Advertisement

Journal of Regulatory Economics

, Volume 56, Issue 1, pp 85–103 | Cite as

Mandated sharing and telecom investment in Latin America and the Caribbean

  • Juan JungEmail author
Original Paper

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to look at the effects of mandated sharing on investment in the telecommunications sector in Latin America and the Caribbean (LAC). Given the relevance of promoting suitable regulatory conditions to stimulate the huge investments required for the region to close its digital divide, this paper intends to provide inputs for the design of regulatory frameworks, particularly towards finding out the optimal levels of intervention. Our results suggest that sharing obligations have been linked with lower investment intensity in the region. Those results are robust to the addition of control variables which may also have an incidence on investment decisions, and to the treatment of possible endogeneity in the estimates. Further checks provide specific insights about the negative effect of mandated co-location obligations and mandated infrastructure sharing. As for local loop unbundling, it was found to have a negative effect on investment intensity only if introduced jointly with price regulation. As a result of the findings reported in this paper, we suggest that regulatory bodies in LAC should pursue light and flexible approaches in order to promote the much-needed investments. In particular, sharing decisions should be the result of voluntary agreements between those concerned, not because of imposed mandates.

Keywords

Industrial organization Investment Regulation Telecommunications 

JEL Classification

L51 L96 

Notes

Compliance with ethical standards

Conflict of interest

The author is employed by the Inter-American Association of Telecommunicators Enterprises (ASIET).

References

  1. Abrardi, L., & Cambini, C. (2019). Ultra-fast broadband investment and adoption: A survey. Telecommunications Policy, 43(3), 183–198.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Aghion, P., Bloom, N., Blundell, R., Griffith, R., & Howitt, P. (2005). Competition and innovation: An inverted-U relationship. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 120(2), 701–728.Google Scholar
  3. Alesina, A., Ardagna, S., Nicoletti, G., & Schiantarelli, F. (2005). Regulation and investment. Journal of the European Economic Association, 3(4), 791–825.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Arellano, M., & Bond, S. (1991). Some tests of specification for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. The Review of Economic Studies, 58(2), 277–297.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Arellano, M., & Bover, O. (1995). Another look at the instrumental variable estimation of error-components models. Journal of Econometrics, 68(1), 29–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bacache, M., Bourreau, M., & Gaudin, G. (2014). Dynamic entry and investment in new infrastructures: Empirical evidence from the fixed broadband industry. Review of Industrial Organization, 44(2), 179–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Blanchard, O., & Giavazzi, F. (2003). Macroeconomic effects of regulation and deregulation in goods and labor markets. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 118(3), 879–907.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Bourreau, M., Cambini, C., & Doğan, P. (2014). Access regulation and the transition from copper to fiber networks in telecoms. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 45(3), 233–258.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Briglauer, W. (2014). The impact of regulation and competition on the adoption of fiber-based broadband services: Recent evidence from the European union member states. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 46(1), 51–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Briglauer, W., & Cambini, C. (2019). Does regulation of basic broadband networks affect the adoption of new fiber-based broadband services? Industrial and Corporate Change, 28(2), 219–240.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Briglauer, W., Cambini, C., & Grajek, M. (2018). Speeding up the internet: Regulation and investment in the European fiber optic infrastructure. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 61, 613–652.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Calzada, J., García-Mariñoso, B., Ribé, J., Rubio, R., & Suárez, D. (2018). Fiber deployment in Spain. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 53(3), 256–274.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Cambini, C., & Jiang, Y. (2009). Broadband investment and regulation: A literature review. Telecommunications Policy, 33(10), 559–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cambini, C., & Rondi, L. (2017). Independent agencies, political interference, and firm investment: Evidence from the European Union. Economic Inquiry, 55(1), 281–304.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Cave, M. (2006). Encouraging infrastructure competition via the ladder of investment. Telecommunications Policy, 30(3), 223–237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cave, M., & Vogelsang, I. (2003). How access pricing and entry interact. Telecommunications Policy, 27(10), 717–727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cet.la. (2013). Desafío 2020. Inversiones para cerrar la brecha digital en América Latina. Convergencia Research. Retrieved August 23, 2018 from https://cet.la/estudios/cet-la/resumen-ejecutivo/.
  18. Cet.la. (2017). Análisis de competencia en mercados dinámicos. Frontier Economics. Retrieved August 23, 2018 from https://cet.la/estudios/cet-la/analisis-competencia-mercados-dinamicos/.
  19. Cet.la & CAF. (2017). Distribución De Retornos y Beneficios Generados por el Sector de Telecomunicaciones en América Latina. Telecom Advisory Services. Retrieved August 23, 2018 from https://cet.la/estudios/cet-la/retornos-beneficios-generados-sector-las-telecomunicaciones-america-latina/.
  20. Friederiszick, H., Grajek, M., & Röller, L. H. (2008). Analyzing the relationship between regulation and investment in the telecom sector. ESMT White Paper WP-108-01.Google Scholar
  21. Grajek, M., & Röller, L. H. (2012). Regulation and investment in network industries: Evidence from European telecoms. The Journal of Law and Economics, 55(1), 189–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Grazzi, M., Pietrobelli, C., & Szirmai, A. (2016). Determinants of enterprise performance in Latin America and the Caribbean: What does the micro-evidence tell us? In M. Grazzi & C. Pietrobelli (Eds.), Firm innovation and productivity in Latin America and the Caribbean (pp. 1–36). New York: Palgrave Macmillan.Google Scholar
  23. Guasch, J. L., Laffont, J. J., & Straub, S. (2008). Renegotiation of concession contracts in Latin America: Evidence from the water and transport sectors. International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26(2), 421–442.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Gutierrez, L. H. (1999). An index of telecommunications regulatory frameworks in the context of privatization and competition reform. PhD Disertation, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.Google Scholar
  25. Gutiérrez, L. H. (2003). The effect of endogenous regulation on telecommunications expansion and efficiency in Latin America. Journal of Regulatory Economics, 23(3), 257–286.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Hausman, J. (1999). The effect of sunk costs in telecommunications regulation. In J. J. Alleman & E. M. Noam (Eds.), The new investment theory of real options and its implication for telecommunications economics (pp. 191–204). Boston, MA: Springer.Google Scholar
  27. Jorde, T. M., Sidak, J. G., & Teece, D. J. (2000). Innovation, investment, and unbundling. Yale Journal on Regulation, 17, 1.Google Scholar
  28. Jung, J. (2019). Mandated Sharing and Telecom Investment in Latin America and the Caribbean - Appendix (September 18, 2019). Retrieved October 1, 2019 from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3455862.
  29. Kim, J., Kim, Y., Gaston, N., Lestage, R., Kim, Y., & Flacher, D. (2011). Access regulation and infrastructure investment in the mobile telecommunications industry. Telecommunications Policy, 35(11), 907–919.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Levy, B., & Spiller, P. T. (1994). The institutional foundations of regulatory commitment: A comparative analysis of telecommunications regulation. The Journal of Law, Economics, and Organization, 10(2), 201–246.Google Scholar
  31. Nardotto, M., Valletti, T., & Verboven, F. (2015). Unbundling the incumbent: Evidence from UK broadband. Journal of the European Economic Association, 13(2), 330–362.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Nickell, S. (1981). Biases in dynamic models with fixed effects. Econometrica: Journal of the Econometric Society, 49(6), 1417–1426.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ranatunga, D., Withanage, R., & Arunatileka, D. (2011). Infrastructure sharing and renewable energy use in telecommunication industry for sustainable development. In M. Khosrow-Pour, S. Clarke, M. E. Jennex, A. Becker, & A.-V. Anttiroiko (Eds.), Handbook of research on green ICT: Technology, business and social perspectives: Technology, business and social perspectives (pp. 1858–1872). IGI Global.Google Scholar
  34. Roodman, D. (2009). How to do xtabond2: An introduction to difference and system gmm in stata. Stata Journal, 9(1), 86–136.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Wallsten, S. (1999). An empirical analysis of competition, privatization, and regulation in telecommunications markets in Africa and Latin America. Washington: The World Bank.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Windmeijer, F. (2005). A finite sample correction for the variance of linear efficient two-step GMM estimators. Journal of econometrics, 126(1), 25–51.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Universidad Complutense de Madrid and Centro de Estudios de Telecomunicaciones de América Latina (Cet.la)Las Rozas de MadridSpain

Personalised recommendations