Advertisement

Review of Economics of the Household

, Volume 17, Issue 1, pp 229–248 | Cite as

Domestic violence laws and suicide in Mexico

  • Trinidad BelecheEmail author
Article

Abstract

In the mid-1990s Mexican states began adopting reforms that for the first time criminalized domestic violence. Two separate policies were also adopted which allowed domestic violence to be grounds for divorce and established prevention and assistance programs for victims of domestic violence. I exploit the variation in time and geography to estimate the impact of these three policies on female suicide rates using a difference-in-difference methodology. The results indicate that states that criminalized domestic violence exhibited a 22–34% decrease in suicide rates compared to non-adopting states, but there is no robust evidence that the other two policies had any impact. A battery of tests provides support for the robustness of these findings and indicates that most of the effects are concentrated among married women. Analysis of a cross-sectional, nationally representative survey covering violence against women in Mexico suggests reduction in sexual and physical violence as a possible mechanism behind the reduction in female suicide rates. These findings are consistent with an intra-household bargaining model with asymmetric information and costly conflict which predicts that policies that reduce conflict within the household can reduce female suicides. The results highlight the importance of developing and implementing policies that facilitate reporting and providing access to legal institutions for victims of domestic violence, which can in turn improve a victim’s wellbeing.

Keywords

Domestic violence Mexico Public policy Suicide rate Intra-household bargaining Conflict 

JEL Classifications

J12 K3 054 D1 

Notes

Acknowledgements

This paper evolved from a chapter of my PhD dissertation and has benefited greatly from comments and suggestions from David Fairris, Mindy Marks, Jorge Agüero, Nellie Lew, Rosemarie Lavaty Summers, and participants of the Eastern Economic Association 2011 Meetings, CSWEP CeMENT Workshop 2015, and three anonymous referees. I also thank Garance Genicot for her invaluable discussion about the model. All errors are my own.

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Supplementary material

11150_2017_9362_MOESM1_ESM.docx (371 kb)
Supplementary Information

References

  1. Aizer, A. (2010). The gender wage gap and domestic violence. The American Economic Review, 100(4), 1847–1859.Google Scholar
  2. Aizer, A. (2011). Poverty, violence and health poverty, violence, and health: The impact of domestic violence during pregnancy on newborn health. Journal of Human Resources, 46(3), 518–538.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, S., & Genicot, G. (2015). Suicide and property rights in India. Journal of Development Economics, 114, 64–78.Google Scholar
  4. Angelucci, M. (2009). Love on the rocks: Alcohol abuse and domestic violence in rural Mexico. The B.E. Journal of Economic Analysis & Policy, 8, Article 43.Google Scholar
  5. Bertrand, M., Duflo, E., & Mullainathan, S. (2009). How much should we trust differences-in-differences estimates? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 119, 249–275.Google Scholar
  6. Bloch, F., & Rao, V. (2002). Terror as a bargaining instrument: A case study of dowry violence in rural India. American Economic Review, 92(4), 1029–1043.Google Scholar
  7. Bobonis, G. J. (2009). Is the allocation of resources within the household efficient? New evidence from a randomized experiment. Journal of Political Economy, 117(3), 453–503.Google Scholar
  8. Bobonis, G. J., Gonzalez-Brenes, M., & Castro, R. (2013). Public transfers and domestic violence: The roles of private information and spousal control. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 5(1), 179–205.Google Scholar
  9. Bowlus, A. J., & Seitz, S. (2006). Domestic violence, employment, and divorce. International Economic Review, 47, 1113–1149.Google Scholar
  10. Brassiolo, P. (2016). Domestic violence and divorce law: When divorce threats become credible. Journal of Labor Economics, doi: 10.1086/683666.
  11. Campbell, J. C., Webster, D., & Koziol-McLain, J., et al. (2003). Assessing risk factors for intimate partner homicide. National Institute of Justice Journal, 250, 15–19.Google Scholar
  12. Campos-Vazquez, R. M., & Knox, M. A. (2013). Social protection programs and employment: The case of Mexico’s seguro popular program. Economia Mexicana, 22(2), 403–448.Google Scholar
  13. Carrell, S. E., & Hoekstra, M. L. (2010). Externalities in the classroom: How children exposed to domestic violence affect everyone’s kids. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2, 211–228.Google Scholar
  14. Castillo-Manzano, R., & Arankowsky-Sandoval, G. (2008). Violencia Intrafamiliar como Factor de Riesgo para Transtorno Depresivo Mayor en Mujeres: Estudio de Casos y Controles. Revista Biomedica, 19, 128–136.Google Scholar
  15. Diette, T.M., Goldsmith, A.H., Hamilton, D., and Darity, W. (2016). Adult happiness and prior traumatic victimization in and out of the household. Review of Economics of the Household, doi: 10.1007/s11150-016-9334-0.
  16. Di Tella, R., MacCulloch, R. J., & Oswald, A. J. (2003). The macroeconomics of happiness. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(4), 809–827.Google Scholar
  17. Eternod Aramburu, M. (2013) Encuesta Nacional sobre la Dinamica de las Relaciones en los Hogares. ENDIREH 2011, INMUJERES Presentation to the Comision de Equidad y Genero de la LXII Legislatura de la Camara de Diputados: Investigaciones sobre la Violencia Contra las Mujeres en Mexico, April 26, 2013.Google Scholar
  18. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia (INEGI). (2003). Encuesta Nacional sobre la Dinamica de las Relaciones en los Hogares: ENDIREH 2003. Mexico: INEGI.Google Scholar
  19. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia (INEGI). (2005). Estadisticas de Intentos de Suicidio y Suicidios. Mexico: INEGI. Cuaderno Numero 11.Google Scholar
  20. Instituto Nacional de Estadistica y Geografia (INEGI). (2013). Panorama de Violencia contra las Mujeres en Mexico: ENDIREH 2011. Mexico: INEGI.Google Scholar
  21. Instituto Nacional de Salud Pública (INSP). (2009). Encuesta Nacional sobre Violencia contra las Mujeres (ENVIM). Cuemavaca, México D.F.: Centro Nacional de Equidad de Genero y Salud Reproductiva.Google Scholar
  22. Lee, D. S. (2009). Training, wages, and sample selection: Estimating sharp bounds on treatment effects. Review of Economic Studies, 76, 1071–1102.Google Scholar
  23. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. (1993). Separate spheres bargaining and the marriage market. Journal of Political Economy, 101, 988–1010.Google Scholar
  24. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. (1994). Noncooperative bargaining models of marriage. American Economic Review AEA Papers and Proceedings, 84, 132–137.Google Scholar
  25. Lundberg, S., & Pollak, R. (1996). Bargaining and distribution in marriage. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 10, 139–158.Google Scholar
  26. McElroy, M. B., & Horney, M. J. (1981). Nash-bargained household decisions: Toward a generalization of the theory of demand. International Economic Review, 22, 333–349.Google Scholar
  27. Manser, M., & Brown, M. (1980). Marriage and household decision-making: A bargaining analysis. International Economic Review, 21, 31–44.Google Scholar
  28. Pollak, R. A. (2004). An intergenerational model of domestic violence. Journal of Population Economics, 17, 311–329.Google Scholar
  29. Rasul, I. (2006). Marriage markets and divorce laws. Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, 22(1), 30–69.Google Scholar
  30. Rivera-Rivera, L., Lazcano-Ponce, E., Salmeron-Castro, J., & Salazar-Martinez, E., et al. (2003). Prevalence and determinants of male partner violence against Mexican women: A population-based study. Salud Publica de Mexico, 46, 113–122.Google Scholar
  31. Sanchez-Pages, S. (2009). Conflict as a part of the bargaining process. The Economic Journal, 119(359), 1189–1207.Google Scholar
  32. Stevenson, B., & Wolfers, J. (2006). Bargaining in the shadow of the law: Divorce laws and family distress. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 121(1), 267–288.Google Scholar
  33. World Health Organization. (2005). WHO Multi-country Study on Women’s Health and Domestic Violence Against Women. Geneva: World Health Organization.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media New York 2017

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.RAND CorporationArlingtonUSA
  2. 2.Food and Drug Administration (FDA)Silver SpringUSA

Personalised recommendations