Review of Industrial Organization

, Volume 53, Issue 4, pp 681–707 | Cite as

Economics at the FCC, 2017–2018: Internet Freedom, International Broadband Pricing Comparisons, and a New Office of Economics and Analytics

  • Jerry Ellig
  • Paul LaFontaine
  • Wayne Leighton
  • Eric Ralph
  • Sean Sullivan


The Federal Communications Commission’s (FCC’s) current strategic plan lists four priority goals: closing the digital divide; promoting innovation; protecting consumers and public safety; and reforming the FCC’s processes. Economists at the FCC contribute toward the realization of each of these goals, through analysis of the nature and significance of the underlying problems that regulations are intended to solve, as well as assessments of alternative solutions. Three major FCC initiatives demonstrate the role that economic analysis played in Commission decisions in 2017–2018: the Restoring Internet Freedom Order; the new hedonic pricing model that was used in the International Broadband Data Report; and the order that reorganized Commission economists into the Office of Economics and Analytics.


Broadband FCC Internet freedom Net neutrality Universal service Benefit–cost analysis 



We thank all of the staff at the Federal Communications Commission who reviewed or otherwise contributed to this essay. The opinions expressed herein are those of the authors and do not represent those of the Federal Communications Commission or any other members of its staff, or of the George Washington University or any other members of its staff.


  1. Anstine, D.B. (2001). How much will consumers pay? A hedonic analysis of the cable television industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 19, 129–147. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from Scholar
  2. Baker, J. (1997). ‘Continuous’ regulatory reform at the federal trade commission. Administrative Law Review, 49(4), 859–874.Google Scholar
  3. Brennan, T. (2017). The post-internet order broadband sector: Lessons from the pre-open internet order experience. Review of Industrial Organization, 50, 469–486.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Bresnahan, T.F. & Reiss, P.C. (1991). Entry and competition in concentrated markets. Journal of Political Economy, 99(5), 977–1009. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from Scholar
  5. Carlton, D. W., & Perloff, J. M. (2000). Modern industrial organization (3rd ed.). Reading: Addison Wesley Longman.Google Scholar
  6. Chaplin, J., Kurn, S., & Stalam, V. (2016). 4Q15 cable trend review: Cable keeps beating, but long-term estimates aren’t going up. New Street Research, Industry Note. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from
  7. Chen, Y., & Riordan, M.H. (2013). Profitability of product bundling. International Economic Review, 54(1), 35–57. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from Scholar
  8. Clinton, W. J. (1993). Executive Order 12866, Regulatory Planning and Review, Federal Register vol. 58 No. 190 (Oct. 4).Google Scholar
  9. Collard-Wexler, A. (2013). Demand fluctuations in the ready-mix concrete industry. Econometrica, 81, 1003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Corrado, C., & Ukhaneva, O. (2016). Hedonic prices for fixed broadband services: estimation across OECD countries. OECD Science, Technology and Industry Working Papers, 2016/07, OECD Publishing, Paris. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from
  11. Cutler, D. M., Glaeser, E. L., & Vigdor, J. L. (1999). The rise and decline of the American ghetto. Journal of Political Economy 107(3), 455–506. Retrieved September 27, 2018 Scholar
  12. Diewert, W. E., Heravi, S., & Silver, M. (2009). Hedonic imputation versus time dummy hedonic indexes. In Price index concepts and measurement, pp. 161–196. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from
  13. Economides, N. (2017). Comments of Prof. Nicholas Economides. In the matter of restoring internet freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108.Google Scholar
  14. Economides, N., & Hermalin, B. E. (2012). The economics of net neutrality. RAND Journal of Economics, 43, 602–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Erickson, T. (2016). On “incorrect” signs in hedonic regression. Bureau of Labor Statistics Working Paper No. 490. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from
  16. Federal Communications Commission. (2015). Protecting and Promoting the Open Internet, WC Docket No. 14-28, Report and Order on Remand, Declaratory Ruling, and Order, 30 FCC Rcd 5601. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from
  17. Federal Communications Commission. (2017a). Strategic Plan 2018-2022. Retrieved from
  18. Federal Communications Commission. (2017b). In the matter of implementation of section 6002(b) of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1993, annual report and analysis of competitive market conditions with respect to mobile wireless, including commercial mobile services; Twentieth report, WT Docket No. 17-69, 32 FCC Rcd pending. Retrieved October 24, 2018, from
  19. Federal Communications Commission. (2018a). Restoring Internet Freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108, Declaratory Ruling, Report and Order, and Order. Retrieved October 24, 2018, from
  20. Federal Communications Commission. (2018b). Sixth report. International Broadband Data Report. GN Docket No. 17-199, released February 2, 2018.Google Scholar
  21. Federal Communications Commission. (2018c). Plan for office of economics and analytics (OEA), recommendations and report to Chairman Ajit Pai. Retrieved October 24, 2018, from
  22. Federal Communications Commission. (2018d). In the matter of establishment of the office of economics and analytics, MD Docket 18-3, FCC 18-7. Retrieved October 24, 2018, from
  23. Feenstra, R. C., & Hanson, G. H. (1996). Globalization, outsourcing, and wage inequality. American Economic Reviews, 86(2), 240–245.Google Scholar
  24. Ford, G. (2018). Regulation and investment in the U.S. telecommunications industry. Applied Economics, 50(56), 6073–6084.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Froeb, L., Pautler, P. A., & Röller, L. H. (2009). The economics of organizing economists. Antitrust Law Journal, 76(2), 569–584.Google Scholar
  26. Greenstein, S., Peitz, M., & Valletti, T. (2016). Net neutrality: A fast lane to understanding the trade-offs. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(2), 127. Retrieved from Scholar
  27. Griliches, Z. (1971). Hedonic price indexes for automobiles: an econometric of quality change. In Z. Griliches (Ed.), Price indexes and quality change: Studies in new methods of measurement. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Guthrie, G. (2006). Regulating infrastructure: The impact on risk and investment. Journal of Economic Literature, 44, 925.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Hausman, J., & Sidak, J. G. (2005). Telecommunications regulation: Current approaches with the End in Sight. In N. L. Rose (Ed.), Economic regulation and its reform: What have we learned? (pp. 345,353–354). Chicago: University of Chicago Press.Google Scholar
  30. Hazlett TW (2011). Economic analysis at the Federal Communications Commission: A simple proposal to atone for past sins. Resources for the future.Google Scholar
  31. Hazlett, T. W., & Wright, J. D. (2017). The effect of regulation on broadband markets: Evaluating the empirical evidence in the FCC’s 2015 ‘Open Internet’ order. Review of Industrial Organization, 50, 487.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heckman, J. J., Stixrud J., & Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 412–482. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from
  33. Hogendorn, C. (2012). Spillovers and Network Neutrality. In G. Faulhaber, G. Madden, & J. Petchey (Eds.), Regulation and the Performance of Communication and Information Networks. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar. Google Scholar
  34. Holmes, A., & Zubak-Skees, C. (2015). U.S. internet users pay more and have fewer choices than Europeans. Center for Public Integrity. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from
  35. Ioannidis, C., & Silver, M. (1999). Estimating hedonic indexes: An application to UK television sets. Journal of Economics, 69(1), 71–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Israel, M., Rubinfeld, D., & Woroch, G. (2016). Analysis of the regressions and other data relied upon in the business data services FNPRM and a Proposed competitive market test. Retrieved from
  37. Jamison, M. A., et al. (2017). Economic scholars’ summary of economic literature regarding title II regulation of the internet. In the matter of restoring internet freedom, WC Docket No. 17-108. Retrieved November 9, 2018, from
  38. Kagan. (n.d.) TV network summary. Retrieved January 16, 2018, from (subscription access only).
  39. Karr, R. (2011). Why is European broadband faster and cheaper? Blame the government. Engadget. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from
  40. Krieger, J. (2015). Germany pay-TV market on the rise. Broadband TV News. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from
  41. McHenry, G. (2016). Evolving technologies change the nature of internet use. Retrieved from
  42. Miller, C.C. (2014). Why the U.S. has fallen behind in internet speed and affordability. The New York Times. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from
  43. National Society of Professional Engineers v. U.S., 435 U.S. 679, 695 (1978).Google Scholar
  44. Nuechterlein, J. E., & Weiser, P. J. (2013). Digital crossroads: Telecommunications law and policy in the internet age (2nd ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  45. OECD (Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development). (2014). The development of fixed broadband networks. Retrieved from
  46. OECD Broadband Portal. (2018). Retrieved July 19, 2018, from
  47. Office of Management and Budget. (2003). Circular A-4, Regulatory Analysis. September 17.
  48. Ohlhausen, M. K. (2016). Antitrust over net neutrality: Why we should take competition in broadband seriously. Colorado Technology Law Journal, 15(1), 119–149.Google Scholar
  49. Pai, A. (2017). Remarks of FCC Chairman Ajit Pai at the Hudson Institute, The importance of economic analysis at the FCC.
  50. Pakes, A. (2003). A reconsideration of hedonic price indexes with an application to PC’s. American Economic Review, 93(5), 1578–1596. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from Scholar
  51. Pautler, P. A. (2003). Evidence on mergers and acquisitions. Antitrust Bulletin, 40, 200–201.Google Scholar
  52. Pautler, P.A. (2015). A history of the FTC’s Bureau of economics. American Antitrust Institute (Working Paper no. 15-03) and Institute for Consumer Antitrust Studies (Working Paper 2015-3).Google Scholar
  53. Rosen, S. (1974). Hedonic prices and implicit markets: product differentiation in pure competition. Journal of Political Economy, 82(1), 34–55. Retrieved July 24, 2018, from Scholar
  54. Ruder, T., & To, T. (2004). Brand dummy variables in hedonic regressions: a study using stereo receiver scanner data. U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics. Retrieved September 27, 2018, from
  55. Rysman, M. (2009). The economics of two-sided markets. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 23, 125.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Shapiro, S. (2017). Structure and process: Examining the interaction between bureaucratic organization and analytical requirements. Review of Policy Research, 34(5), 682–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Shelanski, H. A. (2007). Adjusting regulation to competition: Toward a new model for U.S. telecommunications policy. Yale Journal of Regulations, 24, 55.Google Scholar
  58. Ulmer, M. J. (1972). Comment to Afriat S. N. (1972). The theory of international comparisons of real income and prices. In D.J. Daly (ed.), International comparisons of prices and output, pp. 13–84. National Bureau of Economic Research. Retrieved August 13, 2018, from
  59. Uri, N. (2005). The implicit marginal valuation of cable service in the United States. Economia Internazionale, 58(1). Retrieved September 27, 2018, from
  60. Viscusi, W. K., Harrington, J. E., & Vernon, J. M. (2005). Economics of regulation and antitrust (4th ed.). Cambridge: The MIT Press.Google Scholar
  61. Wallsten, S.J. (2008). Understanding international broadband comparisons. Technology Policy Institute. Retrieved on September 27, 2018, from
  62. White, A. (2012). The economics of online platforms, The new palgrave dictionary of economics. London: Palgrave Macmillan. Google Scholar
  63. White, A., & Weyl, E. G. (2016). Insulated platform competition. Retrieved from
  64. Xiao, M., & Orazem, P. F. (2011). Does the fourth entrant make any difference? Entry and competition in the early U.S. broadband market. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 29, 547.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© This is a U.S. government work and its text is not subject to copyright protection in the United States; however, its text may be subject to foreign copyright protection 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jerry Ellig
    • 1
  • Paul LaFontaine
    • 2
  • Wayne Leighton
    • 2
  • Eric Ralph
    • 2
  • Sean Sullivan
    • 2
  1. 1.The George Washington University Regulatory Studies CenterWashingtonUSA
  2. 2.Federal Communications CommissionWashingtonUSA

Personalised recommendations