Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting

, Volume 52, Issue 2, pp 439–466 | Cite as

Effects of tuition discounting on university’s financial performance

  • Abu JalalEmail author
  • Shahriar Khaksari
Original Research


We study how tuition discounting affects the financial decisions of universities, their student recruitment, and reputation. Using a large panel data of U.S. private and public four-year institutions, we find that tuition discounting helps institutions enhance their short-term operating surplus, increase admission yield, and reduce drop-out rate. However, it does not appear to improve the graduation rate or the quality of the incoming students. Institutions relying more on tuition discounting have more financial leverage, less equity, and experience lower liquidity and asset turnover—indicating greater financial risk. These results are stronger for private universities. Finally, out-of-sample tests show that tuition discounting may not help enhance the reputation of private universities.


Tuition discounting University reputation Financial performance Higher education financial management 

JEL Classification

I22 I23 



We are thankful to the Editor of this journal Cheng-Few Lee and an anonymous referee for insightful comments and suggestions. We gratefully recognize the guidance and assistance of Craig Lockwood and Tuition Management Systems. Special thanks to Abdul Gaylani and, for competent research assistance, to David Buccheri.


  1. Bajeux-Besnainou I, Ogunc K (2006) Spending rules for endowment funds: a dynamic model with subsistence levels. Rev Quant Finance Account 27(1):93–107CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Barber B, Wang G (2013) Do (some) university endowments earn alpha? Financ Anal J 69(5):26–44CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Baum S, Lapovsky L, Ma J (2010) Tuition discounting: institutional aid patterns at public and private colleges and universities, 2000–01 to 2008–09. College Board Advocacy and Policy Center, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  4. Behaunek L, Gansemer-Topf A (2017) Tuition discounting at small, private baccalaureate institutions: reaching a point of no return? Working paperGoogle Scholar
  5. Blume M (2010) Endowment spending in volatile markets: what should fiduciaries do? Rev Quant Finance Account 35(2):163–178CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Browning J (2013) Determining a relationship between higher education financial position and tuition discount rates. Res High Educ J 20:1–34Google Scholar
  7. Bruinicks R, Keeney B, Thorp J (2010) Transforming America’s universities to compete in the “New Normal”. Innov High Educ 35(2):113–125CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cabrera A, La Nasa S (2000) Understanding the college-choice process. New Dir Inst Res 107:5–22Google Scholar
  9. Davis J (2003) Unintended consequences of tuition discounting. Lumina Found Educ New Agenda Ser 5(1):1–40Google Scholar
  10. Dynarski S (2000) Hope for whom? Financial aid for the middle class and its impact on college attendance. NBER working paper 7756Google Scholar
  11. Guo L, Jalal A, Khaksari S (2015) Bank executive compensation structure, risk taking and the financial crisis. Rev Quant Finance Account 45:609–639CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hillman N (2010) Tuition discounting for revenue management. Working paper, University of UtahGoogle Scholar
  13. Hung C, Banerjee A, Meng Q (2017) Corporate financing and anticipated credit rating changes. Rev Quant Finance Account 48(4):893–915CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Kane T (1999) The price of admission: rethinking how Americans pay for college. Brookings Institution Press, Washington, DCGoogle Scholar
  15. McPherson M, Schapiro M (1999) The student aid game: meeting need and rewarding talent in American higher education. Princeton University Press, PrincetonGoogle Scholar
  16. Redd K (2000) Discounting toward disaster: tuition discounting, college finances, and enrollments of low-income undergraduates. USA Group Found New Agenda Ser 3(2):1–36Google Scholar
  17. Shin J, Milton S (2004) The effects of performance budgeting and funding programs on graduation rate in public four-year colleges and universities. Educ Policy Anal Arch 12(22):1–26Google Scholar
  18. Stigler G (1987) Theory of price. McMillan, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  19. Tahey P, Salluzzo R, Prager F, Mezzina L, Cowen C (2010) Strategic financial analysis for higher education: identifying, measuring, & reporting financial risks. KPMG, Prager, Sealy, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  20. Winston G, Zimmerman D (2000) Where is aggressive price competition taking higher education? Change 32(4):10–18CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Zumeta W (2010) The great recession: implications for higher education. In: NEA 2010 Alm High Educ, pp 29–42Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Sawyer Business SchoolSuffolk UniversityBostonUSA

Personalised recommendations