Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis

, Volume 128, Issue 1, pp 443–459 | Cite as

Catalytic synthesis of biodiesel from waste cooking oil and corn oil over zirconia-based metal oxide nanocatalysts

  • Maryam Afsharizadeh
  • Mohsen MohsenniaEmail author


In the present study, ZrO2–SrO2 and ZrO2–CuO mixed oxides with different molar ratios were synthesized via Pechini sol–gel and co-precipitation methods and their catalytic activities were examined for biodiesel production from cheap raw feedstocks. The molar ratio of the prepared mixed oxide nanocatalysts were optimized through examining the effect of different molar rations in the catalytic transesterification of waste cooking oil (WCO) and corn oil. The structural and compositional characterization of as-prepared nanocatalysts were performed using Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectroscopy (EDX) and X-ray diffraction (XRD) techniques. According to the experimental results, the optimal catalytic performance of the prepared ZrO2–SrO2 and ZrO2–CuO mixed oxides was observed at Zr/Sr and Zr/Cu molar ratios = 2/1, temperature = 120 °C, methanol/oil molar ratio = 10/1 and reaction time = 3 h. The results indicated that the new prepared zirconia-based binary mixed oxides are suitable catalysts to produce biodiesel from waste cooking oils (WCOs) and corn oil, applicable to diesel engines.


Pechini sol–gel Co-precipitation Waste cooking oil (WCO) Corn oil Transesterification Biodiesel 



Authors would like to thank University of Kashan, Iran, for partial financial support of this work.

Supplementary material

11144_2019_1622_MOESM1_ESM.docx (1.4 mb)
Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 1404 kb)


  1. 1.
    Kawashima A, Matsubara K, Honda K (2009) Acceleration of catalytic activity of calcium oxide for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 100:696–700. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  2. 2.
    Petinrin JO, Shaaban M (2015) Renewable energy for continuous energy sustainability in Malaysia. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 50:967–981. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  3. 3.
    Alhassan FH, Rashid U, Taufiq-Yap YH (2015) Synthesis of waste cooking oil-based biodiesel via effectual recyclable bi-functional Fe2O3-MnO-SO4 2−/ZrO2 nanoparticle solid catalyst. Fuel 142:38–45. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  4. 4.
    Silva SP, Sales DCS, de Abreu CAP et al (2018) Kinetics of the biphasic liquid–liquid transesterification of vegetable oils into biodiesel. React Kinet Mech Cat 123:529–542. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  5. 5.
    Chouhan APS, Sarma AK (2011) Modern heterogeneous catalysts for biodiesel production: a comprehensive review. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 15:4378–4399. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  6. 6.
    Abdullah SHYS, Hanapi NHM, Azid A et al (2017) A review of biomass-derived heterogeneous catalyst for a sustainable biodiesel production. Renew Sustain Energy Rev 70:1040–1051. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  7. 7.
    Torres-Rodríguez DA, Romero-Ibarra IC, Ibarra IA, Pfeiffer H (2016) Biodiesel production from soybean and Jatropha oils using cesium impregnated sodium zirconate as a heterogeneous base catalyst. Renew Energy 93:323–333. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  8. 8.
    Ullah Z, Bustam MA, Man Z (2015) Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil by acidic ionic liquid as a catalyst. Renew Energy 77:521–526. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  9. 9.
    Kundu SK, Bhaumik A (2015) Pyrene-based porous organic polymers as efficient catalytic support for the synthesis of biodiesels at room temperature. ACS Sustain Chem Eng 3:1715–1723. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  10. 10.
    Zabeti M, Wan Daud WMA, Aroua MK (2009) Activity of solid catalysts for biodiesel production: a review. Fuel Process Technol 90:770–777. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  11. 11.
    Moradi G, Mohadesi M, Hojabri Z (2014) Biodiesel production by CaO/SiO2 catalyst synthesized by the sol–gel process. React Kinet Mech Cat 113:169–186. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  12. 12.
    Puna JF, Correia MJN, Dias APS et al (2013) Biodiesel production from waste frying oils over lime catalysts. React Kinet Mech Cat 109:405–415CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  13. 13.
    Park Y-M, Lee D-W, Kim D-K et al (2008) The heterogeneous catalyst system for the continuous conversion of free fatty acids in used vegetable oils for the production of biodiesel. Catal Today 131:238–243. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  14. 14.
    Tran TTV, Kaiprommarat S, Kongparakul S et al (2016) Green biodiesel production from waste cooking oil using an environmentally benign acid catalyst. Waste Manag 52:367–374. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  15. 15.
    Cho YB, Seo G (2010) High activity of acid-treated quail eggshell catalysts in the transesterification of palm oil with methanol. Bioresour Technol 101:8515–8519. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  16. 16.
    Verziu M, Coman SM, Richards R, Parvulescu VI (2011) Transesterification of vegetable oils over CaO catalysts. Catal Today 167:64–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  17. 17.
    Tantirungrotechai J, Chotmongkolsap P, Pohmakotr M (2010) Synthesis, characterization, and activity in transesterification of mesoporous Mg–Al mixed-metal oxides. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 128:41–47. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  18. 18.
    Bond GC (1962) Catalysis by metals. Academic Press, MassachusettsGoogle Scholar
  19. 19.
    Liu X, He H, Wang Y, Zhu S (2007) Transesterification of soybean oil to biodiesel using SrO as a solid base catalyst. Catal Commun 8:1107–1111. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  20. 20.
    Shan W, Liu F, He H et al (2012) A superior Ce-W-Ti mixed oxide catalyst for the selective catalytic reduction of NOx with NH3. Appl Catal B Environ 115–116:100–106. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  21. 21.
    Antolini E, Salgado JRC, Gonzalez ER (2006) The stability of Pt–M (M = first row transition metal) alloy catalysts and its effect on the activity in low temperature fuel cells: a literature review and tests on a Pt–Co catalyst. J Power Sources 160:957–968. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  22. 22.
    Yuan C, Bin WuH, Xie Y, Lou XWD (2014) Mixed transition-metal oxides: design, synthesis, and energy-related applications. Angew Chem Int Ed 53:1488–1504. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  23. 23.
    Holčapek M, Jandera P, Fischer J, Prokeš B (1999) Analytical monitoring of the production of biodiesel by high-performance liquid chromatography with various detection methods. J Chromatogr A 858:13–31. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  24. 24.
    Liu X, Tao H, Yang K et al (2011) Optimization of surface chemistry on single-walled carbon nanotubes for in vivo photothermal ablation of tumors. Biomaterials 32:144–151. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  25. 25.
    Boujelben N, Bouzid J, Elouear Z (2009) Adsorption of nickel and copper onto natural iron oxide-coated sand from aqueous solutions: study in single and binary systems. J Hazard Mater 163:376–382. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  26. 26.
    Dubal DP, Gund GS, Lokhande CD, Holze R (2013) CuO cauliflowers for supercapacitor application: novel potentiodynamic deposition. Mater Res Bull 48:923–928. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  27. 27.
    Raul PK, Senapati S, Sahoo AK et al (2014) CuO nanorods: a potential and efficient adsorbent in water purification. RSC Adv 4:40580–40587. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  28. 28.
    Baneshi J, Haghighi M, Jodeiri N et al (2014) Homogeneous precipitation synthesis of CuO–ZrO2–CeO2–Al2O3 nanocatalyst used in hydrogen production via methanol steam reforming for fuel cell applications. Energy Convers Manag 87:928–937. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  29. 29.
    Rahman MM, Hussain MM, Asiri AM (2016) A novel approach towards hydrazine sensor development using SrO.CNT nanocomposites. RSC Adv 6:65338–65348. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  30. 30.
    Samarasingha P, Tran-Nguyen D-H, Behm M, Wijayasinghe A (2008) LiNi1/3Mn1/3Co1/3O2 synthesized by the Pechini method for the positive electrode in Li-ion batteries: material characteristics and electrochemical behaviour. Electrochim Acta 53:7995–8000. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  31. 31.
    Ahmadi F, Haghighi M, Ajamein H (2016) Sonochemically coprecipitation synthesis of CuO/ZnO/ZrO2/Al2O3 nanocatalyst for fuel cell grade hydrogen production via steam methanol reforming. J Mol Catal A 208:156–208Google Scholar
  32. 32.
    Fathy A, Elkady O, Abu-Oqail A (2017) Microstructure, mechanical and wear properties of Cu–ZrO2 nanocomposites. Mater Sci Technol 33:2138–2146CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  33. 33.
    Niknahad B, Mohsennia M, Eliassi A (2016) Influence of preparation methods on the structure and catalytic performance of nanostructured La0.7Ba0.3Co0.3Ni0.7O3 for CO oxidation. React Kinet Mech Cat 117:537–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  34. 34.
    Liu X, He H, Wang Y et al (2008) Transesterification of soybean oil to biodiesel using CaO as a solid base catalyst. Fuel 87:216–221. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  35. 35.
    Park JB, Graciani J, Evans J et al (2009) High catalytic activity of Au/CeOx/TiO2(110) controlled by the nature of the mixed-metal oxide at the nanometer level. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 106:4975–4980. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  36. 36.
    Thitsartarn W, Kawi S (2011) An active and stable CaO–CeO2 catalyst for transesterification of oil to biodiesel. Green Chem 13:3423. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  37. 37.
    Dhakshinamoorthy A, Alvaro M, Garcia H (2009) Metal organic frameworks as efficient heterogeneous catalysts for the oxidation of benzylic compounds with t-butylhydroperoxide. J Catal 267:1–4. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  38. 38.
    Wnnw Omar, Nas Amin (2011) Biodiesel production from waste cooking oil over alkaline modified zirconia catalyst. Fuel Process Technol 92:2397–2405CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  39. 39.
    Arzamendi G, Arguinarena E, Campo I et al (2008) Alkaline and alkaline-earth metals compounds as catalysts for the methanolysis of sunflower oil. Catal Today 133:305–313CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  40. 40.
    Chary KVR, Sagar GV, Srikanth CS, Rao VV (2007) Characterization and catalytic functionalities of copper oxide catalysts supported on zirconia. J Phys Chem B 111:543–550CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  41. 41.
    Kawashima A, Matsubara K, Honda K (2008) Development of heterogeneous base catalysts for biodiesel production. Bioresour Technol 99:3439–3443. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  42. 42.
    Tan YH, Abdullah MO, Nolasco-Hipolito C, Taufiq-Yap YH (2015) Waste ostrich- and chicken-eggshells as heterogeneous base catalyst for biodiesel production from used cooking oil: catalyst characterization and biodiesel yield performance. Appl Energy 160:58–70. CrossRefGoogle Scholar
  43. 43.
    Ngamcharussrivichai C, Totarat P, Bunyakiat K (2008) Ca and Zn mixed oxide as a heterogeneous base catalyst for transesterification of palm kernel oil. Appl Catal A Gen 341:77–85. CrossRefGoogle Scholar

Copyright information

© Akadémiai Kiadó, Budapest, Hungary 2019

Authors and Affiliations

  1. 1.Department of ChemistryUniversity of KashanKashanIran
  2. 2.Thermodynamic Research LabUniversity of KashanKashanIran

Personalised recommendations