Advertisement

Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 52, Issue 4, pp 1085–1118 | Cite as

Does CEO managerial ability matter? Evidence from corporate investment efficiency

  • Huiqi GanEmail author
Original Research

Abstract

This study investigates how higher ability CEOs behave differently from lower ability CEOs in making investment decisions and, particularly, whether CEO managerial ability contributes to improved investment efficiency. I show evidence that more able CEOs make more efficient investment decisions. Specifically, talented CEOs increase (decrease) capital expenditures, acquisition expenditures, and total investments when their firms operate in settings more prone to under-investment (over-investment). These results suggest that high managerial ability helps with overcoming the two sources of investment inefficiency: over- and under-investment. I also find that the positive impact of CEO managerial ability on investment efficiency generally persists across different levels of board monitoring, whereas it gets weaker as the CEOs are overly exposed to equity risk. Robustness tests of using alternative measures of CEO managerial ability and controlling for potential endogeneity issues generate consistent results. Overall, the findings suggest that higher managerial ability leads to more efficient investment decision-making.

Keywords

Managerial ability Corporate investment Investment efficiency Managerial incentives Board monitoring 

JEL Classification

G31 G34 M41 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to the members of my dissertation committee, Professors Myung S. Park (Chair), Benson Wier, David Harless, and Jean Zhang for their insights, advice, and support.

References

  1. Altman E (1968) Financial ratios, discriminant analysis and the prediction of corporate bankruptcy. J Financ 23(4):589–609CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ashbaugh-Skaife H, Collins DW, LaFond R (2006) The effects of corporate governance on firms’ credit ratings. J Acc Econ 42(1–2):203–243CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Barker VL, Mueller GC (2002) CEO characteristics and firm R&D spending. Manag Sci 48(6):782–801CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bebchuk L, Cohen A, Ferrell A (2009) What matters in corporate governance? Rev Financ Stud 22(2):783–827CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Bertrand M, Schoar A (2003) Managing with style: the effect of managers on firm policies. Q J Econ 118(4):1169–1208CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bhargava A (2013) Executive compensation, share repurchases and investment expenditures: econometric evidence from US firms. Rev Quant Finan Acc 40(3):403–422CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Biddle G, Hilary G (2006) Accounting quality and firm-level capital investment. Acc Rev 81(5):963–982CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Biddle G, Hilary G, Verdi R (2009) How does financial reporting quality relate to investment efficiency? J Acc Econ 48(2–3):112–131CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chang YY, Dasgupta S, Hilary G (2010) CEO ability, pay, and firm performance. Manag Sci 56(10):1633–1652CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Chemmanur T, Paeglis I (2005) Management quality, certification, and initial public offerings. J Financ Econ 76(2):331–368CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Chemmanur T, Paeglis I, Simonyan K (2001) Management quality and antitakeover provisions. J Law Econ 54(3):651–692CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Chen CR, Steiner TL, Whyte AM (2006) Does stock option-based executive compensation induce risk-taking? An analysis of the banking industry. J Bank Financ 30(3):915–945CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chien C-C, Lee C-F, Chiu SC (2016) Does corporate governance curb managers’ opportunistic behavior of exploiting inside information for early exercise of executive stock options? Rev Pac Basin Financ Markets Polic 19(1):1–22Google Scholar
  14. Coles JL, Daniel ND, Naveen L (2006) Managerial incentives and risk-taking. J Financ Econ 79(2):431–468CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Copeland T, Koller T, Murrin J (1994) Valuation: measuring and managing the value of companies, 2nd edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  16. Core J, Guay W (1999) The use of equity grants to manage optimal equity incentive levels. J Acc Econ 28(2):151–184CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Core J, Guay W (2002) Estimating the value of employee stock option portfolios and their sensitivities to price and volatility. J Acc Res 40(3):613–630CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Demerjian P, Lev B, McVay S (2012) Quantifying managerial ability: a new measure and validity tests. Manag Sci 58(7):1229–1248CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Demerjian P, Lev B, Lewis MF, McVay S (2013) Managerial ability and earnings quality. Acc Rev 88(2):463–498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Dong Z, Wang C, Xie F (2010) Do executive stock options induce excessive risk taking? J Bank Financ 34(10):2518–2529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Doukas JA, Petmezas D (2007) Acquisitions, overconfidence managers and self-attribution bias. Eur Financ Manag 13(3):531–577CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Ferris SP, Jayaraman N, Sabherwal S (2013) CEO overconfidence and international merger and acquisition activity. J Financ Quant Anal 48(1):137–164CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Finkelstein S, Hambrick DC (1989) Chief executive compensation: a study of the intersection of markets and political processes. Strateg Manag J 10(2):121–134CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Francis J, Huang A, Rajgopal S, Zang AY (2008) CEO reputation and earnings quality. Contemp Acc Res 25(1):109–147CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Goodman TH, Neamtiu M, Shroff N, White HD (2013) Management forecast quality and capital investment decisions. Acc Rev 89(1):331–365CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Graham JR, Harvey CR, Puri M (2013) Managerial attitudes and corporate actions. J Financ Econ 109(1):103–121CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Hambrick DC, Mason P (1984) Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Acad Manag Rev 9(2):193–206CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Hayes RM, Lemmon M, Qiu M (2012) Stock options and managerial incentives for risk taking: evidence from FAS 123R. J Financ Econ 105(1):174–190CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hermalin BE, Weisbach MS (1991) The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financ Manag 2(4):101–112CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Hill CW, Phan P (1991) CEO tenure as a determinant of CEO pay. Acad Manag J 34(3):707–717Google Scholar
  31. Hirshleifer D, Suh R (1992) Risk, managerial effort, and project choice. J Financ Intermed 2(3):308–345CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Hirshleifer D, Low A, Teoh SH (2012) Are overconfident CEOs better Innovator. J Financ 67(4):1457–1498CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Huang-Meier W, Lambertides N, Steeley JM (2016) Motives for corporate cash holdings: the CEO optimism effect. Rev Quant Finan Acc 47(3):699–732CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Jensen MC (1986) Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers. Am Econ Rev 76(2):323–329Google Scholar
  35. Jensen MC, Mecking W (1976) Theory of the firm: managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. J Financ Econ 3(4):305–360CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Jian M, Lee KW (2011) Does CEO reputation matter for capital investments. J Corp Financ 17(4):929–946CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Lambert RA, Larcker DF, Verrecchia RE (1991) Portfolio considerations in valuing executive compensation. J Acc Res 29(1):129–149CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Mace ML (1971) Directors: myth and reality. Harvard Business Press, BostonGoogle Scholar
  39. Malmendier U, Tate G (2005) CEO overconfidence and corporate investment. J Financ 60(6):2661–2700CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Malmendier U, Tate G (2008) Who makes acquisitions? CEO overconfidence and the market’s reaction. J Financ Econ 89(1):20–43CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. March JG, Simon HA (1958) Organizations. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  42. McConnell JJ, Servaes H (1990) Additional evidence on equity ownership and corporate value. J Financ Econ 27(2):595–612CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Milbourn TT (2003) CEO reputation and stock-based compensation. J Financ Econ 68(2):233–262CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1988) Management ownership and market valuation: an empirical analysis. J Financ Econ 20:293–315CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Morck R, Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1990) Do managerial objectives drive bad acquisitions? J Financ 45(1):31–48CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Murphy KJ (1999) Executive compensation. Handb Labor Econ 3:2485–2563CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Myers S, Majluf N (1984) Corporate financing and investment decisions when firms have information that investors do not have. J Financ Econ 13(2):187–221CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Rajgopal S, Shevlin T (2002) Empirical evidence on the relation between stock option compensation and risk taking. J Acc Econ 33(2):145–171CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Ryan HE, Wiggins RA (2001) The influence of firm-and manager-specific characteristics on the structure of executive compensation. J Corp Financ 7(2):101–123CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Scharfstein DS, Stein JC (1990) Herd behavior and investment. Am Econ Rev 80:465–479Google Scholar
  51. Shleifer A, Vishny RW (1989) Management entrenchment: the case of manager-specific investments. J Financ Econ 25(1):123–139CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Stein JC (2003) Agency, information and corporate investment. Handb Econ Financ 1:111–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Stulz RM (1988) Managerial control of voting rights: financing policies and the market for corporate control. J Financ Econ 20:25–54CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Trueman B (1986) Why do managers voluntarily release earnings forecasts? J Acc Econ 8(1):53–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Yung K, Chen C (2017) Managerial ability and firm risk-taking behavior. Rev Quant Financ Acc.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11156-017-0695-0 Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Accounting, Manning School of BusinessUniversity of Massachusetts LowellLowellUSA

Personalised recommendations