Advertisement

The effect of children on male earnings and inequality

  • Astrid KunzeEmail author
Article

Abstract

This study investigates the effect of children on male earnings and how earnings inequality among men arises over the life cycle. We use panel register data on earnings and fertility for sibling brothers and twins, and present estimates from flexible earnings regressions. We find that OLS estimates are confounded by selection effects through family fixed factors. The comparison of twin brothers shows that overall earnings growth does not vary between those who ever become fathers and those remaining childless, and there is no significant effect of children on earnings. We also show that controls for marriage explain only a relatively small part of the effect of children. Men who remain childless and unmarried are on relatively low earnings profiles and therefore contribute significantly to the earnings inequality among men.

Keywords

Children Marriage Earnings Men 

Notes

Acknowledgements

The author is grateful for many discussions with Shelly Lundberg, Oddbjørn Raaum, Bernt Bratsberg, Simen Markussen, Kjell Salvanes, Frank Windmeijer, Mette Ejrnæs, Michael Burda, Ken Troske, Øivind A. Nilsen, John Ermisch and various seminar and conference participants.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

References

  1. Anderson, D., Binder, M., & Krause, K. (2002). The motherhood earnings penalty: which mothers pay it and why? American Economic Review, 92(2), 354–358.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Adda, J., Dustmann, C., & Stevens, K. (2017). The career costs of children. Journal of Political Economy, 125(2), 293–337.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Angelov, N., Johansson, P., & Lindahl, E. (2016). Parenthood and the gender gap in pay. Journal of Labor Economics, 34(3), 2016.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Angrist, J. D., & Evans, W. N. (1998). Children and their parents’ labor supply: evidence from exogenous variation in family size. American Economic Review, 88(3), 450–477.Google Scholar
  5. Antonovics, K., & Town, R. (2004). Are all the good men married? Uncovering the sources of the marital earnings premium. American Economic Review, 94(2), 317–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Autor, D., & Wasserman, M. (2013). Wayward Sons: The Emerging Gender Gap in Education and Labor Markets, Third Way, Washington, DC.Google Scholar
  7. Boschini, A., Håkanson, C., Sjögren, A., & Rosen, Å. (2011). Trading off or having it all? Completed fertility and mid-career earnings of Swedish men and women. IFAU Working paper 2011:15.Google Scholar
  8. Becker, G. S. (1985). Human capital, effort, and the sexual division of labor. Journal of Labor Economics, 3(1), S33–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Bertrand, M., Goldin, C., & Katz, L. (2010). Dynamics of the gender gap for young professionals in the financial and corporate sectors. American Economic Journal, 2(3), 228–255.Google Scholar
  10. Blau, F. D., & Kahn, L. M. (1996). International differences in male wage inequality: institutions versus market forces. Journal of Political Economy, 104(4), 791–837.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Blomquist, N., & Hansson-Brusewitz, U. (1990). The effect of taxes on male and female labor supply in Sweden. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 317–357.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bound, J., & Solon, G. (1999). Double trouble: on the value of twins-based estimation of the return to schooling. Economics of Education Review, 18, 169–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Bratberg, E., et al. (2017). A comparison of intergenerational mobility curves in Germany, Norway, Sweden, and the US. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 119(1), 72–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Böckmann, I., & Budig, M. (2013). Fatherhood, Intra-Household Employment Dynamics, and Men’s Earnings in a Cross-National Perspective, LIS Working papers 592, LIS Cross-National Data Center in Luxembourg.Google Scholar
  15. Cools, S., Fiva, J. H., & Kirkebøen, L. J. (2015). Causal effects of paternity leave on children and parents. The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 99(1), 119–127.Google Scholar
  16. Correll, S., Bernard, S., & Paik, I. (2007). Getting a job: is there a motherhood penalty? American Journal of Sociology, 112, 1297–1338.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Dahl, G., Løken, K. V., & Mogstad, M. (2014). Peer effects in program participation. American Economic Review, 104, 2049–2074.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Datta Gupta, N., & Smith, N. (2002). Children and career interruptions: the family gap in Denmark. Economica, 69(276), 609–629.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Datta Gupta, N., Smith, N., & Stratton, L. S. (2007). Is marriage poisonous? Are relationships taxing? An analysis of the male marital earnings differential in Denmark. Southern Economic Journal, 74(2), 412–433.Google Scholar
  20. Dribe, M., & Stanfors, M. (2009). Does parenthood Strengthen a traditional household division of labour? Evidence from Sweden. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(February), 33–45.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Ejrnæs, M., & Kunze, A. (2013). Work and wage dynamics around childbirth. Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 115(3), 856–877.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Fernandez, R., & Fogli, A. (2006). Fertility: the role of culture and family experience. Journal of the European Economic Association, 482(3), 552–561.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Field, E., Molitor, V., Schoonbroodt, A., & Tertilt, M. (2016). Gender gaps in completed fertility. Journal of Demographic Economics, 82(2), 167–206.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Fortin, N. (2005). Gender role attitudes and the labour-market outcomes of women across OECD countries. Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 21, 416–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Ginther, D. K., & Zavodny, M. (2001). Is the male marriage premium due to selection? The effect of shotgun weddings on the return to marriage. Journal of Population Economics, 14(2), 3131–328.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Glauber, R. (2008). Race and gender in families and at work: the fatherhood premium. Gender and Society, 22, 8–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Goldin, C. (2006). The quiet revolution that transformed women’s employment, education, and family. American Economic Review, 96(2), 1–21.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Gould, E. (2008). Marriage and career: the dynamic decisions of young men. Journal of Human Capital, 2(4), 337–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Goux, D., Maurin, E., & Petrongolo, B. (2014). Worktime regulations and spousal labor supply. American Economic Review, 104(1), 252–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gray, J. S. (1997). The fall in men’s return to marriage. Declining productivity effects or changing selection. Journal of Human Resources, 32(3), 481–504.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Griliches, Z. (1979). Sibling Models and Data in Economics: Beginnings of a Survey. Journal of Political Economy, 87(5), S37–S64.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Heckman, J. J., & Hotz, V. J. (1989). Choosing among alternative nonexperimental methods for estimating the impact of social programs: The case of manpower training. Journal of the American statistical Association, 84(408), 862–874.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Hersch, J., & Stratton, L. S. (2000). Household specialization and the male marriage wage premium. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(1), 78–94.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hodges, M. J., & Budig, M. J. (2010). Who gets the daddy bonus? Organizational hegemonic masculinity and the impact of fatherhood on earnings. Gender and Society, 24, 717–745.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Hundley, G. (2000). Male/Female earnings differences in self-employment: the effects of marriage, children, and the household division of labor. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 54(1), 95–114.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Hotz, V. J., McElroy, S. W., & Sanders, S. G. (2005). Teenage childbearing and its life cycle consequences: exploiting a natural experiment. Journal of Human Resources, 60(3), 683–715.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Joshi, H., Paci, P., & Waldfogel, J. (1999). The earnings of motherhood: better or worse? Cambridge Journal of Economics, 23(5), 543–564.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Killewald, A. (2012). A reconsideration of the fatherhood premium: marriage, coresidence, biology, and fathers’ wages. American Sociological Review, 78(1), 96–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Killewald, A., & Lundberg, I. (2017). New evidence against a causal marriage wage premium. Demography, 54(3), 1007–1028.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Kleven, H., Landais, C., & Søgaard, J. E. (2018). Children and gender inequality: evidence from Denmark. American Economic Journal, 11(4), 181–209.Google Scholar
  41. Korenman, S., & Neumark, D. (1991). Does marriage really make men more productive? Journal of Human Resources, 26(2), 282–307.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Krashinsky, H. A. (2004). Do marital status and computer usage really change the earnings structure? Journal of Human Resources, 39, 774–791.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Loh, E. S. (1996). Productivity differences and the marriage wage premium for white males. Journal of Human Resources, 31(3), 566–589.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Loughran, D. S., & Zissimopoulos, J. M. (2009). Why wait? The effect of marriage and childbearing on the earnings of men and women. Journal of Human Resources, 44(2), 326–349.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Ludwig, V., & Brüderl, J. (2018). Is there a male marital wage premium? New evidence from the United States. American Sociological Review, 83(4), 744–770.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Lundberg, S., & Rose, E. (2000). Parenthood and the earnings of married men and women. Labour Economics, 7, 689–710.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Lundberg, S., & Rose, E. (2002). The effects of sons and daughters on men’s labor supply and earnings. Review of Economics and Statistics, 84(2), 251–268.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Miller, A. R. (2011). The effects of motherhood timing on career path. Journal of Population Economics, 24(3), 1071–1100.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, Experience and Earnings. New York: Columbia University.Google Scholar
  50. Norges offentlige utredninger (NOU). (2008). Kjønn og Lønn – Fakta, analyser og virkemidler for likelønn. Norges offentlige utredninger, 2008, 6.Google Scholar
  51. Norges offentlige utredninger (NOU). (2012). Politikk for likestilling, vol 15. Norges offentlige utredninger.Google Scholar
  52. OECD. (2017). The Pursuit of Gender Equality. An Uphill Battle. Paris: OECD Publishing.Google Scholar
  53. Peters, M., & Siow, A. (2002). Competing premarital investments. Journal of Political Economy, 110(3), 592–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Petersen, T., & Penner, A. M. (2011). The male marital wage premium: sorting vs. differential pay. Industrial and Labor Relations Review, 64(2), 282–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Petersen, T., Penner, A. M., & Høgsnes, G. (2014). From motherhood penalties to husband premia: the new challenge for gender equality and family policy, lessons from Norway, American Journal of Sociology, 119(5), 1434–1472.Google Scholar
  56. Pencavel, J. (1986). Labor supply of men: a survey. In Orley Ashenfelter & Richard Layard (Eds), Handbook of labor economics, vol. 1 (pp. 3–101), NY: Elsevier Science Pub., 1986.Google Scholar
  57. Simonsen, M., & Skipper, L. (2010). The family gap revisited: what wombmates reveal. Labour Economics, 19, 102–112.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. van Soest, A., & Woittiez ad, A. K. (1990). Labor supply, income taxes, and hours retrictions in the Netherlands. Journal of Human Resources, 25, 517–558.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Vaage, O. F. (2012). Tidene skifter: Tidsbruk 1971–2010. Statistics Norway, Oslo Kongsvinger.Google Scholar
  60. Waldfogel, J. (1998). Understanding the family gap in pay for women with children. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12(1), 137–156CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Norwegian School of EconomicsBergenNorway

Personalised recommendations