Springer Nature is making Coronavirus research free. View research | View latest news | Sign up for updates

An eye tracking study of digital text reading: a comparison between poor and typical readers

  • 6 Accesses


The inclusion of technology in schools, coupled with the importance of promoting reading for students with difficulties in particular, has increased the need for investigating processes that support reading and reading comprehension. The present study therefore focuses on the characteristics of reading from an educational digital book containing an expository text and illustrations, conducted by means of an eye tracking methodology enabling online reflection of the reading process. The effect on reading a highlighted text with illustrations was compared to that of reading a static text with illustrations. Participants included 30 poor readers and 31 typical readers aged 8–10.9, randomly assigned to two groups according to reading mode: An experimental group that read a highlighted text with an illustration and a control group that read a static text with an illustration. The findings indicate that among poor readers, the highlighted text in the digital book evoked greater visual focusing on the text and more transitions between the text and the illustration. The findings of the study contribute to our knowledge on multimedia learning and the process of reading among poor and typical readers while reading highlighted text with illustrations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in to check access.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2


  1. Aaron, P. G., Joshi, R. M., Gooden, R., & Bentum, K. E. (2008). Diagnosis and treatment of reading disabilities based on the component model of reading: An alternative to the discrepancy model of LD. Journal of Learning Disabilities,41(1), 67–84.

  2. Ainsworth, S. (2006). DeFT: A conceptual framework for considering learning with multiple representations. Learning and Instruction,16(3), 183–198.

  3. Brookshire, J., Scharff, L. F., & Moses, L. E. (2002). The influence of illustrations on children’s book preferences and comprehension. Reading Psychology,23(4), 323–339.

  4. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology,96(1), 31–42.

  5. Catts, H. W., Compton, D., Tomblin, J. B., & Bridges, M. S. (2012). Prevalence and nature of late-emerging poor readers. Journal of Educational Psychology,104(1), 166–196.

  6. Catts, H. W., & Hogan, T. P. (2002). The fourth-grade slump: Late emerging poor readers. In Poster presented at the annual conference of the society for the scientific study of reading, Chicago, IL.‏

  7. Chall, J. (1983). Stages of reading development. New York: McGraw-Hill.

  8. Chall, J. S., & Jacobs, V. A. (2003). The classic study on poor children’s fourth-grade slump. American Educator,27(1), 14–15.

  9. Clifton, C., Ferreira, F., Henderson, J. M., Inhoff, A. W., Liversedge, S. P., Reichle, E. D., et al. (2016). Eye movements in reading and information processing: Keith Rayner’s 40-year legacy. Journal of Memory and Language,86, 1–19.

  10. de Jong, M. T., & Bus, A. G. (2003). How well suited are electronic books to supporting literacy? Journal of Early Childhood Literacy,3(2), 147–164.

  11. Diakidoy, I. A. N., Stylianou, P., Karefillidou, C., & Papageorgiou, P. (2005). The relationship between listening and reading comprehension of different types of text at increasing grade levels. Reading Psychology,26(1), 55–80.

  12. Doty, D. E., Popplewell, S. R., & Byers, G. O. (2001). Interactive CD-ROM storybooks and young readers’ reading comprehension. Journal of Research on Computing in Education,33(4), 374–384.

  13. Duke, N. K. (2000). 3.6 minutes per day: The scarcity of informational texts in first grade. Reading Research Quarterly,35(2), 202–224.

  14. Eden, S., Shamir, A., & Fershtman, M. (2012). Making a difference: Using laptops as a support for spelling improvement among students with learning disability. In A. Shamir & O. Korat (Eds.), Technology as a support for literacy achievements for children at risk (pp. 199–209). Dordrecht: Springer.

  15. Etmanskie, J. M., Partanen, M., & Siegel, L. S. (2014). A longitudinal examination of the persistence of late emerging reading disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities,49(1), 21–35.

  16. Felvegi, E., & Matthew, K. I. (2012). eBooks and literacy in K–12 Schools. Computers in the Schools,29(1–2), 40–52.

  17. Flavell, J. H. (1979). Metacognition and cognitive monitoring: A new area of cognitive–developmental inquiry. American Psychologist,34(10), 906–911.

  18. Fletcher, J. M. (2006). Measuring reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading,10(3), 323–330.

  19. Gilmour, A. F., Fuchs, D., & Wehby, J. H. (2019). Are students with disabilities accessing the curriculum? A meta-analysis of the reading achievement gap between students with and without disabilities. Exceptional Children,85(3), 329–346.

  20. Giuliani, F., & Schenk, F. (2015). Vision, spatial cognition and intellectual disability. Research in Developmental Disabilities,37, 202–208.

  21. Hannus, M., & Hyona, J. (1999). Utilization of illustration during learning of science textbook passages among low-and-high ability children. Contemporary Educational Psychology,24(2), 95–123.

  22. Israeli Ministry of Education. (2017). Development of the educational system: Facts and data [In Hebrew]. Retrieved January 17, 2018 from

  23. Israeli Ministry of Education, National Authority for Measurement and Evaluation in Education (RAMA). (2016). PIRLS 2016: Progress in international reading literacy study. Retrieved October 1, 2019 from

  24. Jian, Y. C. (2015). Fourth graders’ cognitive processes and learning strategies for reading illustrated biology texts: Eye movement measurements. Reading Research Quarterly,51(1), 93–109.

  25. Joseph, H. S., Nation, K., & Liversedge, S. P. (2013). Using eye movements to investigate word frequency effects in children’s sentence reading. School Psychology Review,42(2), 207–222.

  26. Korat, O. (2010). Reading electronic books as a support for vocabulary, story comprehension and word reading in kindergarten and first grade. Computers & Education,55(1), 24–31.

  27. Korat, O., Levin, I., Ben-Shabat, A., Shneor, D., & Bokovza, L. (2014a). Dynamic versus static dictionary with and without printed focal words in e-book reading as facilitator for word learning. Reading Research Quarterly,49(4), 371–386.

  28. Korat, O., & Shamir, A. (2004). Do Hebrew electronic books differ from Dutch electronic books? A replication of a Dutch content analysis. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning,20(4), 257–268.

  29. Korat, O., Shamir, A., & Segal-Drori, O. (2014b). E-books as a support for young children’s language and literacy: The case of Hebrew-speaking children. Early Child Development and Care,184(7), 998–1016.

  30. Labbo, L., & Kuhn, M. (2000). Weaving chains of affect and cognition: A young child’s understanding of CD-ROM talking books. Journal of Literacy Research,32(2), 187–210.

  31. LaBerge, D., & Samuels, S. J. (1974). Toward a theory of automatic information processing in reading. Cognitive Psychology,6(2), 293–323.

  32. Lai, M. L., Tsai, M. J., Yang, F. Y., Hsu, C. Y., Liu, T. C., Lee, S. W. Y., et al. (2013). A review of using eye-tracking technology in exploring learning from 2000 to 2012. Educational Research Review,10, 90–115.

  33. Lau, K. L., & Chan, D. W. (2003). Reading strategy use and motivation among Chinese good and poor readers in Hong Kong. Journal of Research in Reading,26(2), 177–190.

  34. Lefever-Davis, S., & Pearman, C. (2005). Early readers and electronic texts: CD-ROM storybook features that influence reading behaviors. The Reading Teacher,58(5), 446–454.

  35. Lowe, R. K., & Boucheix, J. M. (2007). Eye tracking as a basis for animation design. In Paper presented at the bi-annual meeting of the European association of research on learning and instruction, Budapest, HU.

  36. Luke, S. G., Henderson, J. M., & Ferreira, F. (2015). Children’s eye-movements during reading reflect the quality of lexical representation: An individual differences approach. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition,41, 1675–1683.

  37. Mason, L., Pluchino, P., Tornatora, M. C., & Ariasi, N. (2013a). An eye-tracking study of learning from science text with concrete and abstract illustrations. The Journal of Experimental Education,81, 356–384.

  38. Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2013b). Do fourth graders integrate text and picture in processing and learning from an illustrated science text? Evidence from eye-movement patterns. Computers & Education,60(1), 95–109.

  39. Mason, L., Tornatora, M. C., & Pluchino, P. (2015). Integrative processing of verbal and graphical information during re-reading predicts learning from illustrated text: An eye-movement study. Reading and Writing,28(6), 851–872.

  40. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.

  41. McKeown, M. G., & Beck, I. L. (2006). Encouraging young children’s language interactions with stories. In D. K. Dickinson & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Handbook of early literacy research (Vol. 2, pp. 281–294). New York, NY: The Guilford Press.

  42. Miellet, S., Vizioli, L., He, L., Zhou, X., & Caldara, R. (2013). Mapping face recognition information use across cultures. Frontiers in Psychology,4, 1–12.

  43. Moore, P. J., & Scevak, J. J. (1997). Learning from texts and visual aids: A developmental perspective. Journal of Research in Reading,20(3), 205–223.

  44. National Reading Panel, US National Institute of Child Health, & Human Development. (2000). Teaching children to read: An evidence-based assessment of the scientific research literature on reading and its implications for reading instruction. National Institute of Child Health and Development. Retrieved January 30, 2018 from

  45. Navarro, O., Molina, A. I., Lacruz, M., & Ortega, M. (2015). Evaluation of multimedia educational materials using eye tracking. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences,197, 2236–2243.

  46. Neuman, S. B. (2009). The case for multi-media presentation in learning: A theory of synergy. In A. G. Bus & S. B. Neuman (Eds.), Multimedia and literacy development: Improving achievement for young learners (pp. 44–56). New York: Taylor & Francis.

  47. Nitzan-Tamar, O., Kramarski, B., & Vakil, E. (2016). Eye movement patterns characteristic of cognitive style. Experimental Psychology,63, 159–168.

  48. Olson, R. K., Kliegl, R., Davidson, B. J., & Foltz, G. (1985). Individual and developmental differences in reading disability. In G. MacKinnon & T. Waller (Eds.), Reading research: Advances in theory and practice (Vol. 4, pp. 1–64). London: Academic Press.

  49. Ozcelik, E., Karakus, T., Kursun, E., & Cagiltay, K. (2009). An eye tracking study of how color coding affects multimedia learning. Computer and Education,53(2), 445–453.

  50. Paris, S. G., & Winograd, P. (1990). Promoting metacognition and motivation of exceptional children. Remedial and Special Education,11(6), 7–15.

  51. Pearman, C. J. (2008). Independent reading of CD-ROM storybooks: Measuring comprehension with oral retellings. The Reading Teacher,61(8), 594–602.

  52. Peng, P., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Elleman, A. M., Kearns, D. M., Gilbert, J. K., et al. (2018). A longitudinal analysis of the trajectories and predictors of word reading and reading comprehension development among at-risk readers. Journal of Learning Disabilities,52(3), 195–208.

  53. Raven, J. C. (1964). Colored progressive matrices set A, AB, B. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.

  54. Rayner, K. (1998). Eye movements in reading and information processing: 20 years of research. Psychological Bulletin,124, 372–422.

  55. Rayner, K., Chace, K. H., Slattery, T. J., & Ashby, J. (2006). Eye movements as reflections of comprehension processes in reading. Scientific Studies of Reading,10(3), 241–255.

  56. Roy-Charland, A., Perron, M., Boulard, J., Chamberland, J., & Hoffman, N. (2015). “If I point, do they look?”: The impact of attention–orientation strategies on text exploration during shared book reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,28, 1285–1305.

  57. Roy-Charland, A., Saint-Aubin, J., & Evans, M. A. (2007). Eye movements in shared book reading with children from kindergarten to Grade 4. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal,20(9), 909–931.

  58. Sahin, A. (2013). The effect of text types on reading comprehension. Mevlana International Journal of Education,3(2), 57–67.

  59. Scarborough, H. S. (1998). Predicting the future achievement of second graders with reading disabilities: Contributions of phonemic awareness, verbal memory, rapid naming, and IQ. Annals of Dyslexia,48(1), 115–136.

  60. Schmidt-Weigand, F., Kohnert, A., & Glowalla, U. (2010). A closer look at split visual attention in system-and self-paced instruction in multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction,20(2), 100–110.

  61. Schnotz, W., Ludewig, U., Ullrich, M., Horz, H., McElvany, N., & Baumert, J. (2014). Strategy shifts during learning from texts and pictures. Journal of Educational Psychology,106, 974–989.

  62. Schroeder, S., Richter, T., McElvany, N., Hachfeld, A., Baumert, J., Schnotz, W., et al. (2011). Teachers’ beliefs, instructional behaviors, and students’ engagement in learning from texts with instructional pictures. Learning and Instruction,21, 403–415.

  63. Shamir, A., & Korat, O. (2006). How to select CD-ROM storybooks for young children: The teacher’s role. The Reading Teacher,59, 532–543.

  64. Shamir, A., & Korat, O. (2007). Developing an educational e-book for fostering kindergarten children’s emergent literacy. Computers in the Schools,24(1–2), 125–143.

  65. Shamir, A., & Korat, O. (2013). Introduction: Technology as a support for literacy achievements for children at risk. In A. Shamir & O. Korat (Eds.), Technology as a support for literacy achievements for children at risk (pp. 1–8). Dordrecht: Springer.

  66. Shamir, A., & Korat, O. (2015). Educational electronic books for supporting emergent literacy of kindergarteners at-risk for reading difficulties—What do we know so far? Computers in the Schools,32(2), 105–121.

  67. Shamir, A., Korat, O., & Barbi, N. (2008). The effects of CD-ROM storybook reading on low SES kindergarteners’ emergent literacy as a function of learning context. Computers & Education,51, 354–367.

  68. Shamir, A., & Maor, R. (2019). E-Books for promoting vocabulary among students with intellectual disability as opposed to children with learning disability: Can repeated reading make a difference? Journal of Cognitive Education and Psychology,17(2), 164–177.

  69. Shamir, A., & Margalit, M. (2011). Special issue: Technology and students with special educational needs: New opportunities and future directions. European Journal of Special Needs Education,26, 279–282.

  70. Shamir, A., Segal-Drori, O., & Goren, I. (2018). Educational electronic book activity supports language retention among children at risk for learning disabilities. Education and Information Technologies,3, 1–22.

  71. Shani, M., Lachman, D., Shalem, T., Bahet, A., & Zieger, T. (2003). Ma’akav: Mapping of reading and writing according to national norms: Manual for the teacher in elementary school [Hebrew]. Holon: Yesod.

  72. Snow, C. E., & Matthews, T. J. (2016). Reading and language in the early grades. The Future of Children,26(2), 57–74.

  73. Solan, H. A. (1985). Deficient eye-movement patterns in achieving high school students three case histories. Journal of Learning Disabilities,18(2), 66–70.

  74. Takacs, Z. K., & Bus, A. G. (2016). Benefits of motion in animated storybooks for children’s visual attention and story comprehension. An eye-tracking study. Frontiers in Psychology,7, 1591.

  75. Vellutino, F. R., Fletcher, J. M., Snowling, M. J., & Scanlon, D. M. (2004). Specific reading disability (dyslexia): What have we learned in the past four decades? Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry,45(1), 2–40.

  76. Vila, J., & Gomez, Y. (2016). Extracting business information from graphs: An eye tracking experiment. Journal of Business Research,69, 1741–1746.

  77. Zawoyski, A. M., Ardoin, S. P., & Binder, K. S. (2015). Using eye tracking to observe differential effects of repeated readings for second-grade students as a function of achievement level. Reading Research Quarterly,50(2), 171–184.

Download references

Author information

Correspondence to Adina Shamir.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and Permissions

About this article

Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Bar-Zvi Shaked, K., Shamir, A. & Vakil, E. An eye tracking study of digital text reading: a comparison between poor and typical readers. Read Writ (2020).

Download citation


  • Electronic book
  • Eye movement
  • Highlighted text
  • Poor readers
  • Primary school children