Advertisement

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 895–931 | Cite as

Friends along supply chain and relationship-specific investments

  • Ting LuoEmail author
  • Jianqiao Yu
Original Research
  • 151 Downloads

Abstract

This study investigates whether the presence of school ties between supply chain partners encourages relationship-specific investments. Using Chinese data of educational backgrounds of corporate executives, we document a positive relation between a firm’s school ties with customers and the level of relationship-specific investments. This is consistent with school ties reducing information asymmetry between supply chain partners and mitigating suppliers’ “hold-up” concern when making investment decisions. The result is robust to a PSM approach, a change analysis and a Heckman two-stage analysis. In addition, we show that the association is stronger when customers have an opaque information environment, operate in weak legal environments, face lower switching cost to other suppliers or have higher operational uncertainty. Lastly, we examine the economic consequence of such school-tie associated investments, and find an impact of improved accounting and stock performance. Overall, our findings suggest that school ties benefit cooperation along supply chain by enhancing the level and efficiency of relationship-specific investments.

Keywords

Supply chain management School ties Relationship-specific investments Suppliers Customers 

JEL Classification

D81 G31 L14 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Zengquan Li, Deren Xie, Jian Xue and conference participants at the 2017 Shanghai Accounting Research Forum for helpful comments. We thank the financial support from National Natural Science Foundation of China (Grant No. 71672097).

References

  1. Agle BR, Nagarajan NJ, Sonnenfeld JA, Srinivasan D (2006) Does CEO charisma matter? an empirical analysis of the relationships among organizational performance, environmental uncertainty, and top management team perceptions of CEO charisma. Acad Manag J 49(1):161–174Google Scholar
  2. Allen J, Phillips G (2000) Corporate equity ownership, strategic alliances, and product market relationships. J Financ 55:2791–2815Google Scholar
  3. Allen F, Qian J, Qian M (2005) Law, finance, and economic growth in China. J Financ Econ 77:57–116Google Scholar
  4. Allison PD (2009) Fixed effects regression models: quantitative applications in the social sciences. Sage Publications, Inc., Thousand OaksGoogle Scholar
  5. Armour H, Teece D (1980) Vertical integration and technological innovation. Rev Econ Stat 62:470–474Google Scholar
  6. Armstrong CS, Core JE, Taylor DJ, Verrecchia RE (2011) When does information asymmetry affect the cost of capital. J Acc Res 49(1):1–40Google Scholar
  7. Augurzky B, Schmidt C (2001) The propensity score: a means to an end. University of Heidelberg, working paperGoogle Scholar
  8. Baiman S, Rajan MV (2002) Incentive issues in inter-firm relationships. Acc Organ Soc 27(3):213–238Google Scholar
  9. Banerjee S, Dasgupta S, Kim Y (2008) Buyer-supplier relationships and the stakeholder theory of capital structure. J Financ 63(5):2507–2552Google Scholar
  10. Boone AL, White JT (2015) The effect of institutional ownership on firm transparency and information production. J Financ Econ 117(3):508–533Google Scholar
  11. Botosan CA (1997) Disclosure level and the cost of equity capital. Acc Rev 72(3):323–349Google Scholar
  12. Byard D, Li Y, Yu Y (2011) The effect of mandatory IFRS adoption on financial analysts’ information environment. J Acc Res 49(1):69–96Google Scholar
  13. Caliendo M, Kopeinig S (2008) Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. J Econ Surv 22(1):31–72Google Scholar
  14. Cao Y, Dhaliwal D, Li Z, Yang YG (2015) Are all independent directors equally informed? Evidence based on their trading returns and social networks. Manag Sci 61(4):795–813Google Scholar
  15. Cen L, Chen F, Hou Y, Richardson G (2014) Customer-supplier relationships and strategic disclosures of litigation loss contingencies. University of Toronto and Queen’s University, working paperGoogle Scholar
  16. Cen L, Dasgupta S, Sen R (2015) Discipline or disruption? stakeholder relationships and the effect of takeover threat. Manag Sci 62(10):2820–2841Google Scholar
  17. Chan ALC, Lee E, Petaibanlue J, Tan N (2017) Do board interlocks motivate voluntary disclosure? evidence from Taiwan. Rev Quant Finance Acc 48(2):441–466Google Scholar
  18. Chaney PK, Faccio M, Parsley D (2011) The quality of accounting information in politically connected firms. J Acc Econ 51:58–76Google Scholar
  19. Chen TK, Liao HH (2018) Suppliers’/customers’ production efficiency uncertainty and firm credit risk. Rev Quant Finan Acc 50(2):519–560Google Scholar
  20. Chen C, Huang AG, Jha R (2012) Idiosyncratic return volatility and the information quality underlying managerial discretion. J Financ Quant Anal 47(4):873–899Google Scholar
  21. Chen X, Gong G, Luo S (2015) Short interest and corporate investments: Evidence from business partners. Singapore Management University, Penn State University and National University of Singapore, working paperGoogle Scholar
  22. Chen T, Levy H, Martin X, Shalev R (2016) Buying products from whom you know: Personal connections and information asymmetry in supply chain relationships. Baruch College, Washington University in St. Louis and New York University, working paperGoogle Scholar
  23. Chy M, Hope OK (2017) Do conservative auditors induce myopic underinvestment in R&D. University of Toronto, working paperGoogle Scholar
  24. Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C (2008) The small world of investing: board connections and mutual fund returns. J Polit Econ 116(5):951–979Google Scholar
  25. Cohen L, Frazzini A, Malloy C (2010) Sell-side school ties. J Financ 65(4):1409–1437Google Scholar
  26. Cooney JW, Madureira L, Singh AK, Yang K (2015) Social ties and IPO outcomes. J Corp Financ 33:129–146Google Scholar
  27. Costello AM (2013) Mitigating incentive conflicts in inter-firm relationships: evidence from long-term supply contract. J Acc Econ 56(1):19–39Google Scholar
  28. Dass N, Kini O, Nanda V, Onal B (2014) Board expertise: do directors from related industries help bridge the information gap. Rev Financ Stud 27(5):1533–1592Google Scholar
  29. Dechow PM, Sloan RG, Sweeney AP (1995) Detecting earnings management. Acc Rev 70(2):193–225Google Scholar
  30. Dhaliwal DS, Judd JS, Serfling M, Shaikh S (2016) Customer concentration risk and the cost of equity capital. J Acc Econ 61(1):23–48Google Scholar
  31. Dhaliwal DS, Shenoy J, Williams R (2017) Common auditors and relationship-specific investment in supplier–customer relationships. University of Arizona and Tulane University, working paperGoogle Scholar
  32. Drobetz W, Gruninger MC, Hirschvogl S (2010) Information asymmetry and the value of cash. J Bank Financ 34:2168–2184Google Scholar
  33. Easley D, Hvidkjaer S, Ohara M (2002) Is information risk a determinant of asset returns. J Financ 57(5):2185–2221Google Scholar
  34. Easton PD (2004) PE ratios, PEG ratios, and estimating the implied expected rate of return on equity capital. Acc Rev 79(1):73–95Google Scholar
  35. Eberhart AC, Maxwell WF, Siddique AR (2004) An examination of long-term abnormal stock returns and operating performance following R&D increases. J Financ 59(2):623–650Google Scholar
  36. Ellis JA, Fee CE, Thomas SE (2012) Proprietary costs and the disclosure of information about customers. J Acc Res 50(3):685–727Google Scholar
  37. Ellison G, Fudenberg D (1995) Word-of-mouth communication and social learning. Q J Econ 110(1):93–125Google Scholar
  38. Elster J (1989) Social norms and economic theory. J Econ Perspect 3:99–117Google Scholar
  39. Fee CE, Hadlock CJ, Thomas S (2006) Corporate equity ownership and the governance of product market relationships. J Financ 61(3):1217–1251Google Scholar
  40. Fracassi C, Tate G (2012) External networking and internal firm governance. J Financ 67(1):153–194Google Scholar
  41. Gold T, Guthrie D, Wank D (2002) An Introduction to the study of guanxi. In: Gold T, Guthrie D, Wank D (eds) Social connections in China. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 3–20Google Scholar
  42. Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structure: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91(3):481–510Google Scholar
  43. Granovetter M (2005) The impact of social structure on economic outcomes. J Econ Perspect 19(1):33–50Google Scholar
  44. Gu T, Venkateswaran A (2018) Firm-supplier relations and managerial compensation. Rev Quant Finance Acc 51(3):621–649Google Scholar
  45. Gu Z, Li G, Li Z, Yang YG (2016) Friends in need are friends indeed: an analysis of social ties between financial analysts and mutual fund managers. Chinese University of Hong Kong, China Galaxy Securities and Shanghai University of Finance and Economics, working paperGoogle Scholar
  46. Guan Y, Su L, Wu D, Yang Z (2016) Do school ties between auditors and client executives influence audit outcomes. J Acc Econ 61(2):506–525Google Scholar
  47. He X, Wong TJ, Young D (2012) Challenges for implementation of fair value accounting in emerging markets: evidence from China. Contemp Acc Res 29(2):538–562Google Scholar
  48. Heckman JJ (1979) Sample selection bias as a specification error. Econometrica 47(1):153–161Google Scholar
  49. Hertzel M, Li Z, Officer M, Rodgers K (2008) Inter-firm linkages and the wealth effects of financial distress along the supply chain. J Financ Econ 87(2):374–387Google Scholar
  50. Hochberg YV, Ljungqvist A, Lu Y (2007) Whom you know matters: venture capital networks and investment performance. J Financ 62(1):251–301Google Scholar
  51. Intintoli VJ, Serfling M, Shaikh S (2017) CEO turnovers and disruptions in customer–supplier relationships. J Financ Quant Anal 52(6):2565–2610Google Scholar
  52. Kale JR, Shahrur H (2007) Corporate capital structure and the characteristics of suppliers and customers. J Financ 83(2):321–365Google Scholar
  53. Kim JB, Shi H, Zhou J (2014) International Financial Reporting Standards, institutional infrastructures, and implied cost of equity capital around the world. Rev Quant Finan Acc 42(3):469–507Google Scholar
  54. Klein B, Crawford RG, Alchian AA (1978) Vertical integration, appropriable rents, and the competitive contracting process. J Law Econ 21(2):297–326Google Scholar
  55. Koh PS, Reeb D (2015) Missing R&D. J Acc Econ 60:73–94Google Scholar
  56. Lee S, Pandit S, Willis RH (2013) Equity method investments and sell-side analysts’ information environment. Acc Rev 88(6):2089–2115Google Scholar
  57. Levy D (1985) The transactions cost approach to vertical integration: an empirical examination. Rev Econ Stat 67:438–445Google Scholar
  58. Massa M, Simonov A (2011) Is college a focal point of investor life. Rev Financ 15(4):757–797Google Scholar
  59. Milgrom P, Roberts J (1992) Economics, organization and management. Prentice Hall, Englewood CliffsGoogle Scholar
  60. Patatoukas PN (2012) Customer-base concentration: Implications for firm performance and capital markets. Acc Rev 87(2):363–392Google Scholar
  61. Raman K, Shahrur H (2008) Relationship-specific investments and earnings management: evidence on corporate suppliers and customers. Acc Rev 83(4):1041–1081Google Scholar
  62. Roberts MR, Whited TM (2013) Endogeneity in empirical corporate finance. In: Constantinides GM, Harris M, Stulz RM (eds) Handbook of the economics of finance. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 493–572Google Scholar
  63. Rogers JL, Stocken PC (2005) Credibility of management forecasts. Acc Rev 80(4):1233–1260Google Scholar
  64. Schloetzer JD (2012) Process integration and information sharing in supply chains. Acc Rev 87(3):1005–1032Google Scholar
  65. Shane S, Cable D (2002) Network ties, reputation, and the financing of new ventures. Manag Sci 48(3):364–381Google Scholar
  66. Uzzi B (1996) The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: the network effect. Am Sociol Rev 61:674–698Google Scholar
  67. Wang Q, Wong TJ, Xia L (2008) State ownership, the institutional environment, and auditor choice: evidence from China. J Acc Econ 46:112–134Google Scholar
  68. Wang X, Yu J, Fan G (2013) Business environment index for China’s provinces: 2013 report. China Citic Press, BeijingGoogle Scholar
  69. Williamson O (1985) The economic institutions of capitalism. Free Press, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  70. Yu HY, Chen LW (2017) Ambiguous customer identity disclosure and the cost of equity capital. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 20(3):1750021.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091517500217 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.School of Economics and ManagementTsinghua UniversityBeijingChina
  2. 2.College of Management and EconomicsTianjin UniversityTianjinChina

Personalised recommendations