Advertisement

The Impact of Default and Foreclosure on Housing Values: Rings Vs. Neighborhoods Approach

  • Ying HuangEmail author
  • Ronald W. Spahr
  • Mark A. Sunderman
Article
  • 41 Downloads

Abstract

We use neighborhood boundaries, in addition to a concentric rings approach, to examine single family foreclosure spillover effects on residential sales in Shelby County, TN for 2001–16. We find that using more homogeneous neighborhoods provides better and more consistent results as compared to results of using conventional concentric rings boundaries. Applying hedonic modeling, 2SLS, two-way clustered residual models to account for spatial, temporal and locational effects, we control for market cycles, property characteristics and fixed effects including date of sale. We find significant negative non-linear convex foreclosure rate impacts on sales prices given different locational, shape and demographic neighborhoods. Neighborhoods with high chronic foreclosure rates sustain substantially higher negative price impacts, while those with both lower acute or chronic foreclosure rates show lower price impacts.

Keywords

Housing values Mortgage default Foreclosure 

JEL Classification

R31 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We thank Gregory Mohler and Adam Alsamadisi for their help. We gratefully acknowledge the helpful comments from anonymous participants and referees at the American Real Estate Society (ARES) in San Diego 2014, Southern Financial Association in San Destin 2016, and The Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics. All remaining errors are our own.

References

  1. Baxter, V., & Lauria, M. (2000). Residential mortgage foreclosure and neighborhood change. Housing Policy Debate, 11, 675–699.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Biswas, A. (2012). Housing submarkets and the impacts of foreclosures on property prices. Journal of Housing Economics, 21, 235–245.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Buonanno, P., Montolio, D., & Raya-Vilchez, J. M. (2013). Housing prices and crime perception. Empirical Economics, 43, 305–321.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Brevoort, K. P., & Cooper, C. R. (2013). Foreclosure’s wake: The credit experiences of individuals following foreclosure. Real Estate Economics, 41, 747–792.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Brasington, D. M., & Sarama, R. F., Jr. (2008). Deed types, house prices and mortgage interest rates. Real Estate Economics, 36, 587–610.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bryan, T. B., & Colwell, P. F. (1982). Housing Price indexes. Research in Real Estate, 2, 57–84.Google Scholar
  7. Campbell, J., Giglio, S., & Pathak, P. (2011). Forced sales and house prices. American Economic Review, 101, 2108–2131.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Calomiris, C. W., Longhofer, S. D., & Miles, W. R. (2013). The foreclosure-house price nexus: A panel VAR model for U.S. states, 1981-2009. Real Estate Economics, 41, 709–746.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Clauretie, T. M., & Daneshvary, N. (2009). Estimating the house foreclosure discount corrected for spatial price interdependence and endogeneity of marketing time. Real Estate Economics, 37, 43–67.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Collins, A. J., Seiler, M. J., Gangel, M., & Croll, M. (2013). Applying Latin hypercube sampling to agent-based models: Understanding foreclosure contagion effects. International. Journal of Housing Markets and Analysis, 6(4), 422–437.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Daneshvary, N., Clauretie, T. M., & Kader, A. (2011). Short-term own-price and spillover effects of distressed residential properties: The case of a housing crash. Journal of Real Estate Research, 33, 179–206.Google Scholar
  12. Daneshvary, N., & Clauretie, T. M. (2012). Toxic neighbors: Foreclosures and short-sales spillover effects from the current housing-market crash. Economic Inquiry, 50, 217–231.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Ding, L., Roberto, G. Q., & Ratcliffe, J. (2010). Neighborhood subprime lending and the performance of community reinvestment mortgages. Journal of Real Estate Research, 30, 341–376.Google Scholar
  14. Floyd, C. F., Allen, M. T. (2014). Real Estate Principles, DF Institute Inc., 332 Front St. S., Suite 501, La Crosse, WI 54601.Google Scholar
  15. Ghent, A. C., & Kudlyak, M. (2011). Recourse and residential mortgage default: Evidence from US states. Review of Financial Studies, 24, 3139–3186.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Gangel, M., Seiler, M. J., & Collins, A. (2013a). Exploring the foreclosure contagion effect using agent-based modeling. Journal of Real Estate Financial Economics, 46, 339–354.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Gangel, M., Seiler, M. J., & Collins, A. J. (2013b). Latin hypercube sampling and the identification of the foreclosure contagion threshold. Journal of Behavioral Finance, 14(2), 149–159.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Gibbons, S. (2004). The cost of urban house crime. The Economic Journal, 114, 441–463.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Groves, J. R., & Rogers, W. H. (2011). Effectiveness of RCA institutions to limit local externalities: Using foreclosure data to test covenant effectiveness. Land Economics, 87, 559–581.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Hansen, L. P. (1982). Large sample properties of generalized method of moments estimators. Econometrica, 50, 1029–1054.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Harding, J. P., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V. W. (2009). The contagion effect of foreclosed properties. Journal of Urban Economics, 66, 164–178.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Harding, J. P., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V. W. (2012). The foreclosure discount: Myth or reality? Journal of Urban Economics, 71, 204–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Harding, J. P., Miceli, T. J., & Sirmans, C. F. (2000). Do owners take better care of their housing than renters? Real Estate Economics, 28, 663–681.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Immergluck, D., & Smith, G. (2006a). The external costs of foreclosure: The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on property values. Housing Policy Debate, 17, 57–79.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Immergluck, D., & Smith, G. (2006b). The impact of single-family mortgage foreclosures on neighborhood crime. Housing Studies, 21, 851–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Jaccard, J., & Turrisi, R. (2003). Interaction effects in multiple regression (2 nd ed), Sage University paper series on quantitative applications in the social sciences, 07–072. Thousand Oaks: Sage.Google Scholar
  27. Kashian, R., & Carroll, J. D. (2011). The effect of Sheriff’s sales on condominium sub-market property values. Journal of Regional Analysis and Policy, 41, 71–82.Google Scholar
  28. Kobie, T. F., & Lee, S. (2011). The spatial-temporal impact of residential foreclosures on single-family residential property values. Urban Affairs Review, 47, 3–30.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Lauria, M. (1998). A new model of neighborhood change: Reconsidering the role of white flight. Housing Policy Debate, 9, 395–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Lauria, M., & Vern, B. (1999). Residential mortgage foreclosure and racial transition in New Orleans. Urban Affairs Review, 34, 757–786.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Leonard, T., & Murdoch, J. C. (2009). The neighborhood effects of foreclosure. Journal of Geographical Systems, 11, 317–332.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Lin, Z., Rosenblatt, E., & Yao, V. W. (2009). Spillover effects of foreclosures on neighborhood property values. Journal of Real Estate Finance and Economics, 38, 387–407.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Ling, D. C., Archer, W. R. (2013). Real Estate Principles: A Value Approach, Fourth edition. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin.Google Scholar
  34. Neter, J., Wasserman, W., & Kutner, M. H. (1983). Applied linear regression models. Homewood, Illinois: Richard D. Irwin, Inc..Google Scholar
  35. Paternoster, R., Brame, R., Mazerolle, P., & Piquero, A. (1998). Using the correct statistical test for the quality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36, 859–866.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Pennington-Cross, A. (2006). The value of foreclosed property. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 28, 193–214.Google Scholar
  37. Petersen, M. A. (2009). Estimating standard errors in finance panel data sets: Comparing approaches. The Review of Financial Studies, 22, 435–480.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Pope, J. C. (2008). Fear of crime and housing prices: Household reactions to sex offender registries. Journal of Urban Economics, 64, 601–614.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Rogers, W. H., & Winter, W. (2009). The impact of foreclosures on neighboring housing sales. The Journal of Real Estate Research, 31, 455–479.Google Scholar
  40. Rosenbaum, P., & Rubin, D. (1983). The central role of the propensity score in observation studies for causal effects. Biometrika, 70, 41–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Sanders, A. (2008). The subprime crisis and its role in the financial crisis. Journal of Housing Economics, 17, 254–261.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Schuetz, J., Been, V., & Ellen, I. G. (2008). Neighborhood effects of concentrated mortgage foreclosures. Journal of Housing Economics, 17, 306–319.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Seiler, M. J., Collins, A. J., & Fefferman, N. H. (2013). Strategic mortgage default in the context of a social network: An epidemiological approach. Journal of Real Estate Research, 35(4), 445–475.Google Scholar
  44. Spahr, R. W., & Sunderman, M. A. (1998). Property tax inequities on ranch and farm properties. Land Economics, 74(3), 374–389.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Sunderman, M. A., & Birch, J. W. (2002). Valuation of land using regression analysis. Real Estate Valuation: Research Issues in Real Estate, 8, 325–339.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Sunderman, M. A., & Spahr, R. W. (2006). Management policy and estimated returns on school trust lands. The journal of real estate. Finance and Economics, 33(4), 345–362.Google Scholar
  47. Tita, G. E., Petras, T. L., & Greenbau, R. T. (2006). Crime and residential choice: A neighborhood level analysis of the impact of crime on housing prices. Journal of Quantitative Criminology, 22, 299–317.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Veiga, A. (2013). Sharp drop in US homes lost to foreclosure in Feb. Associated Press, http://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/sharp-drop-us-homes-lost-foreclosure-feb-18725875.
  49. Vernon-Bido, D., Collins, A. J., Sokolowski, J., & Seiler, M. J. (2017). The effect of neighborhood density and GIS layout on the foreclosure contagion effect. Journal of Housing Research, 26(2), 137–155.Google Scholar
  50. West's Encyclopedia of American Law. (2008). Second edition. Inc: The Gale Group.Google Scholar
  51. White, H. (1980). A heteroskedasticity-consistent covariance matrix estimator and a direct test for heteroskedasiticity. Econometrica, 48, 817–838.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Economics and Finance, Mitchell College of BusinessUniversity of South AlabamaMobileUSA
  2. 2.Department of Finance, Insurance and Real Estate, Fogelman College of Business & EconomicsThe University of MemphisMemphisUSA

Personalised recommendations