Executive function: association with multiple reading skills

  • Paul T. CirinoEmail author
  • Jeremy Miciak
  • Yusra Ahmed
  • Marcia A. Barnes
  • W. Pat Taylor
  • Elyssa H. Gerst


Executive function (EF) is related to reading. However, there is a lack of clarity around (a) the relative contribution of different components of EF to different reading components (word reading, fluency, comprehension), and (b) how EF operates in the context of known strong language predictors (e.g., components of the simple view of reading or SVR), and other skills theoretically related to reading (e.g., vocabulary, processing speed) and/or to EF (e.g., short-term memory, motor function). In a large sample of 3rd to 5th graders oversampled for struggling readers, this paper evaluates the impact of EF derived from a bifactor model (Cirino, Ahmed, Miciak, Taylor, Gerst, & Barnes, 2018) in the context of well-known covariates and demographics. Beyond common EF, five specific factors (two related to working memory, and factors of fluency, self-regulated learning, and behavioral inattention/metacognition) were addressed. EF consistently showed a unique contribution to already-strong predictive models for all reading outcomes; for reading comprehension, EF interacted with SVR indices (word reading and listening comprehension). The findings extend and refine our understanding of the contribution of EF to reading skill.


Executive function Word reading Reading comprehension Language Simple view of reading 



This research was supported by Award Number P50 HD052117, Texas Center for Learning Disabilities, from the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development to the University of Houston. The content is the sole responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the Eunice Kennedy Shriver National Institute of Child Health and Human Development or the National Institutes of Health.

Supplementary material

11145_2018_9923_MOESM1_ESM.docx (47 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 48 kb)


  1. Aboud, K. S., Bailey, S. K., Petrill, S. A., & Cutting, L. E. (2016). Comprehending text versus reading words in young readers with varying reading ability: Distinct patterns of functional connectivity from common processing hubs. Developmental Science, 19, 632–656.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Ahmed, Y., Francis, D. J., York, M., Fletcher, J. M., Barnes, M., & Kulesz, P. (2016). Validation of the direct and inferential mediation (DIME) model of reading comprehension in grades 7 through 12. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 44, 68–82.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Altemeier, L. E., Abbott, R. D., & Berninger, V. W. (2008). Executive functions for reading and writing in typical literacy development and dyslexia. Journal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 30, 588–606. Scholar
  4. Anderson, V. A., Anderson, P., Northam, E., Jacobs, R., & Catroppa, C. (2001). Development of executive functions through late childhood and adolescence in an Australian sample. Developmental Neuropsychology, 20, 385–406. Scholar
  5. Arrington, C. N., Kulesz, P. A., Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. A. (2014). The contribution of attentional control and working memory to reading comprehension and decoding. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 325–346. Scholar
  6. Barnes, M. A., Stuebing, K. K., Fletcher, J. M., Barth, A. E., & Francis, D. J. (2016). Cognitive difficulties in struggling comprehenders and their relation to reading comprehension: A comparison of group selection and regression-based models. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 9, 153–172.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Bental, B., & Tirosh, E. (2007). The relationship between attention, executive functions and reading domain abilities in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder and reading disorder: A comparative study. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 48, 455–463. Scholar
  8. Best, J. R., Miller, P. H., & Jones, L. L. (2009). Executive functions after age 5: Changes and correlates. Developmental Review, 29, 180–200. Scholar
  9. Boekaerts, M. (1997). Self-regulated learning: A new concept embraced by researchers, policy makers, educators, teachers, and students. Learning and Instruction, 7, 161–186. Scholar
  10. Burgess, P. W. (1997). Theory and methodology in executive function research. In P. Rabbitt (Ed.), Methodology of frontal and executive function (pp. 81–116). East Sussex: Psychology Press.Google Scholar
  11. Butterfuss, R., & Kendeou, P. (2017). The role of executive functions in reading comprehension. Educational Psychology Review. Scholar
  12. Cain, K., Oakhill, J., & Bryant, P. (2004). Children’s reading comprehension ability: Concurrent prediction by working memory, verbal ability, and component skills. Journal of Educational Psychology, 96, 31–42. Scholar
  13. Christopher, M. E., Miyake, A., Keenan, J. M., Pennington, B., DeFries, J. C., Wadsworth, S. J., et al. (2012). Predicting word reading and comprehension with executive function and speed measures across development: a latent variable analysis. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141, 470–488. Scholar
  14. Cirino, P. T. (2012). Student contextual learning scales. Houston, TX: Author.Google Scholar
  15. Cirino, P. T., Ahmed, Y., Miciak, J., Taylor, W. P., Gerst, E. H., & Barnes, M. A. (2018). A framework for executive function in the late elementary years. Neuropsychology, 32(2), 176–189.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J. M., Ewing-Cobbs, L., Barnes, M. A., & Fuchs, L. S. (2007). Cognitive arithmetic differences in learning difficulty groups and the role of behavioral inattention. Learning Disabilities Research & Practice, 22, 25–35. Scholar
  17. Cirino, P. T., Miciak, J., Gerst, E., Barnes, M. A., Child, A., & Huston-Warren, E. (2017). Executive function, self-regulated learning, and reading comprehension: Training studies. The Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 450–467. Scholar
  18. Cirino, P. T., Romain, M. A., Barth, A. E., Tolar, T. D., Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2013). Reading skill components and impairments in middle school struggling readers. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 26, 1059–1086. Scholar
  19. Claessens, A., & Dowsett, C. (2014). Growth and change in attention problems, disruptive behavior, and achievement from kindergarten to fifth grade. Psychological Science, 25, 2241–2251. Scholar
  20. Compton, D. L., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Elleman, A. M., & Gilbert, J. K. (2008). Tracking children who fly below the radar: Latent transition modeling of students with late-emerging reading disability. Learning and Individual Differences, 18, 329–337. Scholar
  21. Connor, C. M., Day, S. L., Phillips, B., Sparapani, N., Ingebrand, S. W., McLean, L., et al. (2016). Reciprocal effects of self-regulation, semantic knowledge, and reading comprehension in early elementary school. Child Development, 87, 1813–1824. Scholar
  22. Corsi, P. (1972). Memory and the medial temporal region of the brain. Unpublished doctoral dissertation), McGill University, Montreal, QB.Google Scholar
  23. Cowan, R., & Powell, D. (2014). The contributions of domain-general and numerical factors to third-grade arithmetic skills and mathematical learning disability. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 214–229. Scholar
  24. Cutting, L. E., Bailey, S. K., Barquero, L. A., & Aboud, K. (2015). Neurobiological bases of word recognition and reading comprehension: Distinctions, overlaps, and implications for instruction and intervention. In C. M. Connor & P. McCardle (Eds.), Advances in reading intervention: Research to practice to research (pp. 73–84). Baltimore, MD: Brookes Publishing.Google Scholar
  25. Cutting, L. E., Materek, A., Cole, C. A., Levine, T. M., & Mahone, E. M. (2009). Effects of fluency, oral language, and executive function on reading comprehension performance. Annals of Dyslexia, 59, 34–54. Scholar
  26. Cutting, L. E., & Scarborough, H. S. (2006). Prediction of reading comprehension: Relative contributions of word recognition, language proficiency, and other cognitive skills can depend on how comprehension is measured. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 277–299. Scholar
  27. Daneman, M., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). Individual differences in working memory and reading. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 19, 450–466. Scholar
  28. De Franchis, V., Usai, M. C., Viterbori, P., & Traverso, L. (2017). Preschool executive functioning and literacy achievement in Grades 1 and 3 of primary school: A longitudinal study. Learning and Individual Differences, 54, 184–195. Scholar
  29. Delis, D., Kaplan, E., & Kramer, J. (2001). Delis–Kaplan executive function scale. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  30. Follmer, D. J. (2017). Executive function and reading comprehension: A meta-analytic review. Educational Psychologist, 53, 42–60. Scholar
  31. Foorman, B. R., Herrera, S., Petscher, Y., Mitchell, A., & Truckenmiller, A. (2015). The structure of oral language and reading and their relation to comprehension in Kindergarten through Grade 2. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 655–681. Scholar
  32. Francis, D. J., Fletcher, J. M., Stuebing, K. K., Lyon, G. R., Shaywitz, B. A., & Shaywitz, S. E. (2005). Psychometric approaches to the identification of LD: IQ and achievement scores are not sufficient. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 38, 98–108. Scholar
  33. Fuchs, L., Geary, D., Compton, D., Fuchs, D., Hamlett, C., & Bryant, J. (2010). The contributions of numerosity and domain-general abilities to school readiness. Child Development, 81, 1520–1533. Scholar
  34. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D., Hamlett, C., & Wang, A. (2015). Is word-problem solving a form of text comprehension? Scientific Studies of Reading, 19(3), 204–223. Scholar
  35. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Compton, D. L., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Capizzi, A. M., et al. (2006). The cognitive correlates of third-grade skill in arithmetic, algorithmic computation, and arithmetic word problems. Journal of Educational Psychology, 98, 29–43. Scholar
  36. Fuchs, L. S., Fuchs, D., Powell, S. R., Seethaler, P. M., Cirino, P. T., & Fletcher, J. M. (2008). Intensive intervention for students with mathematics disabilities: Seven principles of effective practice. Learning Disabilities Quarterly, 31, 79–92. Scholar
  37. Fuchs, L. S., Schumacher, R. F., Long, J., Namkung, J., Hamlett, C. L., Cirino, P. T., et al. (2013). Improving at-risk learners’ understanding of fractions. Journal of Educational Psychology, 105, 683–700. Scholar
  38. Georgiou, G. K., Das, J. P., & Hayward, D. (2009). Revisiting the “simple view of reading” in a group of children with poor reading comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 42(1), 76–84. Scholar
  39. Gerst, E. H., Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J. M., & Yoshida, H. (2015). Cognitive and behavioral rating measures of executive function as predictors of academic outcomes in children. Child Neuropsychology, 23, 381–407. Scholar
  40. Gioia, G. A., Isquith, P. A., Guy, S. C., & Kenworthy, L. (2000). Behavior rating inventory of executive function. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.Google Scholar
  41. Gough, P. B., & Tunmer, W. E. (1986). Decoding, reading, and reading disability. Remedial and Special Education, 7, 6–10. Scholar
  42. Gray, S. A., Carter, A. S., Briggs-Gowan, M. J., Jones, S. M., & Wagmiller, R. L. (2014). Growth trajectories of early aggression, overactivity, and inattention: Relations to second-grade reading. Developmental Psychology, 50, 2255–2263. Scholar
  43. Hofmann, W., Schmeichel, B. J., & Baddeley, A. D. (2012). Executive functions and self-regulation. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 16, 174–180. Scholar
  44. Ilkowska, M., & Engle, R. W. (2010). Trait and state differences in working memory capacity. In A. Gruszka, G. Matthews, & B. Szymura (Eds.), Handbook of individual differences in cognition. The Springer series on human exceptionality. New York, NY: Springer. Scholar
  45. Inquisit 3. (2003). Millisecond Software [Computer Software]. Seattle, WA.Google Scholar
  46. Instruments, L. (1999). Purdue pegboard model #32020: Instructions and normative data. Lafayette, IN: Lafayette Instruments.Google Scholar
  47. Jacob, R., & Parkinson, J. (2015). The potential for school-based interventions that target executive function to improve academic achievement: A review. Review of Educational Research, 85, 512–552. Scholar
  48. Jacobson, L. A., Koriakin, T., Lipkin, P., Boada, R., Frijters, J. C., Lovett, M. W., et al. (2017). Executive functions contribute uniquely to reading competence in minority youth. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(4), 422–433. Scholar
  49. Joshi, R. M., & Aaron, P. G. (2000). The component model of reading: Simple view of reading made a little more complex. Reading Psychology, 21, 85–97.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Kamil, M. L., Borman, G. D., Dole, J., Kral, C. C., Salinger, T., & Torgesen, J. (2008). Improving adolescent literacy: Effective classroom and intervention practices. IES Practice Guide. NCEE 2008-4027. National Center for Education Evaluation and Regional Assistance. Retrieved from
  51. Kaufman, A. S., & Kaufman, N. L. (2004). Kaufman brief intelligence test. New York: Wiley.Google Scholar
  52. Keenan, J. M., Betjemann, R. S., & Olson, R. K. (2008). Reading comprehension tests vary in the skills they assess: Differential dependence on decoding and oral comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 281–300. Scholar
  53. Kershaw, S., & Schatschneider, C. (2012). A latent variable approach to the simple view of reading. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 433–464. Scholar
  54. Kieffer, M. J., Vukovic, R. K., & Berry, D. (2013). Roles of attention shifting and inhibitory control in fourth-grade reading comprehension. Reading Research Quarterly, 48, 333–348. Scholar
  55. Kintsch, W. (1988). The role of knowledge in discourse comprehension: A construction–integration model. Psychological Review, 95, 163.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Kirchner, W. K. (1958). Age differences in short-term retention of rapidly changing information. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 55, 352. Scholar
  57. Korkman, M., Kirk, U., & Kemp, S. (2007). A developmental neuropsychological assessment (NEPSY)-II. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  58. Locascio, G., Mahone, E. M., Eason, S., & Cutting, L. (2010). Executive dysfunction among children with reading comprehension deficits. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 43, 441–454. Scholar
  59. Logan, G. D., & Cowan, W. B. (1984). On the ability to inhibit thought and action: A theory of an act of control. Psychological Review, 91(3), 295. Scholar
  60. Luciana, M., & Nelson, C. A. (2002). Assessment of neuropsychological function through use of the Cambridge Neuropsychological Testing Automated Battery: Performance in 4- to 12-year-old children. Developmental Neuropsychology, 22, 595–624. Scholar
  61. MacGinitie, W. H. (2000). Gates-MacGinitie reading tests. Itasca, IL: Riverside.Google Scholar
  62. MacGinitie, W. H., MacGinitie, R. K., Maria, K., Dreyer, L., & Hughes, K. E. (2007). GMRT manual for scoring and interpretation. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
  63. Martinussen, R., Grimbos, T., & Ferrari, J. L. (2014). Word-level reading achievement and behavioral inattention: Exploring their overlap and relations with naming speed and phonemic awareness in a community sample of children. Archives of Clinical Neuropsychology, 29(7), 680–690. Scholar
  64. McGrew, K. S., & Woodcock, R. W. (2001). Woodcock-Johnson III: Normative update technical manual. Rolling Meadows, IL: Riverside Publications.Google Scholar
  65. Melby-Lervåg, M., & Hulme, C. (2013). Is working memory training effective? A meta-analytic review. Developmental Psychology, 49, 270. Scholar
  66. Miciak, J., Taylor, W. P., Denton, C. A., & Fletcher, J. M. (2015). The effect of achievement test selection on identification of learning disabilities within a patterns of strengths and weaknesses framework. School Psychology Quarterly, 30, 321. Scholar
  67. Miciak, J., Williams, J. L., Taylor, W. P., Cirino, P. T., Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2016). Do processing patterns of strengths and weaknesses predict differential treatment response? Journal of Educational Psychology, 108(6), 898–909. Scholar
  68. Miller, A. C., Fuchs, D., Fuchs, L. S., Compton, D., Kearns, D., Zhang, W., et al. (2014). Behavioral attention: A longitudinal study of whether and how it influences the development of word reading and reading comprehension among at-risk readers. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 7, 232–249. Scholar
  69. Minguela, M., Solé, I., & Pieschl, S. (2015). Flexible self-regulated reading as a cue for deep comprehension: evidence from online and offline measures. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 28, 721–744. Scholar
  70. Miyake, A., Friedman, N. P., Emerson, M. J., Witzki, A. H., Howerter, A., & Wager, T. D. (2000). The unity and diversity of executive functions and their contributions to complex “frontal lobe” tasks: A latent variable analysis. Cognitive Psychology, 41, 49–100. Scholar
  71. Oakhill, J. V., Cain, K., & Bryant, P. E. (2003). The dissociation of word reading and text comprehension: Evidence from component skills. Language and Cognitive Processes, 18, 443–468.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Olejnik, S., & Algina, J. (2003). Generalized eta and omega squared statistics: Measures of effect size for some common research designs. Psychological Methods, 8, 434–447. Scholar
  73. Peng, P., Barnes, M., Wang, C., Wang, W., Li, S., Swanson, H. L., et al. (2018). A meta-analysis on the relation between reading and working memory. Psychological Bulletin, 144, 48–76.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  74. Peng, P., & Fuchs, D. (2017). A Randomized control trial of working memory training with and without strategy instruction: Effects on young children’s working memory and comprehension. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 62–80. Scholar
  75. Perfetti, C. A. (1999). Comprehending written language: A blueprint of the reader. In C. Brown & P. Hagoort (Eds.), The neurocognition of language (pp. 167–208). New York, NY: Oxford University Press.Google Scholar
  76. Perfetti, C., & Stafura, J. (2014). Word knowledge in a theory of reading comprehension. Scientific Studies of Reading, 18, 22–37. Scholar
  77. Peugh, J. L. (2010). A practical guide to multilevel modeling. Journal of School Psychology, 48, 85–112. Scholar
  78. Pham, A. V. (2013). Differentiating behavioral ratings of inattention, impulsivity, and hyperactivity in children: Effects on reading achievement. Journal of Attention Disorders, 20, 674–683.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  79. Pickering, S., & Gathercole, S. E. (2001). Working memory test battery for children (WMTB-C). London: Psychological Corporation Europe.Google Scholar
  80. Pintrich, P. R. (2004). A conceptual framework for assessing motivation and self-regulated learning in college students. Educational Psychology Review, 16, 385–407. Scholar
  81. Potocki, A., Sanchez, M., Ecalle, J., & Magnan, A. (2017). Linguistic and cognitive profiles of 8- to 15-year-old children with specific reading comprehension difficulties: The role of executive functions. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50(2), 128–142.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  82. Pressley, M., & Ghatala, E. S. (1990). Self-regulated learning: Monitoring learning from text. Educational Psychologist, 25(1), 19–33. Scholar
  83. Redick, T. S., Calvo, A., Gay, C. E., & Engle, R. W. (2011). Working memory capacity and go/no-go task performance: Selective effects of updating, maintenance, and inhibition. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 37, 308. Scholar
  84. Roberts, G., Rane, S., Fall, A., Denton, C. A., Fletcher, J. M., & Vaughn, S. (2015). The impact of intensive reading intervention on level of attention in middle school students. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 44(6), 942–953. Scholar
  85. Robison, M. K., & Unsworth, N. (2017). Working memory capacity, strategic allocation of study time, and value-directed remembering. Journal of Memory and Language, 93, 231–244. Scholar
  86. Sala, G., & Gobet, F. (2017). Does far transfer exist? Negative evidence from chess, music, and working memory training. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 26, 515–520. Scholar
  87. Savage, R. (2006). Reading comprehension is not always the product of nonsense word decoding and linguistic comprehension: Evidence from teenagers who are extremely poor readers. Scientific Studies of Reading, 10, 143–164. Scholar
  88. Savage, R., Lavers, N., & Pillay, V. (2007). Working memory and reading difficulties: What we know and what we don’t know about the relationship. Educational Psychology Review, 19, 185–221. Scholar
  89. Schatschneider, C., Carlson, C. D., Francis, D. J., Foorman, B. R., & Fletcher, J. M. (2002). Relationship of rapid automatized naming and phonological awareness in early reading development: Implications for the double-deficit hypothesis. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35, 245–256. Scholar
  90. Selya, A. S., Rose, J. S., Dierker, L. C., Hedeker, D., & Mermelstein, R. J. (2012). A practical guide to calculating Cohen’s f 2, a measure of local effect size, from PROC MIXED. Frontiers in Psychology, 3, 1–6.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  91. Sesma, H. W., Mahone, E. M., Levine, T., Eason, S. H., & Cutting, L. E. (2009). The contribution of executive skills to reading comprehension. Child Neuropsychology, 15, 232–246. Scholar
  92. Shallice, T. (1982). Specific impairments of planning. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London, B, 298, 199–209.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  93. Shipstead, Z., Redick, T. S., & Engle, R. W. (2012). Is working memory training effective? Psychological Bulletin, 138, 628. Scholar
  94. Sims, D. M., & Lonigan, C. J. (2013). Inattention, hyperactivity, and emergent literacy: Different facets of inattention relate uniquely to preschoolers’ reading-related skills. Journal of Clinical Child & Adolescent Psychology, 42, 208–219. Scholar
  95. Smith, L. E., Borkowski, J. G., & Whitman, T. L. (2008). From reading readiness to reading competence: The role of self-regulation in at-risk children. Scientific Studies of Reading, 12, 131–152. Scholar
  96. Speece, D. L., Ritchey, K. D., Silverman, R., Schatschneider, C., Walker, C. Y., & Andrusik, K. N. (2010). Identifying children in middle childhood who are at risk for reading problems. School Psychology Review, 39, 258–276.Google Scholar
  97. Spira, E. G., & Fischel, J. E. (2005). The impact of preschool inattention, hyperactivity, and impulsivity on social and academic development: A review. Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 46, 755–773. Scholar
  98. Swanson, H. L., Orosco, M. J., & Kudo, M. (2017). Does growth in the executive system of working memory underlie growth in literacy for bilingual children with and without reading disabilities? Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 386–407. Scholar
  99. Swanson, J. M., Schuck, S., Porter, M. M., Carlson, C., Hartman, C. A., Sergeant, J. A., et al. (2012). Categorical and dimensional definitions and evaluations of symptoms of ADHD: History of the SNAP and the SWAN rating scales. The International Journal of Educational and Psychological Assessment, 10, 51.Google Scholar
  100. Tighe, E. L., & Schatschneider, C. (2014). A dominance analysis approach to determining predictor importance in third, seventh, and tenth grade reading comprehension skills. Reading and Writing, 27, 101–127. Scholar
  101. Tippey, K. G., & Longnecker, M. T. (2016). An ad hoc method for computing pseudo-effect size for mixed models. In Proceedings of south central SAS users group forum.Google Scholar
  102. Toplak, M. E., West, R. F., & Stanovich, K. E. (2013). Practitioner review: Do performance-based measures and ratings of executive function asses the same construct? The Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 54, 131–143. Scholar
  103. Torgesen, J., Wagner, R., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). TOWRE: Test of word reading efficiency—Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: PRO-ED.Google Scholar
  104. Unsworth, N., & Spillers, G. J. (2010). Variation in working memory capacity and episodic recall: The contributions of strategic encoding and contextual retrieval. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 17, 200–205. Scholar
  105. van den Broek, P., & Espin, C. A. (2012). Connecting cognitive theory and assessment: Measuring individual differences in reading comprehension. School Psychology Review, 41, 315–326.Google Scholar
  106. van den Broek, P., Young, M., Tzeng, Y., & Linderholm, T. (1999). The landscape model of reading: Inferences and the online construction of a memory representation. In H. van Oosterdorp & S. R. Goldman (Eds.), The Construction of mental representations during reading. Mahwah, NJ: Taylor & Francis.Google Scholar
  107. van der Sluis, S., de Jong, P. F., & van der Leij, A. (2004). Inhibition and shifting in children with learning deficits in arithmetic and reading. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 87(3), 239–266. Scholar
  108. Vaughn, S., Solis, M., Miciak, J., Taylor, W. P., & Fletcher, J. M. (2016). Effects from a randomized control trial comparing research and school implemented treatments with fourth graders with significant reading difficulties. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness. (Advance online publication).CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  109. Wagner, R. K., Torgesen, J. K., & Rashotte, C. A. (1999). Examiner’s Manual: The comprehensive test of phonological processing. Austin, TX: PRO-ED Inc.Google Scholar
  110. Woodcock, R. W., McGrew, K. S., & Mather, N. (2001). Woodcock–Johnson tests of achievement. Itasca, IL: Riverside Publishing.Google Scholar
  111. Ylvisaker, M., & Feeney, T. (2002). Executive functions, self-regulation, and learned optimism in paediatric rehabilitation: A review and implications for intervention. Pediatric Rehabilitation, 5, 51–70. Scholar
  112. Zimmerman, B. J. (2000). Self-efficacy: An essential motive to learn. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 82–91. Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  • Paul T. Cirino
    • 1
    Email author
  • Jeremy Miciak
    • 1
  • Yusra Ahmed
    • 1
  • Marcia A. Barnes
    • 2
  • W. Pat Taylor
    • 1
  • Elyssa H. Gerst
    • 1
  1. 1.Department of PsychologyUniversity of HoustonHoustonUSA
  2. 2.University of Texas at AustinAustinUSA

Personalised recommendations