Advertisement

Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis

, Volume 128, Issue 1, pp 361–377 | Cite as

Efficient one-pot synthesis of 3-methylindole from biomass-derived glycerol with aniline over Cu/SiO2 modified with ZnO and Fe2O3 and deep insight into the mechanism

  • Jianhui Su
  • Xiufang Du
  • Kuixia Ke
  • Yi Qu
  • Na Xing
  • Lei ShiEmail author
Article
  • 29 Downloads

Abstract

An efficient catalyst of Cu/SiO2 modified with ZnO and Fe2O3 was constructed for the one-pot synthesis of 3-methylindole originating from biomass-derived glycerol with aniline. The structure and property of as-prepared Cu/SiO2–ZnO–Fe2O3 composite were characterized by temperature programmed reduction of H2 (H2-TPR), X-ray diffraction (XRD), transmission electron microscope (TEM), temperature programmed desorption (TPD) of NH3 and CO2, inductively coupled plasma (ICP) emission spectroscopy, thermogravimetric and differential thermal analysis (TG–DTA). The results indicated that the interaction between copper and support was improved after adding ZnO to Cu/SiO2, as a result, Cu particles could be firmly anchored on the surface of SiO2–ZnO, which not only increased the dispersion of active component but also inhibited the aggregation or sintering of copper particles effectively. Meanwhile, the acid or base sites on the ZnO modified Cu/SiO2 catalyst significantly increased, which was beneficial to the hydrogenolysis of glycerol to acetol and 1,2-propanediol and promoted the synthesis of 3-methylindole. The introduction of Fe2O3 to Cu/SiO2–ZnO could promote the reduction of CuO and decrease the acidity of the catalyst, thereby the activity and stability of the catalyst were further improved. Under the optimized ZnO or Fe2O3 content of 0.100 or 0.030 mmol/g-SiO2, Cu/SiO2–ZnO–Fe2O3 exhibited excellent catalytic activity and long-term stability, which the yield of 3-methylindole was up to 73% and it was still more than 68% when the catalyst was reused four times. Moreover, the catalytic mechanism for the one-pot synthesis of 3-methylindole from glycerol and aniline over Cu/SiO2–ZnO–Fe2O3 was investigated in depth and a probable synthetic route was proposed based on the research of the catalytic reactions of glycerol, 1,2-propanediol or acetol with aniline as well as the hydrogenolysis of glycerol and the catalytic conversion of acetol, which both acetol and 1,2-propanediol were the intermediates for the production of 3-methylindole.

Keywords

3-Methylindole Cu/SiO2 modified by ZnO and Fe2O3 Catalytic mechanism Biomass-derived glycerol One-pot synthesis 

Notes

Acknowledgements

We gratefully acknowledge the National Natural Science Foundation of China (21576128, 21306073).

Supplementary material

11144_2019_1638_MOESM1_ESM.docx (997 kb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 998 kb)

References

  1. 1.
    Gribble GW (2016) Indole ring synthesis: from natural products to drug discovery, 1st edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Cho I, Jeon NJ, Kwon OK, Kim DW, Jung EH, Noh JH, Seo J, Seok SI, Park SY (2017) Indolo[3,2-b]indole-based crystalline hole-transporting material for highly efficient perovskite solar cells. Chem Sci 8(1):734–741.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C6SC02832B CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Sun LD, Sun Bao ZR, Sun Q, Shi L (2013) Vapor-phase synthesis of 3-methylindole from glycerol and aniline: the effect of Al2O3 promoter and the preparation method on the performance of the Cu–Al2O3/SiO2 catalyst. Reac Kinet Mech Cat 109(2):447–460.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s11144-013-0551-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Howe-Grant M (1995) Kirk-Othmer encyclopedia of chemical technology, 4th edn. Wiley, New YorkGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Nishida Y, Takeda N, Matsuno K, Miyata O, Ueda M (2018) Acylative coupling of amine and indole using chloroform as a carbonyl group. Eur J Org Chem 2018(29):3928–3935.  https://doi.org/10.1002/ejoc.201800571 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Siwach P, Singh S, Gupta RK (2009) Vapor phase alkylation of indole with methanol and dimethylcarbonate over Ni–Mn based ferrospinels. Catal Commun 10(12):1577–1581.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2009.04.019 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Beier RC, Anderson RC, Krueger NA, Edrington TS, Callaway TR, Nisbet DJ (2009) Effect of nitroethane and nitroethanol on the production of indole and 3-methylindole (skatole) from bacteria in swine feces by gas chromatography. J Environ Sci Heal B 44(6):613–620.  https://doi.org/10.1080/03601230903000701 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Tursky M, Lorentz-Petersen LLR, Olsen LB, Madsen R (2010) Iridium- and ruthenium-catalysed synthesis of 2,3-disubstituted indoles from anilines and vicinal diols. Org Biomol Chem 8(24):5576–5582.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C0OB00106F CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Zhou Z, Li Y, Gong L, Meggers E (2017) Enantioselective 2-alkylation of 3-substituted indoles with dual chiral Lewis acid/hydrogen-bond-mediated catalyst. Org Lett 19(1):222–225.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.orglett.6b03500 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Deslandes B, Gariépy C, Houde A (2001) Review of microbiological and biochemical effects of skatole on animal production. Livest Prod Sci 71(2):193–200.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0301-6226(01)00189-0 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Hughes DT, Pelletier J, Luetje CW, Leal WS (2010) Odorant receptor from the southern house mosquito narrowly tuned to the oviposition attractant skatole. J Chem Ecol 36(8):797–800.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-010-9828-9 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Simoneau CA, Strohl AM, Ganem B (2007) One-pot synthesis of polysubstituted indoles from aliphatic nitro compounds under mild conditions. Tetrahedron Lett 48(10):1809–1811.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tetlet.2007.01.031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Robinson B (1963) The fischer indole synthesis. Chem Rev 63(4):373–401.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cr60224a003 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Magnus P, Mitchell IS (1998) Synthesis of 3-methylindoles from N-aryl-N-(3- triisopropyl- silylpropargyl) sulfonamides. Tetrahedron Lett 39(26):4595–4598.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4039(98)00847-8 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Llabres-Campaner PJ, Ballesteros-Garrido R, Ballesteros R, Abarca B (2017) Straight access to indoles from anilines and ethylene glycol by heterogeneous acceptorless dehydrogenative condensation. J Org Chem 83(1):521–526.  https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.joc.7b02722 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Jensen T, Pedersen H, Bang-Andersen B, Madsen R, Jorgensen M (2008) Palladium- catalyzed aryl amination-heck cyclization cascade: a one-flask approach to 3-substituted indoles. Angew Chem Int Ed 47(5):888–890.  https://doi.org/10.1002/anie.200703763 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Cho CS, Kim JH, Kim TJ, Shim SC (2001) Ruthenium-catalyzed heteroannulation of anilines with alkanolammonium chlorides leading to indoles. Tetrahedron 57(16):3321–3329.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S0040-4020(01)00202-2 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Yu J, Xu J, Yu Z, Jin Y, Li J, Lv Y (2017) A continuous-flow fischer indole synthesis of 3-methylindole in an ionic liquid. J Flow Chem 7(2):33–36.  https://doi.org/10.1556/1846.2017.00004 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Ritter SK (2004) Biomass or bust. Chem Eng News 82(22):31–32.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cen-v082n022.p031 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Akiyama M, Sato S, Takahashi R, Inui K, Yokota M (2009) Dehydration–hydrogenation of glycerol into 1,2-propanediol at ambient hydrogen pressure. Appl Catal A 371(1–2):60–66.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2009.09.029 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Gabrysch T, Muhler M, Peng BX (2019) The kinetics of glycerol hydrodeoxygenation to 1,2-propanediol over Cu/ZrO2 in the aqueous phase. Appl Catal A 576:47–53.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcata.2019.03.001 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Xie QL, Li SS, Gong RC, Zheng GJ, Wang YL, Xu P, Duan Y, Yu SZ, Lu MZ, Ji WR, Nie Y, Ji JB (2019) Microwave-assisted catalytic dehydration of glycerol for sustainable production of acrolein over a microwave absorbing catalyst. Appl Catal B 243:455–462.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2018.10.058 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Hong CS, Chin SY, Cheng CK, Sabri MM, Chua GK (2015) Enzymatic conversion of glycerol to glyceric acid with immobilised laccase in Na-alginate matrix. Procedia Chem 16:632–639.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proche.2015.12.102 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Purushothaman RKP, Haveren J, Es DS, Melián-Cabrera I, Heeres HJ (2012) The oxidative esterification of glycerol to methyl glycerate in methanol using gold on oxidic supports: an insight in product selectivity. Green Chem 14:2031–2037.  https://doi.org/10.1039/C2GC35226E CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Aghbashlo M, Hosseinpour S, Tabatabaei M, Rastegari H, Ghaziaskar HS (2019) Multi- objective exergoeconomic and exergoenvironmental optimization of continuous synthesis of solketal through glycerolketalization with acetone in the presence of ethanol as co-solvent. Renew Energy 130:735–748.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2018.06.103 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Lahr DG, Shanks BH (2005) Effect of sulfur and temperature on ruthenium-catalyzed glycerol hydrogenolysis to glycols. J Catal 232(2):386–394.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2005.03.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Sun W, Liu DY, Zhu HY, Shi L, Sun Q (2010) A new efficient approach to 3-methylindole: vapor-phase synthesis from aniline and glycerol over Cu-based catalyst. Catal Commun 12(2):147–150.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.catcom.2010.08.011 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Bao ZR, Cui YX, Sun P, Sun Q, Shi L (2013) Vapor-phase synthesis of 3-methylindole from glycerol and aniline over Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst modified by Co or Ni. Acta Phys Chim Sin 29(11):2444–2450.  https://doi.org/10.3866/PKU.WHXB201309091 Google Scholar
  29. 29.
    Wang ZY, Li XH, Zhang Y, Shi L, Sun Q (2012) Effect of alkaline-earth metal oxides on Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst for vapor-phase synthesis of 3-methylindole from glycerol and aniline. J Chin Catal 33(7):1139–1145.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(11)60407-5 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Yue Zhang, Wei Sun, Lei Shi, Qi Sun (2012) Promoting effect of ZnO or K2O on Cu/SiO2-Al2O3 catalyst for vapor-phase synthesis of 3-methylindole from glycerol and aniline. J Chin Catal 33(6):1055–1060.  https://doi.org/10.3724/SP.J.1088.2012.11142 Google Scholar
  31. 31.
    Cui YX, Zhou XS, Sun Q, Shi L (2013) Vapor-phase synthesis of 3-methylindole from glycerol and aniline over zeolites-supported Cu-based catalysts. J Mol Catal A 378:238–245.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.molcata.2013.06.015 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  32. 32.
    Mondal S, Arifa AA, Biswas P (2017) Production of 1,2-propanediol from renewable glycerol over highly stable and efficient Cu–Zn(4:1)/MgO catalyst. Catal Lett 147(11):2783–2798.  https://doi.org/10.1007/s10562-017-2187-1 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Yfanti VL, Lemonidou AA (2018) Mechanistic study of liquid phase glycerol hydrodeoxygenation with in situ generated hydrogen. J Catal 368:98–111.  https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcat.2018.09.036 CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Lü W, Liu X, Liu D, Shi L, Sun Q (2009) Vapor-phase synthesis of 3-methylindole over Fe-, Co-, or Ni-promoted Ag/SiO2 catalysts. Chin J Catal 30(12):1287–1290.  https://doi.org/10.1016/S1872-2067(08)60145-X CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Wang S, Yin KH, Zhang YC, Liu HC (2013) Glycerol hydrogenolysis to propylene glycol and ethylene glycol on zirconia supported Noble metal catalysts. ACS Catal 3(9):2112–2121.  https://doi.org/10.1021/cs400486z CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  • Jianhui Su
    • 1
  • Xiufang Du
    • 1
  • Kuixia Ke
    • 1
  • Yi Qu
    • 1
  • Na Xing
    • 1
  • Lei Shi
    • 1
    Email author
  1. 1.College of Chemistry and Chemical EngineeringLiaoning Normal UniversityDalianPeople’s Republic of China

Personalised recommendations