Advertisement

Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis

, Volume 128, Issue 1, pp 479–491 | Cite as

Catalytic properties of recombinant Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase immobilized by impregnation into mesoporous silica in the enzymatic esterification of saturated fatty acids with aliphatic alcohols

  • Galina A. KovalenkoEmail author
  • Larisa V. Perminova
  • Anatoly B. Beklemishev
Article
  • 36 Downloads

Abstract

Immobilization of recombinant Thermomyces lanuginosus lipase (designated as rPichia/lip) was carried out by moisture capacity impregnation of mesoporous silica granules followed by drying, and forcible adsorption of enzyme occurred. Eventually prepared lipase-active heterogeneous biocatalysts were systematically studied for enzymatic esterification performed at ambient conditions (20 ± 2 °C, 1 bar) in unconventional anhydrous media of organic solvents such as hexane and diethyl ether. The saturated fatty acids differing in the number of carbon atoms (C2–C10, C18), and aliphatic alcohols differing in the structure of the molecules, namely both the number of carbon atoms (C2–12, C16), and the isomerism of the carbon skeleton (n- and iso-), and OH-group position (prim-, sec-, tert-) were studied as substrates for enzymatic esterification. The specificity of the heterogeneous enzymatic esterification was determined by comparing the reaction rates for various pairs of substrates; and the matrix of relative units of activities was composed. The immobilized on silica rPichia/lip was found to have sufficiently wide specificity toward saturated fatty acids and aliphatic alcohols. High reaction rates were measured in esterification of fatty acids and primary n- and iso-aliphatic alcohols possessing more than four carbon atoms in the molecules. The enanthic acid (heptanoic, C7:0) reacted with butanol (C4) with the highest rate; and the kinetic parameters such as Michaelis constant (KM) for acid and maximal reaction rate (Vmax) were determined under the studied conditions of esterification. Substrates containing aromatic residues did not participate in esterification. The lipase-active heterogeneous biocatalysts possessed considerably high operational stability, and the catalytic activity was completely retained for several tens of reaction cycles in a periodic batch process of low-temperature synthesis of various fatty acid esters.

Keywords

Immobilization by impregnation Lipase Heterogeneous biocatalysts Esterification of fatty acids 

Notes

Acknowledgements

Authors are grateful to Maria B. Pykhtina for cultivation of the rPichia/lip strain-producer for this research. This work was conducted within the framework of the budget Project No. AAAA-A17-117,041,710,075-0.

References

  1. 1.
    Grunwald P (2009) Biocatalysis. Imperial College Press, LondonCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Tao J, Kazlauskas R (2011) Biocatalysis for green chemistry and chemical process development. Wiley, HobokenCrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun J, Lee L, Liu S (2014) Aust J Chem 67:1373–1381CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Talon R, Montel M, Berdague J (1996) Enzym Microb Technol 19:620–6228CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Hsu A, Foglia T, Siya S (2000) Biotechnol Appl Biochem 31:179–183CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Pinto M, Freire D, Pinto J (2014) Molecules 19:12509–12530CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Silveira E, Moreno-Perez S, Basso A, Serban S, Mamede R, Tardioli P, Farinas C, Rocha-Martin J, Fernandez-Lorente G, Guisan J (2017) BMC Biotechnol 17:88–101CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Mulalee S, Srisuwan P, Phisalaphong M (2015) Chin J Chem Eng 23:1851–1856CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Gandhi N, Mukherjee K (2001) J Am Oil Chem Soc 78:161–165CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Lopresto C, Calabro V, Woodley J, Tufvesson P (2014) J Mol Catal B 110:64–71CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Raita M, Kiatkittipong W, Laosiripojana N, Champreda V (2015) Chem Eng J 278:19–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Pang J, Zhou G, Liu R, Li T (2016) Mater Sci Eng C 59:35–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Chang S, Shaw J (2009) New Biotechnol 26:109–116CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Sutili F, Ruela H, Leite S, Miranda L, Leal I, Souza R (2013) J Mol Catal B 85–86:37–42CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Gumel A, Annuar M, Heidelberg T, Chisti Y (2011) Process Biochem 46:2079–2090CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Enayati M, Gong Y, Goddard J, Abbaspourrad A (2018) Food Chem 266:508–513CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Jia C, Wang H, Zhang W, Zhang X, Feng B (2018) Process Biochem 66:28–32CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bernal C, Escobar S, Wilson L, Illanes A, Mesa M (2014) Carbon 74:96–103CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Wang Z, Du W, Dai L, Liu D (2016) J Mol Catal B 127:11–17CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Guebara S, Ract J, Vitolo M (2018) Arab J Sci Eng 43:3631–3637CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Cavalcanti E, Aguieiras É, da Silva P, Duarte J, Cipolatti E, Fernandez-Lafuente R, da Silva J, Freire D (2018) Fuel 215:705–713CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Fernandes K, Papadaki A, da Silva J, Fernandez-Lafuente R, Koutinas A, Freire D (2018) Ind Crops Product 116:90–96CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Akerman C, Hagström A, Mollaahmad M, Karlsson S (2011) Hatti-Kaul. Process Biochem 46:2225–2231CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Kim H, Choi N, Kim Y, Kim H, Lee J, Kim I (2019) Renew Energy 130:489–494CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Verdasco-Martin C, Garcia-Verdugo E, Porcar R, Fernandez-Lafuente R, Otero C (2018) Food Chem 245:39–46CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Naik S, Basu A, Saikia R, Madan B, Paul P, Chaterjee R, Brask J, Svendsen A (2010) J Mol Catal B 65:18–23CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Arsan J, Parkin K (2000) Biotechnol Bioeng 69:222–226CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Perminova L, Kovalenko G, Chukanov N, Patrushev Y (2017) Rus Chem Bull 11:2194–2197CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Kovalenko G, Perminova L, Chuenko T, Rudina N (2016) Appl Biochem Microbiol 52:582–588CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Bearden J (1978) Biochim Biophys Acta 533:525–529CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Kovalenko G, Perminova L, Beklemishev A, Mamaev A, Patrushev Y (2018) Catal Ind 10:68–74CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mahapatra P, Kumari A, Garlapati V, Banerjee R, Nag A (2009) J Mol Catal B 60:57–63CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Galina A. Kovalenko
    • 1
    • 2
    Email author
  • Larisa V. Perminova
    • 1
  • Anatoly B. Beklemishev
    • 1
  1. 1.Boreskov Institute of CatalysisNovosibirskRussia
  2. 2.Novosibirsk State UniversityNovosibirskRussia

Personalised recommendations