Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 287–321 | Cite as

Dowry in the absence of the legal protection of women’s inheritance rights

  • Momoe MakinoEmail author
Article

Abstract

The practice of dowry is often thought to be the root cause of the unequal treatment of girls in India, as represented by sex-selective abortion and female infanticide. This is because the prospect of burdensome dowry payments in future makes the birth of a girl child unwelcome. For adult women without inheritance rights, however, dowry may function as their only source of protection. Using a nationwide dataset and exploiting a natural experimental setting, this study explores the relationship between dowry and women’s empowerment in India, a society where women do not have inheritance rights, and thus do not usually possess immovable assets. In such a society, dowry seems to enhance women’s status in the marital household. The relationship reverses when women have equal inheritance rights as their brothers. Empirical analysis suggests that the outright ban on dowry that ignores the context may not necessarily benefit women. It also implies that dowry may become unnecessary and disappear once women are assured of inheritance rights.

Keywords

Dowry Women’s empowerment Inheritance rights Amendment India 

JEL classification

J12 J16 K11 N35 Z13 

Notes

Acknowledgements

I am grateful to Claus Pörtner for his advice and guidance throughout the development of this paper. I owe thanks to Shelly Lundberg, Seik Kim, Aimee Chin, and seminar participants at the University of Washington for their insightful suggestions. I am very grateful to two anonymous referees for comments on the early version of the paper. I greatly appreciate the financial support from the Department of Economics at the University of Washington, the James K. and Vilola M. Hall Fellowship, and the Grover and Creta Ensley Fellowship in Economic Policy. Any errors, omissions, or misrepresentations are, of course, my own.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author declares that she has no conflict of interest.

Supplementary material

11150_2017_9377_MOESM1_ESM.dta (43 mb)
Supplementary Information
11150_2017_9377_MOESM2_ESM.do (18 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Agarwal, B. (1994). A field of one’s own: Gender and land rights in South Asia. Cambridge, Great Britain: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  2. Aizer, A. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1847–1859.Google Scholar
  3. Altonji, J. G., Elder, T. E., & Taber, C. R. (2005). Selection on observed and unobserved variables: Assessing the effectiveness of Catholic schools. Journal of Political Economy, 113(1), 151–184.Google Scholar
  4. Ambrus, A., Field, E., & Torero, M. (2010). Muslim family law, prenuptial agreements, and the emergence of dowry in Bangladesh. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 125(3), 1349–1397.Google Scholar
  5. Anderson, S. (2004). Dowry and property rights. Bread Working Paper, 80.Google Scholar
  6. Anderson, S. (2007). The economics of dowry and brideprice. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 21(4), 151–174.Google Scholar
  7. Anderson, S., & Bidner, C. (2015). Property rights over marital transfers. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(3), 1421–1484.Google Scholar
  8. Anderson, S., & Genicot, G. (2015). Suicide and property rights in India. Journal of Development Economics, 114, 64–78.Google Scholar
  9. Arunachalam, R., & Logan, T. (2016). On the heterogeneity of dowry motives. Journal of Population Economics, 29(1), 135–166.Google Scholar
  10. Ashraf, N., Bau, N., Nunn, N., & Voena, A. (2015). Bride price and the returns to education for women. Unpublished manuscript, Harvard University. http://scholar.harvard.edu/nunn/publications/bride-price-and-returns-education-women. Accessed 10 December 2015.
  11. Becker, G. S. (1991). A treatise on the family. Cambridge MA: Harvard University Press.Google Scholar
  12. Behrman, J. R., Birdsall, N., & Deolalikar, A. (1995). Marriage markets, labor markets, and unobserved human capital: An empirical exploration for South-Central India. Economic Development and Cultural Change, 43(3), 585–601.Google Scholar
  13. Bellows, J., & Miguel, E. (2009). War and local collective action in Sierra Leone. Journal of Public Economics, 93(11&12), 1144–1157.Google Scholar
  14. Billig, M. S. (1992). The marriage squeeze and the rise of groomprice in India’s Kerala state. Journal of Comparative Family Studies, 23(2), 197–216.Google Scholar
  15. Bloch, F., & Rao, V. (2002). Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1029–1043.Google Scholar
  16. Bloch, F., Rao, V., & Desai, S. (2004). Wedding celebrations as conspicuous consumption: Signaling social status in rural India. Journal of Human Resources, 39(3), 675–695.Google Scholar
  17. Boserup, E. (2007). Women’s role in economic development. London, UK: Earthscan.Google Scholar
  18. Botticini, M., & Siow, A. (2003). Why dowries? American Economic Review, 93(4), 1385–1398.Google Scholar
  19. Brown, P. H. (2009). Dowry and intrahousehold bargaining: Evidence from China. Journal of Human Resources, 44(1), 25–46.Google Scholar
  20. Chiappori, P. A., Fortin, B., & Lacroix, G. (2002). Marriage market, divorce legislation, and household labor supply. Journal of Political Economy, 110(1), 37–72.Google Scholar
  21. Deininger, K., Goyal, A., & Nagarajan, H. (2013). Women’s inheritance rights and intergenerational transmission of resources in India. Journal of Human Resources, 48(1), 114–141.Google Scholar
  22. Deolalikar, A., & Rao, V. (1998). The demand for dowries and bride characteristics in marriage: Empirical estimates of rural South-Central India. In M. Krishnaraj, R. M. Sudarshan & A. Shariff (Eds.), Gender, populations and development (pp. 122–140). London, UK: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  23. Duflo, E. (2012). Women empowerment and economic development. Journal of Economic Literature, 50(4), 1051–1079.Google Scholar
  24. Dyson, T., & Moore, M. (1983). On kinship structure, female autonomy, and demographic behavior in India. Population and Development Review, 9(1), 35–60.Google Scholar
  25. Friedberg, L. (1998). Did unilateral divorce raise divorce rates? Evidence from panel data. American Economic Review, 88(3), 608–627.Google Scholar
  26. Grossbard, S. (2017). [Forthcoming]. Modeling eldercare by children and children-in-law: The role of marriage institutions. ADBI working paper. http://econoflove.sdsu.edu/documents/aging%20in%20Asia%20jan%2012.docx.pdf Accessed 22 May 2017.
  27. Horioka, C. Y., & Terada-Hagiwara, A. (2017). The impact of sex ratios before marriage on household saving in two Asian countries: The competitive saving motive revisited. Review of Economics of the Household, 15(3), 739–757. http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s11150-016-9344-y.
  28. Jacoby, H., & Mansuri, G. (2010). Watta satta: Bride exchange and women’s welfare in rural Pakistan. American Economic Review, 100(4), 1804–1825.Google Scholar
  29. Jejeebhoy, S. J. (2000). Women’s autonomy in rural India: Its dimensions, determinants, and the influence of context. In H. B. Presser & G. Sen (Eds.), Women’s empowerment and demographic processes: Moving beyond Cairo (pp. 204–238). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  30. Jejeebhoy, S. J., & Sathar, Z. A. (2001). Women’s autonomy in India and Pakistan: The influence of religion and region. Population and Development Review, 27(4), 687–712.Google Scholar
  31. Kingdon, G., & Teal, F. (2010). Teacher unions, teacher pay and student performance in India: A pupil fixed effects approach. Journal of Development Economics, 91(2), 278–288.Google Scholar
  32. Kishwar, M. (1988). Rethinking dowry boycott. Manushi, 48, 10–13.Google Scholar
  33. Kishwar, M. (1989). Towards more just norms for marriage: Continuing the dowry debate. Manushi, 53, 2–9.Google Scholar
  34. Leslie, J. (1998). Dowry, ‘dowry deaths’ and violence against women: A journey of discovery. In W. Menski (Ed.), South Asians and the dowry problem (pp. 21–35). New Delhi: Vistaar Publications.Google Scholar
  35. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. A. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101(6), 988–1010.Google Scholar
  36. Maitra, S. (2007). Dowry and bride price. In W. A. Darity (Ed.), International encyclopedia of the social sciences, Vo.2. New York, NY: Macmillan.Google Scholar
  37. Makino, M. (2015). Marriage, dowry, and women’s status in rural Punjab, Pakistan, IDE Discussion Papers, 534.Google Scholar
  38. Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review, 21(1), 31–44.Google Scholar
  39. Mbiti, I. M. (2008). Monsoon wedding? The effect of female labor demand on marriage markets in India. Unpublished manuscript, Southern Methodist University. https://sites.google.com/site/isaacmbiti/mbiti_marriage_jun08.pdf?attredirects=0. Accessed 1 December 2015.
  40. McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22(2), 333–349.Google Scholar
  41. Narayan, U. (1997). Dislocating cultures: Identities, traditions, and third world feminism. New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  42. Oldenburg, V. T. (2002). Dowry murder. New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  43. Panda, P., & Agarwal, B. (2005). Marital violence, human development and women’s property status in India. World Development, 33(5), 823–850.Google Scholar
  44. Palriwala, R. (2009). The spider’s web: Seeing dowry, fighting dowry. In T. Bradley, E. Tomalin & M. Subramaniam (Eds.), Dowry: bridging the gap between theory and practice (pp. 144–176). New Delhi, India: Women Unlimited.Google Scholar
  45. Peters, C. (2011). Effects of family planning and health services on women’s welfare: evidence on dowries and intra-household bargaining in Bangladesh. Review of Economics of the Household, 9(3), 327–348.Google Scholar
  46. Rahman, L., & Rao, V. (2004). The determinants of gender equity in India: Examining Dyson and Moore’s thesis with new data. Population and Development Review, 30(2), 239–268.Google Scholar
  47. Roy, S. (2015). Empowering women? Inheritance rights, female education and dowry payments in India. Journal of Development Economics, 114, 233–251.Google Scholar
  48. Rudd, J. (2001). Dowry-murder: An example of violence against women. Women’s Studies International Forum, 24(5), 513–522.Google Scholar
  49. Sekhri, S., & Storeygard, A. (2014). Dowry deaths: Response to weather variability in India. Journal of Development Economics, 111, 212–223.Google Scholar
  50. Sen, A. (1990). More than 100 million women are missing. New York Review of Books, 37, 61–66.Google Scholar
  51. Sen, P. (1999). Enhancing women’s choices in responding to domestic violence in Calcutta: A comparison of employment and education. European Journal of Development Research, 11(2), 65–86.Google Scholar
  52. Srinivas, M. N. (1994). Some reflections on dowry. New Delhi, India: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  53. Srinivasan, S., & Bedi, A. S. (2007). Domestic violence and dowry: Evidence from a South Indian village. World Development, 35(5), 857–880.Google Scholar
  54. Stone, L., & James, C. (1995). Dowry, bride-burning, and female power in India. Women’s Studies International Forum, 18(2), 125–134.Google Scholar
  55. Suran, L., Amin, S., Huq, L., & Chowdury, K. (2004). Does dowry improve life for brides? A test of the oiequest theory of dowry in rural Bangladesh. Policy Research Division Working Paper 195, Population Council.Google Scholar
  56. Tambiah, S. J. (1973). Dowry and bridewealth and the property rights of women in South Asia. In J. R. Goody & S. J. Tambiah (Eds.), Bridewealth and dowry (pp. 59–169). Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  57. Vogl, T. S. (2013). Marriage institutions and sibling competition: Evidence from South Asia. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 128(3), 1017–1072.Google Scholar
  58. Wolfers, J. (2006). Did unilateral divorce laws raise divorce rates? A reconciliation and new results. American Economic Review, 96(5), 1802–1820.Google Scholar
  59. World Bank. (2011). World development report 2012: Gender equality and development. Washington, DC: World Bank.Google Scholar
  60. Zhang, J., & Chan, W. (1999). Dowry and wife’s welfare: A theoretical and empirical analysis. Journal of Political Economy, 107(4), 786–808.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Institute of Developing EconomiesChibaJapan

Personalised recommendations