Advertisement

Reading and Writing

, Volume 32, Issue 5, pp 1175–1195 | Cite as

Multimedia-assisted self-learning materials: the benefits of E-flashcards for vocabulary learning in Chinese as a foreign language

  • Jui-Teng LiEmail author
  • Fuhui Tong
Article
  • 287 Downloads

Abstract

In this study, we examined the effects of E-flashcards and paper flashcards on Chinese vocabulary learning and learning attitudes among students learning Chinese as a foreign language. One hundred fourth and fifth grade English-speaking students participated in two groups, E-flashcards (n = 50) and paper flashcards (n = 50), to learn 20 new Chinese words. E-flashcards (or digital flashcards through students’ iPads) incorporate multimedia resources with comprehensive visual, verbal, and audio inputs while the paper flashcards provide only visual and verbal inputs. Results revealed that students who used E-flashcards statistically outperformed those who used paper flashcards on immediate post-tests of Chinese word reading and listening, as well as on 1-week delayed listening test. In addition, students who used E-flashcards demonstrated more positive learning attitudes toward Chinese word learning than those who used paper flashcards. Such findings support the audio application of multimedia on Chinese word recognition among novice Chinese language learners as an effective pedagogical approach. Instructional implications are discussed.

Keywords

Chinese as a foreign language (CFL) Vocabulary learning Multimedia aids Learning attitudes E-flashcards 

References

  1. Ahmadian, M., Amerian, M., & Goodarzi, A. (2015). A comparative study of paper-based and computer-based contextualization in vocabulary learning of EFL students. Advances in Language and Literacy Studies, 6, 96–102.Google Scholar
  2. Alvarez-Marinelli, H., Blanco, M., Lara-Alecio, R., Irby, B. J., Tong, F., Stanley, K., et al. (2016). Computer assisted English language learning in Costa Rican elementary schools: An experimental study. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 103–126.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. Atkinson, R. C. (1975). Mnemonics in second-language learning. American Psychologist, 30, 821–828.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. Başoğlu, E. B., & Akdemir, Ö. (2010). A comparison of undergraduate students’ English vocabulary learning: Using mobile phones and flash cards. The Turkish Online Journal of Educational Technology, 9(3), 1–7.Google Scholar
  5. Beaton, A. A., Gruneberg, M. M., Hyde, C., Shufflebottom, A., & Sykes, R. N. (2005). Facilitation of receptive and productive foreign vocabulary learning using the keyword method: the role of image quality. Memory, 13, 458–471.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. Cerezo, L., Baralt, M., Suh, B.-R., & Leow, R. (2014). Does the medium really matter in L2 development? The validity of CALL research designs. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 294–310.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. Chan, K. K., & Siegel, L. S. (2001). Phonological processing in reading Chinese among normally achieving and poor readers. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 80, 23–43.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. Chang, M., & Lehman, J. D. (2002). An experimental study on the effects of the relevance component of the ARCS model. CALICO Journal, 20, 81–98.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. Chen, H.-C., Hsu, C.-C., Chang, L.-Y., Lin, Y.-C., Chang, K.-E., & Sung, Y.-T. (2013). Using a radical-derived character E-learning platform to increase learner knowledge of Chinese characters. Language Learning and Technology, 17, 89–106.Google Scholar
  10. Children’s Chinese Competency Certification. (2015). CCCC word list. Retrieved 5 January 2017, from http://cccc.sc-top.org.tw/.
  11. Chuang, C. J. (1975). The function of imagery in learning of Chinese language. Acta Psychologica, 1, 145–150.Google Scholar
  12. Chuang, H. Y., & Ku, H. Y. (2011). The effect of computer-based multimedia instruction with Chinese character recognition. Educational Media International, 48, 27–41.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. Chung, K. (2008). What effect do mixed sensory mode instructional formats have on both novice and experienced learners of Chinese characters? Learning and Instruction, 18, 96–108.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. Cohen, J. (1988). Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences (2nd ed.). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Earlbaum Associates.Google Scholar
  15. Edwards, V., Monaghan, F., & Knight, J. (2000). Books, pictures, and conversations: Using bilingual multimedia storybooks to develop language awareness. Language Awareness, 9, 135–146.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. Ertmer, P. A., & Ottenbreit-Leftwich, A. (2013). Removing obstacles to the pedagogical changes required by Jonassen’s vision of authentic technology-enabled learning. Computers and Education, 64, 175–182.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. Goldstein, E. B. (2011). Cognitive psychology: Connecting mind, research and everyday experience (4th ed.). Belmont, CA: Wadsworth Cengage Learning.Google Scholar
  18. Hatch, E., & Brown, C. (1995). Vocabulary, semantics and language educations. Cambridge: CUP.Google Scholar
  19. Holm, S. (1979). A simple sequentially rejective multiple test procedure. Scandinavian Journal of Statistics, 6, 65–70.Google Scholar
  20. Hui, W., Hu, P. J., Clark, T. H. K., Tam, K. Y., & Milton, J. (2008). Technology-assisted learning: A longitudinal field study of knowledge category, learning effectiveness and satisfaction in language learning. Journal of Computer Assisted learning, 24, 245–259.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. Hwang, W.-Y., Chen, H. S. L., Shadiev, R., Huang, R. Y., & Chen, C.-Y. (2014). Improving English as a foreign language writing in elementary schools using mobile devices in familiar situational contexts. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 27, 359–378.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. Hwang, W.-Y., Shadiev, R., Hsu, J.-L., Huang, Y.-M., Hsu, G.-L., & Lin, Y.-C. (2016). Effects of storytelling to facilitate EFL speaking using web-based multimedia system. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 215–241.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. Ju, D., & Jackson, N. E. (1995). Graphic and phonological processing in Chinese character identification. Journal of Reading Behavior, 27, 299–313.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. Keller, J. M. (1979). Motivation and instructional design: A theoretical perspective. Journal of Instructional Development, 2, 26–34.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. Keller, J. M. (1993). IMMS: Instructional materials motivation survey. Tallahassee: Florida State University.Google Scholar
  26. Keller, J. M. (2009). Motivational design for learning and performance: The ARCS model approach. New York: Springer Science Business Media.Google Scholar
  27. Khezrlou, S., Ellis, R., & Sadeghi, K. (2017). Effects of computer-assisted glosses on EFL learners’ vocabulary acquisition and reading comprehension in three learning conditions. System, 65, 104–116.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. Kim, D., & Gilman, D. A. (2008). Effects of text, audio, and graphic aids in multimedia instruction for vocabulary learning. Educational Technology and Society, 11, 114–126.Google Scholar
  29. Komachali, M. E., & Khodareza, M. (2012). The effect of using vocabulary flash card on Iranian pre-university students’ vocabulary knowledge. International Education Studies, 5, 134–147.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. Laufer, B., & Goldstein, Z. (2004). Testing vocabulary knowledge: Size, strength, and computer adaptiveness. Language Learning, 54, 399–436.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. Lees, D., & Mcnee, G. (2015). Effects and impressions of digital vocabulary-learning vs. paper-based vocabulary-learning: A small-scale longitudinal study. Kwansei Gakuin University Humanities Review, 20, 143–164.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. Leong, C. K. (1997). Paradigmatic analysis of Chinese word reading: Research findings and classroom practices. In C. K. Leong & R. M. Joshi (Eds.), Cross language studies of learning to reading and spell: Phonological and orthographic processing (pp. 379–417). Dordrecht/Norwell, MA: Kluwer Academic.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. Low, J. H., Hew, S. H., & Wong, C. O. (2014). Innovative pictogram Chinese characters representation. World Academy of Science, Engineering and Technology, 8, 604–608.Google Scholar
  34. Martin-Michiellot, S., & Mendelsohn, P. (2000). Cognitive load while learning with a graphical computer interface. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 16, 284–293.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. Mayer, R. E. (2009). Multimedia learning (2nd ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Aids to computer-based multimedia learning. Learning and Instruction, 12, 107–119.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. McBride-Chang, C., Chow, B. W. Y., Zhong, Y., Burgess, S., & Hayward, W. G. (2005). Chinese character acquisition and visual skills in two Chinese scripts. Reading and Writing, 18, 99–128.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. Min, H. T. (2008). EFL vocabulary acquisition and retention: Reading plus vocabulary enhancement activities and narrow reading. Language Learning, 58, 73–115.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. Mohsen, M. A. (2016). Effects of help options in a multimedia listening environment on L2 vocabulary acquisition. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 29, 1220–1237.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. Nakata, T. (2011). Computer-assisted second language vocabulary learning in a paired-associate paradigm: A critical investigation of flashcard software. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 17–38.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. Nation, I. S. P. (2006). Learning vocabulary in another language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.Google Scholar
  42. Nicholson, T. (1998). The flashcard strikes back. The Reading Teacher, 52, 188–192.Google Scholar
  43. Oxford, R. L. (1990). Language learning strategies: What every teacher should know. Boston: Heinle & Heinle.Google Scholar
  44. Paivio, A. (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.Google Scholar
  45. Paribakht, T. S., &Wesche, M. B. (1992). A methodology for studying the relationship between comprehension and second language development in a comprehension-based ESL program. Retrieved from ERIC database. (ED342237).Google Scholar
  46. Prior, A., Goldina, A., Shany, M., Geva, E., & Katzir, T. (2014). Lexical inference in L2: Predictive roles of vocabulary knowledge and reading skill beyond reading comprehension. Reading and Writing, 27, 1467–1484.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  47. Qian, D. D. (2002). Investigating the relationship between vocabulary knowledge and academic reading performance: An assessment perspective. Language Learning, 52, 513–536.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  48. Sagarra, N., & Alba, M. (2006). The key is in the keyword: L2 vocabulary learning methods with beginning learners of Spanish. The Modern Language Journal, 90, 228–243.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  49. Schmitt, N. (2008). Review article: Instructed second language vocabulary learning. Language Teaching Research, 12, 329–363.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  50. Shen, H. H. (2005). An investigation of Chinese character learning strategies among non-native speakers of Chinese. System, 33, 49–68.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  51. Shen, H. H. (2010). Imagery and verbal coding approaches in Chinese vocabulary instruction. Language Teaching Research, 14, 485–499.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  52. Silverman, R., & Hines, S. (2009). The effects of multimedia-enhanced instruction on the vocabulary of English-language learners and non-English-language learners in pre-kindergarten through second grade. Journal of Educational Psychology, 101(2), 305–314.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  53. Steering Committee for the Test of Proficiency-Huayu. (2015). Children’s Chinese competency certification. Retrieved 5 January 2017, from http://cccc.sc-top.org.tw/download/cccc/cccc.pdf.
  54. Sung, K.-Y. (2014). Novice learners’ Chinese character learning strategies and performance. Electronic Journal of Foreign Language Teaching, 11, 35–51.Google Scholar
  55. Sydorenko, T. (2010). Modality of input and vocabulary acquisition. Language Learning and Technology, 14, 50–73.Google Scholar
  56. Texas Education Agency. (1997). A Texas framework for languages other than English. Retrieved 5 January 2017, from http://curriculum.austinisd.org/wrldLang/general/documents/Texas_Framework_LOTE_000.pdf.
  57. Texas Education Agency. (2015). 20132014 school report card. Retrieved 5 January 2017, from http://ritter.tea.state.tx.us/perfreport/src/2014/campus.srch.html.
  58. The National Standards Collaborative Board. (2015). World-readiness standards for learning languages (4th ed.). Alexandria, VA: Author.Google Scholar
  59. Tozcu, A., & Coady, J. (2004). Successful learning of frequent vocabulary through CALL also benefits reading comprehension and speed. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 17, 473–495.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  60. U.S. Department of Education. (2010). Teachers’ use of educational technology in U.S. public schools: 2009. Retrieved from https://nces.ed.gov/pubs2010/2010040.pdf.
  61. Wu, Y. (2014). The effect of mixed-sensory mode presentation on retaining graphic features of Chinese characters. In Z. Han (Ed.), Second language acquisition of Chinese (pp. 126–141). Bristol: Multilingual Matters.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  62. Wyra, M., Lawson, M. J., & Hungi, N. (2007). The mnemonic keyword method: The effects of bidirectional retrieval training and of ability to image on foreign language vocabulary recall. Learning and Instruction, 17, 360–371.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  63. Xu, X. (2011). Using meaningful interpretation and chunking to memory: The case of Chinese character learning. Unpublished doctoral dissertation. Stanford University, California.Google Scholar
  64. Yeung, P.-S., Ho, S.-H., Wong, Y.-K., Chan, W.-O., Chung, K.-H., & Lo, L.-Y. (2013). Longitudinal predictors of Chinese word reading and spelling among elementary grade students. Applied Psycholinguistics, 34, 1245–1277.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  65. Yun, J. (2011). The effects of hypertext glosses on L2 vocabulary acquisition: A meta-analysis. Computer Assisted Language Learning, 24, 39–58.CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  66. Zhu, Y., Fung, S. L., & Wang, H. Y. (2012). Memorization effects of pronunciation and stroke order animation in digital flashcards. CALICO Journal, 29, 563–577.CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Springer Nature B.V. 2018

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of Educational PsychologyTexas A&M UniversityCollege StationUSA

Personalised recommendations