Advertisement

Leverage, Hand-to-Mouth Households, and Heterogeneity of the Marginal Propensity to Consume: Evidence from South Korea

  • Sang-yoon SongEmail author
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

This study examines the link between households’ leverage, their liquid assets such as cash holdings or checking accounts, and the Marginal Propensity to Consume (MPC) out of income changes (the effect of an additional dollar of income on consumption) for South Korean households over 2012–2017. To build on previous studies, we precisely redefine the hand-to-mouth households (defined broadly as those who hold little or no liquid assets), and examine the asymmetric effects of the direction of income changes on MPCs. By using the methodology of Hansen (2000), we estimate the threshold of the liquidity ratio (defined as liquid assets to monthly after-tax income) and find that households with liquid assets less than about 2 months of after-tax income show higher MPCs than others. We also find that the leverage ratio and newly defined hand-to-mouth status show asymmetric effects on MPCs by the direction of income changes. The MPC of households with positive income changes is smaller than that of those with negative ones. Furthermore, hand-to-mouth households with high leverage are much more sensitive to negative income changes than positive ones. This result suggests that in economic circumstances where households are highly in debt and have insufficient liquid assets, consumption is likely to be vulnerable to negative income changes, which could hamper aggregate spending growth.

Keywords

Marginal Propensity to Consume Leverage Hand-to-Mouth Households 

JEL Codes

D12 D14 D90 E21 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I would like to thank the coordinating editor, Prof. Charles Horioka, and two anonymous referees. For comments and discussions, I am grateful to the participants at the interim seminar of the Bank of Korea and the joint workshop of BOJ-IMES and BOK-ERI. All errors are mine.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Andersen, A. L., Duus, C., & Jensen, T. L. (2014). Household debt and consumption during the financial crisis: evidence from Danish micro data. Danmarks Nationalbank Working Papers, 2014-89.Google Scholar
  2. Atkinson, A. B., Rainwater, L., Smeeding, T. M., et al. (1995). Income distribution in OECD countries: Evidence from the Luxembourg income study. OECD Social Policy Studies, No 18, Paris.Google Scholar
  3. Baker, S. R. (2014). Debt and the Consumption Response to Household Income Shocks. SSRN Research Paper, 2541142, 1–46.Google Scholar
  4. Bunn, P., LeRoux, J., Reinold, K., & Surico, P. (2017). The consumption response to positive and negative income shocks. Journal of Monetary Economics, 96, 1–15.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Caballero, R. J. (1991). Earnings uncertainty and aggregate wealth accumulation. The American Economic Review, 81(4), 859–871.Google Scholar
  6. Carroll, C. D. (1997). Buffer-stock saving and the life cycle/permanent income hypothesis. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(1), 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Carroll, C. D., Hall, R. E., & Zeldes, S. P. (1992). The buffer-stock theory of saving: some macroeconomic evidence. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1992(2), 61–156.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Carroll, C. D., & Kimball, M. S. (1996). On the concavity of the consumption function. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 64, 981–992.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Carroll, C. D., & Kimball, M. S., et al. (1996). On the concavity of the consumption function. Econometrica, 64(4), 981–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Christelis, D., Georgarakos, D., Jappelli, T., Pistaferri, L., & Van Rooij, M. (2019). Asymmetric consumption effects of transitory income shocks.The Economic Journal, 199(622), 2322–2341.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Deaton, A. (1991). Saving and liquidity constraints. Econometrica, 59(5), 1221–1248.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Dynan, K. (2012). Is a household debt overhang holding back consumption? Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2012(1), 299–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Fagereng, A. & Halvorsen, E. (2016). Debt and household consumption responses. Norges Bank Staff Memo, 2016(1).Google Scholar
  14. Flodén, M., Kilström, M., Sigurdsson, J. & Vestman, R. (2017). Household debt and monetary policy: revealing the cash-flow channel. Swedish House of Finance Research Paper, 16–18. Google Scholar
  15. Fuster, A., Kaplan, G. & Zafar, B. (2018). What would you do with $500? Spending responses to gains, losses, news and loans. NBER Working Paper No. 24386. Google Scholar
  16. Hansen, B. E. (2000). Sample splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica, 68(3), 575–603.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Hara, R., Unayama, T., & Weidner, J. (2016). The wealthy hand to mouth in Japan. Economics Letters, 141, 52–54.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. IMF. (2017). Household debt and financial stability. In Global Financial Stability Report Chapter 2. Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  19. Jappelli, T., & Pistaferri, L. (2014). Fiscal policy and MPC heterogeneity. American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 6(4), 107–36.Google Scholar
  20. Kaplan, G., & Violante, G. L. (2010). How much consumption insurance beyond self-insurance? American Economic Journal: Macroeconomics, 2(4), 53–87.Google Scholar
  21. Kaplan, G., & Violante, G. L. (2014). A model of the consumption response to fiscal stimulus payments. Econometrica, 82(4), 1199–1239.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Kaplan, G., Violante, G. L., & Weidner, J. (2014). The wealthy hand-to-mouth. Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 2014(1), 77–153.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Kaufmann, K., & Pistaferri, L. (2009). Disentangling insurance and information in intertemporal consumption choices. American Economic Review, 99(2), 387–92.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Kukk, M. (2016). How did household indebtedness hamper consumption during the recession? Evidence from micro data. Journal of Comparative Economics, 44(3), 764–86.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Mian, A., Rao, K., & Sufi, A. (2013). Household balance sheets, consumption, and the economic slump. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(4), 1687–1726.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Park, K. Y. (2017). The wealthy hand-to-mouth households in South Korea. Global Economic Review, 46, 299–324.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Shin, H. S. & Kim S. J. (2013). Financing growth without banks: Korean housing repo contract. In 2013 Meeting Papers, number 328. Society for Economic Dynamics.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Economic Research InstituteThe Bank of KoreaJung-guRepublic of Korea

Personalised recommendations