Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 32, Issue 9, pp 2179–2200 | Cite as

Using the MULTILIT literacy instruction program with children who have Down syndrome

  • Lisa Lim
  • Joanne ArciuliEmail author
  • Natalie Munro
  • Linda Cupples
Article

Abstract

We evaluated the MULTILIT—“Making Up Lost Time in Literacy”—instruction program for individuals with Down syndrome. The 12-week program was administered on a 1:1 basis to participants who were assessed at three timepoints: Baseline, pre-instruction, and post-instruction. Participants were allocated non-randomly to two groups that had comparable abilities prior to intervention. These groups differed in the duration of the control period between baseline and pre-instruction: 12 weeks for Group 1 (n = 8, mean age = 168.88 months) and 24 weeks for Group 2 (n = 7, mean age = 164.71 months). Improvements in literacy skills were evaluated within participants (each participant serving as her/his own control), and the influence of control periods was evaluated between participants. Phonological awareness, word reading accuracy, and word spelling accuracy all improved significantly from pre- to post-instruction, with large effect sizes; whereas no statistically significant changes were observed during the control period (between baseline and pre-instruction assessments) regardless of the duration of this control period.

Keywords

Literacy Instruction Reading Spelling Phonological awareness Intellectual disability 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Lisa Lim was supported by an Australian Government APA Award. Joanne Arciuli was partly supported by a mid career research Future Fellowship granted by the Australian Research Council. Lisa Lim completed this research as a Ph.D. student under primary supervision of Joanne Arciuli. We would like to thank all the children and their families who participated in this research.

References

  1. Baylis, P., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). Evaluation of a phonological reading programme for children with Down syndrome. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 28, 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Buckingham, J., Beaman, R., & Wheldall, K. (2012). A randomised control trial of a MULTILIT small group intervention for older low progress readers. Effective Education, 4, 1–26.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Burgoyne, K., Duff, F. J., Clarke, P. J., Buckley, S., Snowling, M. J., & Hulme, C. (2012). Efficacy of a reading and language intervention for children with Down syndrome: A randomized controlled trial. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 1044–1053.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Burgoyne, K., Duff, F. J., Snowling, M. J., Buckley, S., & Hulme, C. (2013). Training phoneme blending skills in children with Down syndrome. Child Language Teaching and Therapy, 29, 273–290.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Cardoso-Martins, C., Peterson, R. L., Olson, R. K., & Pennington, B. F. (2009). Component reading skills in Down syndrome. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 277–292.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cologon, K., Cupples, L., & Wyver, S. (2011). Effects of targeted reading instruction on phonological awareness and phonic decoding in children with Down syndrome. American Journal on Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 116, 111–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Cossu, G., Rossini, F., & Marshall, J. C. (1993). When reading is acquired but phonemic awareness is not: A study of literacy in Down syndrome. Cognition, 46, 129–138.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Cupples, L., & Iacono, T. (2000). Phonological awareness and oral reading skill in children with Down syndrome. Journal of Speech, Language and Hearing Research, 43, 595–608.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Cupples, L., & Iacono, T. (2002). The efficacy of ‘whole word’ versus ‘analytic’ reading instruction for children with Down syndrome. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 15, 549–574.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Goetz, K., Hulme, H., Brigstocke, S., Carroll, M. J., Nasir, L., & Snowling, M. (2008). Training reading and phoneme awareness skills in children with Down syndrome. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 21, 395–412.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Hulme, C., Goetz, K., Brigstocke, S., Nash, H. M., Lervåg, A., & Snowling, M. J. (2012). The growth of reading skills in children with Down syndrome. Developmental Science, 15, 320–329.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Lanfranchi, S., Baddeley, A., Gathercole, S., & Vianello, R. (2012). Working memory in Down syndrome: Is there a dual task deficit? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 56, 157–166.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Laws, G. (1998). The use of nonword repetition as a test of phonological memory in children with Down syndrome. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 39, 1119–1130.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Lemons, C. J., & Fuchs, D. (2010a). Phonological awareness of children with Down syndrome: Its role in learning to read and the effectiveness of related interventions. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 31, 316–330.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Lemons, C. J., & Fuchs, D. (2010b). Modelling response to reading intervention in children with Down syndrome: An examination of predictors of differential growth. Reading Research Quarterly, 45, 134–168.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Lemons, C. J., Mrachko, A. A., Kostewicz, D. E., & Paterra, M. F. (2012). Effectiveness of decoding and phonological awareness interventions for children with Down syndrome. Exceptional Children, 79, 67–90.Google Scholar
  18. Lim, L., Arciuli, J., Rickard Liow, S., & Munro, N. (2014). Predictors of spelling ability in children with Down syndrome. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 173–191.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Melby-Lervåg, M., Lyster, S.-A. H., & Hulme, C. (2012). Phonological skills and their role in learning to read: A meta-analytic review. Psychological Bulletin, 138, 322–352.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. Mengoni, S. E., Nash, H. M., & Hulme, C. (2014). Learning to read new words in individuals with Down syndrome: Testing the role of phonological knowledge. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 35, 1098–1109.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. MULTILIT. (2007a). The MULTILIT Reading Tutor Program (revised). Sydney, Australia: MULTILIT Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  22. MULTILIT. (2007b). The MULTILIT Word Attack Skills (revised): Manual. Sydney, Australia: MULTILIT Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  23. MULTILIT. (2007c). The MULTILIT Sight Words (revised): Manual. Sydney, Australia: MULTILIT Pty Ltd.Google Scholar
  24. Naess, K. A. (2016). Development of phonological awareness in Down syndrome: A meta-analysis and empirical study. Developmental Psychology, 52, 177–190.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. National Institute of Child Health & Human Development. (2000). Report of the national reading panel: Teaching children to read. Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, National Institutes of Health.Google Scholar
  26. Oakhill, J. V., & Cain, K. (2012). The precursors of reading ability in young readers: Evidence from a four-year longitudinal study. Scientific Studies of Reading, 16, 91–121.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. O’Hare, M., & Doell, E. (2015). What supports speech-language pathologists to implement treatments with fidelity? Journal of Clinical Practice in Speech-Language Pathology, 17, 140–143.Google Scholar
  28. Raven, J. C., Court, J. H., & Raven, J. (1995). Coloured progressive matrices. Oxford: Oxford Psychologists Press.Google Scholar
  29. Rickard Liow, S. J., & Tng, S. K. (2003). Biscriptal literacy development of Chinese children in Singapore. In C. McBride-Chang & H. C. Chen (Eds.), Reading development in chinese children (pp. 215–228). Westport, CT: Praeger.Google Scholar
  30. Roch, M., & Jarrold, C. (2012). A follow up study on word and non-word reading skills in Down syndrome. Research in Developmental Disabilities, 45, 121–128.Google Scholar
  31. Semel, E., Wiig, E. H., & Secord, W. A. (2003). Clinical evaluation of language fundamentals (CELF-4) (Fourth ed.). Toronto: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  32. Share, D. L. (1995). Phonological recoding and self-teaching: sine qua non of reading. Cognition, 55, 151–218.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Share, D. L. (1999). Phonological recoding and orthographic learning: A direct test of he self-teaching hypothesis. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 72, 95–129.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Snowling, M. J., Stothard, S. E., Clarke, P., Bowyer-Crane, C., Harrington, A., Truelove, E., et al. (2009). York assessment of reading for comprehension. Great Britain: GL Publishers.Google Scholar
  35. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1994). Development of reading-related phonological processing abilities: New evidence of bidirectional causality from a latent variable longitudinal study. Developmental Psychology, 30, 73–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Wheldall, K., & Beaman, R. (2000). An evaluation of MULTILIT: Making Up Lost Time in Literacy. Canberra: Department of Education, Training and Youth Affairs.Google Scholar
  37. Wheldall, K., Beaman, R., & Langstaff, E. (2010). ’Mind the gap’: Effective literacy instruction for indigenous low-progress readers. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 34, 1–16.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Wheldall, K., & Madelaine, A. (2006). The development of a passage reading test for the frequent monitoring of performance of low-progress readers. Australasian Journal of Special Education, 30, 72–85.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Wilkinson, G. S., & Robertson, G. J. (2006). Wide range achievement test (4th ed.). Lutz, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  40. Yoder, P. J., Woynaroski, T., Fey, M., & Warren, S. (2014). Effects of dose frequency of early communication intervention in young children with and without Down syndrome. American Journal of Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities, 119, 17–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Faculty of Health SciencesThe University of SydneySydneyAustralia
  2. 2.Department of LinguisticsMacquarie UniversitySydneyAustralia

Personalised recommendations