Advertisement

Co-opted directors, gender diversity, and crash risk: evidence from China

  • Erin H. Kao
  • Ho-Chuan Huang
  • Hung-Gay Fung
  • Xiaojian LiuEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

This study examines how the composition of the board of directors at Chinese firms affects crash risk. The results indicate that co-opted directors (i.e., directors appointed after the CEO assumed office) have a positive and significant effect on crash risk; the positive relation between board directors and crash risk is primarily driven by co-opted male directors, implying a gender difference on crash risk. Non-co-opted independent directors mitigate crash risk, but the negative relation between gender and crash risk is much stronger for female directors than for male directors. The results indicate that co-option/non-co-opted independence along with gender diversity on the board plays an important role in shaping crash risk behaviors. The director-crash risk linkage disappears at state-owned enterprises, suggesting that ownership structure affects board behaviors and board members play the role of rubber-stamp. Finally, the relation between gender and crash risk is more pronounced at crash-risk prone firms with high earnings management and high financial leverage.

Keywords

Co-option Crash risk Gender diversity Independent director State-owned enterprises 

JEL Classification

G3 G32 G34 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the constructive comments and recommendations of the Editor, Cheng-Few Lee, and an anonymous reviewer. We also appreciate participants at 2019 27th Annual Conference on Pacific Basin Finance, Economics, Accounting, and Management (PBFEAM) at Taiwan University. This research was partly supported by the Ministry of Science and Technology (MOST) of Taiwan (Grant Nos. 107-2410-H-029-050 and MOST 107-2410-H-032-015).

References

  1. Adams RB, Ferreira D (2007) A theory of friendly board. J Finance 62:217–250CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adams RB, Ferreira D (2009) Women in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. J Financ Econ 94:291–309CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Adams R, Hermalin B, Weisbach M (2010) The role of boards of directors in corporate governance: a conceptual framework and survey. J Econ Lit 48:58–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. An H, Zhang T (2013) Stock price synchronicity, crash risk, and institutional investors. J Corp Finance 21:1–15CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Anderson JD, Core JE (2018) Managerial incentives to increase risk provided by debt, stock, and options. Manag Sci 64:3971–4470CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Arcand JL, Berkes E, Panizza U (2015) Too much finance? J Econ Growth 20:105–148CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Arena MP, Braga-Alves MV (2013) The discretionary effect of CEOs and board chairs on corporate governance structures. J Empir Finance 21:121–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Baldenius T, Melumad N, Meng X (2014) Board composition and CEO power. J Financ Econ 112:53–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Barber B, Odean T (2001) Boys will be boys: gender, overconfidence, and common stock investment. Q J Econ 116:261–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Baum CF, Schaffer ME (2012) ivreg2h: Stata module to perform instrumental variables estimation using heteroskedasticity-based instruments. http://ideas.repec.org/c/boc/bocode/s457555.html
  11. Bowen CC, Wu Y, Hwang C, Scherer RF (2007) Holding up half of the sky? Attitudes toward women as managers in the People’s Republic of China. Int J Hum Resour Man 18:268–283CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bu N, Roy JP (2005) Career success networks in China: sex differences in network composition and social exchange practices. Asia Pac J Manag 22:381–403CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Callen JL, Fang X (2013) Institutional investor stability and crash risk: monitoring versus short-termism? J Bank Finance 37:3047–3063CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Callen JL, Fang X (2015) Religion and stock price crash risk. J Financ Quant Anal 50:169–195CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cao Y, Dhaliwal D, Li Z, Yang YG (2015) Are all independent directors equally informed? Evidence based on their trading returns and social networks. Manag Sci 61:795–813CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Chen J, Hong H, Stein JC (2001) Forecasting crashes: trading volume, past returns, and conditional skewness in stock prices. J Financ Econ 61:345–381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Chen G, Firth M, Gao DN, Rui OM (2006) Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: evidence from China. J Corp Finance 12:424–448CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Chen S, Ni X, Tong J (2016) Gender diversity in the boardroom and risk management: a case of R&D investment. J Bus Ethics 136:599–621CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Chen CR, Li Y, Luo D, Zhang T (2017) Helping hands or grabbing hands? An analysis of political connections and firm value. J Bank Finance 80:71–89CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Cheng S (2008) Board size and the variability of corporate performance. J Financ Econ 87:157–176CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Cheung Y, Chung C, Tan W, Wang W (2013) Connected board of directors: a blessing or a curse? J Bank Finance 37:3227–3242CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveen L (2008) Boards: does one size fit all? J Financ Econ 87:329–356CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveen L (2014) Co-opted boards. Rev Financ Stud 27:1751–1796CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Colonnello S, Curatola G, Hoang NG (2017) Direct and indirect risk-taking incentives of inside debt. J Corp Finance 45:428–466CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Cumming D, Leung T, Rui O (2015) Gender diversity and securities fraud. Acad Manag J 58:1572–1593CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Dechow PM, Sloan RG, Sweeney AP (1995) Detecting earnings management. Acc Rev 70:193–225Google Scholar
  27. Diallo B, Koch W (2018) Bank concentration and Schumpeterian growth: theory and international evidence. Rev Econ Stat 100:489–501CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Dimson E (1979) Risk measurement when shares are subject to infrequent trading. J Financ Econ 7:197–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Faleye O (2015) The costs of a (nearly) fully independent board. J Empir Finance 32:49–62CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Fedaseyeu V, Linck JS, Wagner HF (2018) Do qualifications matter? New evidence on board functions and director compensation. J Corp Finance 48:816–839CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Fracassi C, Tate G (2012) External networking and internal firm governance. J Finance 67:153–194CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Francis B, Hasan I, Li L (2016) Abnormal real operations, real earnings management, and subsequent crashes in stock prices. Rev Quant Financ Acc 46:217–260CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Gul F, Srinidhi B, Ng A (2011) Does board gender diversity improve the informativeness of stock prices? J Acc Econ 51:314–338CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hsu P-H, Huang S, Massa M, Zhang H (2015) The new lyrics of the old folks: the role of family ownership in corporate innovation. CEPR Discussion Paper No. DP10445. https://ssrn.com/abstract=2572423
  35. Huang S, Lim CY, Ng J (2019) Not clawing the hand that feeds you: the case of co-opted boards and claw-backs. Eur Acc Rev 28:101–127CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hutton AP, Marcus A, Tehranian JH (2009) Opaque financial reports, R2, and crash risk. J Financ Econ 94:67–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Hwang ER (1987) Face and favor: the Chinese power game. Am J Sociol 92:35–41CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Jensen MC (1993) The modern industrial revolution, exit and the failure of internal control systems. J Finance 48:831–880CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Jensen MC, Murphy KJ (1990) Performance pay and top-management incentives. J Polit Econ 98:225–265CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Jiang F, Kim KA (2015) Corporate governance in China: a modern perspective. J Corp Finance 32:190–216CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Jin L, Myers SC (2006) R2 around the world: new theory and new tests. J Financ Econ 79:257–292CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Kang J-K, Liu W-L, Low A, Zhang L (2018) Friendly boards and innovation. J Empir Finance 45:1–25CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Kao EH, Yeh CC, Wag LH, Fung HG (2018) The relationship between CSR and performance: evidence in China”. Pac-Basin Financ J 51:155–170CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Khanna V, Kim E, Lu Y (2015) CEO connectedness and corporate fraud. J Finance 70:1203–1252CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Kim D, Starks LT (2016) Gender diversity on corporate boards: do women contribute unique skills? Am Econ Rev 106:267–271CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Kim JB, Zhang L (2014) Financial reporting opacity and expected crash risk: evidence from implied volatility smirks. Contemp Acc Res 31:851–875CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Kim JB, Zhang L (2016) Accounting conservatism and stock price crash risk: firm-level evidence. Contemp Acc Res 33:412–441CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Kim JB, Li Y, Zhang L (2011a) Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: firm-level analysis. J Financ Econ 100:639–662CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Kim JB, Li Y, Zhang L (2011b) CFOs versus CEOs: equity incentives and crashes. J Financ Econ 101:713–730CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kim Y, Li H, Li S (2014) Corporate social responsibility and stock price crash risk. J Bank Finance 43:1–13CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Landier A, Sauvagnat J, Sraer D, Thesmar D (2013) Bottom-up corporate governance. Rev Finance 17:161–201CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Lee W, Wang L (2017) Do political connections affect stock price crash risk? Firm-level evidence from China. Rev Quant Financ Acc 48:643–676CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Lewbel A (2012) Using heteroskedasticity to identify and estimate mismeasured and endogenous regressor models. J Bus Econ Stat 30:67–80CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Li S, Filer L (2007) The effects of the governance environment on the choice of investment mode and the strategic implications. J World Bus 42:80–98CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Li J, Tang Y (2010) CEO hubris and firm risk taking in China: the moderating role of managerial discretion. Acad Manag J 53:45–68CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Li X, Wang S, Wang X (2017) Trust and stock price crash risk: evidence from China. J Bank Finance 76:74–91CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Liang Q, Xu P, Jiraporn P (2013) Board characteristics and Chinese bank performance. J Bank Finance 37:2953–2968CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Liu Y, Wei Z, Xie F (2014) Do women directors improve firm performance in China? J Corp Finance 28:169–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Louie K (2002) Theorizing Chinese masculinity. Cambridge University Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  60. Luo Y (2000) Guanxi and business. World Scientific, SingaporeCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Ma J, Khanna T (2016) Independent directors’ dissent on boards: evidence from listed companies in China. Strateg Manag J 37:1547–1557CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Morse A, Nanda V, Seru A (2011) Are incentive contracts rigged by powerful CEOs? J Finance 66:1779–1821CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Rev Financ Stud 22:435–480CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. Ren B, Au K, Birtch T (2009) China’s business network structure during institutional transitions. Asia Pac J Manag 26:219–241CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Schmidt B (2015) Costs and benefits of friendly boards during mergers and acquisitions. J Financ Econ 117:424–447CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Tee CM, Yee ASV, Chong AL (2018) Institutional investors’ monitoring and stock price crash risk: evidence from politically connected firms. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Polic 21:1–35Google Scholar
  67. Wang L (2015) Protection or expropriation: politically connected independent directors in China. J Bank Finance 55:92–106CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Wilson N, Altanlar A (2011) Director characteristics, gender balance and insolvency risk: an empirical study. Working paper. https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1932107
  69. Xu N, Li X, Yuan Q, Chan KC (2014) Excess perks and stock price crash risk: evidence from China. J Corp Finance 25:419–434CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Yang J, Chi J, Young M (2011) A review of corporate governance in China. Asian Pac Econ Lit 25:15–28CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Yeung IY, Tung RL (1996) Achieving business success in Confucian societies: the importance of guanxi. Organ Dyn 3:54–65CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Zhou F, Fan Y, An Y, Zhong L (2017) Independent directors, non-controlling directors, and executive pay-for-performance sensitivity: evidence from Chinese non-state owned enterprises. Pac-Bas Financ J 43:55–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Zhu Y, Konrad AM, Jiao H (2016) Violation and activation of gender expectations: do Chinese managerial women face a narrow band of acceptable career guanxi strategies? Asia Pac J Manag 33:53–86CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Zuo J, Bian Y (2001) Gendered resources, division of housework, and perceived fairness-a case in urban China. J Marriage Fam 63:1122–1133CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of International BusinessTunghai UniversityTaichung CityTaiwan R.O.C.
  2. 2.Department of Banking and FinanceTamkang UniversityNew Taipei CityTaiwan R.O.C.
  3. 3.College of Business AdministrationUniversity of Missouri St. LouisSt. LouisUSA
  4. 4.College of Finance and StatisticsHunan UniversityChangsha CityChina

Personalised recommendations