Advertisement

Multiple dimensions of adolescents’ reading attitudes and their relationship with reading comprehension

  • Bong Gee Jang
  • Ji Hoon Ryoo
Article
  • 15 Downloads

Abstract

Despite a growing research base that explores motivational constructs in reading and their relationship to achievement, nuanced questions remain. The present study examines the complex relationships among attitudes, proficiency, grade, and gender. Attitudes were differentiated by purpose (recreational vs. academic) and medium (digital vs. print), and a survey comprising those four subscales was administered to 586 Korean adolescents. Results showed that attitudes toward Recreational Print, Academic Print, and Academic Digital reading are positively associated while attitudes toward Recreational Digital reading are negatively associated with the other three attitudes. We also found that reading attitudes significantly predicted reading comprehension scores. We discuss these results and suggest implications for adolescent literacy instruction.

Keywords

Reading attitudes Adolescent literacy Digital literacy Reading comprehension 

References

  1. Afflerbach, P. P., & Cho, B. Y. (2011). The classroom assessment of reading. In M. L. Kamil, P. D. Pearson, E. B. Moje, & P. P. Afflerbach (Eds.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 4, pp. 487–514). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  2. Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (2005). The influence of attitudes on behavior. In D. Albarracín, B. T. Johnson, & M. P. Zanna (Eds.), The handbook of attitudes (pp. 173–221). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  3. Anderson, R. C., & Pearson, P. D. (1984). A schema-theoretic view of basic processes in reading comprehension. In P. D. Pearson (Ed.), Handbook of reading research (Vol. 1, pp. 255–291). New York, NY: Longman.Google Scholar
  4. Asparouhov, T., & Muthén, B. (2009). Exploratory structural equation modeling. Structural Equation Modeling, 16, 397–438.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Becker, M., McElvany, N., & Kortenbruck, M. (2010). Intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation as predictors of reading literacy: A longitudinal study. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 773–785.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Bentler, P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychological Bulletin, 107(2), 238–246.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural equations with latent variables. New York, NY: Wiley.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Brislin, R. W. (1970). Back-translation for cross-cultural research. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 1, 185–216.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Browne, M. W., & Cudeck, R. (1993). Alternative ways of assessing model fit. In K. A. Bollen & J. S. Long (Eds.), Testing structural equation models (pp. 136–162). Beverly Hills: Sage.Google Scholar
  10. Bruce, B. (1997). Literacy technologies: What stance should we take? Journal of Literacy Research, 29, 289–309.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Byrne, B. M. (2012). Structural equation modeling with Mplus: Basic concepts, applications, and programming. New York, NY: Taylor and Francis Group.Google Scholar
  12. Chiu, M. M., Chow, B. W. Y., & Joh, S. W. (2017). Streaming, tracking and reading achievement: A multilevel analysis of students in 40 countries. Journal of Educational Psychology, 109(7), 915–934.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Coiro, J. (2012). Understanding dispositions toward reading on the Internet. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 55(7), 645–648.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Coiro, J., Knobel, M., Lankshear, C., & Leu, D. J. (2008). Central issues in new literacies and new literacies research. In J. Coiro, M. Knobel, C. Lankshear, & D. J. Leu (Eds.), The handbook of research in new literacies (pp. 1–22). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  15. Conlon, E. G., Zimmer-Gembeck, M. J., Creed, P. A., & Tucker, M. (2006). Family history, self-perceptions, attitudes and cognitive abilities are associated with early adolescent reading skills. Journal of Research in Reading, 29, 11–32.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., Bryant, C., Craft, A., & McKenna, M. C. (2013). Measuring adolescents’ attitudes toward reading: A classroom survey. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 56(7), 565–576.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Conradi, K., Jang, B. G., & McKenna, M. C. (2014). Motivation terminology in reading research: A conceptual review. Educational Psychology Review, 26, 127–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Dong, T., Anderson, R. C., Kim, I.-H., & Li, Y. (2008). Collaborative reasoning in China and Korea. Reading Research Quarterly, 43, 400–424.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. Dressman, M., Wilder, P., & Connor, J. J. (2005). Theories of failure and the failure of theories: A cognitive/sociocultural/macrostructural study of eight struggling students. Research in the Teaching of English, 40(1), 8–61.Google Scholar
  20. Graham, S., Berninger, V., & Fan, W. (2007). The structural relationship between writing attitude and writing achievement in first and third grade students. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 32, 516–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Guthrie, J. T., Wigfield, A., & You, W. (2012). Instructional contexts for engagement and achievement in reading. In S. Christensen, A. Reschly, & C. Wylie (Eds.), Handbook of research on student engagement (pp. 601–634). New York, NY: Springer.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hedges, L. V., & Hedberg, E. C. (2007). Intraclass correlation values for planning group-randomized trials in education. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 29(1), 60–87.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural Equation Modeling, 6, 1–55.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Huang, Y. M., Liang, T. H., & Chiu, C. H. (2013). Gender differences in the reading of E-books: Investigating children’s attitudes, reading behaviors and outcomes. Journal of Educational Technology & Society, 16(4), 97–110.Google Scholar
  25. IBM Corp. (2016). IBM SPSS statistics for Windows (Version 24.0). Armonk, NY: IBM Corp.Google Scholar
  26. Ivey, G. (1999). A multicase study in the middle school: Complexities among young adolescent readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 34, 172–192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Ivey, G., & Broaddus, K. (2001). Just plain reading: A survey of what makes students want to read in middle school classrooms. Reading Research Quarterly, 36, 350–377.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Katzir, T., Lesaux, N. K., & Kim, Y. (2009). The role of reading self-concept and home literacy practices in fourth grade reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 261–276.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Kim, K. J. (2011). Reading motivation in two languages: an examination of EFL college students in Korea. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 24(8), 861–881.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Klauda, S. L., & Guthrie, J. T. (2015). Comparing relations of motivation, engagement, and achievement among struggling and advanced adolescent readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(2), 239–269.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Kline, R. B. (2011). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  32. Kush, J. C., Watkins, M. W., & Brookhart, S. M. (2005). The temporal-interactive influence of reading achievement and reading attitude, educational research and evaluation. Educational Research and Evaluation, 11(1), 29–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Lankshear, C., & Knobel, M. (2011). New literacies: Everyday practices and social learning (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Open University Press.Google Scholar
  34. Lee, S. Y. (2007). Korean adolescent engaged readers: Their self-perceptions, literacy practices, and negotiations inside and outside of a seventh grade classroom (doctoral dissertation). Available from ProQuest dissertations and theses database. (UMI No. 3301722).Google Scholar
  35. Lee, Y.-H., & Wu, J.-Y. (2012). The effect of individual differences in the inner and outer states of ICT on engagement in online reading activities and PISA 2009 reading literacy: Exploring the relationship between the old and new reading literacy. Learning and Individual Differences, 22, 336–342.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Lei, P. W., & Wu, Q. (2007). Introduction to structural equation modeling: Issues and practical considerations. Educational Measurement: Issues and Practice, 26(3), 33–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Leu, D. J., Forzani, E., Rhoads, C., Maykel, C., Kennedy, C., & Timbrell, N. (2015). The new literacies of online research and comprehension: Rethinking the reading achievement gap. Reading Research Quarterly, 50(1), 37–59.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., & Cammack, D. (2004). Toward a theory of new literacies emerging from the Internet and other information and communication technologies. In R. B. Ruddell & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (5th ed., pp. 1568–1611). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  39. Leu, D. J., Kinzer, C. K., Coiro, J., Castek, J., & Henry, L. A. (2013). New literacies: A dual-level theory of the changing nature of literacy instruction and assessment. In D. E. Alvermann, R. B. Ruddell, & N. Unrau (Eds.), Theoretical models and processes of reading (6th ed., pp. 1150–1181). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Li, J., Snow, C., Jiang, J., & Edwards, N. (2015). Technology use and self-perceptions of English language skills among urban adolescents. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 28(5), 450–478.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Lim, H. J., Bong, M., & Woo, Y. K. (2015). Reading attitude as a mediator between contextual factors and reading behavior. Teachers College Record, 117(1), 1–36.Google Scholar
  42. Lin, D., Wong, K. K., & McBride-Chang, C. (2012). Reading motivation and reading comprehension in Chinese and English among bilingual students. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25(3), 717–737.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Logan, S., & Johnston, R. (2009). Sex differences in reading ability and attitudes: Examining where these differences lie. Journal of Research in Reading, 32(2), 199–214.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lupo, S., Jang, B. G., & McKenna, M. (2017). The relationship between reading achievement and attitudes toward print and digital texts in adolescent readers. Literacy Research: Theory, Method, and Practice, 66(1), 264–278.Google Scholar
  45. Marsh, H. W., Liem, G. A. D., Martin, A. J., Morin, A. J., & Nagengast, B. (2011). Methodological measurement fruitfulness of exploratory structural equation modeling (ESEM): New approaches to key substantive issues in motivation and engagement. Journal of Psychoeducational Assessment, 29, 322–346.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Martinez, R. S., Aricak, O. T., & Jewell, J. (2008). Influence of reading attitude on reading achievement: A test of the temporal-interaction model. Psychology in the Schools, 45, 1010–1023.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. McGeown, S. P., Duncan, L. G., Griffiths, Y. M., & Stothard, S. E. (2015). Exploring the relationship between adolescent’s reading skills, reading motivation and reading habits. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28(4), 545–569.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. McGeown, S., Goodwin, H., Henderson, N., & Wright, P. (2012). Gender differences in reading motivation: does sex or gender identity provide a better account? Journal of Research in Reading, 35(3), 328–336.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. McKenna, M. C. (1994). Toward a model of reading attitude acquisition. In E. H. Cramer & M. Castle (Eds.), Fostering the love of reading: The affective domain in reading education (pp. 18–40). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.Google Scholar
  50. McKenna, M. C. (2001). Development of reading attitudes. In L. Verhoeven & C. Snow (Eds.), Literacy and motivation: Reading engagement in individuals and groups (pp. 135–158). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.Google Scholar
  51. McKenna, M. C., Conradi, K., Lawrence, C., Jang, B. G., & Meyer, J. P. (2012). Reading attitudes of middle school students: Results of a U.S. survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 47, 283–306.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. McKenna, M. C., Kear, D. J., & Ellsworth, R. A. (1995). Children’s attitudes toward reading: A national survey. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 934–956.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Meelissen, M. R. M., & Drent, M. (2008). Gender differences in computer attitudes: Does the school matter? Computers in Human Behavior, 24(3), 969–985.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Moje, E. B., Overby, M., Tysvaer, N., & Morris, K. (2008). The complex world of adolescent literacy: Myths, motivations, and mysteries. Harvard Educational Review, 78(1), 107–154.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  55. Muthén, L. K., & Muthén, B. O. (2015). Mplus user’s guide (7th ed.). Los Angeles, CA: Muthén & Muthén.Google Scholar
  56. National Center for Education Statistics. (2016). The nation’s report card: Reading 2015. Washington, DC: Institute of Education Sciences, U.S. Department of Education. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.nationsreportcard.gov/reading_math_2015/files/infographic_2015_reading.pdf.
  57. Noh, M. (2011). Literacy education and research. Seoul: Bakijung.Google Scholar
  58. Nolen, S. B. (2007). Young children’s motivation to read and write: Development in social contexts. Cognition & Instruction, 25, 219–270.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. O’Brien, D. G. (2012). “Struggling” adolescents’ engagement in multimediating: Countering the institutional construction of incompetence. In D. E. Alvermann & K. A. Hinchman (Eds.), Reconceptualizing the literacies in adolescents’ lives (3rd ed., pp. 71–91). New York, NY: Routledge.Google Scholar
  60. O’Brien, D. G., Beach, R., & Scharber, C. (2007). “Struggling” middle schoolers: Engagement and literate competence in a reading-writing intervention class. Reading Psychology, 28(1), 51–73.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. O’Brien, D. G., Stewart, R., & Beach, R. (2009). Proficient reading in school: Traditional paradigms and new textual landscapes. In L. Christenbury, R. Bomer, & P. Smagorinsky (Eds.), Handbook of adolescent literacy research (pp. 80–97). New York, NY: Guilford Press.Google Scholar
  62. O’Byrne, W. I., & McVerry, J. G. (2009). Measuring the dispositions of online reading comprehension: A preliminary validation study. National Reading Conference Yearbook, 58, 362–375.Google Scholar
  63. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2010). PISA 2009 results: Executive summary. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from http://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/46619703.pdf.
  64. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2016). PISA 2015 results in focus: OECD.org. Paris: OECD Publishing. Retrieved June 15, 2017, from https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisa-2015-results-in-focus.pdf.
  65. Petscher, Y. (2010). A meta-analysis of the relationship between student attitudes towards reading and achievement in reading. Journal of Research in Reading, 33, 335–355.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Protacio, M. S. (2012). Reading motivation: A focus on English learners. The Reading Teacher, 66(1), 69–77.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Putman, M. (2014). Exploring dispositions toward online reading: Analyzing the survey of online reading attitudes and behaviors. Reading Psychology, 35(1), 1–31.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. Schaffner, E., Schiefele, U., & Ulferts, H. (2013). Reading amount as a mediator of the effects of intrinsic and extrinsic reading motivation on reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48(4), 369–385.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Sharma, S., Durand, R. M., & Gur-Arie, O. (1981). Identification and analysis of moderator variables. Journal of Marketing Research, 18, 291–300.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (2007). Using multivariate statistics (5th ed.). Boston, MA: Allyn & Bacon.Google Scholar
  71. Taboada, A., Tonks, S. M., Wigfield, A., & Guthrie, J. T. (2009). Effects of motivational and cognitive variables on reading comprehension. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 22, 85–106.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Troia, G. A., Harbaugh, A. G., Shankland, R. K., Wolbers, K. A., & Lawrence, A. M. (2013). Relationships between writing motivation, writing activity, and writing performance: Effects of grade, sex, and ability. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 17–44.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Tsai, M. J., & Tsai, C. C. (2010). Junior high school students’ Internet usage and self-efficacy: A re-examination of the gender gap. Computers & Education, 54(4), 1182–1192.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Unrau, N., & Schlackman, J. (2006). Motivation and its relationship with reading achievement in an urban middle school. Journal of Educational Research, 100(2), 81–101.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  75. Wang, J. H. Y., & Guthrie, J. T. (2004). Modeling the effects of intrinsic motivation, extrinsic motivation, amount of reading, and past reading achievement on text comprehension between U.S. and Chinese students. Reading Research Quarterly, 39, 162–184.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  76. Wolters, C. A., Denton, C. A., York, M. J., & Francis, D. J. (2014). Adolescents’ motivation for reading: Group differences and relation to standardized achievement. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27(3), 503–533.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  77. Yoon, B. (2009). Education fever and exam hell: The current educational systems and issues in South Korea. In S. B. Mertens, V. A. Anfara, & K. Roney (Eds.), Handbook of research in middle level education: An international look at educating young adolescents (pp. 115–134). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.Google Scholar
  78. Yoon, J. (2008). The development of the Noh reading inventory. Paper presented at the annual meeting of Korean Literacy Research Association, Seoul, Korea.Google Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Reading and Language ArtsSyracuse UniversitySyracuseUSA
  2. 2.Keck School of MedicineUniversity of Southern CaliforniaLos AngelesUSA

Personalised recommendations