Advertisement

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 53, Issue 3, pp 811–844 | Cite as

Trade liberalization and conditional accounting conservatism: evidence from import competition

  • Qing L. BurkeEmail author
  • Tim V. Eaton
  • Mengying Wang
Original Research
  • 111 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines the impact of import competition, an underexplored but integral component of trade liberalization, on conditional accounting conservatism. Existing literature offers conflicting arguments on the effect of import competition on conditional conservatism. Import competition may reduce the need for conditional conservatism through the disciplining role of competition in corporate governance. Conversely, faced with heightened import competition, firms may have greater business uncertainty and become more susceptible to agency costs, thus generating a higher demand for conditional conservatism from shareholders and creditors. Using a sample of manufacturing firm-years from 1977 to 2012, we find that firm-level import competition is significantly and positively associated with conditional conservatism. Moreover, we establish the causal effect of import competition on conditional conservatism by estimating instrumental variable regressions and employing a difference-in-differences specification of large tariff reductions. Our results are robust when further controlling for other proxies of product market competition. These findings contribute to the literature on competition and enhance our understanding of the impact of trade liberalization on financial reporting.

Keywords

Trade liberalization Import penetration Competition Conditional conservatism 

JEL Classification

G10 L1 M41 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Dmitri Byzalov, Po-Chang Chen, Charles Moul, John Nofsinger, Chi Wan, Matt Wieland, and the participants at the 2017 AAA annual meeting for their helpful comments. The authors gratefully acknowledge the financial support of the Farmer School of Business at Miami University and the College of Management at the University of Massachusetts, Boston.

References

  1. Acemoglu D, Autor D, Dorn D, Hanson GH, Price B (2016) Import competition and the great US employment sag of the 2000s. J Labor Econ 34:S111–S198.  https://doi.org/10.1086/682384 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed AS, Billings BK, Morton RM, Stanford-Harris M (2002) The role of accounting conservatism in mitigating bondholder–shareholder conflicts over dividend policy and in reducing debt costs. Account Rev 77:867–890.  https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2002.77.4.867 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Alchian AA (1950) Uncertainty, evolution and economic theory. J Polit Econ 58:211–221.  https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9781107415324.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Baggs J, De Bettignies J-E (2007) Product market competition and agency costs. J Ind Econ 55:289–323CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Balakrishnan K, Cohen DA (2013) Competition and financial accounting misreporting. Working paper. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1927427
  6. Baldwin R (2009) U.S. trade policy since 1934: an uneven path toward greater trade liberalization. National Bureau of Economic Research Working Paper No. 15397Google Scholar
  7. Ball R, Shivakumar L (2005) Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. J Account Econ 39:83–128.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2004.04.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Ball R, Kothari SP, Nikolaev V (2013) Econometrics of the Basu asymmetric timeliness coefficient and accounting conservatism. J Account Res 51:1071–1097.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1475-679X.12026 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bartelsman EJ, Doms M (2000) Understanding productivity: lessons from longitudinal microdata. J Econ Lit 38:569–594.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.38.3.569 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Basu S (1997) The conservatism principle and the asymmetric timeliness of earnings. J Account Econ 24:3–37.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(97)00014-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Basu S (2005) Discussion of “Conditional and unconditional conservatism: concepts and modeling”. Rev Account Stud 10:311–321.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1533-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Beaver WH, Ryan SG (2005) Conditional and unconditional conservatism: concepts and modeling. Rev Account Stud 10:269–309.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-005-1532-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Berger PG, Hann RN (2007) Segment profitability and the proprietary and agency costs of disclosure. Account Rev 82:869–906.  https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.4.869 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Berger AN, Klapper LF, Turk-Ariss R (2009) Bank competition and financial stability. J Financ Serv Res 35:99–118.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10693-008-0050-7 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Bernard AB, Jensen JB, Schott PK (2006) Survival of the best fit: exposure to low-wage countries and the (uneven) growth of U.S. manufacturing plants. J Int Econ 68:219–237.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2005.06.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Bernard A, Jensen J, Redding S, Schott P (2007) Firms in international trade. J Econ Perspect 21:105–130CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Bernard AB, Redding SJ, Schott PK (2011) Multiproduct firms and trade liberalization. Q J Econ 126:1271–1318.  https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjr021 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Bertrand M (2004) From the invisible handshake to the invisible hand? How import competition changes the employment relationship. J Labor Econ 22:723–765.  https://doi.org/10.1086/423153 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Bertrand M, Mullainathan S (2003) Enjoying the quiet life? Corporate governance and managerial preferences. J Polit Econ 111:1043–1075.  https://doi.org/10.1086/376950 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Bertrand M, Duflo E, Mullainathan S (2004) how much should we trust difference-in-differences estimates? Q J Econ 119:249–275.  https://doi.org/10.3386/w8841 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Bloom N, Sadun R, Van Reenen J (2010) Does product market competition lead firms to decentralize? Am Econ Rev 100:434–438.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.100.2.434 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Bloom N, Draca M, Van Reenen J (2016) Trade induced technical change? The impact of Chinese imports on innovation, IT and productivity. Rev Econ Stud 83:87–117.  https://doi.org/10.1093/restud/rdv039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Botosan CA, Stanford M (2005) Managers’ motives to withhold segment disclosures and the effect of SFAS No. 131 on analysts’ information environment. Account Rev 80:751–772.  https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2005.80.3.751 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Bowen HP, Wiersema MF (2005) Foreign-based competition and corporate diversification strategy. Strateg Manag J 26:1153–1171.  https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.499 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Bustos P (2011) Trade liberalization, exports, and technology upgrading: evidence on the impact of MERCOSUR on Argentinian firms. Am Econ Rev 101:304–340.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.101.1.304 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Chhaochharia V, Grullon G, Grinstein Y, Michaely R (2016) Product market competition and agency conflicts: evidence from the Sarbanes Oxley law. Manag Sci 63:1405–1424.  https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1109225 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Christie AA, Joye MP, Watts RL (2003) Decentralization of the firm: theory and evidence. J Corp Financ 9:3–36.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(01)00036-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Chung H, Wynn JP (2008) Managerial legal liability coverage and earnings conservatism. J Account Econ 46:135–153.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2008.03.002 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Clinch G, Verrecchia RE (1997) Competitive disadvantage and discretionary disclosure in industries. Aust J Manag 22:125–137.  https://doi.org/10.1177/031289629702200201 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Cuñat V, Guadalupe M (2009) Globalization and the provision of incentives inside the firm: the effect of foreign competition. J Labor Econ 27:179–212.  https://doi.org/10.1086/599817 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Deardorff AV (1980) The general validity of the law of comparative advantage. J Polit Econ 88:941–957.  https://doi.org/10.1086/260915 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Deardorff AV, Stern RM (eds) (1998) Measurement of nontariff barriers. University of Michigan Press, Ann Arbor, MIGoogle Scholar
  33. DeFond ML, Park CW (1999) The effect of competition on CEO turnover. J Account Econ 27:35–56.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(98)00044-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. DeRosa D, Goldstein M (1981) Import discipline in the US manufacturing sector. Staff Pap 28:600–634CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Dhaliwal D, Huang S, Khurana IK, Pereira R (2014) Product market competition and conditional conservatism. Rev Account Stud 19:1309–1345.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11142-013-9267-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Ferrantino M (2006) Quantifying the trade and economic effects of non-tariff measures. OECD Trade Policy Pap. http://doi.org/10.1787/837654407568
  37. Francis JR, Martin X (2010) Acquisition profitability and timely loss recognition. J Account Econ 49:161–178.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2009.09.003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Fresard L (2010) Financial strength and product market behavior: the real effects of corporate cash holdings. J Finance 65:1097–1122.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01562.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Frésard L, Valta P (2016) How does corporate investment respond to increased entry threat? Rev Corp Financ Stud 5:1–35.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rcfs/cfv015 Google Scholar
  40. Gaspar J-M, Massa M (2006) Idiosyncratic volatility and product market competition. J Bus 79:3125–3152.  https://doi.org/10.1086/505251 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Giroud X, Mueller HM (2010) Does corporate governance matter in competitive industries? J Financ Econ 95:312–331CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Giroud X, Mueller HM (2011) Corporate governance, product market competition, and equity prices. J Finance 66:563–600.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2010.01642.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Givoly D, Hayn CK, Natarajan A (2007) Measuring reporting conservatism. Account Rev 82:65–106.  https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.1.65 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Grubel HG, Lloyd PJ (1975) Intra-industry trade: the theory and measurement of international trade in differentiated products. Macmillan, LondonGoogle Scholar
  45. Hart OD (1983) The market mechanism as an incentive scheme. Bell J Econ 14:366–382.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3003639 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Haw I-MG, Ho SSM, Li Y, Zhang F (2015) Product market competition, legal institutions, and accounting conservatism. J Int Account Res 14:1–39.  https://doi.org/10.2308/jiar-51051 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Hoberg G, Phillips G (2010a) Product market synergies and competition in mergers and acquisitions: a text-based analysis. Rev Financ Stud 23:3773–3811.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhq053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Hoberg G, Phillips G (2010b) Real and financial industry booms and busts. J Finance 65:45–86.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01523.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Hoberg G, Phillips G, Prabhala N (2014) Product market threats, payouts, and financial flexibility. J Finance 69:293–324.  https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12050 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Holmstrom B (1982) Moral hazard in teams. Bell J Econ 13:324–340.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3003457 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Huang Y, Jennings R, Yu Y (2017) Product market competition and managerial disclosure of earnings forecasts: evidence from import tariff rate reductions. Account Rev 92:185–207.  https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-51558 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Hui KW, Klasa S, Yeung PE (2012) Corporate suppliers and customers and accounting conservatism. J Account Econ 53:115–135.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.11.007 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Imbens GW, Wooldridge JM (2009) Recent developments in the econometrics of program evaluation. J Econ Lit 47:5–86.  https://doi.org/10.1257/jel.47.1.5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Irvine PJ, Pontiff J (2009) Idiosyncratic return volatility, cash flows, and product market competition. Rev Financ Stud 22:1149–1177.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn039 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Iyengar RJ, Zampelli EM (2010) Does accounting conservatism pay? Account Financ 50:121–142.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-629X.2009.00325.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Karuna C (2007) Industry product market competition and managerial incentives. J Account Econ 43:275–297.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2007.02.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Katics MM, Petersen BC (1994) The effect of rising import competition on market power: a panel data study of US manufacturing. J Ind Econ 42:277–286CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Kim I, Skinner DJ (2012) Measuring securities litigation risk. J Account Econ 53:290–310.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2011.09.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Kleibergen F, Paap R (2006) Generalized reduced rank tests using the singular value decomposition. J Econom 133:97–126.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2005.02.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. Krugman P (2009) The increasing returns revolution in trade and geography. Am Econ Rev 99:561–571.  https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.99.3.561 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Krugman P (2011) Increasing returns in a comparative advantage world. In: Stern R (ed) Comparative advantage, growth, and the gains from trade and globalization, 16th edn. World Scientific Studies in International Economics, London, pp 43–51CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Kubick TR, Lynch DP, Mayberry MA, Omer TC (2015) Product market power and tax avoidance: market leaders, mimicking strategies, and stock returns. Account Rev 90:675–702.  https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-50883 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Kwon S, Yin Q, Han J (2006) The effect of differential accounting conservatism on the “over-valuation” of high-tech firms relative to low-tech firms. Rev Quant Financ Account 27:143–173.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-006-8794-3 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  64. LaFond R, Watts RL (2008) The information role of conservatism. Account Rev 83:447–478.  https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2008.83.2.447 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Lapteacru I (2014) Do more competitive banks have less market power? The evidence from central and eastern Europe. J Int Money Financ 46:41–60.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jimonfin.2014.03.005 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Levinsohn J (1993) Testing the imports-as-market-discipline hypothesis. J Int Econ 35:1–22.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-1996(93)90002-F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Lin L (2016) Institutional ownership composition and accounting conservatism. Rev Quant Financ Account 46:359–385.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-014-0472-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Lin C, Officer MS, Zhan X (2015) Does competition affect earnings management? Evidence from a natural experiment. Working paper. http://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2357783
  69. Lin C, Wei L (2014) Product market competition and firms’ voluntary disclosure behavior: evidence from a quasi-natural experiment. Working paper. http://doi.org/10.1007/s13398-014-0173-7.2
  70. Liu R (2010) Import competition and firm refocusing. Can J Econ 43:440–466.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5982.2010.01579.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Liu Z, Elayan FA (2015) Litigation risk, information asymmetry and conditional conservatism. Rev Quant Financ Account 44:581–608.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-013-0428-y CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Liu M, Magnan M (2016) Conditional conservatism and the yield spread of corporate bond issues. Rev Quant Financ Account 46:847–879.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-014-0489-6 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Liu R, Rosell C (2013) Import competition, multi-product firms, and basic innovation. J Int Econ 91:220–234.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinteco.2013.08.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Lobo GJ, Zhou J (2006) Did conservatism in financial reporting increase after the Sarbanes-Oxley act? Initial evidence. Account Horizons 20:57–73.  https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2006.20.1.57 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Nalebuff BJ, Stiglitz JE (1983) Prizes and incentives: towards a general theory of compensation and competition. Bell J Econ 14:21–43.  https://doi.org/10.2307/3003535 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Peress J (2010) Product market competition, insider trading, and stock market efficiency. J Finance 65:1–43.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2009.01522.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Petersen MA (2009) Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: comparing approaches. Rev Financ Stud 22:435–480.  https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn053 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  78. Pierce JR, Schott PK (2012) A concordance between ten-digit U.S. harmonized system codes and SIC/NAICS product classes and industries. J Econ Soc Meas 37:61–96.  https://doi.org/10.3233/JEM-2012-0351 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Qiang X (2007) The effects of contracting, litigation, regulation, and tax costs on conditional and unconditional conservatism: cross-sectional evidence at the firm level. Account Rev 82:759–796.  https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2007.82.3.759 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  80. Revenga AL (1992) Exporting jobs? The impact of import competition on employment and wages in U.S. manufacturing. Q J Econ 107:255–284.  https://doi.org/10.2307/2118329 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  81. Schott PK (2008) The relative sophistication of Chinese exports. Econ Policy 23:6–49.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0327.2007.00195.x Google Scholar
  82. Shleifer A (2004) Does competition destroy ethical behavior? Am Econ Rev 94:414–418.  https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828041301498 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  83. Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1997) A survey of corporate governance. J Finance 52:737–783.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1997.tb04820.x CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  84. Stigler GJ (1958) The economies of scale. J Law Econ 1:54–71.  https://doi.org/10.1086/466541 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  85. Tinaikar S, Xue S (2009) Product market competition and earnings management: some international evidence. Working Paper, University of FloridaGoogle Scholar
  86. Tybout JR (2008) Plant-and firm-level evidence on “new” trade theories. In: Choi E, Harrigan J (eds) Handbook of international trade. Basil-Blackwell, OxfordGoogle Scholar
  87. US International Trade Commission (2009) The economic effects of significant US import restraints. Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  88. Valta P (2012) Competition and the cost of debt. J Financ Econ 105:661–682.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.04.004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  89. Verrecchia R (1983) Discretionary disclosure. J Account Econ 5:179–194.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(90)90021-U CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  90. Watts RL (2003a) Conservatism in accounting part I: explanations and implications. Account Horizons 17:207–221.  https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.3.207 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Watts RL (2003b) Conservatism in accounting part II: evidence and research opportunities. Account Horizons 17:287–301.  https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2003.17.4.287 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  92. Wooldridge JM (2002) Econometric analysis of cross section and panel data. MIT Press, CambridgeGoogle Scholar
  93. Xu J (2012) Profitability and capital structure: evidence from import penetration. J Financ Econ 106:427–446.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2012.05.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  94. Yeh Y, Shu P, Ho F, Su Y (2012) Board structure, intra-industry competition, and the R&D announcement effect. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 15:250011.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091512500117 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  95. Yoo Y, Lee J, Chang J (2014) Distinctive features of BBB- and BB-graded firms using earnings management and conservatism: evidence from the Korean market. Rev Pac Basin Financ Mark Policies 17:1–31.  https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219091514500052 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  96. Zhou J, Booth L, Chang B (2013) Import competition and disappearing dividends. J Int Bus Stud 44:138–154.  https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.36 CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Miami UniversityOxfordUSA
  2. 2.University of Massachusetts BostonBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations