Advertisement

Robert Cummings Neville, Defining Religion: Essays in Philosophy of Religion

SUNY Press, Albany and New York, 2018, xvi + 363 pp, $95 (hb), $29.95 (pb)
  • J. Aaron SimmonsEmail author
Book Review
  • 111 Downloads

Philosophers of religion ask a lot of important questions, but one that far too often remains unasked is perhaps the one that is perhaps the most urgent: “what is religion?” Indeed, if philosophers of religion are not clear on what counts as “religion” then it is difficult to see how we are able to understand the domain and scope of our own inquiry. Unlike many other “philosophy of” discourses—e.g., philosophy of science, philosophy of gender, philosophy of race, philosophy of mind, etc.—philosophy of religion often begins with assumptions about the category of “religion” that, if pressed, prove to be problematic. Although there are some important counter examples (see e.g., Quin and Taliaferro 1999), often textbooks in philosophy of religion begin by jumping into specific debates: the nature and existence of God, problem of evil, or the relation between faith and reason, etc.1Yet, it should seem odd that we philosophers of religion don’t start by asking whether “God” is an essential...

Notes

References

  1. Anderson, P. S. (1998). A feminist philosophy of religion. Oxford: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  2. Blum, J. N. (Ed.). (2018). The question of methodological naturalism. Leiden: Brill.Google Scholar
  3. Cahn, S. M. (2009). Exploring philosophy of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  4. Draper, P., & Schellenberg, J. L. (2018). Renewing philosophy of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  5. McCutcheon, R. T. (2001). Critics not caretakers. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar
  6. Onishi, B. (2016). The beginning, not the end: on continental philosophy of religion and religious studies. Journal of the American Academy of Religion, 84(4), 1–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Oppy, G., & Scott, M. (2010). Reading philosophy of religion. Malden: Wiley.Google Scholar
  8. Peterson, M., Hasker, W., Reichenbach, B., & Basinger, David (Eds.). (1996). Philosophy of religion. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  9. Pojman, L., & Rea, M. (Eds.). (2008). Philosophy of religion: An anthology. Stamford: Thompson-Wadsworth.Google Scholar
  10. Quin, P. L., & Taliaferro, C. (Eds.). (1999). A companion to philosophy of religion. Malden: Blackwell.Google Scholar
  11. Schilbrack, K. (2014). Philosophy and the study of religion. Malden: Wiley-Blackwell.Google Scholar
  12. Shook, J. (2011). Varieties of twentieth century american naturalism. The Pluralist, 6(2), 1–17. (Summer).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Simmons, J. A. (2015). A search for the ‘really’ real: Philosophically approaching the task of defining religion. Bulletin for the Study of Religion, 44(4), 19–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Simmons, J. A. (Ed.). (2019a). Christian philosophy: Conceptions, continuations, and challenges. Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  15. Simmons, J. A. (2019b). The strategies of christian philosophy. In J. A. Simmons (Ed.), Christian philosophy: Conceptions, continuations, and challenges (pp. 187–208). Oxford: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  16. Simmons, J. A. (forthcoming). Vagueness and its virtues: A proposal for renewing philosophy of religion. In R. Amesbury & M. Rodgers (Eds.), Philosophy of religion after religion. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck.Google Scholar
  17. Trakakis, N. (2008). The end of philosophy of religion. New York: Continuum.Google Scholar
  18. Wildman, W. J. (2011). Religious philosophy as multidisciplinary comparative inquiry. Albany: SUNY.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Furman UniversityGreenvilleUnited States

Personalised recommendations