) Fate of pharmaceuticals and personal care products in wastewater treatment plants—conception of a database and first results. Environ Pollut 157(5):1721–1726Google Scholar
  102. Monsalvo VM, McDonald JA, Khan SJ, Le-Clech P (2014) Removal of trace organics by anaerobic membrane bioreactors. Water Res 49:103–112Google Scholar
  103. Müller E, Schüssler W, Horn H, Lemmer H (2013) Aerobic biodegradation of the sulfonamide antibiotic sulfamethoxazole by activated sludge applied as co-substrate and sole carbon and nitrogen source. Chemosphere 92(8):969–978Google Scholar
  104. Murdoch RW, Hay AG (2005) Formation of catechols via removal of acid side chains from ibuprofen and related aromatic acids. Appl Environ Microbiol 71(10):6121–6125Google Scholar
  105. Musolff A, Leschik S, Möder M, Strauch G, Reinstorf F, Schirmer M (2009) Temporal and spatial patterns of micropollutants in urban receiving waters. Environ Pollut 157(11):3069–3077Google Scholar
  106. Musson SE, Campo P, Tolaymat T, Suidan M, Townsend TG (2010) Assessment of the anaerobic degradation of six active pharmaceutical ingredients. Sci Total Environ 408(9):2068–2074Google Scholar
  107. Nakada N, Tanishima T, Shinohara H, Kiri K, Takada H (2006) Pharmaceutical chemicals and endocrine disrupters in municipal wastewater in Tokyo and their removal during activated sludge treatment. Water Res 40:3297–3303Google Scholar
  108. Ng ANL, Kim AS (2007) A mini-review of modeling studies on membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment for municipal wastewaters. Desalination 212(1–3):261–281Google Scholar
  109. Nguyen LN, Hai FI, Kang J, Price WE, Nghiem LD (2012) Removal of trace organic contaminants by a membrane bioreactor-granular activated carbon (MBR-GAC) system. Bioresour Technol 113:169–173Google Scholar
  110. Okabe S, Oshiki M, Takahashi Y, Satoh H (2011) N2O emission from a partial nitrification anammox process and identification of a key biological process of N2O emission from anammox granules. Water Res 45(19):6461–6470Google Scholar
  111. Omil F, Suárez S, Carballa M, Reif R, Lema JM (2010) Criteria for conceiving sewage treatment plants for an enhanced removal of organic micropollutants, chap. 16. In: Fatta-Kassinos D, Bester K, Kummerer K (eds) Xenobiotics in the urban water cycle. Springer, New York, pp 283–306. ISBN 9-789048-135080Google Scholar
  112. Orlando EF, Guillette LJ Jr (2007) Sexual dimorphic responses in wildlife exposed to endocrine disrupting chemicals. Environ Res 104(1):163–173Google Scholar
  113. Ortiz de García S, Pinto Pinto G, García Encina P, Irusta Mata R (2013) Consumption and occurrence of pharmaceutical and personal care products in the aquatic environment in Spain. Sci Total Environ 444:451–465Google Scholar
  114. Paredes L, Fernandez-Fontaina E, Lema JM, Omil F, Carballa M (2016) Understanding the fate of organic micropollutants in sand and granular activated carbon biofiltration systems. Sci Total Environ 551–552:640–648Google Scholar
  115. Park J, Yamashita N, Park C, Shimono T, Takeuchi DM, Tanaka H (2017) Removal characteristics of pharmaceuticals and personal care products: comparison between membrane bioreactor and various biological treatment processes. Chemosphere 179:347–358Google Scholar
  116. Parrott JL, Blunt BR (2005) Life-cycle exposure of fathead minnows (Pimephales promelas) to an ethinylestradiol concentration below 1 ng/L reduces egg fertilization success and demasculinizes males. Environ Toxicol 20(2):131–141Google Scholar
  117. Phan HV, Hai FI, Kang J, Dam HK, Zhang R, Price WE, Broeckmann A, Nghiem LD (2014) Simultaneous nitrification/denitrification and trace organic contaminant (TrOC) removal by an anoxic–aerobic membrane bioreactor (MBR). Bioresour Technol 165:96–104Google Scholar
  118. Plósz BG, Langford KH, Thomas KV (2012) An activated sludge modelling framework for xenobiotic trace chemicals (ASM-X): assessment of diclofenac and carbamazepine. Biotechnol Bioeng 109:2757–2769Google Scholar
  119. Pomiès M, Choubert JM, Wisniewski C, Coquery M (2013) Modelling of micropollutant removal in biological wastewater treatments: a review. Sci Total Environ 443:733–748Google Scholar
  120. Quintana JB, Weiss S, Reemtsma T (2005) Pathways and metabolites of microbial degradation of selected acidic pharmaceutical and their occurrence in municipal wastewater treated by a membrane bioreactor. Water Res 39:2654–2664Google Scholar
  121. Radjenović J, Petrović M, Barceló D (2009) Fate and distribution of pharmaceuticals in wastewater and sewage sludge of the conventional activated sludge (CAS) and advanced membrane bioreactor (MBR) treatment. Water Res 43(3):831–841Google Scholar
  122. Reif R, Suarez S, Omil F, Lema JM (2008) Fate of pharmaceuticals and cosmetic ingredients during the operation of a MBR treating sewage. Desalination 221:511–517Google Scholar
  123. Reif R, Besancon A, Corre KL, Jefferson B, Lema JM, Omil F (2011) Comparison of PPCPs removal on a parallel-operated MBR and AS system and evaluation of effluent post-treatment on vertical flow reed beds. Water Sci Technol 63(10):2411–2417Google Scholar
  124. Remy M, Van der Marel P, Zwijnenburg A, Rulkens W, Temmink H (2009) Low dose powdered activated carbon addition at high sludge retention times to reduce fouling in membrane bioreactors. Water Res 43:345–350Google Scholar
  125. Rice RG, Robson CM (1982) Biological activated carbon-enhanced aerobic biological activity in GAC systems. Ann Arbor SCI, WoburnGoogle Scholar
  126. Ruiz G, Jeison D, Rubilar O, Ciudad G, Chamy R (2006) Nitrification-denitrification via nitrite accumulation for nitrogen removal from wastewaters. Bioresour Technol 97(2):330–335Google Scholar
  127. Santos JL, Aparicio I, Callejón M, Alonso E (2009) Occurrence of pharmaceutically active compounds during 1-year period in wastewaters from four wastewater treatment plants in Seville (Spain). J Hazard Mater 164(2–3):1509–1516Google Scholar
  128. Serrano D, Suárez S, Lema JM, Omil F (2011) Removal of persistent pharmaceutical micropollutants from sewage by addition of PAC in a sequential membrane bioreactor. Water Res 45:5323–5333Google Scholar
  129. Sigg L (2000) Redox potential measurements in natural waters: significance, concepts and problems. In: Schüring J, Schulz HD, Fischer WR, Böttcher J, Duijnisveld WH (eds) Redox: fundamentals, process and applications. Springer, BerlinGoogle Scholar
  130. Silva-Teira A, Sánchez A, Buntner D, Rodríguez-Hernández L, Garrido JM (2017) Removal of dissolved methane and nitrogen from anaerobically treated effluents at low temperature by MBR post-treatment. Chem Eng J 326:970–979Google Scholar
  131. Silvestre G, Fernández B, Bonmatí A (2015) Significance of anaerobic digestion as a source of clean energy in wastewater treatment plants. Energy Convers Manage 101(1):255–262Google Scholar
  132. Sipma J, Osuna B, Collado N, Monclús H, Ferrero G, Comas J, Rodriguez-Roda I (2010) Comparison of removal of pharmaceuticals in MBR and activated sludge systems. Desalination 205(2):653–659Google Scholar
  133. Sirotkin AS, Koshkina LY, Ippolitov KG (2001) The BAC-process for treatment of waste water containing non-ionogenic synthetic surfactants. Water Res 35(13):3265–3271Google Scholar
  134. Spongberg AL, Witter JD (2008) Pharmaceutical compounds in the wastewater process stream in Northwest Ohio. Sci Total Environ 397:148–157Google Scholar
  135. Stephenson T, Judd S, Jeferson B, Brindle K (2000) Membrane bioreactors for wastewater treatment, 1st edn. IWA Publishing, London. ISBN 1-900222-07-8Google Scholar
  136. Stumm W, Morgan JJ (1996) Aquatic chemistry: chemical equilibria and rates in natural waters. Wiley, NewYorkGoogle Scholar
  137. Stumpf M, Ternes TA, Wilken R-D, Rodrigues Silvana Vianna, Baumann W (1999) Polar drug residues in sewage and natural waters in the state of Rio de Janeiro, Brazil. Sci Total Environ 225:135–141Google Scholar
  138. Suárez S, Carballa M, Omil F, Lema JM (2008) How are pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) removed from urban wastewaters? Rev Environ Sci Biotechnol 7:125–138Google Scholar
  139. Suárez S, Omil F, Lema JM (2010) Removal of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) under nitrifying and denitrifying conditions. Water Res 44:3214–3224Google Scholar
  140. Suárez S, Reif R, Lema JM, Omil F (2012) Mass balance of pharmaceutical and personal care products in a pilot-scale single-sludge system: influence of T, SRT and recirculation ratio. Chemosphere 89(2):164–171Google Scholar
  141. Tadkaew N, Hai FI, McDonald JA, Khan SJ, Nghiem LD (2011) Removal of trace organics by MBR treatment: the role of molecular properties. Water Res 45(8):2439–2451Google Scholar
  142. Tauxe-Wuersch A, De Alencastro LF, Grandjean D, Tarradellas J (2005) Occurrence of several acidic drugs in sewage treatment plants in Switzerland and risk assessment. Water Res 39:1761–1772Google Scholar
  143. Ternes TA (1998) Occurrence of drugs in German sewage treatment plants and rivers. Water Res 32(11):3245–3260Google Scholar
  144. Ternes T, Joss A (2006) Human pharmaceuticals, hormones and fragrances. The challenge of micropollutants in urban water management. IWA Publishing, LondonGoogle Scholar
  145. Ternes T, Bonerz M, Schmidt T (2001) Determination of neutral pharmaceuticals in wastewater and rivers by liquid chromatography-electrospray tandem mass spectrometry. J Chromatogr A 938(1–2):175–185Google Scholar
  146. Ternes TA, Herrmann N, Bonerz M, Knacker T, Siegrist H, Joss A (2004) A rapid method to measure the solid-water distribution coefficient (Kd) for pharmaceuticals and musk fragrances in sewage sludge. Water Res 38(19):4075–4084Google Scholar
  147. Terzic S, Matosic M, Ahel M, Mijatovic I (2005) Elimination of aromatic surfactants from municipal wastewaters: comparison of conventional activated sludge treatment and membrane biological reactor. Water Sci Technol 51(6–7):447–453Google Scholar
  148. Thorpe KL, Cummings R, Hutchinson TH, Scholze M, Brighty G, Sumpter JP, Tyler CR (2003) Relative potencies and combination effects of steroidal estrogens in fish. Environ Sci Technol 37(6):1142–1149Google Scholar
  149. Tran HT, Urase T, Kusakabe O (2009) The characteristics of enriched nitrifier culture in the degradation of selected pharmaceutically active compounds. J Hazard Mater 171(1–3):1051–1057Google Scholar
  150. Tran NH, Urase T, Ngo HH, Hu J, Ong SL (2013) Insight into metabolic and cometabolic activities of autotrophic and heterotrophic microorganisms in the biodegradation of emerging trace organic contaminants. Bioresour Technol 146:721–731Google Scholar
  151. Triebskorn R, Casper H, Heyd A, Eikemper R, Köhler HR, Schwaiger J (2004) Toxic effects of the non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drug diclofenac. Part II: cytological effects in liver, kidney, gills and intestine of rainbow trout (Oncorhynchus mykiss). Aquat Toxicol 68(2):151–166Google Scholar
  152. van der Aa NG, Kommer GJ, van Montfoort JE, Versteegh JF (2011) Demographic projections of future pharmaceutical consumption in the Netherlands. Water Sci Technol 63(4):825–831Google Scholar
  153. Vázquez-Padín JR, Morales N, Gutiérrez R, Fernández R, Rogalla F, Barrio JP, Campos JL, Mosquera-Corral A, Méndez R (2014) Implications of full scale implementation of an anammox based process as post-treatment of a municipal anaerobic sludge digester operated with co-digestion. Water Sci Technol 69(6):1151–1158Google Scholar
  154. Verlicchi P, Galletti A, Petrovic M, Barceló D (2010) Hospital effluents as a source of emerging pollutants: an overview of micropollutants and sustainable treatment options. J Hydrol 389(3–4):416–428Google Scholar
  155. Verlicchi P, Al Aukidy M, Zambello E (2012) Occurrence of pharmaceutical compounds in urban wastewater: removal, mass load and environmental risk after a secondary treatment—a review. Sci Total Environ 429:123–155Google Scholar
  156. Verlicchi P, Zambello E, AlAukidi M (2013) Removal of pharmaceuticals by conventional wastewater treatment plants. In: Petrovic M, Barcelo D, Perez S (eds) Comprehensive analytical chemistry, vol 8. Analysis removal, effects and risks of pharmaceuticals in the water cycle—occurrence, and transformation in the environment. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 231–286Google Scholar
  157. Vieno NM, Tuhkanen T, Kronberg L (2005) Seasonal variation in the ocurrence of pharmaceuticals in effluents from a sewage treatment plant and in the recipient water. Environ Sci Technol 39(21):8220–8226Google Scholar
  158. Widjaja T, Miyata T, Nakano Y, Nishijima W, Okada M (2004) Adsorption capacity of powdered activated carbon for 3,5-dichlorophenol in activated sludge. Chemosphere 57(9):1219–1224Google Scholar
  159. Wunder DB, Bosscher VA, Cok RC, Hozalski RM (2011) Sorption of antibiotics to biofilm. Water Res 45(6):2270–2280Google Scholar
  160. Xue W, Wu C, Xiao K, Huang X, Zhou H, Tsuno H, Tanaka H (2010) Elimination and fate of selected micro-organic pollutants in a full-scale anaerobic/anoxic/aerobic process combined with membrane bioreactor for municipal wastewater reclamation. Water Res 44:5999–6010Google Scholar
  161. Yang GF, Zhang QQ, Jin RC (2013) Changes in the nitrogen removal performance and the properties of granular sludge in an anammox system under oxytetracycline (OTC) stress. Bioresour Technol 129:65–71Google Scholar
  162. Yi T, Harper WF (2007) The Link between nitrification and biotransformation of 17α-ethinylestradiol. Environ Sci Technol 41(12):4311–4316Google Scholar
  163. Yi TW, Harper WF, Holbrook RD, Love NG (2006) Role of particle size and ammonium oxidation in removal of 17 alpha-ethinyl estradiol in bioreactors. J Environ Eng 132(11):1527–1529Google Scholar
  164. Zeng QL, Li YM, Gu GW, Zhao J, Zhang C, Luan J (2009) Sorption and biodegradation of 17β-estradiol by acclimated aerobic activated sludge and isolation of the bacterial strain. Environ Eng Sci 26(4):783–790Google Scholar
  165. Zhang Z, Gao P, Su H, Zhan P, Ren N, Feng Y (2015) Anaerobic biodegradation characteristics of estrone, estradiol, and 17α-ethinylestradiol in activated sludge batch tests. Desalin Water Treat 53(4):985–993Google Scholar
  166. Zhang M, Peng Y, Wang C, Wang C, Zhao W, Zeng W (2016) Optimization denitrifying phosphorus removal at different hydraulic retention times in a novel anaerobic anoxic oxic-biological contact oxidation process. Biochem Eng J 106:26–36Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Chemical Engineering, Institute of Technology, School of EngineeringUniversity of Santiago de CompostelaSantiago de CompostelaSpain

Personalised recommendations