Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 1257–1274 | Cite as

Cross-linguistic transfer of handwriting performance: a comparison of Arabic bilingual and monolingual elementary school students

  • Abeer Salameh-MatarEmail author
  • Nasir Basal
  • Naomi Weintraub
Article
  • 86 Downloads

Abstract

The knowledge relating to the effect of learning a second language (L2) on the mother tongue (L1) is relatively limited. Most studies focused on linguistic and reading skills, but we did not find studies relating to handwriting performance. Our study focused on the transfer effect of handwriting performance from Hebrew L2 to Arabic L1. The sample consisted of 123 native Arabic speaking fourth-grade students, of whom 64 attended monolingual schools, and 59 attended bilingual (Arabic–Hebrew) schools. We evaluated students’ Arabic handwriting speed and legibility as well as their handwriting automaticity, reading performance, motor control and non-verbal intelligence. Results showed that after controlling for reading speed, handwriting automaticity and motor control, the monolingual students outperformed their bilingual peers in handwriting speed but not in legibility. In addition, using hierarchical regression analysis, our results indicated that beyond the contribution of handwriting automaticity, reading speed and motor control, that explained 27% of the variance in handwriting speed, the model of education of L2 (monolingual vs. bilingual schools) had a unique contribution, and explained an additional 2% of students’ handwriting speed. We discuss these results with regard to the stage of students’ second language acquisition, language dominance, as well as the complexity of the Arabic versus Hebrew languages.

Keywords

Handwriting speed Legibility Cross-language transfer Reading skills Bilingualism 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We are grateful to the principals, teachers and students for their time and cooperation. We also thank Ms. Haya Fogel-Grinvald, for her statistical consultation.

Funding

Funding was provided by Bernard van Leer Foundation (Grant No. #ISR-2008-116).

References

  1. Abbott, R. D., Berninger, V. W., & Fayol, M. (2010). Longitudinal relationships of levels of language in writing and between writing and reading in grades 1–7. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 281–298.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0019318.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. Abdelhadi, S., Ibrahim, R., & Eviatar, Z. (2011). Perceptual load in the reading of Arabic: Effects of orthographic visual complexity on detection. Writing Systems Research, 3, 117–127.  https://doi.org/10.1093/wsr/wsr014.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Abu-Rabia, S., Shakkour, W., & Siegel, L. (2013). Cognitive retroactive transfer (CRT) of language skills among bilingual Arabic-English readers. Bilingual Research Journal, 36, 61–81.  https://doi.org/10.1080/15235882.2013.775975.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Alstad, Z., Sanders, E., Abbott, R. D., Barnett, A. L., Henderson, S. E., Connelly, V., et al. (2015). Modes of alphabet letter production during middle childhood and adolescence: Interrelationships with each other and other writing skills. Journal of Writing Research, 6, 199–231.  https://doi.org/10.17239/jowr-2015.06.03.1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. Amara, M., Azaiza, F., Hertz-Lazarowitz, R., & Mor-Sommerfeld, A. (2009). A new bilingual education in the conflict-ridden Israeli reality: Language practices. Language and Education, 23, 15–35.  https://doi.org/10.1080/09500780802152820.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Asaad, H., & Eviatar, Z. (2013). Learning to read in Arabic: The long and winding road. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 649–664.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9469-9.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Barac, R., Bialystok, E., Castro, D. C., & Sanchez, M. (2014). The cognitive development of young dual language learners: A critical review. Early Childhood Research Quarterly, 29, 699–714.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecresq.2014.02.003.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Berninger, V. W., Abbott, R. D., Abbott, S. P., Graham, S., & Richards, T. (2002). Writing and reading: Connections between language by hand and language by eye. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 35(1), 39–56.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Berninger, V. W., Mizokawa, D. T., & Bragg, R. (1991). Scientific practitioner. Theory-based diagnosis and remediation of writing disabilities. Journal of School Psychology, 29, 57–79.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-4405(91)90016-K.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. Bialystok, E. (2002). Acquisition of literacy in bilingual children: A framework for research. Language Learning, 52, 159–199.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9922.00180.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. Bialystok, E., Luk, G., & Kwan, E. (2005). Bilingualism, biliteracy, and learning to read: Interactions among languages and writing systems. Scientific Studies of Reading, 9, 43–61.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s1532799xssr0901_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. Bosga-Stork, I., Bosga, J., Ellis, J., & Meulenbroek, R. (2016). Developing interactions between language and motor skills in the first three years of formal handwriting education. British Journal of Education, Society & Behavioural Science, 12, 1–13.  https://doi.org/10.9734/BJESBS/2016/20703.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Brown, T., & Link, J. (2016). The association between measures of visual perception, visual-motor integration, and in-hand manipulation skills of school-age children and their manuscript handwriting speed. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79, 163–171.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022615600179.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cenoz, J., Genesee, F., & Gorter, D. (2014). Critical analysis of CLIL: Taking stock and looking forward. Applied Linguistics, 35, 243–262.  https://doi.org/10.1093/applin/amt011.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. Chen, X., Xu, F., Nguyen, T.-K., Hong, G., & Wang, Y. (2010). Effects of cross-language transfer on first-language phonological awareness and literacy skills in Chinese children receiving English instruction. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102, 712–728.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0018802.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Cook, V. (2003). Effects of the second language on the first. Toronto: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Cummins, J. (1979). Linguistic interdependence and the educational development of bilingual children. Review of Educational Research, 49, 222–251.  https://doi.org/10.3102/00346543049002222.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. Cummins, J. (1989). A theoretical framework of bilingual special education. Exceptional Children, 56, 111–119.Google Scholar
  19. D’Angiulli, A., Siegel, L. S., & Serra, E. (2001). The development of reading in English and Italian in bilingual children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 22, 479–507.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716401004015.Google Scholar
  20. Deacon, H. S., Chen, X., Luo, Y., & Ramirez, G. (2013). Beyond language borders: Orthographic processing and word reading in Spanish–English bilinguals. Journal of Research in Reading, 36, 58–74.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9817.2011.01490.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Duiser, I. H. F., van der Kamp, J., Ledebt, A., & Savelsbergh, G. J. P. (2014). Relationship between the quality of children’s handwriting and the Beery Buktenica developmental test of visuomotor integration after one year of writing tuition. Australian Occupational Therapy Journal, 61, 76–82.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1440-1630.12064.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Durgunoglu, A. Y., & Oney, B. (1999). A cross-linguistic comparison of phonological awareness and word recognition. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 11, 281–299.  https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1008093232622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Eviatar, Z., & Ibrahim, R. (2000). Bilingual is as bilingual does: Metalinguistic abilities of Arabic-speaking children. Applied Psycholinguistics, 21, 451–471.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716400004021.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Eviatar, Z., Ibrahim, R., & Ganayim, D. (2004). Orthography and the hemispheres: Visual and linguistic aspects of letter processing. Neuropsychology, 18, 174–184.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0894-4105.18.1.174.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Eviatar, Z., & Share, D. (2013). Processing Semitic writing systems: Introduction to a special issue of Writing Systems Research. Writing Systems Research, 5, 131–133.  https://doi.org/10.1080/17586801.2013.863086.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. Farran, L. K., Bingham, G. E., & Matthews, M. W. (2012). The relationship between language and reading in bilingual English–Arabic children. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 25, 2153–2181.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-011-9352-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. Feng, L., Lindner, A., Ji, X. R., & Joshi, R. M. (2017). The role of handwriting and keyboarding writing: A meta-analytic review. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-017-9749-x.Google Scholar
  28. Friedmann, N., & Haddad-Hanna, M. (2012). Letter position dyslexia in Arabic: From form to position. Behavioural Neurology, 25, 193–203.  https://doi.org/10.3233/BEN-2012-119004.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. Genesee, F. (2015). Myths about early childhood bilingualism. Canadian Psychology, 56, 6–15.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0038599.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Gonca, A. (2016). Do L2 writing courses affect the improvement of L1 writing skills via skills transfer from L2 to L1? Educational Research and Reviews, 11, 987–997.  https://doi.org/10.5897/ERR2016.2743.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Graham, S., Harris, K. R., & Fink, B. (2000). Is handwriting causally related to learning to write? Treatment of handwriting problems in beginning writers. Journal of Educational Psychology, 92, 620–633.  https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-0663.92.4.620.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Graham, S., Harris, K., & Hebert, M. (2011). It is more than just the message: Presentation effects in scoring writing. Focus on Exceptional Children, 44, 1–12.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Graham, S., Struck, M., Santoro, J., & Berninger, V. W. (2006). Dimensions of good and poor handwriting legibility in first and second graders: Motor programs, visual–spatial arrangement, and letter formation parameter setting. Developmental Neuropsychology, 29, 43–60.  https://doi.org/10.1207/s15326942dn2901_4.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. Hammill, N., Pearson, J., & Voress, J. K. (1993). Developmental test of visual perception. Examiner’s manual. Austin, TX: Pro-Ed.Google Scholar
  35. Hussien, A. M. (2014). The effect of learning English (L2) on learning of Arabic literacy (L1) in the primary school. International Education Studies, 7, 88–99.  https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v7n3p88.Google Scholar
  36. Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2002). The characteristics of Arabic orthography slow its processing. Neuropsychology, 16, 322–326.  https://doi.org/10.1037//0894-4105.16.3.322.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. Ibrahim, R., Eviatar, Z., & Aharon-Peretz, J. (2007). Metalinguistic awareness and reading performance: A cross language comparison. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 36, 297–317.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-006-9046-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Ibrahim, R., Khateb, A., & Taha, H. (2013). How does type of orthography affect reading in Arabic and Hebrew as first and second languages? Open Journal of Modern Linguistics, 3, 40–46.  https://doi.org/10.4236/ojml.2013.31005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Kecskes, I. (2008). The effect of the second language on the first language. Babylonia, 2, 31–34.Google Scholar
  40. Kecskes, I. (2009). Dual and multilanguage systems. International Journal of Multilingualism, 7, 91–109.  https://doi.org/10.1080/14790710903288313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Kent, S., Wanzek, J., Petscher, Y., Al Otaiba, S., & Kim, Y. S. (2014). Writing fluency and quality in kindergarten and first grade: The role of attention, reading, transcription, and oral language. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 27, 1163–1188.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-013-9480-1.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. Koda, K. (2007). Reading and language learning: Crosslinguistic constraints on second language reading development. Language Learning, 57(Suppl. 1), 1–44.  https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9922.2007.00411.x.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. Lasagabaster, D., & Sierra, J. M. (2009). Immersion and CLIL in English: More differences than similarities. English Language Teaching Journal, 64, 367–375.  https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccp082.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  44. Lauchlan, F., Parisi, M., & Fadda, R. (2013). Bilingualism in Sardinia and Scotland: Exploring the cognitive benefits of speaking a “minority” language. International Journal of Bilingualism, 17, 43–56.  https://doi.org/10.1177/1367006911429622.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  45. Loizou, M., & Stuart, M. (2003). Phonological awareness in monolingual and bilingual English and Greek five-year-olds. Journal of Research in Reading, 26, 3–18.  https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9817.261002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  46. Mennen, I. (2004). Bi-directional interference in the intonation of Dutch speakers of Greek. Journal of Phonetics, 32, 543–563.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wocn.2004.02.002.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Ministry of Education, Israel (2011). Arabic language education. Retrieved from http://cms.education.gov.il/NR/rdonlyres/202A56F5-EC9E-43CD-9592-0EAE76451DF2/212803/29916.pdf.
  48. Montanari, S., Simón-Cereijido, G., & Hartel, A. (2016). The development of writing skills in an Italian-English two-way immersion program: Evidence from first through fifth grade. International Multilingual Research Journal, 10, 44–58.  https://doi.org/10.1080/19313152.2016.1118670.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Murphy, V. A., Macaro, E., Alba, S., & Cipolla, C. (2015). The influence of learning a second language in primary school on developing first language literacy skills. Applied Psycholinguistics, 36, 1133–1153.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716414000095.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Niemeijer, A. S., & Smits-Engelsman, M. (2007). Neuromotor task training for children with developmental coordination disorder: A controlled trial. Developmental Medicine and Child Neurology, 49, 406–411.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.humov.2003.09.010.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Noor, H. (2007). The influence of L2 on the syntactic processing of L1 by Arab EFL learners. Journal of Literature, Language and Linguistics, 1(1), 1–18.Google Scholar
  52. Pasquarella, A., Chen, X., Gottardo, A., & Geva, E. (2015). Cross-language transfer of word reading accuracy and word reading fluency in Spanish–English and Chinese–English bilinguals: Script-universal and script-specific processes. Journal of Educational Psychology, 107, 96–110.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036966.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Purkarthofer, J., & Mossakowski, J. (2011). Bilingual teaching for multilingual students? Innovative dual-medium models in Slovene-German schools in Austria. International Review of Education, 57, 551–565.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11159-011-9255-3.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  54. Raven, J. C., Style, I., & Raven, J. (1998). Raven’s progressive matrices: CPM parallel test booklet. San Antonio, TX: The Psychological Corporation.Google Scholar
  55. Ringbom, H., & Jarvis, S. (2009). The importance of cross-linguistic similarity in foreign language learning. In M. H. Long & C. J. Daughty (Eds.), The handbook of language teaching (pp. 106–118). Oxford: Wiley-Blackwell.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  56. Rodriguez, C., & Villarroel, R. (2016). Predicting handwriting difficulties through spelling processes. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 50, 504–510.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0022219416633863.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  57. Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24, 431–451.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.system.2004.04.005.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  58. Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25, 495–512.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716404001249.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  59. Salameh-Matar, A., Basal, N., Nashef-Tali, B., & Weintraub, N. (2010). Manual for Arabic handwriting assessment for elementary school students (A-HAT). Jerusalem: School of Occupational Therapy of Hadassah and the Hebrew University.Google Scholar
  60. Salameh-Matar, A., Basal, N., Nashef-Tali, B., & Weintraub, N. (2016). Development and validity of the Arabic Handwriting Assessment for elementary school students. British Journal of Occupational Therapy, 79, 212–219.  https://doi.org/10.1177/0308022615616819.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  61. Salameh-Matar, A., Basal, N., & Weintraub, N. (2018). Relationship between body functions and Arabic handwriting performance at different acquisition stages. Manuscript in Preparation.Google Scholar
  62. Schwartz, M., Taha, H., Asaad, H., Khamaisi, F., & Eviatar, Z. (2016). The role of emergent bilingualism in the development of morphological awareness in Arabic and Hebrew. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 59, 797–809.  https://doi.org/10.1044/2016_JSLHR-L-14-0363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Taha, H. (2009). Diagnostic reading test in Arabic for elementary school students in 2nd6th grade. Unpublished test, Haifa University, Israel.Google Scholar
  64. Taha, H. Y. (2013). Reading and spelling in Arabic: Linguistic and orthographic complexity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3, 721–727.  https://doi.org/10.4304/tpls.3.5.721-727.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Taha, H., Ibrahim, R., & Khateb, A. (2013). How does arabic orthographic connectivity modulate brain activity during visual word recognition: An ERP study. Brain Topography, 26, 292–302.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10548-012-0241-2.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Teimourtash, M., & Shakouri, N. (2016). On the mutual effect of L1 and L2 in SLA: A brief look at Cook’s multi-competence. Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 7, 398–402.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  67. Valencia, R. R. (1984). Reliability of the Raven coloured progressive matrices for Anglo and for Mexican–American children. Psychology in the Schools, 21, 49–52.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  68. van der Leij, A., Bekebrede, J., & Kotterink, M. (2010). Acquiring reading and vocabulary in Dutch and English: the effect of concurrent instruction. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 23, 415–434.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11145-009-9207-5.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  69. Van Galen, G. P. (1991). Handwriting: Issues for a psychomotor theory. Human Movement Science, 10, 165–191.  https://doi.org/10.1016/0167-9457(91)90003-G.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  70. Weintraub, N., Gilmour-Grill, N., & Weiss, P. L. (2010). Relationship between handwriting and keyboarding performance among fast and slow adult keyboarders. American Journal of Occupational Therapy, 64, 123–132.  https://doi.org/10.5014/ajot.64.1.123.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  71. Wicki, W., Lichtsteiner, S. H., Geiger, A. S., & Müller, M. (2014). Handwriting fluency in children: Impact and correlates. Swiss Journal of Psychology, 73, 87–96.  https://doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000127.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  72. Yeong, S. H. M., Fletcher, J., & Bayliss, D. M. (2014). Importance of phonological and orthographic skills for English reading and spelling: A comparison of English monolingual and Mandarin-English bilingual children. Journal of Educational Psychology, 106, 1107–1121.  https://doi.org/10.1037/a0036927.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  73. Yeong, S. H. M., Fletcher, J., & Bayliss, D. M. (2017). Impact of early home language exposure on phonological and orthographic skills and their contributions to English literacy abilities in English monolingual and Chinese–English bilingual adults. Applied Psycholinguistics, 38, 1–30.  https://doi.org/10.1017/S0142716416000151.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.The Neurodevelopmental Disabilities and Writing Research Laboratory, School of Occupational TherapyHadassah and the Hebrew University of JerusalemJerusalemIsrael
  2. 2.Middle Eastern and African HistoryTel-Aviv UniversityRamat Aviv, Tel-AvivIsrael

Personalised recommendations